Mitchell Swartz wrote:
Jed Rothwell continues his high-bandwidth falsehoods.
First, Rothwell got the papers in title before ICCF10, in follow-up by email,
in the listing FROM ICCF10, and thereafter over and over and over.
Yes. As I said, I cut them from the database along with McKubre,
At 10:12 AM 12/6/2004, the ever-disingenuous Rothwell wrote:
Third, there is the following outright bogus Rothwell rant.
Rothwell: 1. Oral presentations do not count. Do these papers exist in
writing?
The proof that Rothwell is utterly disingenuous is that he was personally
handed
each of these
Mitchell Swartz accuses us of censoring him and cutting his papers from
indexes. Anyone who looks in our index will see that we list 28 papers by
him. Obviously his statements are nonsense. We have censored three papers
but we included 28 others by the same author?!? What kind of censorship
This is just another obvious falsehood by Jed Rothwell who tries to
deflect the issue and a falsehood which requires a response.
The actual issue involves the ICCF10 Titles. Nothing else.
The actual issue is:
The censored LENR-CANR database removed the two oral papers
and one demonstration
Mitchell Swartz wrote:
The censored LENR-CANR database removed the two oral papers
and one demonstration paper, pending for the ICCF10 Proceedings.
Furthermore, when this was discussed, others contacted me with the
same complaint.
We include no oral papers in the LENR-CANR database. We only list
Jed Rothwell continues his high-bandwidth falsehoods.
First, Rothwell got the papers in title before ICCF10, in follow-up by email,
in the listing FROM ICCF10, and thereafter over and over and over.
Caught in his lies, he again changes the subject, but cannot tell
the truth.
Second, at least
6 matches
Mail list logo
