Ryan Hunt would better to ask this question. I believe the reactor tube in
the Bang! experiment was from CoorsTek. The other dogbone alumina tubes
were also from CoorsTek. They have an online store.
It is the dogbone Lugano HotCat replica that has the heater coil wrapped
around a second
Hei Mats,
I will applaud your efforts. I know you are fighting the establishment and
they are powerful.
The only thing I might have another opinion about is how the Swedish
scientist have handled their PR.
I think they would have had a better response if they have been totally
honest and been in
Dear Friends
I hope many ideas will add to this:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/03/drastically-decreasing-death-rate-of.html
We need reactors so viable in hellish conditions as the one tested at
Lugano.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
The added silica in the Parkhomov experiment is consistent with improving the
fracture toughness of the tube. The silica addition acts to blunt the defects
in the alumina and make the cracks that start at such a defect arrest before a
significant crack propagation occurs. This is good old
To improve the internal heat transfer look for an inert gas--He for example.
He is a good and rapid heat transfer agent and would act to maintain a more
even temperature within the reactor. It could even improve the alumina itself
if sufficient porosity is incorporated into its structure.
Peace Nobel committee draw the way by firing it's chairman, for bad choices.
Who have to be fired in that affair ?
beside the journalist I mean ?
It is important to prove that following the groupthink despite evidence is
dangerous for your career.
today it is the LENR supporter who risk their
Mats--
I second Bob Higgins comment.
If you are at ICCF-19, I hope to shake your hand.
I once was a reporter of sorts and ran into problems with folks that did not
like to hear the reality of things around them, nor its distribution to a large
audience. Such wide spread knowledge of
Thanks for the info, Bob.
For the last week, I have been concerned about the Elastic Expansion of the
Reactor Tube due to the approximately 5000 psi pressure change that could
occur. A back-of-the-envelope calculation revealed a 0.010” expansion. This
is about an order of magnitude greater
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Lewan Mats mats.le...@nyteknik.se wrote:
The scientific news team at Swedish National Radio, SR, received a honorary
mention a few days ago at the Swedish Rewards for investigative journalism,
The Golden Spade, for its four part reportage on Swedish researchers'
conclusions
a)investigative journaism is analogous to bravos- paid killers; our friend
Steve Krivit is quite efficient in it , Gary Wright is very hard working;
b) the passive and inactive behavior of the 4 Swedish scientists is perhaps
not the most rational- it is quite a complicity of the
Peter,
I know that the Swedish researchers are still working on the update, doing
additional calibration measurements.
They have also stated that they intend to continue investigating the LENR
phenomenon. That could include some kind of replication, but since they prefer
to work in silence
The scientific news team at Swedish National Radio, SR, received a honorary
mention a few days ago at the Swedish Rewards for investigative journalism, The
Golden Spade, for its four part reportage on Swedish researchers' (those who
made the Lugano measurements) collaboration with the fraudster
We are all grateful to Ed Storms and Kiva Labs for analyzing the sintered
Ni ash of the MFMP Bang! experiment. Those images are from the sintered
Ni, molded int o a rod by the ID of the reaction tube. There is woefully
insufficient evidence that the Bang! experiment produced any LENR.
However,
What you say is absolutely true, Bob. I don't believe that LENR occurred
in the MFMP Bang! experiment. However the conditions were very similar to
the Lugano experiment at that temperature and with the fuel that MFMP
used. Check the Lugano SEM images of their Ni ash and compare to the SEM
This is not true. There are many physical and chemical thing happening
that set the stage for LENR, and just because the stage has been set, it
doesn't mean the show started. The chemical changes are the dissociation
of the LiAlH4 and the dissolving of the Ni (at higher temperatures). The
Mats, you are a brave and insightful journalist. I believe you will one
day be rewarded for capturing the birth of a critical new technology for
the future of our planet and its people.
[If not, you will still have gained the experiences needed to become a
blues musician.]
Bob Higgins
On Wed,
This is a wonderful video, so thanks for pointing us to watch it. However,
the molten Li-Al is not in a super-critical phase, but as he said, it
doesn't have to be supercritical - just hot and high pressure. He also
demonstrated a chemical mixing that produced nanoparticles as a
precipitate.
Bob, very nice design [I downloaded from home] and realized the gas/plasma
inside the tube is a far superior transfer medium. I understand your purpose of
only transferring heat in case of temp increase when the drive is removed for
calorimetry BUT would you also consider dual use as part of
One of the things not sampled in the Lugano experiment is the product gas
or gas ash. This may have very important clues to the nature of the
reaction. In my replication (under construction), I intend to be able to
collect the product gas for analysis off-site. We could find enhanced
deuterium,
Thanks Fran. I would love to be able to just see the XH to start. It
would be a happy circumstance to then go on to evolve the software control
to regulate temperature by modulating the thermal load.
I am most of the way through making the small pieces for the convection
system (it will have 4
Bob, what was the Free Tolerance between the Reaction Tube OD
and the Heater Tube ID in the MFMP Bang! Experiment?
Who was the manufacturer of the alumina tubes?
Thanks,
Mark Jurich
21 matches
Mail list logo
