The dimethyl siloxane type of polymer will confine hydrogen since oxygen
carbon and silicon all keep hydrogen from escaping.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The Lithium Aluminum Hydride was not added to the fuel mix for its good
looks. The Hydride had a
it is open peer review.
Pomp start to propose critic. he is desperate. he should join 9/11
truthers. (sorry guys).
as Beaudette stated we should focus on heat, not nuclear ashes. this is the
key
even if physicist don't understand heat, engineers, thus investors, do
understand heat.
my bet is
I thought I read that the analysis was for the surface of the grain. Also
the result differes
from grain to grain, it would have been nice to see some ranges of the
values found in the surface. I got the feeling that the presented sample
was chooses just to make a statement of how different the
this is an old tactic that Beaudette debunked.
the physicist ignore voluntarily that heat above chemistry level is a
nuclear ash.
maybe Jed can make a better historical perspective than me.
as I've read, the chemist were so bad in particle detection, and physicist
so bad in calorimetry, that
I wrote:
In recent months my bet has been on transmutation from one isotope of
nickel to another, but I will need to read the report to see how I continue
to feel about that.
I just read over the report, and I feel greatly confirmed in the hypothesis
that neutron stripping of deuterium is
bad logic
even a fraudster cannot change the physics of heat.
a fraudster need to control his environment. he makes pony show.
he ensure condition for his fraud. he does not let people play with his
reactor, choose methods...
the fraud hypotheis are empty... they don't even consider the
tthe isotopic shift observed is probably only a side effect of the real
reaction.
from others LENR experiments one can suspect that hydrogen is the fuel,
and that Ni is just modified.
that the surface of the powder is pure Ni62 maye be simply that it is
cooked by the reactions, stay stable, and
beware of the streelight effect.
we have no isotopic evidence about hydrogen and helium
one of my hypothesis is that hydrogen is fused with symmetric p-e-p d-e-d
t-e-t and fission, and anecdotal fusion with heavy compounds like Li or
Ni, or Fe, of even number of hydrogen as iwamura observed...
moreover the various methods gave different result, suggesting that surface
is very different from deeper.
it is expected as it happen the same for others LENr experiments ...
there are very complex transmutation in the craters of LENR electrodes
2014-10-09 9:20 GMT+02:00 Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Two things:
On 10/08/2014 11:07 PM, Robert Lynn wrote:
The uniformity of the Ni ash concerns me, the burn mechanism somehow
converts all natural Ni isotopes (smaller and larger!! so fusion and
fission in evidence) to Ni62, but with miraculously no radioactive
isotopes produced?
Patterson,
And being a 3rd part test I would assume Rossi does not have access or
opportunity to switch out anything.
From: Blaze Spinnaker [mailto:blazespinna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 10:26 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Jed, perhaps someone
On 10/09/2014 07:00 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
And being a 3^rd part test I would assume Rossi does not have access
or opportunity to switch out anything.
From page 7 of the report:
The dummy reactor was switched on at 12:20 PM of 24 February 2014 by
Andrea Rossi who gradually
brought
Axel addressed this in earlier threads, but I too wander what happened with
the C, Ca, Cl, Fe, Mg, Mn that was observed in the 'virgin' fuel?
0.011 grams of Li, 0.55 grams of Ni, so the remaining elements should not
have been ignored in the analysis.
I find it quite a coincident that after 32 days approximately all Ni and Li
were transmuted to Ni62 and Li6. I would have guessed that running out of
the original isotopes would create a reduced performance which would be the
reason for shutdown.
Why has this not been mentioned?
Rossi says on his blog the test was planned for 35 days.
Peter
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I find it quite a coincident that after 32 days approximately all Ni and
Li were transmuted to Ni62 and Li6. I would have guessed that running out
of
OTOH… If it wasn’t new physics then it would have been solved long ago. There
is enough information disclosed now for knowledgeable researchers to gather
their own data. There is almost certainly efforts to borrow design and material
property disclosed in this report by Rossi’s competitors and
Maybe it took a few days to set up/tear down all the equipment.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi says on his blog the test was planned for 35 days.
Peter
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I find it
A point of clarification if I might. The siloxane was never present in the
reactor. It was the adhesive used to fix the ash particles, after removal
from the reactor, so they could be analyzed for isotopic composition. The
odd thing about the isotopic analysis: if you read the appendix you will
http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/aldrich/323403?lang=en for example
.s
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:50:36 -0400
From: janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Lithium Aluminum Hydride
Did you notice that the temperature that the Lithium Aluminum Hydride
decomposes is 150
From: Axil Axil
The dimethyl siloxane type of polymer will confine hydrogen
since oxygen carbon and silicon all keep hydrogen from escaping.
No, that is incorrect. As Steve High says, this material was never in the
reactor.
This is a high temperature polymer
That is true, Fran - but as of now – this is looking more unbelievable to me
than the very first Rossi demo – the “steam or hot-air” version.
This is no longer a hydrogen reactor. That is a huge change in focus. As
someone else has commented, at least now Rossi has now backed himself into a
At 04:23 AM 10/9/2014, Teslaalset wrote:
I find it quite a coincident that after 32 days approximately all Ni
and Li were transmuted to Ni62 and Li6. I would have guessed that
running out of the original isotopes would create a reduced
performance which would be the reason for shutdown.
Why
At 08:20 AM 10/8/2014, Alan Fletcher wrote:
Releasing the report during Nobel week means that all the
scientific journalists will be busy on that and/or won't have space
for it (print versions).
Still no media mention -- not even NyTeknik. So it can't go in the
wiki article yet. (Also, as a
At 05:46 PM 10/8/2014, Jones Beene wrote:
Many things do not
add up here, especially the drastic changes from the original
E-Cat.
I don't have any problem with the design evolution.
The original warm cat went from a large tube boiler to a
small tube boiler to a kettle.
The hotcat went from a
I for one consider a hot Li6 is inconsistent with no radiation.
The enerrgy release must be by a different mechanism.
Bob Cook
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE SmartphoneAxil Axil janap...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree, you really can tell where that Li6 came from.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:26 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
How many ebola virus can you fit into a droplet in a sneeze or cough???
Does it matter? It takes only one.
WHO contradicted CDCP by saying that you can get ebola from a sneeze:
torulf.gr...@bredband.net wrote:
The fraud hypothesis is an obvious option.
If it is so obvious then please explain how it would be done. By Rossi, I
mean. Obviously if Levi et al. wanted to commit fraud they could simply
publish fake data. They could make up the whole thing without doing an
On 10/09/2014 10:40 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
WHO contradicted CDCP by saying that you can get ebola from a sneeze:
http://www.naturalnews.com
If it's in saliva, then why wouldn't it be in a sneeze?
Craig
Elforsks CEO: Let's move on with research on LENR
http://www.nyteknik.se/asikter/debatt/article3854541.ece
google translation of swedish:
Elforsk takes now the initiative to build a comprehensive Swedish
research initiative. More knowledge is needed to understand and explain.
Let us engage more
In this study they looked at only a few particles of nickel. They found
that nearly all of the nickel had been transmuted into another isotope.
Presumably this was the source of the energy in the experiment. People
wonder how Rossi could have arranged to make the nickel deplete just as the
THIS is the kind of response I was hoping to see!
Elforsk takes now the initiative to build a comprehensive Swedish research
initiative. More knowledge is needed to understand and explain. Let us
engage more researchers in searching coat phenomenon and then explain how
it works.
Ignore the
--On Thursday, October 09, 2014 5:07 AM -0400 Craig Haynie
cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
It does look like the system ran until its fuel was exhausted.
The unused fuel shows the natural isotope composition from both SIMS
and ICP-MS, i.e. 58 Ni (68.1%), 60 Ni (26.2%), 61 Ni (1.1%), 62 Ni
They only looked at a few grains of the ash so to extrapolate the results
to all of the remaining fuel is probably erroneous.
--On Thursday, October 09, 2014 1:23 PM +0200 Teslaalset
robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com wrote:
I find it quite a coincident that after 32 days approximately all Ni and
the powder change seems quite simple... no complex procedure... surprising.
2014-10-09 15:53 GMT+02:00 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com:
At 04:23 AM 10/9/2014, Teslaalset wrote:
I find it quite a coincident that after 32 days approximately all Ni and
Li were transmuted to Ni62 and Li6. I would
yes, they probably choosed the most extreme sample to make a statement.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Ron Wormus prot...@frii.com wrote:
--On Thursday, October 09, 2014 5:07 AM -0400 Craig Haynie
cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
It does look like the system ran until its fuel was
NyTeknik just make an article about the Boss of Elforsk who play the
cautious man, but say he will launche a research effor on that subject with
partners...
http://www.nyteknik.se/asikter/debatt/article3854541.ece
david made a translation
Is sounds unbelievable because the Ni58 and annihilation radiaton.
but maybe something like that may work.
At the start up D is formed
from p threw Storms process PePD
And then D reacts with Ni in a
Oppenheimer-Phillips process.
The new protons then recycle back to D.
This may provide
Perhaps anyone that takes proper precautions associated with the use of micro
sized particles can perform the task. The lack of needing controlled
atmosphere for loading is fabulous. This technology has the potential of
becoming extremely wide spread.
Dave
-Original
At 04:23 AM 10/9/2014, Teslaalset wrote:
I find it quite a coincident that after 32 days approximately all Ni
and Li were transmuted to Ni62 and Li6. I would have guessed that
running out of the original isotopes would create a reduced
performance which would be the reason for shutdown.
Why has
Jones, I think you have far insufficient data to jump to the conclusion
that this is no longer a Ni-H reaction. Earlier, the hotCat used
stainless, and it worked just fine. Before that, it was just added H2
gas. Just because alumina is used now does not mean it is beta alumina
or even uncoated
Thanks this looks fine.
Rossi have to declare watt material he
used.
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 09:41:33 -0600, Bob Higgins wrote:
Jones,
I think you have far insufficient data to jump to the conclusion that
this is no longer a Ni-H reaction. Earlier, the hotCat used stainless,
and it worked
Stephen Pomp asserts that it is possible to use commercially available
isotopes to make an ash sample that gives the same values as measured in
the report. Setting aside the issues of how Rossi would switch samples and
his motivation for doing so, we should ask if Pomp is exaggerating the
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
There are so many transmutation threads going on that I'm not sure if this
was posted :
Rodney Nicholson
October 8th, 2014 at 5:05 PM
2) It seems that in the ITP test the content of 58Ni was reduced almost to
zero
Rossi commented on his blog today that he was expecting to see the Li7
depletion from his research. He said that he also has seen Ni62 enhancement,
but was surprised to see the latest conversion efficiency reported.
It is encouraging to see that earlier testing revealed similar results to what
A statement about the report in Swedish and English on the Elforsk website:
http://www.elforsk.se/LENR-Matrapport-publicerad/
Harry
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
THIS is the kind of response I was hoping to see!
Elforsk takes now the initiative
Thanks Harry.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:44 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
A statement about the report in Swedish and English on the Elforsk website:
http://www.elforsk.se/LENR-Matrapport-publicerad/
Harry
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
At 09:44 AM 10/9/2014, H Veeder wrote:
A statement
about the report in Swedish and English on the Elforsk website:
http://www.elforsk.se/LENR-Matrapport-publicerad/
This sentence is on the NyTeknik site, but not in the Elforsk
release
Elforsk takes now the initiative to build a comprehensive
I think this report was very good from many aspects. I understand from the
comments that the Pomp's of this world now have one and only one way to
deny the existence of Rossi's E-cat and that is to say that Rossi is an
fraud and a magician.
As much as I want to be critical and as much as it is OK
Dear Friends,
I have published with a bit of delay:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/10/the-rossi-report-no-2-is-great-step.html
I wish I could have been an incombustible fly inside that alumina vessel
to see everything what happened there!
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
Hi all
Cold fusion reactor verified by third-party researchers, seems to have 1
million times the energy density of gasoline
Andrea Rossi’s E-Cat — the device that purports to use cold fusion to
generate massive amounts of cheap, green energy – has been verified by
third-party researchers,
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/10/the-rossi-report-no-2-is-great-step.html
Without a decent hypothesis at least, a paper is not
scientific.
I strongly disagree with that. It's perfectly respectable and
scientific to report an observation without an explanation.
First off let me get this out of the way, I am not a physicists so this
is probably completely impossible, but I'll throw it out here anyway.
What if the conversion of Ni 58 and Li 7 happen relatively quickly so
that very soon after the reaction is commenced there is almost a
complete
Dr. Gluck, please remove me from your Cc list.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/10/the-rossi-report-no-2-is-great-step.html
* Without a decent hypothesis at least, a paper is not scientific. *I
strongly disagree with
I don’t consider this a crazy idea at all.
In fact, there is my nearly-identical conclusion from yesterday:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98021.html
-Bob
From: Robert Dorr [mailto:rod...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 10:31 AM
To:
I agree with you but this is the custom for scientific publications.
It is not my opinion.
Peter
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/10/the-rossi-report-no-2-is-great-step.html
* Without a decent hypothesis at least, a
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/10/09/probability-is-now-45/
Based on http://www.nyteknik.se/asikter/debatt/article3854541.ece
Exciting times!
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/probability-now-20/
Dear Jemes Bowery,
you are not an my cc list, but Vortex sends my messages to you
I am a founding member of Vortex but you can ask Bill Beatty to
exclude me from it.
Peter
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:32 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Dr. Gluck, please remove me from your Cc list.
Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, they probably choosed the most extreme sample to make a statement.
I do not think they chose the samples. I think they only analyzed two and
they reported on both. If they had analyzed 10 or 20 I think they would've
said so.
- Jed
I think a line is being crossed in regard to the accusations made. While there
are many points to be debated, accusing professionals of being part of a fraud
is something that should answered in a courtroom as defamation.
-
Mind blowing.This is a B.F.D.
Exciting times!!
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:53 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Elforsks CEO: Let's move on with research on LENR
http://www.nyteknik.se/asikter/debatt/article3854541.ece
google translation of swedish:
Elforsk takes now the
My apologies. I saw the big Cc list and didn't notice I wasn't on it.
Your contributions to the vortex-l are proper to the list so I have no
complaints for Mr. Beatty.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Jemes Bowery,
you are not an my cc list, but
This is correct thinking and a real path to truth.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
tthe isotopic shift observed is probably only a side effect of the real
reaction.
from others LENR experiments one can suspect that hydrogen is the fuel,
and that Ni
Hi Terry!
I was being sarcastic...
I have a colleague who earned his PhD at UCLA in Biology back in the 80s... he
used to have lunch with some of the virologists, at the time when HIV was in
the news a lot... viruses are good at mutating, but the virologists said that
what made HIV difficult
I'll second your opinion Alan.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/10/the-rossi-report-no-2-is-great-step.html
* Without a decent hypothesis at least, a paper is not scientific. *I
strongly disagree with that. It's
Chris Zell chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
I think a line is being crossed in regard to the accusations made. While
there are many points to be debated, accusing professionals of being part
of a fraud is something that should answered in a courtroom as defamation.
I agree with your
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
This is correct thinking and a real path to truth.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
wrote:
tthe isotopic shift observed is probably only a side effect of the real
reaction.
from others LENR experiments one can suspect
From an electromagnetic point of view, nickel and lithium perform the same
no matter how many neutrons are included in their nuclei.
The testers should not have run the reactor at 1400C. That high operational
temperature would have partially melted many of the nickel particles
thereby reducing
Blaze exhibits his wishy-washiness yet again. He also doesn't follow his
own posted criteria, which was that if the report came out after
September he would lower the probability to 25%, which he never did. He
went straight to 20% yesterday and today he's at 45%. Because of ONE
reaction to the
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The testers should not have run the reactor at 1400C.
I do not think they knew it would get that hot.
That high operational temperature would have partially melted many of the
nickel particles thereby reducing the power output of the test reactor.
To disprove it you must be more specific.
Watt is the reactions
between Ni 62 and Li 6?
I am not a physicists to but have already
proposed this cyclic reactions.
And it may be easy to disprove.
At
the start up D is formed from p threw Storms process PePD
And then D
reacts with Ni in a
The TIP report is out, and it is positive for Rossi. The next step for him
is to challenge the USPTO rejection of his patent because their assessment
is that it is not operable. Now he has 7 independent scientists saying it
IS operable.
But the patent office will still drag their heels because
Here is a comment from Rossi's blog.
This seems to indicate there was only enough Ni to run for about a month. I
am not sure what it means. See the word charge.
- Jed
Rodney Nicholson http://na/
October 8th, 2014 at 5:05 PM
Peter Gluck already told us about this. I should pay closer attention.
I do not know what to make of this. How could Rossi know what power level
they would run at? It is a shame they did not try to run for 40 days.
It is difficult believe Rossi can calibrate the amount of fuel so closely,
given
I find GoatGuy's comment interesting, how valid is his objection?
http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/10/third-party-report-on-32-day-continuous.html?utm_source=feedburnerutm_medium=feedutm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2Fadvancednano+%28nextbigfuture%29
not. it still ignores the fact that the transmitted light was more than
the power coming in.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe
stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
I find GoatGuy's comment interesting, how valid is his objection?
not, maybe but I wan't some more meat.
Doesn't it depend if light get's through from the inner tube but the heat
radiation is insulated within. Of cause if the layer is thin or if it
conduct heat well the inner and the outer has pretty much the same
temperature and hence the argument is moot, not
Better would be a patent cooperation treaty country somewhere other than
the US approving the patent and the US physics theocracy being paraded
around for historic scorn and perhaps trials for crimes against humanity.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
The
If we consider that the granules are different and react diferently, and it
seams to be known
how a particle that react well should look like, couldn't the testers have
picked a biased sample
for their expensive analysis e.g. a particle that have had the time to
saturate in order to ne sure to
get
Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote:
I find GoatGuy's comment interesting, how valid is his objection?
GoatGuy's comments are always valid. Just be sure you reverse the truth
value. X := Not(X);
- Jed
Thank you. Also, Noted that the 2nd law is not violated.
Ol' Bab
On 10/7/2014 1:34 PM, Ian Walker wrote:
Hi David
I did a search for good-bye-second-law-of-thermodynamics
It came up in google with this
http://motls.blogspot.com/2014/10/fusion-dynomak-new-compact-rival-of.html
On a new HOT fusion device, but the new hotcat test is mentioned in a couple of
comments.
The whole paper must be ignored because the authors put their units in square
brackets : [W] etc
He enthusiastically quotes
Would Sweden qualify? The demo plant was originally stated to be in Sweden
a couple of years ago.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:51 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Better would be a patent cooperation treaty country somewhere other than
the US approving the patent and the US physics
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 9 Oct 2014 15:51:09 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Peter Gluck already told us about this. I should pay closer attention.
I do not know what to make of this. How could Rossi know what power level
they would run at? It is a shame they did not try to run for 40 days.
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
The whole paper must be ignored because the authors put their units in
square brackets : [W] etc
Motl actually said that! Amazing. Quote:
For example, these cranks haven't understood the concept of units in
physics. All equations for dimensionful variables
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 9 Oct 2014 11:01:38 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
THIS is the kind of response I was hoping to see!
Elforsk takes now the initiative to build a comprehensive Swedish research
initiative. More knowledge is needed to understand and explain. Let us
engage more
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
If Rossi already knew the reaction mechanism, then it wouldn't be hard to
weigh
out exactly the right amount of chemicals.
You can weigh them out with a milligram lab scale I suppose. I guess you
could be plus/minus a week or two in fuel. But they describe pouring
FYI, he's definitely NOT looking to engage research into coat phenomena : )
just looking to describe the phenomenon and then explain how it works
/SunilElforsk takes now the initiative to build a comprehensive
Swedish research initiative. More knowledge is needed to understand and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium
Isotopes
Naturally occurring lithium is composed of two stable isotopes, 6Li and
7Li, the latter being the more abundant (92.5% natural
abundance).[3][13][23] Both natural isotopes have anomalously low nuclear
binding energy per nucleon compared to the next
On 10/09/2014 03:51 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
It is difficult believe Rossi can calibrate the amount of fuel so
closely, given that a microscopic amount of fuel produces a huge
amount of energy.
I assume that Rossi simply put more than enough fuel into the cell to
accommodate a 35 day
Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
I assume that Rossi simply put more than enough fuel into the cell to
accommodate a 35 day test, at whatever power level was chosen.
That would be sensible.
This may have nothing to do with the near total transmutation of the nickel.
Still, if
http://www.networkworld.com/article/2824558/infrastructure-management/could-ultra-cheap-clean-energy-be-just-around-the-corner-the-return-of-rossi-and-the-e-cat.html
Our good friend mark gibbs! Click on it! Many times!
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
wrote:
Greetings Vortex-L:
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/697-Tonight-we-listen-to-Sterling-Lewan-and-Andrea-Rossi/
Ad Astra,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
I find it disturbing that he wrote: The problem with Pons and
Fleischmann’s claimed discovery was that no one could duplicate it . . .
That is nonsense, and he knows it is nonsense.
- Jed
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
My guess as to how it works:- Hydrinohydride is a small heavy negative
particle with a mass about 10 times greater than a negative muon. These form
the equivalent of muonic molecules (Hydronic molecules?) with Ni Li,
allowing them to approach
Maybe it can all be done with shrunken lithium...
...Lithino
harry
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
My guess as to how it works:- Hydrinohydride is a small heavy negative
particle with a mass about
don't you remember when Rossi said...
He said that he tested a number of secret sauce element which all
basically worked.
Lithium is just one of a number of elements that do basically the same
thing.
Lithium is not unique. How does a family of element doing the secret sauce
function fit into
Sorry, I did not reply sooner. Thanks for the interest. Except for my
encounters with Maxwell's demon this field is all new to me. Unfortunately
I don't know anything about semiconductor theory. I found Sheehan's
proposed epicatalytic method for violating of the second law of
thermodynamics
If Gibbs knows it's nonsense, why did he write it? It's frustrating that
he unsubscribed from Vortex-L.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I find it disturbing that he wrote: The problem with Pons and
Fleischmann’s claimed discovery was that no one could
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Lithium is not unique. How does a family of element doing the secret sauce
function fit into your new theories?
Neutron stripping. :)
Eric
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
