Didn't Adolf Hitler apply social Darwinism to economics as well as politics on
a massive scale?
Fiofrst few of 86,000 Google hits on social darwinism and adolf hitler
Social Darwinism
www.mrdowling.com/706-socialdarwinism.htmlCached - Similar
Adolf Hitler's racial theories were
How would carbon nanotubes be off topic?
http://www.eskimo.com/~billb/weird/wvort.html#rules
The Vortex-L list was originally created for discussions of professional
research into fluid vortex/cavitation devices which exhibit anomalous energy
effects (ie: the inventions of Schaeffer,
No
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_Law_of_Headlines
On 2 August 2012 12:40, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=2000category=Environment
Is There A Large Pyramid Underground Between
Mt. McKinley and Nome, Alaska?
Friday, August 17 at 10am -- near the end of the ICCF-17 program -- is the
scheduled time of the Defkalion presentation.
http://www.iccf17.org/program.php
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Daniel,
I know the future but like a lady called
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Craig Brown cr...@overunity.co wrote:
Steorn In 50 million Euros HephaHeat Bonanza
http://truthfall.com/steorn-in-e50-million-a-year-hephaheat-bonanza/
Isn't truthfall.com your web site?
T
Hello gang,
In honor of my bet with Terry, this is my first post on the Fallacies of
Darwinian Evolution. Before I continue, I would like to lay the ground work
and define a few basic terms that we will be using in my series of posts.
Hopefully, people read this post so that I do not have
Recent discoveries show that Darwin's ideas were an over
simplification of genetics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigenetics
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/ghostgenes.shtml
T
Yes, That is why I say Darwinian Evolution is dead, a totally discredited
and fallacious idea.Darwin did not know about DNA, genes, cell
structures, RNA and others.
Had he known the structure of DNA for instance, he would have concluded that
slow random mutation can not explain the
Isn't Betteridge's Law of Headlines correct most of the time?
:-)
From: Robert Lynn
No
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_Law_of_Headlines
Terry Blanton wrote:
http://www.earthfiles.com/news.php?ID=2000
Are there any dishonest politicians?
No. They are all honest with themselves.
2012/8/3 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
Are there any dishonest politicians?
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Looks like Sean's pub tab has maxed out again.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Craig Brown wrote:
Steorn In 50 million Euros HephaHeat Bonanza
http://truthfall.com/steorn-in-e50-million-a-year-hephaheat-bonanza/
Isn't truthfall.com your web site?
T
HephaHeat's description is consistent with what might be thought of as a
mere heat capacitor that can be trickle charged over a period of time and
then rapidly discharged on demand. Steorn has made no public over-unity
claim for this technology, despite a confusing email sent by Steorn to pesn.
From: Roarty, Francis
* Is it possible that 1) Ni-H releases H, 2) the released H is forced
into Pd fissure, 3) its electron cloud goes through redistribution, and 4)
energy is released. [snip]
Doesn't that scenario presuppose that there is an adequate
Jojo I think that your statement that no random process can increase the
information content of a system is too broad. The formation of a crystal from
a vat of molten material seems to be a system that takes the random motion of
the hot atoms as its input and then a directing force leads to
Is the correct answer to this question no?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Aug 3, 2012 9:18 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Isn't Betteridge's Law of Headlines correct most of the time?
Are there any dishonest
Dave Roberson wrote:
With this type of process in mind, I think that the choice of system
boundaries become critical.
Yes, system boundaries are of primary importance!
Let me cut-n-paste from one of my postings:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg66744.html
Jones, I want to inject my question about the effect of magnetic fields into
the considerations. You have pointed out that power is always required for
heat generation and I recall that power is supplied by means of an electric
current in most cases. I think it is prudent for us to make an
Darwinian Evolution presupposes that the mutation or the change is small,
and the mutation process in passed down only via the mechanism of natural
selection. In other words, a new trait must not be so complex and the
change so huge as to cause people to suspect that there might be some
directed
Jones,
Kengchi still has a small language barrier -when he says fissures he
really is referring to fissures - cracks not fission - in the Ni geometry ..
I think he mentioned Pd by mistake - I am guilty of hijacking his magma
question by responding with the National Instrument news
The genome of an organism is more complex and adaptive then the
creationist’s arguments assume and are embodied in the genetic concept of
Epigenesis.
Though the theory seems an obvious fact to us in today's genetic age,
however, the theory was not given much credence in former times because of
David - the short answer is yes, it is definitely NOT
coincidental that the well-documented trigger temperature in many NiH
systems is around the Curie point of nickel (358 C). The problem is that
there could be several known processes interacting at the same time,
including a
Jones,
Well said!
Fran
_
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 1:27 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:magma heat source?
David - the short answer is yes, it is definitely NOT
The trait or change must be permanent. In other words, the change must not
revert back or disappear once the stress is removed. If it does, it will
not be additive and hence can not result in a complex organ like an eye. This
will result in natural selection only for a few generations and then
Jed:
I consider you to be one of the reliable experts on Cold Fusion, primarily
because of the website you put together, lenr-canr.org.
Have you put together anything similar when it comes to Evolution or Global
Warming? I'm not aware of it if you have.
I regularly recommend your
Renowned paleontologist Jack Horner has spent his career trying to
reconstruct a dinosaur. He's found fossils with extraordinarily
well-preserved blood vessels and soft tissues, but never intact DNA. So, in
a new approach, he's taking living descendants of the dinosaur (chickens)
and genetically
Darn, it is already a bit scary hiking in the mountains with the bears and
snakes to deal with. Now, I guess it will not be long before I will have to
run from these nasty critters.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent:
From first principles of infinite time and random fluctuations of
nothingness, humans can evolve.
Said in simple terms, given enough time, the human species can come into
existence as a result of random chance.
The way modern theological though handles this sort of argument in terms of
7. The change or trait must not affect an individual's reproductive ability.
If there is no reproduction, there is no natural selection, hence no
Darwinian Evolution.
Not true
With the ambiguity in the definitions of the concept of species
notwithstanding, even when species have diverged,
LET ME BEGIN with a general 'adhominim' pejorative statement: The I
AM/Infinite All Mind has a 'thing' forNINCOMPOOPS, He/She excreted so many of
them; of which I am numero uno. . .(or not) so now that we have 'that' out of
the way. . . )
***THIS IS EXCELLENT TAOISM*** oldest 'book of
Nuclear reactions, induced by gamma-quanta, in palladium saturated with
deuterium surrounded by dense deuterium gas
http://iopscience.iop.org/0295-5075/99/2/22001?fromSearchPage=true
- Fusion and fissions result in micro-volcanoes on Pd surfaces,
along with significant transmutations, similar to
Soo,
No need to tell me how a fool I am and How smart you are. You think ID is a
religion, well I think Darwinian Evolution is a religion. If you think
otherwise, debate it. Stop wasting my time with these personal emails.
Jojo
PS. why should I read your link from an uninformed atheist.
The formation of crystals with the apparent increase in information is a
process governed by chemical laws - the polar bonding laws governing the
formation of ice crystals. While the crystals appear to have more information,
the crystal formation itself is a random application of chemical
Yes given enough time Darwinian Evolution can happen. BUT, did the Earth
really had Infinite time to accomplish the evolution of a Human. With all
the complexity of the human body, its structure, its chemical composition, the
cells structures, the millions of chemical processes, the cognitive
Crystals are formed through the maximization of disorder.
Designer materials: Entropy (*Entropy* is the thermodynamic property toward
quilibrium/average/homogenization/dissipation) can lead to order, paving
the route to nanostructures.
Entropy is a consequence of the expansion of the universe.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/07/120724104638.htm
How quickly can new species arise? In as little as 6,000 years,
according to a study of Australian sea stars.
Yes, I am familiar with the idea of Punctuated Equilibrium. It is an attempt
to explain why even after over a century of intense fossil digging, we have not
found many of the supposedly transitional species. Gould of course thinks
that that is because evolution occurs in rapid spurts and
LIVING CRYSTALS: It is intriquing that certain 'virus's in the dormant phase/
are identified as CRYSTALINE STRUCTURES. AND DNA is likewise a CRYSTALINE
LATTICE mechanism. . . crystals are cool. . . EVOLVING CRYSTALS. . . ?By
whatmechanistic momentum should a Crystal evolve?
From:
Yes, our genone (DNA) is complex, such that it is impossible to explain its
existence as a series of random accumulations of minute changes.
If anything, the presence of Information within our DNA should be enough to
totally discredit Darwinian Evolution.
Jojo
- Original Message
LOL ...
Axil, my friend, you should know better than to swallow this joke. Please do
not take this as an insult but you should know that these kinds of things
should only be for the comsumption of the uninitiated and uninformed YouTube
generation.
I raise chickens in my hacienda here, and
Panspermia releases evolution from the timeframe restrictions that earth
places on it; That is the time frame for the evolution of life as
beeing restricted only to the time when conditions on the earth was
conducive to life. Panspermia is the hypothesis that the mechanisms of
evolution formed
GENETIC MEMORY: This is 'not' such an off-the-wall proposition as once
thought. IF: Experiential Inputs are bio-mechanistically inbedded into our
Reproductive DNA apparatus THAT LEAD to SUPERIOR adaptation, indeed areREAL. .
. then maybe Darwin, although crude, did possess the grain of a
Human DNA holds far more capacity to adapt then can be expressed in any
given individual. This DNA is like a large toolkit, where tools can lay
dormant until needed.
For example, in the battle against Aids, scientists have acquired what
looks like a potent new weapon. HIV, the virus that causes
Yes, you have identified the basic crux of the problem. That is the definition
of a species.
Till now, we have defined species based on their gross physical
characteristics. We now know that that approach is flawed and contributes much
to the confusion of the debate.
Maybe, we should
Yes, DNA is an amazing thing. I am not disputing what you are saying below.
What I am disputing is your attribution of it to Darwinian Evolution.
I will be explaining the difference between Mircroevolution (Adaptation) vs.
Macroevolution (Darwinian Evolution). Maybe after I explain it, the
Ah Yes, the We were created by Aliens argument.
Panspermia does not solve the problem. It simply shifts the problem somewhere
else. There is an issue of Abiogenesis - how life can form from non-life via
random processes. Currently, the biggest problem for Darwinian Evolutionists
is to
The single most advanced adaptive Evolutionary Mechanism to surface in any
organism is THOUGHT, INTROSPECTION, INSIGHT that lead (hopefully) to
successfully adaptive creative behavioral alterations relative to environment;
whether social environment /or physical environment /or reproductive
Terry, once again this ambiguity is caused by our flawed definition of what
a species is.
Yes, there are changes within a species, it's called Microevolution or
Adaptation. But Macroevolution or Darwinian Evolution (changing from
species to another) is a discredited idea.
I contend that
Hello gang,
In this post I will define the difference between Microevolution vs.
Macroevolution. Yes, I believe evolution happens, I believe Microevolution
happens, not Macroevolution.
First, micro vs macro has nothing to do with the amount or number of changes.
That is, numerous micro
JoJo wrote:
It won't be long now when we will have the ability to very rapidly and
cheaply sequence each and every DNA for all animals and plants.
Already here.
http://www.nanoporetech.com/news/press-releases/view/39
image001.png
Consider the following situation: Take a random letter generator and begin to
fill in the squares of a block of 10 letters. With a fast computer, it will
not take long to have generated almost every word in the English dictionary.
Many of the words would certainly be classified as
In the context of intelligent design, the interesting question from an
ethical standpoint is as follows:
If God's plan of creation is embodied in human DNA, is it a sin for man to
modify it in order to correct flaws in it or to improve the human species
as a general principle?
Is creation of a
Hi Jojo,
I work as a bioinformatician and study DNA and mutations in DNA every day.
I develop software for this that is used in 100's of Universities and we
have over 200 citations on Google scholar.
Darwin had a view of evolution that we now know was rather simple.
A few things about DNA that I
Axil, since you are asking an ethical question that delves into religion and
the Bible, I will answer an answer from the Bible
In the Bible, God does leave specific commandments against interspecies
breeding. A man laying with a beast (cow, goat, etc) is automatically stoned
to death. God
Interesting facts but I fail to see how it would help bolster your argument.
Saying that this model fits random mutation better is useless because you are
simply expressing an opinion. You mention a lot of facts but have not tied it
into your argument. How do these facts you enumerated
*In the Bible, God does leave specific commandments against interspecies
breeding. A man laying with a beast (cow, goat, etc) is automatically
stoned to death. God has ordained that a species remain within the bounds
of his own species. Hence, it is clear that any attempt to transcend a
species
Axil, you asked an ethical question; I have no other means to answer an ethical
question other to appeal to the ethical teachings of the Bible. Biblical
teachings and ethics is the only ethics I consider absolute.
Yes, you are correct in that assembling DNA one piece at a time is technically
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
PS. Absolutely, this is off-topic, but this is part of a bet. I am betting
that a person who expresses a belief different from Darwinian dogma will be
treated differently. I am not doing anything more than what Jed is
The post of Colin Hercus interests me greatly, and I am greatful that he
took the time to explain how things work for a bioinformatician.
When a library of DNA fragments are finally complied across all known
species, and object oriented life builder can be authored as a software
process to
Jojo, haven't you said that you'd post an off topic thread for every
thread Jed posted? I think you are going beyond your promise. You cannot
win the bet without following the rules you established yourself.
2012/8/3 Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
**
Hello gang,
In this post I will define the
One of the weaknesses of the creationist argument is the reliance on the
bible for total moral direction.
The Bible is full of the agendas of various rule givers down through the
ages. These rules may have be relevant to illiterate goat herders but may
not have application in this hi-tech age.
*They sequenced DNA of Neanderthals (from fossils, DNA left in teeth and
Bones.) Interestingly about 5% of DNA in Europeans is from Neanderthals
rather than early descendant from Africa.*
* *
This is a great example of adaptive evolution. The Neanderthals spent
200,000 years in Europe and
Hmmmthat was a really mature retort.
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, 3 August 2012 11:53 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:RE: Steorn HephaHeat
Looks like Sean's pub tab has maxed out again.
-Original Message-
Le Aug 3, 2012 à 3:35 PM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com a écrit :
Till now, we have defined species based on their gross physical
characteristics. We now know that that approach is flawed and contributes
much to the confusion of the debate.
What you're describing is not much less than the
Hi Colin,
Thanks for the very interesting details!
Here is one more interesting tidbit.
Due to the efforts of the Human Microbiome Project (HMP), which sequenced
the microbiota (bacteria, virus, fungi, etc.) living in or on the human
body, they estimate a total of about 1,000,000 genes from
Le Aug 3, 2012 à 8:29 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com a écrit :
The fact that a certain temperature makes a difference tends to suggest the
rearrangement of grains of the material which is a characteristic of magnetic
behavior. Nickel is particularly responsive to magnetic fields.
You are not far off in your assessment of my position. I believe the field of
evolutionary biology and probably biology itself and all its subfields is rife
with lies, converups and deception. That's true for geology, anthropology and
almost all life sciences, including medicine. The entire
Look at the wording of the bet before you start bitching. The bet calls for me
to post at most 5 new threads per week. This is the estimated number of
off-topic threads Jed starts in a week. I have only posted 2 threads this
week. I have to make up for it by posting 8 threads next week.
So
What do you mean? Do you mean to double our bet to $200?
Sure, deal!!!
Keep this up and pretty soon I'll have somebody to buy all the reactor parts
I can not source here.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday,
I noticed that you have not actually said anything to counter what I posted.
No fact to rebut my post or the facts in my posts. Instead, your strategy is
one of obfuscation. That is, supply a bunch of irrelevant facts to obfuscate
the real debate.
In doing this, you have indeed adapted a
What is your criteria to rule out all other creation myths except for the
biblical one?
2012/8/4 Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
**
I noticed that you have not actually said anything to counter what I
posted. No fact to rebut my post or the facts in my posts. Instead, your
strategy is one of
What other creation myth are you specifically referring to? Other than the
Darwinian Evolution Myth and the God created it myth, I know of no other
myth of consequence.
But if the explanation fits the observed facts, I do not rule it out. That is
the essence of science and I would like to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_creation_myths
2012/8/4 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
You can refer to all of these.
2012/8/4 Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
**
What other creation myth are you specifically referring to? Other than
the Darwinian Evolution Myth and the God created
You can refer to all of these.
2012/8/4 Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com
**
What other creation myth are you specifically referring to? Other than
the Darwinian Evolution Myth and the God created it myth, I know of no
other myth of consequence.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
74 matches
Mail list logo
