Very good logical analysis, Bob. I agree phonons can not release
nuclear energy for this reason as well as for several others. Theories
based on phonon emission would appear to be in conflict with observed
behavior.
Ed
On Aug 20, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Bob Higgins wrote:
In the case of craters
and as yet still to be determined
other criteria.
Fran
From: Arnaud Kodeck [mailto:arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 5:06 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment
How a heat shock can prod
How a heat shock can produce plasma?
_
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: mardi 20 août 2013 20:49
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment
Rossi uses heat shock to produce plasma.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Arnaud
In the case of craters and mini-explosions, regardless of the true nature
of a nano-NAE, it is interesting to consider the implications of explosion
to the nature of the excited nucleus energy release. If the energy were
released by phonons, the temperature would be highest near the NAE and
would
suppose that a process might originate where elevated temperature
>>>> results in that destruction being enhanced, particularly in the hot
>>>> spots.
>>>> The question is: What keeps the process in balance according to your
>>>> hypothesis?
>>
e hot
>>> spots.
>>> The question is: What keeps the process in balance according to your
>>> hypothesis?
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Axil Axil
>>> To: vort
om: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Aug 20, 2013 10:23 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment
LENR is driven by a specific topology that directs electrons into
the
special motions and concentrations which result in the LENR reaction.
Cracks are a good ex
s.
>>> The question is: What keeps the process in balance according to your
>>> hypothesis?
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Axil Axil
>>> To: vortex-l
>>> Sent: Tue, Aug 20, 2
process in balance according to your
hypothesis?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Aug 20, 2013 10:23 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment
LENR is driven by a specific topology that directs electrons into the
special motions and
ding to your
> hypothesis?
>
> Dave
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Axil Axil
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Tue, Aug 20, 2013 10:23 am
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment
>
> LENR is driven by a specific topology that directs
the process in balance according to your hypothesis?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Aug 20, 2013 10:23 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment
LENR is driven by a specific topologythat directs electrons into the special
LENR is driven by a specific topology that directs electrons into the
special motions and concentrations which result in the LENR reaction.
Cracks are a good example of this topology in that through the
discontinuity of the lattice that a crack provides, dipole motion meets a
boundary conditi
Terry, the problem is psychological, not scientific. Understanding CF
requires a change in perspective, which is hard for many people to do.
You need to look at the system in which the nuclear reaction occurs
from the perspective of the assembly of atoms, i.e. like a chemist
does. The chem
@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:04:06 -0600
On Aug 19, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
Dear Ed,
Thank you for criticizing my paper as I have asked the readers.
I am reading everything you are publishing; then perhaps the
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Sunil Shah wrote:
> Ed,
>
> A long time ago, in Solid State Physics, I read about various types of
> Dislocations in crystals (grains). Are they the NAEs? They move with
> applied/internal stress/pressure.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dislocation
Wikipedia has a
uck [mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 12:37 AM
To: VORTEX
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment
Dear Ed,
I hope my ideas will eventually help you to improve our
theory- this works in case I am really in multiple fatal error.
The future will
: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: about the Nuclear Active Environment
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:04:06 -0600
On Aug 19, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:Dear Ed,
Thank you for criticizing my paper as I have asked the readers.I am reading
everything you are publishing; then perhaps
Dear Ed,
The confusion I think is this- the principle of NAE is simple, the concept
is actually very complex. \
NAE is actually an other name for active sites known from catalysis, only
a very small fragment of matter does the job, all the rest is...inactive
sites.
It is a natural law, and a distr
On Aug 19, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Peter Gluck wrote:
Dear Ed,
I hope my ideas will eventually help you to improve our
theory- this works in case I am really in multiple fatal error.
The future will show, it is nothing personal and i am not angry
because you have told that I am not able to understa
Dear Ed,
I hope my ideas will eventually help you to improve our
theory- this works in case I am really in multiple fatal error.
The future will show, it is nothing personal and i am not angry
because you have told that I am not able to understand your
concept of NAE.
What has made me to worry was
On Aug 19, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
Dear Ed,
Thank you for criticizing my paper as I have asked the readers.
I am reading everything you are publishing; then perhaps the
problem is my limited or absent understanding.
I hope you are perfectly understanding what you write and will
be
Dear Ed,
Thank you for criticizing my paper as I have asked the readers.
I am reading everything you are publishing; then perhaps the
problem is my limited or absent understanding.
I hope you are perfectly understanding what you write and will
be able to show at the target where and what I am tell
Peter, why do you write about subjects that you know nothing about?
You obviously have not read or understood what I propose. You have not
asked questions or discussed this with me. You make statements that
have no relationship to what I have proposed or even to general
knowledge about the
23 matches
Mail list logo
