On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok so you can design a calorimeter to detect this particular endothermic
reaction, however, if you don't know a-priori what type of endothermic
reaction or what energy source
From the wikipedia page on Negative Luminescence
*((My thoughts are in double brackets))*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_luminescence
Negative luminescence is a physical phenomenon by which an electronic
device emits less thermal radiation when an electric current is passed
through it
dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
This effect sounds like a form of heat pump. The energy is moved from
one location to another.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Oct 23, 2014 2:33 am
Subject: [Vo]:Negative Luminescence
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
The assumption that there is any equilibrium in the reactor and, hence,
black body radiation from it surface, is not correct IMO.
Would that be equivalent to saying the surface cannot have a steady
temperature?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:05 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
As Rossi has stated on many occasions, only the market can convince some
folks of reality.
Rossi could have chosen the academic route but he hasn't.
He has *decided* the market will decide and for better or worse
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Given that Levi did know of this phenomenon – and that it could be helpful in
the context of the experiment – all he needs to do is release the
thermocouple data which may not support the highest gain, but probably is
MFMP placed enlarged three pictures of hotcat together for comparison.
https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/photos/pcb.850773311620036/850772991620068/?type=1theater
In the report the bottom picture is contracted.
Harry
On surface the report contains as many imperfections as the alumina tube.
;-)
harry
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
It could be that the nature of the light is very unusual as produced by
the reactor. If only
A lack of caftsmanship is not necessarily antithetical to greatness.
e.g. The first transistor was crudely assembled.
http://cnx.org/resources/9120e4bccd37da6ab1c4ff90e8c498cc/firsttransistor.gif
Harry
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:15 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On surface the report
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBuWTP9SQLk
Harry
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Humor aside, I think you might find this interesting:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.6364
march 2013 test, p. 7
We note that the authors’ reasoning in the case of the thermal signature
shows a tendency
to quickly jump
Amazing Bioluminescent/Glowing Deep Sea Creatures
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XD7thJVRKmQ
Harry
Andrea Rossi
October 20th, 2014 at 10:18 AM
JCRenoir:
The Professors told me that they are discussing the questions that merit an
answer and that will answer to such questions by means of updates of the
report published on
http://www.elforsk.se/LENR-mattrapport-publicerad
Their report will be
In this context the temperature /T/
is known
a-priori
and
the output power /q/
is known
a posteriori , so emissivity /ε/
will
adjust the ouptut power downwards
if
0
/ε/ 1
q = ε σ T^4 A
Harry
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 10/20/2014 04:30 PM, H Veeder wrote:
In this context the temperature /T/
is known
a-priori
and
the output power /q/
is known
a posteriori , so emissivity /ε/
will
adjust the ouptut power
Maybe Jed is right. See this subjective colour temperature chart:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_radiation#Subjective_color_to_the_eye_of_a_black_body_thermal_radiator
Contrast with this chart which are presumably the true temperature
colours.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com
wrote:
But the question I've been trying to ask, isn't the color adjusted by the
emissivity factor? So if the emissivity is 0.75, then doesn't this mean
that the observed color is less than the actual temperature?
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
If the outside surface temperature really is 1400 deg C, then the outside
surface material should be incandescent white. It does not matter what the
inside temperature is. All materials glow with the same incandescent
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: H Veeder
Ø Other examples of light emitting bodies which* do not* follow the
incandescent temperature rule are phosphorescent and fluorescent bodies.
Yup. And as far back as 1886 it was noticed that alumina
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com
wrote:
But the question I've been trying to ask, isn't the color adjusted by the
emissivity factor? So if the emissivity is 0.75, then doesn't this mean
that the observed color is less than the actual temperature?
Should the reactor radiate like a normal incandescent body of 1400C or
does the reactor radiate according to some other rules?
Jed (and Mizuno?) assume it behaves like a normal incandescent body of
1400C so it should glow white. Since it doesn't glow white they assume the
output power estimate
with for so long Harry.
I may have found a method of getting to the real temperature value. The
technique need a lot more calibration before it can be trusted.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Oct 19, 2014 3
From the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project facebook page:
---
Is this the catalyst?
As we reported in a previous Facebook post, we know for a fact that Pons
and Fleischmann had a key Lithium compound in their lab,
it is shinning through an atmosphere of alumina.
With this model of illumination the the output power estimates appear valid.
Harry
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
In the report they said they were unable to attach
Are you ok? 'cause this place can sometimes make people feel a bit...
...you know...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3bGYljQ5Uw
Harry
well done.
harry
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I must have produce 500 posts identifying an alkali metal as the Rossi
secret catalyst and even better, I provided the theory behind that
recommendation. Lithium is a simplistic conclusion to draw from the
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Jed--
I hope you get an answer. This question has caused me to resist getting
into a give and take about the camera data. The thermocouple must have
been used to calibrate the camera at operating conditions, IF IT
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Consider the difference between the sun at noon and the sun at dawn/dusk.
The interior of the HotCat glows white but from the outside it glows red
like a sunrise because
Other examples of light emitting bodies which do not follow the
incandascent temperature rule are phosphorescent and fluorescent bodies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphorescence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescence
Harry
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 7:27 PM, H Veeder hveeder
electromagnetic
radiation. The term 'luminescence' was introduced in 1888 by Eilhard
Wiedemann
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:16 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Other examples of light emitting bodies which do not follow the
incandascent temperature rule are phosphorescent and fluorescent bodies
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:
James, it's just so tiring.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uai7M4RpoLU
Let them continue to hallucinate;
their typing is the only thing keeping the economy going
while a new infrastructure is being built right under their noses!
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
The isotopic analyses are a little amazing, and, as far as I can tell, do
not give indications of a gradient effect in the 6Li and 62Ni species.
appendix 3
measured abundance in ash sample
6Li - 92.1%
7Li - 7.9%
Dave and Axil,
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't believe that the independent science team could ever make a
mistake that bad: measuring a reactor temperature that as actually at 700C
as being 1400C.
Ordinarily a surface at 1400C should glow
Where are the neutrons?
Must be a mistake.
Where is the white glow?
Must be another mistake.
Harry
Poetic infusion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ns4kEuz7G3E
Harry
_Colour temperature_ refers to the *peak* emission of a blackbody whose
temperature produces a peak emission within the visible spectrum.
e.g. The surface of the sun is about 6000C and the peek emission is white
light so it has colour temperature of white.
_Incadescence_ is the *visible* light
emission wavelength are we not?
Why would you expect the device to look white hot when a known metal
casting looks orange hot at approximately the same temperature? What am I
missing?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
This assumes insulating it will have no adverse effect on the new fire,
but excessive insulation could extinguish it.
A good test to perform on the Hotcat would be to add the insulation *after*
start up.
Harry
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 10:24 PM, jwin...@cyllene.uwa.edu.au wrote:
I don't know why
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:31 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Thanks for the heads up Harry. I wonder if others on the list are seeing
my new topics being sent to spam.
The question that I am asking is whether or not there are clues to the
behavior of the temperature and power
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v514/n7522/full/nature13832.html
Giant Rydberg excitons in the copper oxide Cu2O
Nature 514, 343–347 (16 October 2014) doi:10.1038/nature13832Received 05
March 2014 Accepted 02 September 2014 Published online 15 October 2014
A highly excited atom having an
Sunspots are examples of unusually cool regions persisting in hotter
surroundings, so it is not beyond all experience to say that the
temperature of the wire inside the reactor remains below its melting
temperature.
Harry
Doesn't look good for Rossi, but I am not sure I understand Pomp's point.
Is Pomp saying Rossi is
rewriting history to make it look
Ni62 was present in the ash of his earlier
EC
at?
http://stephanpomp.blogspot.se/2014/10/mr-rossi-i-admire-you.html
Harry
So Rossi's quasi-scam is to jerk around a bunch of scientists with phony
reactors so as to throw off his competitors?
harry
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Randy Wuller
So for example, let’s say Rossi knew that
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* H Veeder
Doesn't look good for Rossi, but I am not sure I understand Pomp's point.
Is Pomp saying Rossi is rewriting history to make it look like Ni62 was
present in the ash of his earlier EC at?
http
The Courage to Create by Rollo May
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auOW5tNFjZg
Psychoanalyst Rollo May~We Lack Mystery!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw0SCmoj9tc
Harry
Brené Brown - Embracing Vulnerability
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO6n9HmG0qM
Harry
sorry the link to
_
Psychoanalyst Rollo May~We Lack Mystery!_ should be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zi9NAzMJbds
Harry
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:11 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The Courage to Create by Rollo May
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auOW5tNFjZg
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
To see how truly powerful TPC is, you have to watch this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_President's_Analyst
ThePhoneCompany
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vbbpjd52atwfeature=youtu.bet=5m59s
Maybe this inspired the
Dave, for some reason when you start a new thread your message appears in
my spam folder.
I am not sure what you are asking, but the Earth supposedly generates some
heat too. I am not sure how much of this heat contributes to the global
temperature.
Harry
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:00 PM,
Dave, for some reason when you start a new thread your message appears in
my spam folder.
I am not sure what you are asking, but the Earth supposedly generates some
heat too. I am not sure how much of this heat contributes to the global
temperature.
Harry
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:00 PM, David
Some people suspect that the resistor wire can't be Inconel because they
are predicted to melt at the reactor's operating temperature. However,
since we know the resistor wire casts a shadow in the alumina, the
temperature of the wire remains below the operating temperature and
therefore can't
If the wire were the brightest area there would be no excess heat.
Harry
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
how do you know this? How do you know the the wire is not the brightest
area?
On 15 October 2014 15:06, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
how do you know this? How do you know the the wire is not the
brightest area?
On 15 October 2014 15:06, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Some people suspect that the resistor wire can't be Inconel because
If the thermography was done reasonably well, then it is proving to be more
than just a means of measuring excess heat, it is also a means of probing
the LENR phenomena.
Harry
Thanks for posting your ideas.
I hadn't seen that picture of the march 2013 reactor sitting on the scale
with heating coils visible.
Why don't we just accept that the authors of the 2014 test also know enough
about the construction of the reactor to say that the dark bands align with
the wires?
You might say I am splitting hairs but what Mckubre has written here is
technically incorrect.
The Stephan-Boltzman law is relationship between temperature and output
power.
It is not a relationship between input power and output power so you can't
use the law by itself
to infer any relationship
to believe them. There is a mountain to climb to convince the world, and
they have not really helped that process.
On 16 October 2014 11:41, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for posting your ideas.
I hadn't seen that picture of the march 2013 reactor sitting on the scale
with heating
to the thermocouple end cap, otherwise the external tube
would be broken by axial stress due to differential thermal expansion of
higher temperature of inner tube compared to external tube.
On 16 October 2014 10:58, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
If the wire inside the reactor was hot
Another strange thing might be happening. Assuming the electrical input
power measurements are correct, is there enough electrical power flowing
through the wires to cause the wires external to the reactor to glow with
the observed color?
Harry
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
A corespondent sent me this link:
http://www.eurotherm2008.tue.nl/Proceedings_Eurotherm2008/papers/Radiation/RAD_6.pdf
He commented: My interpretation of figure 6 is that the tranmissivity of
alumina goes down
what is SPP?
Harry
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
In any event, there seems to be no good reason to eliminate the Inconel as
being active, since it contains lots of nickel - especially in the context
of SPP.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Broadly speaking, I think three explanation have been offered for the
astounding mass spec results:
1. Tentative acceptance, or at least acceptance for the sake of argument.
That, it seems to me, is McKubre's
camera is measuring.
So there could be visible shadows / glowing resistors seen through the
ceramic, but the IR calculations are OK.
--
*From: *H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
*Sent: *Monday, October 13, 2014 11:27:44 PM
He commented: My interpretation of figure 6
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Another point has to do with how the heat is conveyed from a LENR
reaction. Since the LENR reaction is likely a nano-scale event, heat must
be conveyed from the reaction in a way that doesn't make the NAE the
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 1:21 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can we refocus this thread into discussion about the construction of the
latest reactor? For example:
- Why do we think the end
The phone cops
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTPzTG1Lx60
Harry
over 10 years ago that SPP can produce nuclear
reactions.
Paper is on LENR-CANR
*From:* H Veeder
what is SPP?
Harry
In any event, there seems to be no good reason to eliminate the Inconel as
being active, since it contains lots of nickel - especially in the context
of SPP.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/10/14/nbc-news-article-on-fusion-mentions-e-cat-not-negatively/
Harry
So the heater coils in the 2013 test were embedded in ceramic sheath which
covered a steel vessel. I was recalling the 2013 test as if the coils were
inside the steel vessel.
It all makes sense now.
Harry
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Yes, sorry -- I was
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Figure 6 : this is complicated by transmission, which may be happening in
the visible range. (IF the helical shadows are indeed images or shadows of
the coiuls. But I still think they represent different conduction zones of
. An alternating . In turn, most of the energy becomes heat
in the high- resistance steel, while the driving coil stays cool.
On Monday, October 13, 2014, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Figure 6 : this is complicated
the fins? I have not studied
the photos.
On Monday, October 13, 2014, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The banded regions should absorb heat and in the long run reach the same
temperature as their surroundings. The fact that they persist is a sign of
something significant...and I don't
ugh...my idiot twin wrote this.
Harry
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:57 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Another related thought experiment
Consider the focusing of sunlight by a simple parabolic reflector. Why
doesn't that constitute a violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics which
Robert Godes from Brillouin comments:
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/734-Short-text-from-Robert-Godes-regarding-the-test/
Harry
what is the other direction?
(I am having hard time following the flow of thought in this particular
thread)
harry
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:31 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
How does the emissivity of the alumina effect the optical appearance with
regard to color? Is it
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:43 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I refer to the opposite effect in this case Harry. In other words, can
the color appear to be too dark in the visual region to our eyes compared
to the emission of thermal energy in the IR.
Are there surfaces that
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:48 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Especially if they switch to a pulse mode where they are not really
heating directly anymore, the pulses are working like an induction stovetop
I can see it now ...and infrared picture of Rossi on the cover of TIME. lol
Harry
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Fig 3 clearly shows a camera in the top-left, with a (temporary?) cable
strung from it, aimed
Can this be used to challenge Pomp's claim that the ash was faked by
commercially available enriched isotopes?
Most people on this list seem to be very good about raising technical
objections to criticisms of the calorimetry, but they counter Pomp's claim
with non-technical arguments about how it
this would be possible to fake
even with tremendous effort.
So, rather than providing evidence of fraud, I very much believe that this
isotope fractionation gradient clearly indicates that some kind of nuclear
reaction is taking place in during this experiment.
-Bob
*From:* H Veeder
As far as I know the biggest source of coal pollution comes from coal fired
electricity plants. However, Tom Darden seems to be talking about coal
burning just for heat. I suppose this is still a major problem in China.
Harry
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Blaze Spinnaker
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I am glad they published this report. They were under no obligation to do
so. We are beggars and beggars cannot be choosers.
This is another reason why most scientists will ignore this report because
they see
It is worth noting that some FP cells got hot enough to boil off the
electrolytic solution and then remained hot for a while.
Harry
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Very perceptive and a great insight into why the test was setup the way
that it was. Rossi
The issue of translucency would alter the absolute power calculations but
wouldn't the relative difference between input and output power remain
roughly the same and therefore the COP too?
Harry
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
At 03:48 PM 10/10/2014, you
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
In reply to H Veeder's message
* Maybe it can all be done with shrunken lithium... Lithino
... or maybe the apparent Rossi reaction of Ni58 - Ni 62 can be
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
This transparency to infrared photons must be why Rossi uses this ceramic
material to get heat unencumbered to his powder. Rossi is clever.
Or maybe it allows more infrared photons to escape unencumbered once the
reactor
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
At 06:14 PM 10/10/2014, H Veeder wrote:
The issue of translucency would alter the absolute power calculations but
wouldn't the relative difference between input and output power remain
roughly the same and therefore the COP
Another related thought experiment
Consider the focusing of sunlight by a simple parabolic reflector. Why
doesn't that constitute a violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics which
(according to one of the many equivalents formulations) says heat cannot
flow from a cold to hot region without an
Elforsks CEO: Let's move on with research on LENR
http://www.nyteknik.se/asikter/debatt/article3854541.ece
google translation of swedish:
Elforsk takes now the initiative to build a comprehensive Swedish
research initiative. More knowledge is needed to understand and explain.
Let us engage more
Stephen Pomp asserts that it is possible to use commercially available
isotopes to make an ash sample that gives the same values as measured in
the report. Setting aside the issues of how Rossi would switch samples and
his motivation for doing so, we should ask if Pomp is exaggerating the
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
There are so many transmutation threads going on that I'm not sure if this
was posted :
Rodney Nicholson
October 8th, 2014 at 5:05 PM
2) It seems that in the ITP test the content of 58Ni was reduced almost to
zero
A statement about the report in Swedish and English on the Elforsk website:
http://www.elforsk.se/LENR-Matrapport-publicerad/
Harry
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
THIS is the kind of response I was hoping to see!
Elforsk takes now the initiative
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium
Isotopes
Naturally occurring lithium is composed of two stable isotopes, 6Li and
7Li, the latter being the more abundant (92.5% natural
abundance).[3][13][23] Both natural isotopes have anomalously low nuclear
binding energy per nucleon compared to the next
Maybe it can all be done with shrunken lithium...
...Lithino
harry
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
My guess as to how it works:- Hydrinohydride is a small heavy negative
particle with a mass about
engine (Seebeck device).*
We can further discuss if found interesting enough.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:25 AM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The Paradigm Energy website is now empty (although you can still download
the papers at the links given on the MFMP page). In the comments
http://matslew.wordpress.com/2014/10/09/interview-on-radio-show-free-energy-quest-tonight/#comment-3469
I don’t have details minute by minute, but I was told one member of the
team together with Rossi and a technician opened the reactor in a closed
room. A diamond saw had to be used to cut some
New scientific report on the E-Cat shows excess heat and nuclear process
http://matslew.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/new-scientific-report-on-the-e-cat-shows-excess-heat-and-nuclear-process/
Harry
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Unfortunately there are some nuclear proliferation issues involved.
In what way
?
Harry
Jed, don't you think it is strange that the isotopic composition of the ash
closely resembles what is commercially available.
Also the ash is free of other elements that were present before the run.
That would make sense if the ash came from a commercial source
which didn't contain these elements.
It is strange if the ash contents really do resemble what is available
commercially.
I read one suggestion on facebook, that the reactor could contian special
compartments like a magician's trick box . One thing goes in and a
different thing comes out depending on how the box is manipulated.
101 - 200 of 599 matches
Mail list logo
