I think that other members of the MFMP were also designing Parkhomov style
experiments. Perhaps one of their designs is the golden goose.
It's annoying to read this communication to MFMP :
https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/posts/1051219568242075
Statement from NRL source on their... - Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project |
Facebook
Statement from NRL source on their position, re their data, cited in the
. (After ~21:05 see figure 6)
From:
Finlay MacNab [mailto:finlaymac...@hotmail.com]
Sent: lundi 29 décembre 2014 23:01
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:the Parkhomov
paper translated
It is interesting that in figure 4
of the report the heating coils wrapped
It is interesting that in figure 4 of the report the heating coils wrapped
around the Al2O3 cylinder appear dark.
This suggests that the inside of the cylinder is hotter than the coils.
http://www.e-catworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Lugano-Confirmed.pdf
Hard to look at with the naked eye? I don't recall anything in the lugano
report about the ecat being hard to look at.
I am not sure this is correct.
An examination of black body radiative power versus temperature shows that
below 3000 degrees kelvin the emission from a hot body is diffuse
I dunno, have you ever been around glass blowing? It gets pretty bright
I think this is a question of surface area.
Based on this calculator
http://www.spectralcalc.com/blackbody_calculator/blackbody.php , and my limited
understanding of radiance, a 1400C (~1700K) black body radiator will
And I forgot, much of the brightness of glass is from the sodium emission
line. Glassblowing glasses filter the sodium emission line (brilliant yellow
light). Much of the brightness of molten glass comes from light from sodium if
i recall correctly. In fact, when you put on sodium line
I was thinking the same thing while looking at this research.
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:29:26 -0500
From: janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Mainstream scientific research is looking into LENR and doesn’t
know it yet.
The 6000:1 figure is close to correct.
The cross sectional area of the earth is 127.8 million km^2. Each km^2
receives a approximately a gigawatt of solar radiation. In one hour the earth
receives 127 thousand terawatt hours of energy. Which is approximately the
global consumption of energy
I remember the Pons and Fleischmann announcement, when I was a young boy of 13,
vividly. I started jumping around the room as Tom Brokaw was describing it on
the television in my father's den. It was at that moment that I realized that
it is possible for one person to make a difference in
Except that temperatures are rising faster at night than during the day
There may have been many reasons for temperature changes in the past. It is
clear that the current rise in temperature is due to a reduced flux of infra
red light re-radiating into space at a constant temperature, not
As a research scientist working for a solar start-up in Vancouver, I agree with
Jed.
It would be wonderful if Defkalion moved here. I would love to nanostructure
some nickel for them!
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:48:11 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:ICCF-17: Brillouin is no more?
From:
Subject: RE: [Vo]:SPAWAR has yet to respond re simple error in claims of
effects of external high voltage dc fields inside a conducting electrolyte:
Rich Murray 2012.03.01 2012.07.02
At 12:00 PM 7/4/2012, Finlay MacNab wrote:
Your argument assumes that the there is no air
gap between
@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: a...@lomaxdesign.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:SPAWAR has yet to respond re simple error in claims of
effects of external high voltage dc fields inside a conducting electrolyte:
Rich Murray 2012.03.01 2012.07.02
At 11:46 PM 7/3/2012, Finlay MacNab wrote
It should be noted that in an electrolyte the current results from a chemical
reaction at the anode and cathode (in this case the generation of hydrogen and
oxygen) there are no free charge carriers in the solution itself. The cations
and anions are bound together by electrostatic attraction
electrolyte:
Rich Murray 2012.03.01 2012.07.02
At 03:44 PM 7/3/2012, Finlay MacNab wrote:
It should be noted that in an electrolyte the current results from a
chemical reaction at the anode and cathode (in this case the
generation of hydrogen and oxygen) there are no free charge carriers
Hey Mark,
Very interesting links (although I dont have full access to the second one).
From: zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:SPAWAR has yet to respond re simple error in claims of
effects of external high voltage dc fields inside a conducting electrolyte:
I think your assessment is spot on Jeff.
The only question in my mind is whether or not the mixing of the electrolyte
caused by the evolution of gas at the working electrode might generate a
varying electric field by redistributing the ions in solution.
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 23:17:01 -0400
of external high voltage dc fields inside a conducting electrolyte:
Rich Murray 2012.03.01 2012.07.02
At 08:02 PM 7/3/2012, Finlay MacNab wrote:
To clarify:
An electrolyte does not conduct. Chemical reactions occur at the
electrodes that accept and give up electrons. Current flows
The device shown in the video is depicted in slides 20,21,22 of Zawodny's pdf
presentation that NET obtained through the FOI request.
The experiment is significant because it elegantly allows the direct
observation of cold fusion without complicated calorimetry or controls. The
Zawodny slides
Your calculation does not take into account the fact that the activation energy
barrier releases the energy added to overcome it during the reaction. In this
case once coulomb repulsion is overcome, the energy is added back to the system
by attractive nuclear force. The 3.41MeV is the
Message-
From: Finlay MacNab finlaymac...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, May 22, 2012 1:50 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Proton Fusion Ni58 to Cu59 Endothermic?
Your calculation does not take into account the fact that the activation energy
barrier releases
In the case of regular fusion the kinetic energy of the proton would be
conserved in the reaction products (i.e. the total energy of the system would
be 5.6 MeV + 3.41MeV) these reaction products might be a Cu59 nucleus with
9.01MeV of kinetic energy or more likely some combination of gamma
There are many problems with this paper.
The most glaring error is that they heated their sample to 1000C for 10 minutes
before measuring. They do this to remove sulphur, which should not be present
under tightly controlled conditions (incidentally they claim to explain the
presence of
Iwamura's transmutation experiments are very convincing. They confirm their
results by three advanced instrumental techniques, secondary ion mass
spectrometry(SIMS), x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy(XPS), and x-ray
fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF). These three measurements confirming each
I would invite NASA researcher Joe Zawodny and or Prof. Miley.
The NASA slides appear to me to develop and test a well modeled structure and
yield predictable results.
PS I'll be there if you invite them to speak in Vancouver!
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:32:11 -0400
From:
to make comments about people, but the theory Zawodny
advocates is an embarrassment to anyone who has scientific training and have
you ever heard Miley talk? These people are not the best source of information
about the field.
Ed
On Mar 29, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Finlay MacNab wrote:I would invite NASA
Hello, Long time lurker here.
The question was absurd. I am disappointed that a professional scientist would
ask such a question.
Almost every new technology that is not well understood suffers from poor
reproducibility, it took decades to achieve reproducible results with field
effect
The early Ny Tecknik video of the inside of the 1MW reactor reveals that the
hydrogen inlets for the individual inlets are not connected. If each
individual module must be filled separately then the measurement is valid.
From: robert.leguil...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject:
Bob,
Excellent observation. And one that makes perfect sense.
Daniel,
Isn't the measured dimension of the reactor wafer 20cm x 20cm x 6cm including
the shielding (2.4 litres)?
How do you account for the fact that the density of lithium perchlorate is
2.4times the density of water.
How is the
certain that you've
established
that through proof or equations. For instance in both cases cold water is imput
at the same rate and temperature so why should there be a
difference?
- Original Message -
From:
Finlay MacNab
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 14
generate and
how much energy would the system lose as steam squeezes out that orifice.
There's so much unexplained and so many assumptions that can be made. I'm
totally disappointed and disillusioned.
Colin
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Finlay MacNab finlaymac...@hotmail.com wrote
Excellent observation! If this was a closed system with no FLOWING WATER
EXITING THE SYSTEM you would have a point. As it is you have only discredited
your argument about thermal inertia. Congratulations!
I find your hand waving arguments completely unconvincing. Please describe in
detail
Dear Jed,
As a professional scientist I would like to take this opportunity to thank
you for you continued efforts to present a balanced perspective on cold fusion.
Since the January announcement at the University of Bologna sparked my
interest in the topic, your library of CF literature
, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Finlay MacNab finlaymac...@hotmail.com
wrote:
If the relative humidity sensor measures capacitance then the dielectric
constant of steam and the dielectric constant of steam plus water would be very
different and yield very different readings.
From what I found
03:46:29 -0500
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cat vs. Water Heater for coffee/tea...
From: joshua.c...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Finlay MacNab finlaymac...@hotmail.com wrote:
The delta ohm probe in question is rated to 150C with an accuracy of +/- 3.5%
above
@eskimo.com
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Finlay MacNab finlaymac...@hotmail.com
wrote:
There are several different part numbers listed in the sensor chart in the pdf.
A number of them are rated to 150C.
Again, I think you're reading that wrong. There is a table that gives the
application
If the relative humidity sensor measures capacitance then the dielectric
constant of steam and the dielectric constant of steam plus water would be very
different and yield very different readings.
A quick google search for capacitance measurement of steam quality yields
several papers and a
I think you should reexamine your calculations.
The problem is that you are confusing watts and watt*hours.
130kW is = to 130KJ/sec
130kW for 1 hour is equal to 130KW*h
15minutes of 130kW is equal to 130kW*0.25 hours or 32.5kW*H (the energy
delivered in 15 mins)
If the 130kW had continued for
Ack I am very sorry to have included the body of the email in the post.
Please excuse my error...
The copper isotope ratios reported here contradict those from Rossi's blog
published data.
In his blog post titled Experimental Results he states the Cu63/Cu65 ratio is
1.6 after transmutation.
The isotope results reported by the swedish observers seems very suspicious to
me.
41 matches
Mail list logo
