http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/05/antibiotic-overuse-may-give-bacteria-an-evolutionary-boost/
*Are humans increasing bacterial evolvability?*
This subject is more important than religious doctrinaire; it is literally
a matter of life or death in this world today.
During the time of
Von: James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 21:58 Freitag, 25.Mai 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Tritium in Ni-H LENR
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Kuhn understood that scientists are
There appears to be some interest in this subject, so I will continue
discussing it as long as people want to discuss it by responding. Apoligies
to Bill in advance if this is inappropriate.
First, let me make something very clear. My goal in brining up this
discussion is to try to draw a
re 'Yeomen' -- Eric and James
2nd take
Yeomen, as
I understand the term, are a group of people having enough material and
educational resources to be 'free thinkers'.
The
question is:
Are these
people decisive wrt the advancement of humanity?
I think
not.
They play a
certain role, but
Von: Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 11:17 Samstag, 26.Mai 2012
Betreff: [Vo]:Darwinian Evolution (Was Tritium in Ni-H LENR)
There appears to be...
#
Jojo,
...My goal in brining up this
This was featured in Slate magazine. I read it years ago. It is a damning
critique of the Space Shuttle written before the first Shuttle flew:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/8004.easterbrook-fulltext.html
Many people consider the Shuttle a technical triumph. I always had my
Jed:
The leap too far point is incorrect. That had little to do with the
shuttle's issues.
The main problem was that it was designed to be everything. A truck, a
car, a lab all rolled into one. You wouldn't design a passenger carrier
and add a large truck carrier to it. It makes both
The Soviets won the space race. They installed a communist bureaucracy
over the most critical of all areas to US culture:
Frontiers.
Very few of
ushttp://web.archive.org/web/20090901150614/http://www.geocities.com/jim_bowery/NssEthicsAward.htmlwere
fighting against this communist
system of
Condemning the shuttle program is like condemning jet fighter aircraft
bombers now that we have drones to do the dirty work.
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/05/08/secret-air-force-x-37b-space-plane-mission-pectacular-success/
Without the shuttle crew Hubble would be a piece of space junk.
You could have replaced the Hubble many time over for the cost of the Shuttle
and its operation.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 26, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Condemning the shuttle program is like condemning jet fighter aircraft
bombers now that we have
Most people who used a horse or a horse-drawn carriage back at the turn of
the 20th Century had a initial negative reaction to the first gas powered
vehicles, and usually shouted to it's driver to Get A Horse!!!.
The folks at the Ernest Yeager Center at Case Western U. informed me they
added LENR-CANR to their on-line resources guide:
http://electrochem.cwru.edu/estir/pdi.htm
Top page:
http://electrochem.cwru.edu/
http://electrochem.cwru.edu/estir/
My response to them:
That's great! Thanks. It is an
Randy Wuller rwul...@freeark.com wrote:
You could have replaced the Hubble many time over for the cost of the
Shuttle and its operation.
That is true. See the book Hubble Wars. The cost of the Shuttle mission
to repair the Hubble was greater than the cost of launching a new Hubble
would have
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com
wrote:
In the early middle ages it was the church-builders, which advanced the
art of empirical construction of large buildings by trial and error. Lots
of churches had to be repaired or collapsed altogether.
Those
Here's the actual paper from which the authors draw their conclusions;
http://users.elo.com.br/~deaquino/ELF%20Earthquakes
I was able to wade through the math to grasp his essential points, some very
interesting theoretical data...
I had formerly made objections to what Aquino made known back in
Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Condemning the shuttle program is like condemning jet fighter aircraft
bombers now that we have drones to do the dirty work.
No, it is like condemning the F22 Raptor because that airplane was too
ambitious, it tried to do too many different
If that was the only accomplishment of the shuttle i might give your
argument some weight
On Saturday, May 26, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Randy Wuller rwul...@freeark.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'rwul...@freeark.com'); wrote:
You could have replaced the Hubble many time over for the cost of
I'm sorry but the Shuttle and the ISS have simply gobbled up funding with very
little real purpose. When you lose sight of a real goal, government funding
turns into a jobs program.
There were a lot of better alternaives for funding space development. I was
involved in lobby groups for years
The Hubble data information management structure reminds me of the Dilbert
character Mordac, Preventer of Information Services:
http://dilbert.com/strips/?CharIDs=15After=01/01/1996Before=08/20/2008Order=s.DateStrip+DESCPerPage=50x=23y=9CharFilter=Any
A lot of that goes on in industry. In
Guess what, if relativity itself was prooved by Einstein using an
eclipse, and it is the eclipse itself is what brings on these torsional
effects: that also precludes special laws of physics taking place, then
Einsteins observations were not made in the ordinary world we live in
where
Jed,
Jed,
I suggest you remove all of those Hubble screen savers and wallpapers off
your PC. It cost way too much to produce them
On Saturday, May 26, 2012, Chemical Engineer wrote:
If that was the only accomplishment of the shuttle i might give your
argument some weight
On Saturday, May
Now that the shuttle is gone, how do we keep kids interested in STEM? What
inspiration does a teenager get from cargo drone launches? What would get
you pumped up and want to spend your future doing science?
*From:* Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Saturday, May 26, 2012
Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
If that was the only accomplishment of the shuttle i might give your
argument some weight
No one denies that the Shuttle was a major improvement. So was the IBM
Stretch computer. If they had made one Shuttle, learned lesson from it, and
then tried
Hell, Obama skipped right by basic research and gave billions to green
energy companies to rush out products destined for failure
On Saturday, May 26, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The Hubble data information management structure reminds me of the Dilbert
character Mordac, Preventer of
64 views before announcement...
beforeitsnews.com/story/2177/069/Localized_time-_space_curvature_demonstrated_from_3_phase_alternator_powered_666_machine.html
This measurement showed in the video is the most important measurement ever
made regarding relativity, besides that of the eclipse of the
Like i said, the new shuttle drone has spent almost two years in space and
is doing great and so is the SpaceX drone. Go USA!
On Saturday, May 26, 2012, Chemical Engineer wrote:
Hell, Obama skipped right by basic research and gave billions to green
energy companies to rush out products
Open space to the people so they participate in reality not vicariosly through
others. Being personally involved is a great motivator. How to do it, lower
cost access to space. How do you achieve lower cost access? Building a private
commercial transportation industry. You do that with
Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hell, Obama skipped right by basic research and gave billions to green
energy companies to rush out products destined for failure
That is nonsense. All of the technology the government has assisted has
been conventional, long established, proven
___
Von: James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
Paracelsus whose motto was: Let no man belong to another that can belong to
himself.
James,
I understand this as a typical statement of a renaissance mind.
But: Paracelsus was not a Yeoman.
He was driven by his
You call spending billions on gigawatts of CSP power towers proven and
conventional? Do some more research Jed.
On Saturday, May 26, 2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'cheme...@gmail.com'); wrote:
Hell, Obama skipped right by basic
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 8:32 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
It is incredible to watch the folks here in Vortex speak about obscenity
like NASA in any other terms. It was born of a Manhattan Project-style
centralized government program an and, like the Manhattan Project, spawned
a
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
It was not a Gregg Easterbrook-like character, but Stanley Pons and his
financial independence (along with Fleischmann's retirement independence)
that allowed for an escape route for cold fusion. Yet, we see 2 decades
later, the monster spawned of
This argument is not right. It is not valid also to compare it to a
computer or aircraft projects. The development of Hubble led to a unique
architecture, not to mass production. It would take a long time to build
another one. So, fixing it in space, even if required a lot of money, was
necessary
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
This argument is not right. It is not valid also to compare it to a
computer or aircraft projects. The development of Hubble led to a unique
architecture, not to mass production. It would take a long time to build
another one. So, fixing it in space,
The definition of Yeoman is at issue. Its modern degeneration has
virtually nothing to do with the original notion. Basically there was,
once upon a time, recognition of the foundation of civilization --
primarily because civilization had only recently arisen. This is
particularly true of
Jed, Hubble must have a very accurate focusing and detection than any spy
satellite because it gets very few photons. Its production is much more
expensive and slow, to correct defects.
2012/5/26 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
This argument is
Von: Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
This argument is not right. It is not valid also to compare it to a computer or
aircraft projects. The development of Hubble led to a unique architecture, not
to mass production. It would take a long time to build
The optics was not replaced, it was corrected by COSTAR,
http://hubblesite.org/the_telescope/nuts_.and._bolts/optics/costar/
That was a set of small mirrors that corrected the focal point.
2012/5/26 Guenter Wildgruber gwildgru...@ymail.com
--
*Von:* Daniel Rocha
I would think the idea that one can take land to support a mate is
agricultural notion of identity and integrity.
Harry
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:42 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The definition of Yeoman is at issue. Its modern degeneration has
virtually nothing to do with the
James,
thank you for Your sensible comment.
I did not know about the term 'allodium'.
looking after the term, I read:
...
True allodial title is rare, with most property ownership in the common law
world—primarily, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada,
Australia, New Zealand and the
It took 3 months for the mirror glass to cool down and two years to
grind it. There were actually two mirrors, the one with the spherical
aberration made by Perkin Elmer and the likely unflawed one still in
storage made by Kodak.
T
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
There were actually two mirrors, the one with the spherical
aberration made by Perkin Elmer and the likely unflawed one still in
storage made by Kodak.
I did not know they had another one. That surely would have reduced the
cost of building a
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I did not know they had another one. That surely would have reduced the cost
of building a replacement, instead of repairing the one up there.
Yes, built by two different contractors in the event one was destroyed
in
Contact with Jodie Foster:
S.R. Hadden: First rule in government spending: why build one when you
can have two at twice the price?
T
The US currently has two X-37 OTV shuttle drones. A third was recently
approved. Design for this began in1999, more than 10 years prior to
retiring the shuttle. Much was learned from the original shuttle program.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-37
On Saturday, May 26, 2012, Terry
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
It was not a Gregg Easterbrook-like character, but Stanley Pons and his
financial independence (along with Fleischmann's retirement independence)
that allowed for an escape
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
I would think the idea that one can take land to support a mate is
agricultural notion of identity and integrity.
Is sexual notion of identity and integrity.
You know nothing of animal behavior.
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Guenter Wildgruber
gwildgru...@ymail.comwrote:
James,
thank you for Your sensible comment.
I did not know about the term 'allodium'.
looking after the term, I read:
...
True allodial title is rare, with most property ownership in the common
law
Guys, this thread has gotten very far off the subject. I request that you
rename it and continue. I would really appreciate a discussion concerning
tritium associated with Ni-H LENR.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
To: Guenter Wildgruber
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:03 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
I would think the idea that one can take land to support a mate is
agricultural notion of identity and integrity.
Is sexual notion of identity
50 matches
Mail list logo
