I am simply asking
***There is nothing simple about your asking. You led with this
statement: As often as I instruct your, you never learn. This
stubbornness is a problem that will keep you from true understanding.
you how you came to arrive at your opinion.
***I would ask the same of you, but
Once again, you're confused. Just because someone can't explain a
phenomena (like cold fusion branching) doesn't mean the phenomena doesn't
exist.
Rocks fell from the sky for centuries before the explanation was ever
figured out. Please try to come up to speed on the process of science,
I am simply asking you how you came to arrive at your opinion. If such a
request offends you then forget this attempt at further communication.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
Once again, you're confused. Just because someone can't explain a
near the surface yes, maybe not at the surface.
the bulk seems to matter, but maybe only as surprising substrate.
2014-05-10 6:05 GMT+02:00 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com:
LENR always occurs on the surface of the metal. show me experimental
results that contradict this fact.
On Thu, May 8,
Right here, Axil:
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg91559.html
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
LENR always occurs on the surface of the metal. show me experimental
results that contradict this fact.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Jed
I remember this picture of the volcano. It was found and misrepresented in
the Brillouin energy theory document
http://www.academia.edu/4206209/Brillouin_Energy_Corp._THE_QUANTUM_REACTION_HYPOTHESIS
This photo is based on a piece of core from one of Roger Stringham’s
sono-fusion devices.
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
This photo is based on a piece of core from one of Roger Stringham’s
sono-fusion devices.
You are failing for this propaganda that Brillouin energy is using to
support their theory. This is BS.
I have heard from someone
I wrote:
I have heard from someone who has done business with Brillouin in the past
that one should be wary of the claims they make.
I should add that I do not know the person well and cannot vouch for the
accuracy of the claim of having done business with Brillouin, so take this
detail for
You're the one falling for your own bs. You can look at a volcano and call
it an impact crater. And it's not only this set of data that points to an
under-surface phenomenon. Hagelstein in his recent IAP lectures said that
there is not evidence to support the contention that it's a surface
Any references available?
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
You're the one falling for your own bs. You can look at a volcano and
call it an impact crater. And it's not only this set of data that points
to an under-surface phenomenon. Hagelstein
Yes. Perhaps you should come up to speed before going into @$$#0/e mode.
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Any references available?
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote:
You're the one falling for your own bs. You
Rossi's reactor reaches a burn up temperature of 2000C before the refectory
outer shell of the reactor melts down. Please explain how this very high
white hot temperature can be reached if the heat from LENR is
generated from inside the nickel powder.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Kevin
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 8 May 2014 19:50:52 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Thank you for proving my point that the cathode is an engine. ;)
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
You do not calculate the energy density of engines. You calculate the
energy
density of fuels.
(Unless as Jed
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Thu, 8 May 2014 15:54:23 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Rossi's low temperature E-Cat I believe has a fixed H supply and a fixed Ni
supply. They are loaded together in the sealed reactor tube at the
beginning of the heating to start the reaction.
Rossi's Hot Cat reactor
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, helium is not hydrogen, but still, it does indicate there is
trapped gas.
For palladium and deuterium, where we know 4He is produced, 4He is
immobile in bulk palladium, while deuterium will escape over time. The 4He
gets stuck in a way
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
wrote:
Agree it is relevant to power density and less so for energy density
since it is only certain metal lattices that possess this property and the
property is far more dependent of the broken geometries of the
LENR always occurs on the surface of the metal. show me experimental
results that contradict this fact.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
That's for deuterium! No one knows what happens with H!
Well, I
Who's arguing to the contrary? A certain % of Helium can't be trapped in
the surface layer why?
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
LENR always occurs on the surface of the metal. show me experimental
results that contradict this fact.
On Thu, May 8, 2014
Agree it is relevant to power density and less so for energy density since it
is only certain metal lattices that possess this property and the property is
far more dependent of the broken geometries of the lattice..how often and to
what extent defects occur seems more important than the volume
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Thu, 8 May 2014 11:27:09 +:
Hi,
[snip]
I disagree with this portion of your reply [snip] Since the actual source of
energy is likely to be
the Hydrogen in the water, not the actual cathode metal, the volume of the
cathode is pretty much irrelevant
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
You do not calculate the energy density of engines. You calculate the
energy
density of fuels.
(Unless as Jed mentioned, you are stuck with the Hydrogen in the cathode,
and it
is not replaceable - in which case the outlook for CF is far more
restricted.)
I do
That's for deuterium! No one knows what happens with H!
2014-05-08 20:50 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
First, a well-established fact: The reaction produces helium.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
That's for deuterium! No one knows what happens with H!
Well, I suppose it produces some other gas, probably deuterium. But the
point I was trying to make is that only half of the helium emerges. The
rest is trapped. So there is no process going on that
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, helium is not hydrogen, but still, it does indicate there is
trapped gas.
For palladium and deuterium, where we know 4He is produced, 4He is immobile
in bulk palladium, while deuterium will escape over time.
24 matches
Mail list logo
