RE: [Vo]:Notes on Rossi device

Jed: You forgot to mention Rossi's quote about seeing 100keV to 300keV particles... I think that's a reasonably important piece of data! I've posted it twice; not going to do it again just look for postings in the last 3 to 7 days with 300 keV at the end of the subject line. -Mark

RE: [Vo]:About isotopic ratio on spent fuel (E-Cat)

Perhaps the 'secret' catalyst is the Nickel and its catalyzing the fusion of H into He... -Mark _ From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 2:11 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:About isotopic ratio on spent fuel (E-Cat) Thank you for your i

RE: [Vo]:About isotopic ratio on spent fuel (E-Cat)

Could the protons be fusing into Helium (perhaps providing some of the heat), and then the Helium burning? -Mark _ From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 1:45 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:About isotopic ratio on spent fuel (E-Cat)

RE: [Vo]: DNA can detect spin states...

broken, so is there an actual url for this? (Preferably newsreporting article) On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Mark Iverson wrote: FYI: "Professor Ron Naaman from the Weizmann Institute in Israel and scientists in Germany discovered that biological molecules in DNA can detect spi

RE: [Vo]:Rossi comments on Cu isotope ratios; 100-300keV seen.

ratios; 100-300keV seen. On Apr 12, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Mark Iverson wrote: > I don't think this was mentioned yet... > Apparently they have seen energetic particles of 100-300keV. > The following excerpt from one of the Ny Teknik Q&A sessions with > Rossi... > > Rossi: N

[Vo]: DNA can detect spin states...

FYI: "Professor Ron Naaman from the Weizmann Institute in Israel and scientists in Germany discovered that biological molecules in DNA can detect spin states in atoms. The researchers fabricated self-assembling, single layers of DNA attached to a gold substrate. The DNA was exposed to electron

RE: [Vo]:What Rossi Says list... add "emissions seen in the 100keV-300keV range"

Jed: Add that he has seen energetic particle emissions in the 100keV to 300keV range... I put this in a posting a few days ago and no one even noticed! This from a Ny Teknik Q&A session with Rossi... Rossi: No radioactivity has been found in the residual metals, it is true, but the day after t

RE: [Vo]:Rossi comments on Cu isotope ratios; 100-300keV seen.

I don't think this was mentioned yet... Apparently they have seen energetic particles of 100-300keV. The following excerpt from one of the Ny Teknik Q&A sessions with Rossi... "Peter Ekström: In the fusion of a proton with Ni-58 a substantial activity of Cu-59 is formed. Cu-59 decays with a half-

RE: Fwd: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread

Some only want to see the worst in people... we're all a product of what we've gone thru in out lives. Unfortunately, its not all rosy... -Mark _ From: noone noone [mailto:thesteornpa...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 7:43 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: Fwd: [Vo]:Ros

[Vo]:articles of interest...

>From PhysOrg.com. The first having to do with catalysts... "...researchers with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)'s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) have created bilayered nanocrystals of a metal-metal oxide that are the first to feature multiple catalytic sites on nanoc

RE: [Vo]: Swedish physicists on the E-cat: "It's a nuclear reaction"

-Original Message- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 4:52 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Swedish physicists on the E-cat: "It's a nuclear reaction" On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Mark Iverson wrote: > As Jed poin

Re:[Vo]: Swedish physicists on the E-cat: "It's a nuclear reaction"

As Jed pointed out... The test in Feb put out 130KW (129KW is my recollection) for a short period, so if we look at it as a ratio of heat out over volume of reactor chamber, we have: Feb test: 130K/1000 = 130 Mar test:4K/50 = 80 >From this, one might try to conclude that the scaled down

[Vo]:Current understanding of Boron/Hydrogen reaction found to be wrong...

http://research.duke.edu/sites/default/files/tri-alpha-paper.pdf Instead of one hi-Energy alpha and two low-Energy alphas, they found just the opposite, two hi-E and one Lo-E alpha... Geez, seems like we're learning all kinds of things that mainstream science has wrong... This likely ma

[Vo]:Superdense deuterium...

FWIW, a friend who is a Ph.D. physicist had this to say about possible mechanisms... see below. -Mark Look into Prof. Leif Holmlid from the University of Gothenburg... He claims that he produced 'superdense' deuterium and when he shoots a green laser pulse on it (which causes 'Coulomb explosion

RE: [Vo]:Fukushima 5 & 6 "Safe"

The best place for the generators would be on top of the containment buildings... After all, if the water got that high, you wouldn't need any backup generators to pump cooling water! :-) -Mark -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 20,

[Vo]:Recall: Table showing status of reactors...

Mark Iverson would like to recall the message, "Table showing status of reactors...". <>

[Vo]:Table showing status of reactors...

Here's a table (spreadsheet) of the different reactors and the status of various parts of the systems as of 12:30, March 14... http://www.jaif.or.jp/english/news/2011/110314fukushima_event-status-1.pdf http://brav

RE: [Vo]:Latest Rossi news at PESN

No way... going for ANY govt regulatory body approval first is clearly a Lose, Lose proposition They will have to test it first to make any determination, and assess just what kind of certifications are needed, and by the time they get around to even starting the process, you'll be out of

RE: [Vo]:How to fake a large-scale demonstration

Dennis wrote: "Again I am not he, but I would opt for several small units to prove reproducibility," It should be obvious by now, and Rossi has stated it many times... his opinion on how to convince anyone, be they political or scientific or the press, is to build and install a decent size pla

RE: [Vo]:Rossi's Nickel

But hasn't Rossi said repeatedly that his reactor only uses about a gram of Ni??? Although, I don't remember a timeframe for that figure.. Was it for an hour, a day or 6 months? -Mark -Original Message- From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 3:26

[Vo]:Interesting article: exchange of single quanum between two ions... its all about resonance.

Very interesting article (some specific text below). It seems to be indicating: 1) atoms as a whole vibrate, but that is only because they are out of balance internally 2) whatever an 'atom' is, INTERNALLY it has very regular/periodic oscillations going on 3) when a quantum or quanta of heat (or

RE: [Vo]:friendly exchange of ideas

Not interesting yet... I'll bet he's watching it very closely, though, and will likely mention something when he's had more time to ask the same questions as we have here of course, even though he might ask himself the same questions, doesn't mean his rational mind will overcome his patholo

RE: [Vo]:Non-Standard Reactions

Because of the multiple uses of words like nuclear and fission and fusion, the message was FWDed to the Department of Homeland Security... Jones, warm up the tea and crumpets... you'll be having some expected, but uninvited, visitors soon... :-) -Mark _ From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hh

RE: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

Charles wrote: "Isn't it more likely that the skeptics simply think the field is a joke, rather than that they're intimidated by the weight of the positive evidence?" Yes, given the ridicule that CF has received over the years, that is certainly a good possibility... We're very complex beings an

RE: [Vo]:Is there a "SONO" connection to the Rossi Demo?

niele Passerini who writes the reports and with Giuseppe Levi. If something interesting happens, i can ask them, but only answerable questions. By the way the great problem now is to understand how 0.4 grams of hydrogen can n generate 270 KWh energy. Amazing. Peter On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at

RE: [Vo]:What will convince Joshua Cude?

Abd: You've been most patient, and Jed too, in trying to bring JC up to speed on the facts, don't waste your time... Of course, one could predict how he was going to respond, with the following statement: "You know, if you spent less time trying to analyze my motives, and describe my style, and

RE: [Vo]:Is there a "SONO" connection to the Rossi Demo?

Jones: I remember someone here saying that someone at the Jan 14 demo said they could hear the sound of rushing air inside the hose, and that it was routed thru the door and into the sink in another room nearby... that narrows it down, since only a few people on vortex are in contact with someon

RE: [Vo]:OT: Collective bargaining

ct: Re: [Vo]:OT: Collective bargaining On Feb 23, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Mark Iverson wrote: > In Nevada, collective bargaining and behind doors negotiating has > resulted in Fire Marshalls making a quarter of a million dollars a > year in total compensation! That is absolutely ridiculous

RE: [Vo]:OT: Collective bargaining

In Nevada, collective bargaining and behind doors negotiating has resulted in Fire Marshalls making a quarter of a million dollars a year in total compensation! That is absolutely ridiculous... I would only be in favor of it if its done in the open.. These are public employees, and the taxpayers

RE: [Vo]:Abd being censured?

I think I've been rcving all the postings... I've got duplicates of the last two of Horaces' where he reposted because he didn't see the original... -Mark -Original Message- From: William Beaty [mailto:bi...@eskimo.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 9:58 AM To: Vortex-L Subject: Re:

RE: [Vo]:Revised version Celani reports on gamma emission from Rossi device

Joshua: A few clarifications from you would be helpful... Jed wrote: >>You do have to trust Levi, Celani and Dufour and some other people. To which Joshua stated: > Why? They were hand-picked by Rossi. Where is your evidence that the scientists that were there to instrument the demo were

RE: [Vo]:flies in Ockham's face

Horace: Yes, I've noticed the postings out of order... For now we just deal with it. Thanks for the analysis, and I'll have to read it fully later, but I'd like to say two things at this time: 1) If what you mean by "resonant tunneling" is, "Resonant tunneling refers to tunneling in which the e

[Vo]: flies in Ockham's face... was, Krivit praises Miles while dismissing his results

Is it flies in Ockie's face, or just one big-ass, never-before-seen, new-species type of fly! :-) see below... Jones wrote: "He finds numerous channels for fusion, and by implication, there are numerous possible nuclear reactions other than fusion, all at the same time. All in the same exper

RE: [Vo]:Imagine a teakettle

Although this discussion thread is really a moot point after it was pointed out that there are 5 PLCs which are controlling the power to the resistive heaters, there's one thing I'd like to point out... Stephen said: "Jed, it's a container, with all the walls at several hundred degrees C or hi

RE: [Vo]:Levi's interpretation of the two Rossi demos does not hold water

This whole thread started by the critique by Joshua Cude posted by Rich Murray... It would appear that Joshua (and Rich) have not read all of the comments and reports on Rossi's website, so they were UNinformed as to the purpose of the 'control box'. Rich, would you please correct Joshua on th

RE: [Vo]:Levi's interpretation of the two Rossi demos does not hold water

Been following this discussion carefuly, since I can understand the point being made... Stephen asked, "And if the reactor is putting out an extra 500 watts over and above the amount to exactly vaporize the water, exactly *where* do you think that extra 500 watts is going?" The answer, which s

RE: [Vo]:Robert E. Godes claims theory and device for .1 MHz AC to drive H2O electrolysis next to Ni or Pd [ wires?], so protons become 4 neutron particles and then He with heat, no local lattice dama

heory and device for .1 MHz AC to drive H2O electrolysis next to Ni or Pd [ wires?], so protons become 4 neutron particles and then He with heat, no local lattice damage, no radiation, no radioactives, 200 C, 129 atm On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Mark Iverson wrote: > Or, the Rossi demo

RE: [Vo]:Robert E. Godes claims theory and device for .1 MHz AC to drive H2O electrolysis next to Ni or Pd [ wires?], so protons become 4 neutron particles and then He with heat, no local lattice da

Jones: I just read the following from the linked pdf, and I think it ties in nicely with your comments about using a beta emitter... "When working with protium, an explicit source of electrons must be supplied as the reaction starts with four protons and no neutron but ends with two of each res

RE: [Vo]:A few comments by Celani about the demonstration

Abd: You really need to be more careful with your choice of words... "There is a staged demonstration, under the control of Rossi, with experimental details concealed..." No, there were at least two tests done with the same seasoned university scientists present. No, it was not a 'staged' de

RE: [Vo]:A few comments by Celani about the demonstration

Abd... I think you haven't been following this as closely as the active contributors... Perhaps your time is limited and you have not been able to read all the postings... "What did Rossi hope to accomplish by the demonstration? My suspicion is, he got exactly what he wanted. Lots of publicity,

RE: [Vo]:group seeks to discredit Rossi

Abd: You stated: "Right now, the Rossi device is a Black Box, with two apparent inputs: electrical power, as a supposedly measured level, and water," Did you forget the hydrogen? At least I would consider it an input since it is not entirely contained within the reactor. I.e., there is an exte

RE: [Vo]:Magnetic field triggering... The other Good-Year moment!

When you can melt down 365 used condoms and make it into a tire... now that's a "Good Year" ! That's an old one from high school days. -Mark _ From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 3:44 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Magnetic field t

RE: [Vo]:ICCF16 Rossi section

No, Steven, it wasn't a 'dumb comment'... Jed is more like an extrovert and what first comes to his mind comes out his mouth... Then he thinks about it! :-) It is certainly appropriate that *someone* report on the Rossi-Focardi demo at ICCF-16, but who? Are there any researchers at ICCF-16 who w

RE: [Vo]:ICCF16 Rossi section

Even if Melich is not speaking for Rossi, he has a lot to gain from 'reporting' on the demo... Perceptions in the business world are critical, and the person who can create/foster the perception that they are the 'goto' person, the person 'in-the-know', will inevitably gain from it... They wil

RE: [Vo]:http://leonardocorp.com/ does not exist

It's not just the hoards of reporters and gawkers, they're just annoying... There are numerous entities whose power is severely threatened by this type of technology; they have much to lose, and would probably go to great lengths to either buy it, squash it, or at least delay it's introduction

RE: [Vo]:http://leonardocorp.com/ does not exist

=-yPpTyGN1_Q Gee, Horace, how's work up there in "Alaska"... ;-) ;-) How's the weather on the 'west' coast? ;-) ;-) Horace wrote: >>"On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:42 PM, Mark Iverson wrote: >> If I were him, I wouldn't let anyone know where the units are

RE: [Vo]:http://leonardocorp.com/ does not exist

hard not to... -Mark -Original Message- From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 11:46 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:http://leonardocorp.com/ does not exist On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:42 PM, Mark Iverson wrote: > 1) He does

RE: [Vo]:http://leonardocorp.com/ does not exist

Jed wrote: "If you want people to believe your claims you should provide the kind of information any normal business would provide, such as the address. When you give out only an "info@" address it gives people the impression you are fake." All these kinds of comments are useless and irrelevent

RE: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists... RE: the JS Brown paper.

-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists... Damn! What a coincidence. I was just reading the Brown article. I think he’s got it almost cracked - Dipole attraction exactly cancels monopole repulsion at very short H-H distances. A must-read ! J

RE: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...

got hold of it. From: Jones Beene Damn! What a coincidence. I was just reading the Brown article. I think he's got it almost cracked - Dipole attraction exactly cancels monopole repulsion at very short H-H distances. A must-read ! Jones From: Mark Iv

[Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...

There are now over 320 comments on http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com... Two caught my attention, the second one for all you theorists with a link to arXiv doc! -Mark -- Comment 1 by Rossi - By the way, we are manufacturing o

RE: [Vo]: new double-slit experiments reveal modified electron behavior

You're most welcome... -Mark -Original Message- From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:22 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: new double-slit experiments reveal modified electron behavior On Jan 26, 2011, at 7:58 AM,

RE: [Vo]: OMG! Horace is working for Rossi!

e Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:38 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: OMG! Horace is working for Rossi! On Jan 26, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Mark Iverson wrote: > It just hit me... Horace is working for Rossi!!! > Here are the facts: >

[Vo]: OMG! Horace is working for Rossi!

It just hit me... Horace is working for Rossi!!! Here are the facts: - Horace has published a few papers on Rossi's 'journal' (website). - About 10 months ago, Horace says he's gonna be very 'busy' during spring and summer and won't have much time to chime in on vortex-l... - Horace was so 'b

[Vo]: new double-slit experiments reveal modified electron behavior

I don't think anyone mentioned this article, and since its fundamental to QM, as well as to much of the hypothesizing going on around here, I think its worthwhile to take time to read it: Which-way detector unlocks some mystery of the double-slit experiment http://www.physorg.com/news/2011

RE: [Vo]:A New Slant on Hydrogen Fusion via Efimov and a Deflated electron

Hi Jones, Can certainly understand trying to develop alternative hypotheses based on what "nature prefers to do", however, if I understand correctly, you are choosing a reaction process that is occuring in the sun? Many involved with LENR have argued with the skeptics that the "usual fusion p

RE: [Vo]: Where have all the neutrons gone...

Robin: I was quoting from the "comment" section of the Knol page on CF... -Mark -Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 1:00 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Where have all the neutrons gone... In reply to M

RE: [Vo]:EETIMES publishes report

m Subject: Re: [Vo]:EETIMES publishes report It is disconcerting that I have not seen the post from Jones Beene which has been quoted by Mark Iverson below. Something is gumming up the works! And what's with "Symantec" deleting messages? The audit trail on this subject s

[Vo]: Where have all the neutrons gone...

Now sing along with me... from that ol' folk song... "Where have all the neutrons gone..." ...perhaps into heavy fermions? ;-) This from the comment section of the Knol page on CF... Consider "heavy fermion" superconductors The August 2009 issue of Scientific American, pg 66 at left margin,

RE: [Vo]: Thinking out of the box... Was: Radiation issues with Ni+p->Cu->Ni

Thanks for the lead, Robin... Have you got a link to it? I probably already downloaded it... Just haven't been able to read it yet! -Mark -Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com] Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 8:38 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re:

RE: [Vo]:Your suspicion is not proof there is a problem

The scientists who agreed to participate in the public demo, most certainly REQUIRED the private demo before they were willing to risk their necks for anyone... So, the december test was more to reduce the risk for them, not Rossi. -Mark -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:h

[Vo]: Thinking out of the box... Was: Radiation issues with Ni+p->Cu->Ni

Jones wrote: "Why the hell does everyone keep trying to shoehorn these reactions into KNOWN reactions?" Exactly! Because they can't think out of the box! They are "parroting" the 'laws of physics' which is what they learned, but they fail to ask themselves "Are the conditions in which the exp

RE: [Vo]:EETIMES publishes report

Hi Jones, Horace, We have a Z-pinch device housed here at the Nevada Terawatt Facility, a part of the University's physics dept... it took three railroad flatcars to get it here from Sandia or Los Alamos. A close friend, an electrical engineer, was a part of the technical team at this facilit

[Vo]: Thernal Regards!

I think this is funny... this is Rossi's response to Jed's Q re: 1MW reactor being heat or electrical energy... Dear Mr Jed Rothwell: Thermal. Warm regards, A.R. Why not kill 2 birds with one stone and just say... "Thermal Regards" :-) -Mark <>

[Vo]: anomalous energy in cold-cathode lasers???

An interesting tidbit from Rossi's comment section, by former CTO of Aerospace company... A. D. Klein January 23rd, 2011 at 2:52 PM I have not seen the data BUT if the #s presented are true and reproducible, the physics is clear; hugh energy densities at microscopic (n

[Vo]: Volume of reactor is 1 liter

>From Rossi's website comments, we now know the volume of the reactor... 1 >liter. Much smaller than Jed's earlier estimate. Andrea Rossi January 23rd, 2011 at 10:49 AM Dear Mr Giorgio Roncolato: The volume of the reactor is 1 liter. If you read carefully the report you find all yuo are aski

RE: [Vo]:HP474AC probe measures Relative Humidity, not steam quality

In order to make any accurate assessment of the dryness of the steam, wouldn't one have to measure it as close to the reactor as possible? Could there be some condensation on the inside walls of the tube and the steam picking up liquid water from that? Do we know how far from the reactor they

[Vo]: The tides have changed... The genie is out of the bottle.

I've spent some time reading comments on other sites reporting about the Rossi-Focardi demo, and I must say that there might be 1 or 2 negative comments for every 20 to 40 positive ones (and I'm not counting people who frequent this site)... And those few are just plain ignorant of the data. T

[Vo]: Primary Examiner for USPTO asking Rossi questions!!!

Reading thru the comments page on Rossi's website we find this posting: Bernard E Souw, Ph.D. January 22nd, 2011 at 8:09 AM Dear Dr. Rossi, Is your novel invention somehow related to Dr. Randell Mills (Blacklight Power, Inc.) hydrogen reactor based on hydrino reaction?

RE: [Vo]:Monday Update to Release Information on Self Sustain Mode

Jones wrote: "Why, you ask? In two words - "chain reaction". This ability to self-sustain is a very clear indication of at least a limited chain reaction. I will define the "limited" part in another post." It may be a chain reaction, but most likely NOT the kind that escalates as fast as in a

RE: [Vo]:Rossi addresses RH probe issue

In Jed's posting of comments between Josephson and Rossi, Rossi says of the dry steam test, "I was terrorized of that test, because should something go wrong I would have been killed, but I accepted the test because I had total and full trust in the Scientists." He doesn't mean he would have bee

RE: [Vo]:Krivit relents

Stephen wrote: "In the latter case, one can assume there will be delays and unexpected problems with continuing to create the effect on demand a few months down the road..." I think that is what happened with his grant with the DOD... perhap's Jones might know more about this, but I started read

RE: [Vo]:Deuterium kills the reaction?

Yes, I think Jones has a point... We know that at least some of the input power is used to feed a (resistive) heating element when starting up the reactor... i.e., you have to 'preheat the oven before baking the cookies'! :-) This initial power level is ~1000W - 1200W. After the reaction start

RE: [Vo]:Deuterium kills the reaction?

Jones: Did you have the right units on that RF frequency... 1420 Mhz is 1.420 Ghz, correct? -Mark -Original Message- From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 7:56 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Deuterium kills the reaction? -Or

[Vo]: vortex server seems a bit lethargic!

Horace: I've noticed that the vortex server is taking longer than usual.. sometimes up to 30 to 40 minutes to get a posting thru and out to the subscribers... Hope its not getting what the birds have! -Mark -Original Message- From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net] Sent:

RE: [Vo]: the real brains behind Rossi...

Are you implying that this was (partly) Maddy's idea, by that comparison :-) http://www.teslasociety.com/Mileva.htm . I think it more likely the (25 million Euro) bill for toxic dumping may have had a little something to do with it too, bankruptcy laws being what they are in some

[Vo]: Russian experiments from 1974 and other musings...

This from Rossi's website comment section... But no one in Russia has been able to find the right combination to exploit/enhance the energy production in almost 40 years... I guess that's where Rossi-Focardi come in... or did it just happen by chance? Given that there are 6e9 people on the plan

[Vo]: the real brains behind Rossi...

This from the italian article sent to Jed by Pierre (earlier posting): "The prototype, already covered by patents owned by Maddalena Pascucci, wife of Ross[i]..." Article in La Republicca Bologna : http://bit.ly/gm9mlQ (translation is not perfect !) That must be a translation error... but i

RE: [Vo]:Krivit relents

The Q and A between Krivit and Rossi (on the NET link that Jones refers to below) has Rossi giving many additional tidbits... One is that books by Greiner and Cooks were important to his success... This is what Rossi has to say about it: "the more important books (for me, Greiner and Cooks) do n

RE: [Vo]: how to stop runaway condition... I must be missing something!

runaway condition... I must be missing something! on Wednesday, January 19 Mark Iverson said [snip]" If that won't reverse the runaway condition fast enough, inject a contaminating gas... Perhaps, of all things, steam?" [/snip] Hi Mark, I agree a reaction quashing gas is a go

RE: [Vo]: OT: Can a proud uncle crow about his nephew's first peer-reviewed paper!

ew's first peer-reviewed paper! Congrats, Google says he is somebody! A very interesting subject. He collaborstes witha Romanian lady; where? Peter On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Mark Iverson wrote: Molecular Investigations into the Mechanics of Actin in Different Nucleotide St

[Vo]: OT: Can a proud uncle crow about his nephew's first peer-reviewed paper!

Molecular Investigations into the Mechanics of Actin in Different Nucleotide States Ji Y. Lee, Tyler M. Iverson, and Ruxandra I. Dima* J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 186-195 Wish he didn't live so far away... Sniff! -Mark Iverson

RE: [Vo]:Thousands of Birds and Fish Dropping Dead

Welcome back to the fray, Horace! Its been about 9 months since your last postings... Glad you didn't decide to join Richard for a drink yet... Wow, your extensive compilation is overwhelming! Are all of those incidents within the last few weeks? A few days ago I read an article that stated i

[Vo]: how to stop runaway condition... I must be missing something!

I am finally caught up with reading all the postings, and I fully expected someone to have pointed out the obvious way to stop a runaway condition... Shut off the hydrogen!! Has it not been said NUMEROUS times that the thing stops very quickly after the hydrogen supply is shut off?? I MUST be

[Vo]: More accurate van der Waals measurement...

Research at Univ of Arizona... They've come up with a way to more accurately measure van der Waals forces... specifically the force between an atom and a surface, which may have some bearing on LENR. Here is the interesting bit... "The most significant discovery was that an atom's inner electron

RE: [Vo]:Nagel: Check List for LENR Validation Experiments

I not sure about whether clotting was a problem, but hemolysis (breaking apart the red blood cells) is. Pumping blood requires very gentle movements in order to avoid damaging the cells. Just modestly squeezing your finger can burst blood cells. When a diabetic is taking a blood sample and sq

RE: [Vo]:The dawn of a new era?

t: Re: [Vo]:The dawn of a new era? Mark Iverson wrote: Apparently, a reporter from the NY Times was there... Really? Where did you hear that? - Jed

RE: [Vo]:The dawn of a new era?

Apparently, a reporter from the NY Times was there... -Mark _ From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 2:36 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:The dawn of a new era? Ah, the first mass media notice, from a radio station. - Jed

RE: [Vo]:Input power must be far lower than ~10 kW

year ago today. Terry Blanton had it spot on. == from Vortex 16 Jan 2010 === On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Mark Iverson wrote: > If you armchair skeptics spent as much time reading the Steorn forum or > Overunity.com, Terry Blanton : "I read an

RE: [Vo]:The Wicked Problem

In Rossi's most recent post he says, " ... the inventor, in this case me, has to disclose to the Public all the clues of the technology. Of course, such clues remain confidential until the Patent is granted." This may indicate that he's only holding back until they have resolved all other issue

RE: [Vo]:Input power must be far lower than ~10 kW

Swartz, its pretty clear whose 'ranting' here... Shoo... you're wasting bandwidth. -Mark _ From: Mitchell Swartz [mailto:m...@theworld.com] Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:15 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Input power must be far lower than ~10 kW Rothwell: "I am so

RE: [Vo]:Will report on Rossi soon

Jed wrote: "I think the likelihood of fraud is vanishingly small. There is no way you could fool the professors involved in this, and I am sure they are not all engaged in a conspiracy to fool the rest of us." I think all those involved in any way with this demo are keenly aware of the consequ

[Vo]: Corp world is watching closely...

I've just been reading thru the comments on the Rossi/Focardi website... Seems this is being watched by the corporate world... Dr.Kathrine Martinez-Martignoni January 14th, 2011 at 11:24 AM GOOD LUCK !!! I WILL OBSERVE YOU DIRECTLY FROM ZÜRICH (SWITZERLAND). SINCERELY, DR.KATH

RE: [Vo]:A word of caution on Rossi

Jones wrote: "Who says that rational science is immune from the "soap opera effect" of petty jealousy and multiple layers of intrigue and 'white lie' dishonesty?" It most definitely is NOT, especially when big $ are at stake... -Mark _ From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]

RE: [Vo]:A word of caution on Rossi

Might I provide some different points of view from real-world (i.e., personal) experiences... Sometimes decisions are not so clear-cut... I've come to a conclusion in my life that those who live by absolutes probably live in a box, or have not been involved in a sufficient number of situations

RE: [Vo]:Focardi And Rossi Energy Amplifier: Reality or Scam? 2011.01.14 Steven B. Krivit: Rich Murray 2011.01.14

What I wouldn't give to see Garwin's face when he sees this... But then, he probably wouldn't believe it even if you spilled the boiling water on his lap! -Mark -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 7:57 PM To: vortex-l@eskim

RE: [Vo]:Focardi And Rossi Energy Amplifier: Reality or Scam? 2011.01.14 Steven B. Krivit: Rich Murray 2011.01.14

What I wouldn't give to see Garwin's face when he sees this... But then, he probably wouldn't believe it even if you spilled the boiling water on his lap! -Mark -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 7:57 PM To: vortex-l@eskim

RE: [Vo]: new insights about water's adsorption to platinum

Sorry, forgot the link: http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-10-interaction-platinum-requires-closer.html -Mark -Original Message- From: Mark Iverson [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 11:07 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]: new insights about water&#

[Vo]: new insights about water's adsorption to platinum

FYI: Could there also be similar revelations to discover about water and palladium, or hydrogen and palladium, that would help to explain LENR? Quote from the article is below: "Basic assumptions about water's adsorption to platinum do not hold true, Sandia researchers have found. They found t

RE: [Vo]:Some personal thoughts on the recent "Guide to the Cosmos" Krivit interview

Thanks Steven, I think your level-headed analysis and comments are timely and on-point. The only thing I'd like to add to this topic is that any reporter, and certainly Steve as an investgative reporter, has more info that is "off-the-record" that he can't report on directly, but that is part

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >