Re: MAHG vs BLP reaction

2005-06-30 Thread Mike Carrell
From: Ron Wormus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MAHG vs BLP reaction Mike, Does Mills have any runs done at 0.1 atm (~80Torr)? As I understand them, Mills experiments are all run at substantially lower pressures. Ron Most of the BLP gas phase experiments have been done in the vicinity

Re: MAHG vs BLP reaction

2005-06-30 Thread Christopher Arnold
Chris http://members.aol.com/hypercom59look for the video under the images link.Mike Carrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "Ron Wormus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: MAHG vs BLP reaction Mike, Does Mills have any runs done at 0.1 atm (~80Torr)? As I understand them, Mills experiments are all

Re: MAHG vs BLP reaction

2005-06-29 Thread Mike Carrell
Jones wrote: From: Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MAHG vs BLP reaction Steven, Would anyone care (or dare) to speculate on the similarities and dissimilarities between Nicholas Moller's MAHG device and Randy Mill's BLP catalytic reaction? There is obviously some overlap

Re: MAHG vs BLP reaction

2005-06-29 Thread orionworks
One MAJOR theoretical difference between the MAHG and the BLP process is the need for a CATALIST to extract excess energy. The BLP process is driven by individual atomic hydrogen atoms coming in contact with special CATALYST atoms like helium. According to Mills' CQM theory, the catalyst is

Re: MAHG vs BLP reaction

2005-06-29 Thread Jones Beene
Hi Mike, There is obviously some overlap. In Mills view, hydrogen is consummed, but JLN has now run this long enough to know that no hydrogen is consumed in MAHG. This must mean that the power source is ultimately ZPE and not the hydrino. ***Not so at all.*** Hydrogen is a fuel in BLP

Re: MAHG vs BLP reaction

2005-06-29 Thread Mike Carrell
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 12:31 PM Subject: Re: MAHG vs BLP reaction One MAJOR theoretical difference between the MAHG and the BLP process is the need for a CATALIST to extract excess energy. True, the postulated

Re: MAHG vs BLP reaction

2005-06-29 Thread Ron Wormus
Mike, Does Mills have any runs done at 0.1 atm (~80Torr)? As I understand them, Mills experiments are all run at substantially lower pressures. Ron --On Wednesday, June 29, 2005 8:38 PM -0400 Mike Carrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jones wrote, Hi Mike, There is obviously some

MAHG vs BLP reaction

2005-06-28 Thread orionworks
Would anyone care (or dare) to speculate on the similarities and dissimilarities between Nicholas Moller's MAHG device and Randy Mill's BLP catalytic reaction? I perceive certain similarities between BLP's Balmer line excess heat readings and Moller's extraordinary claims of generated heat.

Re: MAHG vs BLP reaction

2005-06-28 Thread Terry Blanton
From: Jones Beene Exactamundo !! or else that others build on the lessons of the MAHG device and take the hybrid Mills/Mahg to the next level - that could be a microwave augmented thermoacoustic resonator which is self-powering. If Naudin is correct - the potential is there. With