with Rossie’s statement. It is of
course important to obtain accurate measurements of these values to
make consistent sense of the data.
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob
sense of the data.
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner [mailto:hheff...@mtaonline.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
Mark,
I am working on getting better or confirming estimates. I am also
working on multiple other things
Obviously a lot of effort went into this. I am curious, where did the
information about the 1 bar pressure regulator in the outlet come from? How
does that talley with the 124°C temperature that was recorded at 15:58,
given that 124°C implies a pressure (saturated steam) of 2.25bar absoulute
At 01:03 PM 10/13/2011, Robert Lynn wrote:
Obviously a lot of effort went into this. I am
curious, where did the information about the 1
bar pressure regulator in the outlet come
from? How does that talley with the 124°C
temperature that was recorded at 15:58, given
that 124°C implies a
Mr. Higgins did a fantastic diagram of the fat-cat...
-mark
do not think
that is accurate.
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 1:20 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
Mr. Higgins did a fantastic diagram of the fat-cat...
-mark
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
However, I'm not sure if he's got the dimensions of the heat spreaders
correct.
From all the pics of the fat-cat open, the heat spreader fins look to
have a
uniform ~3cm clearance from the 4 walls. In Higgins' drawing, he shows
the
heat
At 01:19 PM 10/13/2011, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Mr. Higgins did a fantastic diagram of the fat-cat...
He offered me a higher-res version, if anyone wants it.
At 01:32 PM 10/13/2011, Higgins Bob-CBH003 wrote:
The drawing I included is only meant to be a diagrammatic/schematic
representation to help understand the quantities being considered.
Welcome to vortex
[mailto:bob.higg...@motorolasolutions.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 1:32 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
The drawing I included is only meant to be a diagrammatic/schematic
representation to help understand the quantities being considered.
Regards, Bob
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Hi Bob,
I think all us Vorts appreciate the time you've put into the analyses and
diagrams...
Yes! Welcome to Vortex, Bob.
I'm curious. At one time it was rumored that Motorola was interested
in the CETI
...@charter.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 4:53 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
Hi Bob,
I think all us Vorts appreciate the time you've put into the analyses
and
diagrams...
I know you say the diagram is only meant to help visualize things, but
from
what I've read
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Hi Bob,
I think all us Vorts appreciate the time you've put into the analyses
and
diagrams...
Yes! Welcome to Vortex, Bob.
I'm curious. At one time it was rumored
At 03:26 PM 10/13/2011, Higgins Bob-CBH003 wrote:
Hi Mark,
I will consider such a drawing. However, the present diagram is not
geometrically correct - the internal unit is rotated in the
cross-section so as to highlight the fins. What is needed is a proper
drawing from the pictures. I just
...@motorolasolutions.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 3:27 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
Hi Mark,
I will consider such a drawing. However, the present diagram is not
geometrically correct - the internal unit is rotated in the
cross-section so as to highlight
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Higgins Bob-CBH003
bob.higg...@motorolasolutions.com wrote:
At this point, I can only say that my involvement is personal. I was
around in those Patterson days and was part of a panel that considered
Motorola's involvement. Unfortunately, I am one of the few
: Thursday, October 13, 2011 7:20 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
At 03:26 PM 10/13/2011, Higgins Bob-CBH003 wrote:
Hi Mark,
I will consider such a drawing. However, the present diagram is not
geometrically correct - the internal unit is rotated in the
cross
A belated welcome to Bob Higgins and all the other newcomers brought
here by the Rossi extravaganza.
On Oct 13, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Hi Bob,
Having some basic dimensioning (height, width, length, etc.) would
have been
helpful for many of the analyses done to
At 05:58 PM 10/13/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
It does not appear there are any fins on the bottom of the reactor
housing.
My confidential observer said that there ARE fins on the bottom.
I pleaded with him to get photos of everything WITH a ruler but
here we are again pixel-peeping!
On Oct 13, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Higgins Bob-CBH003 wrote:
I think the resistor network and finite element approaches discussed
below are a great track for understanding the possible magnitude of
the
Tout error. The big uncertainty is the pipe thread. It may take
experiments to estimate the
On Oct 13, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 05:58 PM 10/13/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
It does not appear there are any fins on the bottom of the reactor
housing.
My confidential observer said that there ARE fins on the bottom.
I pleaded with him to get photos of everything WITH
...@mtaonline.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Analysis by Bob Higgins
Mark,
I am working on getting better or confirming estimates. I am also
working on multiple other things at the moment so please be patient.
[snip]
22 matches
Mail list logo
