I am simply asking you how you came to arrive at your opinion. If such a request offends you then forget this attempt at further communication.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > Once again, you're confused. Just because someone can't "explain" a > phenomena (like cold fusion branching) doesn't mean the phenomena doesn't > exist. > > Rocks fell from the sky for centuries before the explanation was ever > figured out. Please try to come up to speed on the process of science, > especially before you get so touchy in your ignorance. > > > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Rossi's reactor reaches a burn up temperature of 2000C before the >> refectory outer shell of the reactor melts down. Please explain how this >> very high white hot temperature can be reached if the heat from LENR is >> generated from inside the nickel powder. >> >> >> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> Yes. Perhaps you should come up to speed before going into @$$#0/e mode. >>> >>> >>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Any references available? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Kevin O'Malley >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're the one falling for your own bs. You can look at a volcano and >>>>> call it an impact crater. And it's not only this set of data that points >>>>> to an under-surface phenomenon. Hagelstein in his recent IAP lectures >>>>> said >>>>> that there is not evidence to support the contention that it's a surface >>>>> phenomenon. You're the one who's lagging in understanding on this issue, >>>>> no matter how often "I instruct you". >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I remember this picture of the volcano. It was found and >>>>>> misrepresented in the Brillouin energy theory document >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.academia.edu/4206209/Brillouin_Energy_Corp._THE_QUANTUM_REACTION_HYPOTHESIS >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This photo is based on a piece of core from one of Roger Stringham’s >>>>>> sono-fusion devices. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You are failing for this propaganda that Brillouin energy is using >>>>>> to support their theory. This is BS. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The crater was created by a cavitation bubble which projects a plasma >>>>>> jet that penetrates the surface of the metal to excavate a pit into the >>>>>> metal as seen in the picture you reference.. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, the mechanism of cavitation is different from SPP in Ni/H >>>>>> because the SPP is produced on the walls of the collapsing cavitation >>>>>> bubble exterior to the metal and projected onto the nearest surface of >>>>>> metal that is adjacent to the bubble. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As often as I instruct your, you never learn. This stubbornness is a >>>>>> problem that will keep you from true understanding. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Kevin O'Malley >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Right here, Axil: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg91559.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> LENR always occurs on the surface of the metal. show me >>>>>>>> experimental results that contradict this fact. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected] >>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's for deuterium! No one knows what happens with H! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well, I suppose it produces some other gas, probably deuterium. >>>>>>>>> But the point I was trying to make is that only half of the helium >>>>>>>>> emerges. >>>>>>>>> The rest is trapped. So there is no process going on that quickly and >>>>>>>>> forcefully empties out the lattice and replaces all the gas in it. I >>>>>>>>> do not >>>>>>>>> think it is likely that the deuterium is be forced out and replaced, >>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>> the helium remains trapped. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - Jed >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
