Nick Palmer wrote:
http://www.neweconomics.org/gen/
This organisation actually works on new economic models that include the
environmental and social costs of economies onto the bottom line of
the balance sheet. That is all one has to do to solve so many seemingly
intractable problems. A
Nick Palmer wrote:
Horace said I think we ought to see this email.
OK, here is the email in its entirety at the bottom with just a few
asterisks to protect the niceties. It's not that shocking. Remember
who set the tone first with their green crowd and bigmouth cracks.
FWIW I agree
http://www.neweconomics.org/gen/
This organisation actually works on new economic models that include the
environmental and social costs of economies onto the bottom line of the
balance sheet. That is all one has to do to solve so many seemingly
intractable problems. A business/country that
Gorbals Phil wrote:- I think that means your worm is dead., not drunk.
LOL!
Pax?
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
On Nov 19, 2007 9:08 AM, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stick with cactus juice... it's the bottle with the little dead worm
floating .
My worm is at the bottom of the bottle. Is that a problem?
Terry
Richard Macaulay wrote:
Most everyone in Vortex excepting the really dense understand that the
Dime Box Saloon does not
allow English gentlemen inside unless accompanied by a Scots. So make
friends with Philip of Glasgow.
I'm married to a Scot Richard! So, if it's all right with you,I won't
LOL
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 11:27:41 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
Nick Palmer wrote..
This topic was started off by Richard Dime box Macaulay looking
Nick Palmer poster excerpt..
The panel, which was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize last month, said the
world would have to reverse the growth of greenhouse gas emissions by 2015
to prevent serious climate disruptions.
Howdy Nick,
Some suspect this panel has a few loose hinges.
Your concern for
loud laughter
Richard, I think you could easily vie with Yogi Berra for quotable quotes...
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 9:08:12 AM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
Nick Palmer poster excerpt
On Nov 19, 2007 9:08 AM, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stick with cactus juice... it's the bottle with the little dead worm
floating .
My worm is at the bottom of the bottle. Is that a problem?
Terry
I think that means your worm is dead., not drunk.
P.
- Original Message
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 7:00:16 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
On Nov 19, 2007 9:08 AM, R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stick
Nick Palmer posted..
and going even further back yet, before the energy greedy consumer society
was even defined... even before Silent Spring was published
Many of the scientists involved with this marathon effort (the IPCC - NP)
have spent more than half their lives trying to clarify what
has his own problems to contend with without our adding to them.
And I'm not easily bullied.
P.
- Original Message
From: Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 2:44:39 AM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
On Nov 17, 2007, at 3:29 PM
Horace said I think we ought to see this email.
OK, here is the email in its entirety at the bottom with just a few
asterisks to protect the niceties. It's not that shocking. Remember who
set the tone first with their green crowd and bigmouth cracks. I am sick
to death of self
And this was Philip Winestone's original reply to me (asterisks replace
letters in words which are extremely common currency in Glasgow...)
I don't know what the f**k you are talking about; not a word... And I can
swear better than you because I'm from Glasgow. Assuming you can read
Jack Smith wrote:
Also, push now for commuter rail so we have some way to
get around when the Straits of Hormuz are blocked and
every pipeline in the Middle East is blown up...
Hoyt Stearns wrote:
Push now for PRT (Personal Rapid Transit):
BlankHowdy Vorts,
Watching the world financials try to function can give one pause. There is a
problem.
The world has been operating on model based on a quasi-Keynesian theory of
economics since FDR's New Deal of the 1930's. That model served until JFK paid
his debt to big labor and LBJ used
Are you having as good a weekend as I think you are Richard?
P.
- Original Message
From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 8:35:29 AM
Subject: [VO]: Economic models
Blank
BODY {
MARGIN-TOP:25px;FONT-SIZE:10pt;MARGIN-LEFT:25px
Eric Beinhocker examines a new model for economics in THE ORIGIN OF WEALTH:
The Radical Remaking of Economics and What It Means for Business and
Society. Pretty provocative and it may answer Richard's criterion.
Good weekend, all.
image001.gif
Well, I ordered the book based on the less than enthusiastic (first)
review on the Amazon site. The economic ideas seems rather logical, but
perhaps too idealist and remote for use in actual decision making, as
opposed to practical solutions to present problems.
Speaking of practicality - has
From: Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 10:23:04 AM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
Well, I ordered the book based on the less than enthusiastic (first)
review on the Amazon site. The economic ideas seems rather logical, but
perhaps
@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 12:42:16 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models
PHILIP WINESTONE wrote:
You don't even have to convert coal to methanol... When you consider
how
much energy is used by many manufacturing processes, to name but one
major energy using sector, converting
Jones wrote:
``... Of course the same process can be taken a step further,
to produce methanol on a large scale. Not only are the
emissions of this syn-gas plant on Florida well below
regulatory limits - it is one of the cleanest coal-based
power plants in the world - since the sulfur content of
their bank balances substantially, but those who (apparently)
do, sure stand out.
P.
- Original Message
From: Taylor J. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 3:51:47 PM
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models -- Kondrateiff peak war
Jones wrote
Philip Winestone ranted
The main problem, as I believe we all know, is that the green crowd don't
want us burning ANYTHING, so the proposal to dig up coal and use if for
ANYTHING will be met with fierce resistance, mostly by bigmouths.
See the very latest report from the IPCC released a day
-Original Message-
From: R.C.Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 5:14 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [VO]: Economic models -- Kondrateiff peak war
Jack Smith wrote..
Also, push now
for commuter rail so we have so way to get around when
On Nov 17, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Nick Palmer wrote:
Philip Winestone ranted
The main problem, as I believe we all know, is that the green
crowd don't want us burning ANYTHING, so the proposal to dig up
coal and use if for ANYTHING will be met with fierce resistance,
mostly by bigmouths.
27 matches
Mail list logo
