Any references available?
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: > > You're the one falling for your own bs. You can look at a volcano and > call it an impact crater. And it's not only this set of data that points > to an under-surface phenomenon. Hagelstein in his recent IAP lectures said > that there is not evidence to support the contention that it's a surface > phenomenon. You're the one who's lagging in understanding on this issue, > no matter how often "I instruct you". > > > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I remember this picture of the volcano. It was found and misrepresented in >> the Brillouin energy theory document >> >> >> >> http://www.academia.edu/4206209/Brillouin_Energy_Corp._THE_QUANTUM_REACTION_HYPOTHESIS >> >> >> >> >> >> This photo is based on a piece of core from one of Roger Stringham’s >> sono-fusion devices. >> >> >> >> You are failing for this propaganda that Brillouin energy is using to >> support their theory. This is BS. >> >> >> >> The crater was created by a cavitation bubble which projects a plasma jet >> that penetrates the surface of the metal to excavate a pit into the metal >> as seen in the picture you reference.. >> >> >> >> Yes, the mechanism of cavitation is different from SPP in Ni/H because >> the SPP is produced on the walls of the collapsing cavitation bubble >> exterior to the metal and projected onto the nearest surface of metal that >> is adjacent to the bubble. >> >> >> >> As often as I instruct your, you never learn. This stubbornness is a >> problem that will keep you from true understanding. >> >> >> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Right here, Axil: >>> >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg91559.html >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> LENR always occurs on the surface of the metal. show me experimental >>>> results that contradict this fact. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> That's for deuterium! No one knows what happens with H! >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well, I suppose it produces some other gas, probably deuterium. But >>>>> the point I was trying to make is that only half of the helium emerges. >>>>> The >>>>> rest is trapped. So there is no process going on that quickly and >>>>> forcefully empties out the lattice and replaces all the gas in it. I do >>>>> not >>>>> think it is likely that the deuterium is be forced out and replaced, but >>>>> the helium remains trapped. >>>>> >>>>> - Jed >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
