Yes. Perhaps you should come up to speed before going into @$$#0/e mode.
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Any references available? > > > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> You're the one falling for your own bs. You can look at a volcano and >> call it an impact crater. And it's not only this set of data that points >> to an under-surface phenomenon. Hagelstein in his recent IAP lectures said >> that there is not evidence to support the contention that it's a surface >> phenomenon. You're the one who's lagging in understanding on this issue, >> no matter how often "I instruct you". >> >> >> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I remember this picture of the volcano. It was found and misrepresented >>> in the Brillouin energy theory document >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.academia.edu/4206209/Brillouin_Energy_Corp._THE_QUANTUM_REACTION_HYPOTHESIS >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> This photo is based on a piece of core from one of Roger Stringham’s >>> sono-fusion devices. >>> >>> >>> >>> You are failing for this propaganda that Brillouin energy is using to >>> support their theory. This is BS. >>> >>> >>> >>> The crater was created by a cavitation bubble which projects a plasma >>> jet that penetrates the surface of the metal to excavate a pit into the >>> metal as seen in the picture you reference.. >>> >>> >>> >>> Yes, the mechanism of cavitation is different from SPP in Ni/H because >>> the SPP is produced on the walls of the collapsing cavitation bubble >>> exterior to the metal and projected onto the nearest surface of metal that >>> is adjacent to the bubble. >>> >>> >>> >>> As often as I instruct your, you never learn. This stubbornness is a >>> problem that will keep you from true understanding. >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Right here, Axil: >>>> >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg91559.html >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> LENR always occurs on the surface of the metal. show me experimental >>>>> results that contradict this fact. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> That's for deuterium! No one knows what happens with H! >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, I suppose it produces some other gas, probably deuterium. But >>>>>> the point I was trying to make is that only half of the helium emerges. >>>>>> The >>>>>> rest is trapped. So there is no process going on that quickly and >>>>>> forcefully empties out the lattice and replaces all the gas in it. I do >>>>>> not >>>>>> think it is likely that the deuterium is be forced out and replaced, but >>>>>> the helium remains trapped. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Jed >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
