Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread lenr4po...@gmail.com
I am sure he will after you, Jed, Jojo, Lomax, Johnson  at least 6 more 
lame brains
who childishly produce written diarrhea about how to avoid paying taxes, 
comic science fiction, insults, etc. place the following on an open web 
site: copies of birth certificate, drivers license, SS card, all school 
transcripts, resume listing all employment stating salaries(10 years), 
all real estate tax bills (10 years) and a complete financial statement 
listing all current assets and bank accounts. How dare you treat rights 
of privacy so lightly? Find yourself a bureaucratic job in DC minding 
other peoples business.


Fart

James Bowery 
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22James+Bowery%22 
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:07:16 -0800 
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20121219


Perhaps what is so difficult for the Vortex lame brains is not
deciphering the Mole comment, but figuring out why Lucky Saint has not
provided a video of this LENR disk boiling water.




Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell - about Jaro Jaro trolling

2012-12-20 Thread de Bivort Lawrence
Without addressing anything else in this  s message, I'll merely stay that all 
reference to Islam and Muhammad is no sensual and reflects a degree of 
ignorance that exceeds expectations. 


Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 19, 2012, at 1:32 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:

 He he he.
 
 yeah I'm all you label me.  I'm all that and more.  And yes, I have a 
 repressed childhood.  You can believe whatever it is that tickles your fancy.
 
 Yes, I'm a turd; but whose more pathetic?  The turd or the man playing with 
 the turd knowing it's a turd?  The turd has no choice, but the man playing 
 with a turd has got to be some maladjusted retard.  LOL...
 
 But at least. at least I am smart enough to graduate with a engineering 
 degree; but sensible enough not to boast that I am some kind of expert.. And 
 I am wise enough not to worship a 2nd rate moon god preached by a 
 sex-perverted 9 year-old child molesting prophet.
 
 Somebody doing this must be some maladjusted individual.  The sexual pervert 
 prophet would have tipped any sensible man to stay away from that moon god; 
 but our expert worships him.  LOL
 
 
 OH my, I've really done it this time.  I'm done for..  You will now really 
 call for my banning.  Since I just insulted your great moon god and his 
 holey loving prophet.  I'm done for; you will now go to your imam and issue 
 a fatwah against me and have me killed.  LOL
 
 BTW, for those of you just reading this.  I have done nothing more than tell 
 the truth.  Allah is the moon god of muhammed's tribe; and muhammed is a 
 sex-perverted prophet with dozens of wives and concubines including a 9 
 year-old little girl barely out of diapers.  And muslim imams do indeed issue 
 a fatwah for the assasination of anyone who they consider have insulted their 
 prophet.   I speak the truth if you care to research it yourself.  Even 
 muslims acknowledge these truths and this is a source of great embarassment 
 for many a moon god worshipper; and you will see our expert trying to spin 
 this away.
 
 
 Jojo
 
 PS, Don't even pretend that you don't read what I write.  Everyone know that 
 you read it. LOL.   But, as for me, I honestly only read the first part of 
 your posts.  It's tiresome to read your verbal diarrhea.  So, if you really 
 really really want to insult me; make sure you do so in the first few 
 sentences.  That would really be effective in getting me and hurting me with 
 your insults.  LOL
 
 So, Go ahead, continue the insults.   I will give as much and much more than 
 I can get.  Christmas period is a slow time for me so I'll play along with 
 your games.  But come January, you can play with yourself.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message - From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax 
 a...@lomaxdesign.com
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2012 12:13 AM
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell - about Jaro Jaro 
 trolling
 
 
 Hah! I see that when I added the tag to the subject, I mispelled Jojo Jaro
 
 At 04:14 AM 12/8/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
 
 So, this libtard from Wisconsin claims that I do not have emotional maturity 
 and that I am 10 or that I did not get feedback and all that crap. O well, 
 if I am a turd, what do you call somebody who keeps playing with a turd 
 knowing full well its a turd.
 
 Someone who is not willing to give up on the idea
 that a turd is a human being.
 
 Foolish, perhaps. Jojo is giving us plenty of
 evidence that he wants us to think he's a turd.
 
 Libtard claims that I am emotionally volatile, so why does he keep on 
 provoking me other than to elicit a strong reaction from me.
 
 Jojo would not understand the reason, but there are many possibilities.
 
 1. It's so much fun.
 2. We like watching Jojo make an idiot out of himself.
 3. We have a hope (foolish?) that the pimple will finally pop.
 4. We have nothing better to do at the time we write the post.
 5. We have something better to do and we are avoiding doing it.
 6. Just because.
 7. We care.
 8. ???
 
  This behavior from libtard seems to be what is classically defined as 
 trolling.
 
 It could be, were it not clearly provoked.
 Responding to trolling is not trolling. However,
 not all insult is trolling. The essence of
 trolling is an attempt to provoke outraged
 response. The sequence here began with something
 other than that, but Jojo responded to it as an
 insult. It could be argued that it was mildly
 insulting, but it clearly was not, from context,
 trolling. It was just a comment on what had just
 happened, and it did not insult, beyond calling
 Jojo a bible fanatic. Is that an insult? It can
 be so. Am I a cold fusion fanatic?
 
 Someone who said so would not necessarily be
 insulting me. They might just be describing how my behavior looks to them.
 
 It is a clear pattern with this individual that he would say something to 
 provoke me for the fun of it.
 
 And then we might need to look at what fun
 means. Why would it be fun to poke at 

Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread James Bowery
lenr4power, Lucky Saint's privacy does involve a LENR technology, that he
has already disclosed.  A video needn't disclose anything more about Lucky
Saint than what he has already disclosed save evidence that technology
works.

So this is not a matter of privacy, lame brain.

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:09 PM, lenr4po...@gmail.com
lenr4po...@gmail.comwrote:

 I am sure he will after you, Jed, Jojo, Lomax, Johnson  at least 6 more
 lame brains
 who childishly produce written diarrhea about how to avoid paying taxes,
 comic science fiction, insults, etc. place the following on an open web
 site: copies of birth certificate, drivers license, SS card, all school
 transcripts, resume listing all employment stating salaries(10 years), all
 real estate tax bills (10 years) and a complete financial statement listing
 all current assets and bank accounts. How dare you treat rights of privacy
 so lightly? Find yourself a bureaucratic job in DC minding other peoples
 business.

 Fart

 James Bowery http://www.mail-archive.com/**search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com*
 *q=from:%22James+Bowery%22http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22James+Bowery%22
 Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:07:16 -0800 http://www.mail-archive.com/**
 search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com**q=date:20121219http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20121219
 


 Perhaps what is so difficult for the Vortex lame brains is not
 deciphering the Mole comment, but figuring out why Lucky Saint has not
 provided a video of this LENR disk boiling water.





[Vo]:[OT] Everyone Needs a Hobby

2012-12-20 Thread Terry Blanton
These quadrotors look like fun:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ax-DeybxBpY



[Vo]:VSG-Overlooked Free Energy?

2012-12-20 Thread Zell, Chris
I'm looking for a little help here.

Some years ago, J. Naudin published the Synergetics theory of a French 
scientist.  His models of this theory appeared to offer overunity.  
Unfortunately, the stuff is mostly in French and Babblefish is kinda 
approximate.

The scientist claimed that Tomakak experiments proved free energy but were 
never published to avoid trouble.

Then, there was a guy who replicated the device, repeatedly:

www.intalek.comhttp://www.intalek.com

I'd like to build this device but I can't understand the triggering part of the 
theory. High voltage?  Alpha particles? Naudin isn't very clear.

Help, help..(Thanks)




Re: [Vo]:STMicroelectronics report on their version of the Celani apparatus

2012-12-20 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 05:08 PM 12/19/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:

Harry Veeder mailto:hveeder...@gmail.comhveeder...@gmail.com wrote:

Does this mean they did not detect any anomalous gamma or neutrons emissions?
If so then it is more evidence that the Celani doesn't produce excess heat.


Incorrect. Most cold fusion devices that produce excess heat do not 
produce measurable gamma or neutron emissions. Cold fusion is not 
plasma fusion. If it were, I would be dead.


Variation on the dead graduate student effect. The dead 
philanthropist or dead editor/translator effect. 



Re: [Vo]:STMicroelectronics report on their version of the Celani apparatus

2012-12-20 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 03:43 PM 12/19/2012, Harry Veeder wrote:

STMicroelectronics report on their version of the Celani apparatus:

http://www.22passi.it/coherence2012/coherence%2014%20dicembre%202012%20Celani%20wire.pdf

On page 2  it says over a couple of charts:
Neutron and gamma continuous recording in ST
lab. No difference for spectra during experiments
showing extra heat and background

Does this mean they did not detect any anomalous gamma or neutrons emissions?
If so then it is more evidence that the Celani doesn't produce excess heat.


Jed already replied to this, I've seen, but I wanted to add my two cents.

Lack of gamma/neutron emission was considered evidence against cold 
fusion, initially. Reports of neutrons, in particular, cluttered the 
landscape, and were generally, if high-level (no reports were really 
high in an absolute sense), found to be artifact, in some prominent 
cases, or were low-level  and thus subject to doubt about whether or 
not they were simply unusual events as to background radiation, i.e., 
cosmic rays.


The evidence for radiation never became truly strong and confirmed, 
such as it was. Storms is now reporting X-rays from certain 
experiments, but that's not confirmed.


However, the evidence is very strong, now, I consider it rebuttably 
conclusive (with it being difficult to even imagine a rebuttal), 
that the Fleischmann-Pons Heat Effect is due to the conversion of 
deuterium to helium, for the heat/helium ratio, based on results from 
a dozen research groups, is consistent with the right value, and the 
correlation between heat and helium is so clear as to be quite solid, 
chance-in-a-million artifact. Or less than that, really.


Yet there is no detectable gamma radiation, generally, and similarly 
with neutrons; any asserted contrary findings, so far, have been at 
ridiculously low levels, and probably represent, if real -- as they 
seem to be, see the SPAWAR neutron findings -- very minor, rare 
side-reactions, reactions with rare cell constituent elements, or 
sequelae, i.e, some occasionally hot products, like hot alphas, 
prodice some secondary reactions. At extremely low levels.


So the lack of radiation from any experiment is not evidence against 
excess heat. It is the absence of a particular kind of evidence that 
could confirm excess heat. That's all. To think otherwise is to 
repeat the error of 1989-1990, where absence of expected nuclear 
products was considered reason to doubt the heat results.


In 1989-1990, it was expected that if cold fusion were occurring, 
it would be d-d fusion, nothing else. That assumption was behind much 
criticism. Pons and Fleischmann knew that what they were observing 
was not ordinary d-d fusion, that's why they called it, in their 
original paper, an unknown nuclear reaction. But they also had 
found, they thought, neutrons, and they dedicated way too much space, 
in hindsight, to speculating on an obvious possible source, some kind 
of d+d - He-3 + n reaction as a rare branch.


But He-3 was not detected, except at very low levels, as expected 
from tritium found -- at levels 10^6 or so below the level expected 
if the reaction was d-d fusion, which branches 50% to T + p, and 50% 
to He-3 + n. T decays, slowly, to He-3 + e.


The PF finding of neutrons was quickly exposed as artifact. Yes, 
many people thought that, then, no neutrons = heat artifact.


It was a total error. The reaction is clearly, almost entirely, 2 * N 
* d - N * He-4, where N is as low as 1, but could be higher, and if 
higher (N = 2 has been studied), could explain the neutron-free 
reaction, through, for example, 2 D2 - Be-8 - 2 He-4. The problem 
with this, as stated, and with a naive analysis, is that this would 
be expected to produce very hot alpha particles, and a recent 
Hagelstein study placed an upper limit on *common* charged particle 
energies of 20 KeV. So theorists continue to labor with the problem.


But deuterium is being converted to helium, mechanism unknown, that 
is a real scientific consensus at this point. Yes, there are lots of 
scientists who doubt it, but they have not published under peer 
review for roughly a decade. It's actually over, in the journals. 
That news simply has not gotten around, has not penetrated completely 
the fog of the anti-cold fusion cascade that occurred over 20 years 
ago. It can take time.


Cascades create an impression of scientific consensus where there is 
none (or, more accurately, there is a kind of consensus, but it's not 
based on the scientific method, it's a social phenomenon). I got the term from


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/09/science/09tier.html?pagewanted=all_r=0

It's ironic. Gary Taubes helped create the cold fusion cascade, but 
he's now spent more than a decade debunking two: positions on salt in 
the diet, and fat, similarly. 



RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread Roarty, Francis X
I'm trying to ignore the hostility associated with this  thread because the 
subject material still has my curiosity piqued.. does anyone have some related 
links where I can learn more about lucky saint and his theories... any 
historical background?
Fran

From: James Bowery [mailto:jabow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:26 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

lenr4power, Lucky Saint's privacy does involve a LENR technology, that he has 
already disclosed.  A video needn't disclose anything more about Lucky Saint 
than what he has already disclosed save evidence that technology works.

So this is not a matter of privacy, lame brain.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:09 PM, 
lenr4po...@gmail.commailto:lenr4po...@gmail.com 
lenr4po...@gmail.commailto:lenr4po...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sure he will after you, Jed, Jojo, Lomax, Johnson  at least 6 more lame 
brains
who childishly produce written diarrhea about how to avoid paying taxes, comic 
science fiction, insults, etc. place the following on an open web site: copies 
of birth certificate, drivers license, SS card, all school transcripts, resume 
listing all employment stating salaries(10 years), all real estate tax bills 
(10 years) and a complete financial statement listing all current assets and 
bank accounts. How dare you treat rights of privacy so lightly? Find yourself a 
bureaucratic job in DC minding other peoples business.

Fart

James Bowery 
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22James+Bowery%22
 Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:07:16 -0800 
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20121219


Perhaps what is so difficult for the Vortex lame brains is not
deciphering the Mole comment, but figuring out why Lucky Saint has not
provided a video of this LENR disk boiling water.




Re: [Vo]:STMicroelectronics report on their version of the Celani apparatus

2012-12-20 Thread Daniel Rocha
Karabut  also found signs of x-rays, before Storms announced, since 2005,
presented in ICCF12:

Karabut A. *Research into Energy and Temporal Characteristics of X-ray
Emission from Solid State Cathode Medium of High-Current Glow
Discharge*, *Proc.
ICCF12* (2005), www.iscmns.org/iccf12/Karabut_2.pdf

See more from Karabut:

http://www.iscmns.org/library.htm

See the papers concerning the same subject, even in the JCMNS vol. 6, where
Karabut published with Hagelstein:

http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol6.pdf






2012/12/20 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com

 The evidence for radiation never became truly strong and confirmed, such
 as it was. Storms is now reporting X-rays from certain experiments, but
 that's not confirmed.



-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com


Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 05:09 PM 12/19/2012, lenr4po...@gmail.com wrote:
How dare you treat rights of privacy so lightly? Find yourself a 
bureaucratic job in DC minding other peoples business.


Fart


Fart produced, as the name might indicate, more gaseous emissions, 
perhaps single-handedly contributing to the greenhouse effect. Or 
not. Maybe it's insignificant.


James Bowery 
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22James+Bowery%22 
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:07:16 -0800 
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20121219


Perhaps what is so difficult for the Vortex lame brains is not
deciphering the Mole comment, but figuring out why Lucky Saint has not
provided a video of this LENR disk boiling water.


The alleged device in question is claimed to have been boiling water 
for five years. It's a sealed cell, two pieces of copper bonded, and 
small. That could be shown, and, if it is actually boiling water, 
without revealing *at all* what is inside, and it is not necessary. 
If this small thing keeps boiling water for a few hours, if observers 
can examine the beaker thoroughly, and maybe replace the water, and 
water keeps boiling, we'd have a conclusive demonstration of an 
astounding heat effect.


One could easily fake this in a video, it would be trivial. It could 
be done with, indeed, induction heating of the copper, that could be 
invisible on the video, and *anything* can be faked in a video. But 
this could be extremely difficult to fake with an in-person 
demonstration, where observers could check everything -- except, to 
preserve privacy -- i.e., intellectual rights, if those matter -- 
the contents of the copper cell.


If that much energy can be produced from a small copper cell, it's 
revolutionary, and worth billions or more, even much more.


So the lack of independent confirmation is *telling*. It doesn't 
prove that the effect is absent, but that the person claimng the 
effect is ... weird.


And therefore cannot be taken as reliable.

That's all.

Look, there are conspiracy theorists who believe that anyone who 
finds something like this *will* be suppressed. But that leads to a 
conclusion that it should not be publically announced. And here it 
is, announced. No, the pieces don't fit together, it doesn't make sense.


We have seen countless free energy announcements, and none of them 
have been confirmed. Yet there would be ways for a genuine inventor 
to deal with the problems of, say, some suppressive conspiracy. It 
merely takes patience and time. If he's got that boiling device, he's 
got the ticket out of the trap. But he's not using it. Hence ... the 
default conclusion is that this is just one more of these phony 
announcements, there are many possible motives for such. Sometimes 
the person announcing is simply crazy, sometimes it's a prank or 
hoax. If the latter, the guy is laughing every time someone takes 
this seriously.


In this case, his point would be how gullible people are. Well, are we?

By the way, I haven't told the inventor what to do. I'm not even in 
communication with the inventor. I've merely written on the high 
likelihood here, given known facts, that this is quite unreal. There 
is no such device, boiling water for the last five years.


I would *absolutely love* being wrong on this. But what I would love 
is irrelevant. It only means that my motive here is not to win 
through ridicule. Generally, I'm known for pointing out the obvious.


Look, thinking about falsifying my own theory, here: suppose this 
device is real. Suppose there is some conspiracy of major interests 
to suppress free energy ideas. They have an agency that investigates 
possibilities. They aren't a serious conspiracy if they don't! So 
they would track this guy down, there are ways. They would find out 
where he's getting internet access, where his computer is located, 
and they would start to watch him.


If this thing is boiling for five years, it needs constant 
maintenance. He's got to be watching it, somehow. They would figure 
it out, and, say it's in his house. There would be a break-in to the 
house, stuff would be trashed to make it look like the burglars were 
ordinary thieves, and the piece of copper would be missing. And then 
it would be handled with extreme care. They'd want to know what is 
powering it, and they would have the resources to figure it out. If 
this is truly a serious conspiracy, the guy would be kidnapped or 
just plain killed.


Hence my conclusion: this is a hoax, if there is a conspiracy, they 
know that, so they won't bother killing him. They *like* there being 
people like him, because it will divert attention from real technologies.


If it's real, there is no conspiracy, then, and the inventor is 
merely crazy. Unfortunate. Being a crazy inventor can easily lead to 
the loss of one's invention. Crazy people die, and crazy ideas often 
die with them. Whether those ideas are sound or not. Consider Papp, 
where there are 

Re: [Vo]:[OT] Everyone Needs a Hobby

2012-12-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
Wow! I am surprised the recoil from the machine gun does not make the
helicopter go completely out of control. The guy who made that video is
nuts.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:STMicroelectronics report on their version of the Celani apparatus

2012-12-20 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 07:34 PM 12/19/2012, Harry Veeder wrote:

I meant that if the excess heat is real and whatever the cause of the
excess heat, the excess heat  might force a limited number of
transmutations  and emit a small amount of gammas and neutrons.


Sure, the FPHE appears to do that, but the small amounts are 
difficult to detect, and the apparatus and approach used in this case 
would be expected to come up empty. One must consider background 
radiation, which is ubiquitous, and, as well, the inverse square law 
that has radiation decline in intensity as the square of the distance 
from the source.


SPAWAR has detected low levels of neutrons by using solid state 
radiation detectors which are very close to the source, and they can 
accumulate radiation over weeks. They are, under those conditions, 
apparently observing roughly ten times background. This is extremely 
low level. You would not see this with detectors outside the cell, 
unless the reaction site is next to the cell wall, and the detectors 
are right next to the cell wall on the outside, and even that will 
reduce the signal.


It's easy to look for radiation as they did, and cheap. But negative 
findings mean nothing, beyond setting an upper limit on radiation.


We have not found LENR effects that produce much prompt radiation, or 
much of any radiation. That's quite an interesting observation, 
itself. There may be something about LENR mechanisms that suppresses 
unstable products, that takes the reaction all the way to stable 
products (like helium) while non-photon/phonon emissions remain at 
low levels. And the photons cannot be high-energy, or they would 
easily be detected.


Storms takes this and runs with it, postulating a series of photon 
emissions at low energies, instead of one big photon dump. He's 
proposing a specific mechanism for this that seems shaky to me, but 
the basic idea is sound. There are, very likely, a series of 
emissions that are not individually large. For example, Be-8, if 
formed from 4D fusion, will first exist as an excited nucleus. That 
excited nucleus will start to emit photons in a series of emissions 
down to the ground state. If it reaches the ground state, eventually 
it will fission and we would expect two alphas at roungly 45 KeV 
each. That's above the Hagelstein limit, but *not far.* So call me, maybe.


The fly in this ointment is that Be-8 has a normal half-life of a 
femtosecond. It doesn't seem like it would have time to decay as 
described, so the alphas would have *much* higher energy, and that 
*would* be observed. You don't have 20 MeV alphas zipping around with 
no observable effects. Even if there is no prompt gamma, there will 
be secondary radiation, and plenty of it.


So something else is happening. Maybe a fusion product being formed 
inside of a condensate remains stable for a while. I still don't get 
it. I'd think that if a condensate started radiating photons, it 
would uncondense, very rapidly. But ... we do not know.


That's the central message about cold fusion at this point. We don't 
know what it is, and I suggest a healthy dose of skepticism for *any 
theory* that, at this point, proposes to explain it. This mystery has 
survived for twenty years, with some very powerful minds having worked on it.


Almost certainly, we need more information about the conditions of 
cold fusion before theory will start to catch up.


Of course, if someone has a theory and uses it with success to 
predict CF behavior *quantitatively* -- or qualitatively under new, 
unexpected conditions -- the *experimental results* should be 
respected and confirmed. Not to do this wouldn't be skepticism, it 
would be pseudoskepticism. 



Re: [Vo]:STMicroelectronics report on their version of the Celani apparatus

2012-12-20 Thread Daniel Rocha
BTW, as someone pointed out, It seems other people have also detected x
rays even earlIer. Just check the paper by Ed Storms, JCMNS, nov. 2012


2012/12/20 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com

 Karabut  also found signs of x-rays, before Storms announced, since 2005,
 presented in ICCF12:

 Karabut A. *Research into Energy and Temporal Characteristics of X-ray
 Emission from Solid State Cathode Medium of High-Current Glow Discharge*,
 *Proc. ICCF12* (2005), www.iscmns.org/iccf12/Karabut_2.pdf

 See more from Karabut:

 http://www.iscmns.org/library.htm

 See the papers concerning the same subject, even in the JCMNS vol. 6,
 where Karabut published with Hagelstein:

 http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol6.pdf






 2012/12/20 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com

 The evidence for radiation never became truly strong and confirmed, such
 as it was. Storms is now reporting X-rays from certain experiments, but
 that's not confirmed.



 --
 Daniel Rocha - RJ
 danieldi...@gmail.com




-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com


[Vo]:OT: December 21, 2012

2012-12-20 Thread Robert Léguillon
Good news:
I'm in Japan right now, and it's 4:43am. Armageddon has yet to kickoff.The 
world hasn't been stick by an asteroid yet, the magnetic poles haven't 
reversed, and dogs and cats still don't get along.

  

Re: [Vo]:OT: December 21, 2012

2012-12-20 Thread ChemE Stewart
If it is a big orbital black hole traveling 500 miles/sec you won't see it
coming.  You might hear a quick swish...:)

On Thursday, December 20, 2012, Robert Léguillon wrote:

 Good news:
 I'm in Japan right now, and it's 4:43am. Armageddon has yet to kickoff.The
 world hasn't been stick by an asteroid yet, the magnetic poles haven't
 reversed, and dogs and cats still don't get along.




[Vo]:Greenyer and Valat (MFMP) Interview at 9 PM (EST)

2012-12-20 Thread pagnucco
Unless there is a schedule change -

Bob Greenyer and Mathieu Valat of The Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project
will be interviewed at 9PM(EST Dec20 = 2:00 GMT) at URL:

http://smartscarecrow.com/

I believe there will be a live QA session.


Also, for those who missed it the Swedish SVT TV show on Rossi's E-cat is
available with English subtitles at:

http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/12/swedish-svt-e-cat-program-with-english-subtitles/




RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 01:47 PM 12/20/2012, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
I’m trying to ignore the hostility associated 
with this  thread because the subject material 
still has my curiosity piqued.. does anyone have 
some related links where I can learn more about 
“lucky saint” and his theories… any historical background?


Look, Fran, you are perfectly welcome to waste 
your time purusing will-o-the-wisps. You are 
actually performing a community service if you 
do. And I've certainly wasted a lot of my own 
time, in a sense, checking out, say Orbo, or the 
Obama fake birth certificate claims, or any of 
many such things. Tell us what you find, this 
particular one is definitely on topic here (as with Orbo, MAHG, etc.)


I hope, however, you don't regale us with endless 
theories about what you think might actualy be 
happening, when it's highly unlikely that 
anything is happening out of the ordinary at all.


The default something unknown is generating 
heat is actually quite adequate as a working 
hypothesis. If you find *specific evidence* for 
some serious theory, then call me, maybe. So to speak. 



Re: [Vo]:STMicroelectronics report on their version of the Celani apparatus

2012-12-20 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Finding X-rays from a glow discharge (plasma, basically) is one 
thing, finding them from a low-energy environment is quite another.


This is not to denigrate the research cited. It's just not relevant 
to what had been mentioned, Storms finding of X-radiation *without* a 
glow discharge. Yes, there had been lots of reports of X-rays before, 
see Storms' book.


However, the circumstances of X-ray production, and association with 
other LENR evidence, is important. Correlated reports are rare. 
Rather, someone runs an experiment, say, and has some X-ray film 
sitting there, and it ends up with some exposure, and then people 
argue about causation and possible artifacts. Correlation with other, 
independent effects, cuts through this noise.


At 02:04 PM 12/20/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Karabut  also found signs of x-rays, before Storms announced, since 
2005, presented in ICCF12:


Karabut A. Research into Energy and Temporal Characteristics of 
X-ray Emission from Solid State Cathode Medium of High-Current Glow 
Discharge, Proc. ICCF12 (2005), 
http://www.iscmns.org/iccf12/Karabut_2.pdfwww.iscmns.org/iccf12/Karabut_2.pdf


See more from Karabut:

http://www.iscmns.org/library.htmhttp://www.iscmns.org/library.htm

See the papers concerning the same subject, even in the JCMNS vol. 
6, where Karabut published with Hagelstein:


http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol6.pdfhttp://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol6.pdf






2012/12/20 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax 
mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com
The evidence for radiation never became truly strong and confirmed, 
such as it was. Storms is now reporting X-rays from certain 
experiments, but that's not confirmed.




--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
mailto:danieldi...@gmail.comdanieldi...@gmail.com




Re: [Vo]:[OT] Everyone Needs a Hobby

2012-12-20 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 02:16 PM 12/20/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Wow! I am surprised the recoil from the machine gun does not make 
the helicopter go completely out of control. The guy who made that 
video is nuts.


Actually, a quick review of the video showed no sign of recoil. 
Further, the dummies being attacked don't look like they were hit 
with ordinary machine gun rounds. It looks like ordinary rounds hit 
the ground, maybe, but when the dummies are hit, they explode. Like 
they have a charge placed in them, detonated. Spectacular.


It's a hell of a lot safer, and cheaper, to make a video like this, 
simply faking it, than it would be do do the real thing. That recoil 
problem could be severe, and, yes, it might lead to some, ah, 
inaccuracy. I'd not want to be near one of those things, if it were real.


Much more likely: this is entertainment. The quadrorotor may be real. 
So he had some fun with it.


Actually setting up the quadrorotor with a machine gun (carrying a 
lot of rounds!) and designing the control system to anticipate recoil 
when the gun is fired, maintaining attitude and targeting control, 
that would be difficult and very, very expensive to do.


Easy to fly a remote control quadrorotor around, I think you can buy 
those, and you might be able to borrow one. After all, this video 
could sell these devices. 



RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Abd,
My interest was piqued because I suspect It might be my own theories being fed 
back to the vort.. the bit about milling the powder in inert gas and then 
submerging the finished reactor immediately in a heat sink directly from the 
glove box sounded awful familiar :_) hopefully some troll isn't trying to feed 
me my own tail but that is one suspicion that occurred to me.. anyway, nothing 
came up on google and think whoever labeled this an urban legend was probably 
closest to the mark.. sorry my long winded theories appear to annoy you .. as a 
Christmas present I'll skip my annual nod to limestone blocks and ambient gases 
trapped inside :_)
Fran

-Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com] 
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 3:10 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

At 01:47 PM 12/20/2012, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
I'm trying to ignore the hostility associated 
with this  thread because the subject material 
still has my curiosity piqued.. does anyone have 
some related links where I can learn more about 
lucky saint and his theories... any historical background?

Look, Fran, you are perfectly welcome to waste 
your time purusing will-o-the-wisps. You are 
actually performing a community service if you 
do. And I've certainly wasted a lot of my own 
time, in a sense, checking out, say Orbo, or the 
Obama fake birth certificate claims, or any of 
many such things. Tell us what you find, this 
particular one is definitely on topic here (as with Orbo, MAHG, etc.)

I hope, however, you don't regale us with endless 
theories about what you think might actualy be 
happening, when it's highly unlikely that 
anything is happening out of the ordinary at all.

The default something unknown is generating 
heat is actually quite adequate as a working 
hypothesis. If you find *specific evidence* for 
some serious theory, then call me, maybe. So to speak. 



Re: [Vo]:[OT] Everyone Needs a Hobby

2012-12-20 Thread David Roberson
That is exactly what I was thinking.  Perhaps this guy is not aware of software 
glitches?  No one should try this at home.


Dave



-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 20, 2012 2:16 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:[OT] Everyone Needs a Hobby


Wow! I am surprised the recoil from the machine gun does not make the 
helicopter go completely out of control. The guy who made that video is nuts.


- Jed


 


Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread James Bowery
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:


  James Bowery http://www.mail-archive.com/**search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com;
 **q=from:%22James+Bowery%22http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22James+Bowery%22
 Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:07:16 -0800 http://www.mail-archive.com/**
 search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com**q=date:20121219http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20121219
 

 Perhaps what is so difficult for the Vortex lame brains is not
 deciphering the Mole comment, but figuring out why Lucky Saint has not
 provided a video of this LENR disk boiling water.



 One could easily fake this in a video, it would be trivial. It could be
 done with, indeed, induction heating of the copper, that could be invisible
 on the video, and *anything* can be faked in a video. But this could be
 extremely difficult to fake with an in-person demonstration, where
 observers could check everything -- except, to preserve privacy -- i.e.,
 intellectual rights, if those matter -- the contents of the copper cell.


Induction heating would require a visible device nearby.  If Lucky Saint
is sincerely attempting to help the world by releasing this technology, as
he has presumably attempted by disclosing the fabrication technique, then
it would be a small additional effort to post a video of a beaker of water
containing the boiling device, with the beaker elevated on some sort of
stand that would not plausibly contain an induction heater.

Faking that video would be difficult enough to motivate a Russ type of
fellow, who has access to the requisite resources, to proceed to replicate
the recipe.


Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell - about Jaro Jaro trolling

2012-12-20 Thread Jojo Jaro

Which part of what I said do you think is untrue?

Note, I am willing to discuss it as long as you do not throw insults.  If 
you are so convinced that I am wrong and find it necessary to insult me to 
prove a point, then it is best that we stop the discussion.


I stand 1000% behind what I said about allah and muhammed.  Allah is the 
moon god of the tribe of muhammed; and muhammed did indeed have dozens of 
wives and concubines.  And he did indeed have a 9 year-old little girl that 
also served as his concubine.


Heck, modern islamic countries today condone the marriage of even 3 year-old 
girls as long as sex is postponned until puberty.  That means 10-12 
years-old.  So, in modern islamic countries, you can marry a 3 year-old 
little girl and postpone sex until she is 10.  That my friend is also true. 
Many people find it offensive and insulting and many muslims are quite 
embarrassed by it but it is a true part of their heritage.  I believe, islam 
is the only religion that has this practice.  Somebody may correct me on 
this.


But, you don't have to believe me.  Research it for yourself.



Jojo


PS, Note that I have not insulted you in any way.  If you think that I am 
insulting because I am speaking the truth; then tell me how I can say these 
truths without being insulting.  There is just no way.  The truth is 
offensive to muslims; but it is the truth.





- Original Message - 
From: de Bivort Lawrence ldebiv...@gmail.com

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell - about Jaro Jaro 
trolling



Without addressing anything else in this  s message, I'll merely stay that 
all reference to Islam and Muhammad is no sensual and reflects a degree of 
ignorance that exceeds expectations.



Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 19, 2012, at 1:32 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:


He he he.

yeah I'm all you label me.  I'm all that and more.  And yes, I have a 
repressed childhood.  You can believe whatever it is that tickles your 
fancy.


Yes, I'm a turd; but whose more pathetic?  The turd or the man playing 
with the turd knowing it's a turd?  The turd has no choice, but the man 
playing with a turd has got to be some maladjusted retard.  LOL...


But at least. at least I am smart enough to graduate with a 
engineering degree; but sensible enough not to boast that I am some kind 
of expert.. And I am wise enough not to worship a 2nd rate moon god 
preached by a sex-perverted 9 year-old child molesting prophet.


Somebody doing this must be some maladjusted individual.  The sexual 
pervert prophet would have tipped any sensible man to stay away from that 
moon god; but our expert worships him.  LOL



OH my, I've really done it this time.  I'm done for..  You will now really 
call for my banning.  Since I just insulted your great moon god and his 
holey loving prophet.  I'm done for; you will now go to your imam and 
issue a fatwah against me and have me killed.  LOL


BTW, for those of you just reading this.  I have done nothing more than 
tell the truth.  Allah is the moon god of muhammed's tribe; and muhammed 
is a sex-perverted prophet with dozens of wives and concubines including a 
9 year-old little girl barely out of diapers.  And muslim imams do indeed 
issue a fatwah for the assasination of anyone who they consider have 
insulted their prophet.   I speak the truth if you care to research it 
yourself.  Even muslims acknowledge these truths and this is a source of 
great embarassment for many a moon god worshipper; and you will see our 
expert trying to spin this away.



Jojo

PS, Don't even pretend that you don't read what I write.  Everyone know 
that you read it. LOL.   But, as for me, I honestly only read the first 
part of your posts.  It's tiresome to read your verbal diarrhea.  So, if 
you really really really want to insult me; make sure you do so in the 
first few sentences.  That would really be effective in getting me and 
hurting me with your insults.  LOL


So, Go ahead, continue the insults.   I will give as much and much more 
than I can get.  Christmas period is a slow time for me so I'll play along 
with your games.  But come January, you can play with yourself.







- Original Message - From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax 
a...@lomaxdesign.com

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2012 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:How bad is this news? Jed Rothwell - about Jaro Jaro 
trolling



Hah! I see that when I added the tag to the subject, I mispelled Jojo 
Jaro


At 04:14 AM 12/8/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:


So, this libtard from Wisconsin claims that I do not have emotional 
maturity and that I am 10 or that I did not get feedback and all that 
crap. O well, if I am a turd, what do you call somebody who keeps playing 
with a turd knowing full well its a turd.


Someone who is not willing to give up on the idea
that a turd is a human being.

Foolish, perhaps. Jojo 

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 04:29 PM 12/20/2012, Roarty, Francis X wrote:

Abd,
My interest was piqued because I suspect It might be my own theories 
being fed back to the vort.. the bit about milling the powder in 
inert gas and then submerging the finished reactor immediately in a 
heat sink directly from the glove box sounded awful familiar :_) 
hopefully some troll isn't trying to feed me my own tail but that is 
one suspicion that occurred to me.. anyway, nothing came up on 
google and think whoever labeled this an urban legend was probably 
closest to the mark.. sorry my long winded theories appear to annoy 
you .. as a Christmas present I'll skip my annual nod to limestone 
blocks and ambient gases trapped inside :_)


Don't take my comment too far out of its intended application, which 
was specific. I really don't have a strong judgment of your general 
theories, particularly when you are attempting to explain observed 
phenomena with some level of serious credibility behind them.


This incident could indeed be an attempt to feed your theories back 
to you, through a pretend confirmation. It's a possible explanation.


It would be an extraordinary coincidence that such a major 
confirmation -- doing something that you haven't done -- would be 
accomplished by some wing nut.


Yes, one has to have some, shall we say, ego strength, to buck the 
alleged scientific consensus, so we expect people on the fringe to be 
a bit unraveled, so to speak. However, that only goes so far. Serious 
researchers on the fringe are only particularly fringe as to what 
they investigate, not as to the techniques used.


Mmmm maybe we are missing out on something here! Has anyone used 
a ouija board with a cold fusion replication? Why not?


How are you feeling today? F I N E
Going to show us some XP? NO T R Y A G A I N T O M O R R O W
How about some helium? S E E A B O V E Y O U I D I O T GOODBYE

The possibilities are endless.



Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread Brad Lowe
Hi Francis,

Lucky Saint is, in my opinion, the same person who posts on vortex and
elsewhere under a dozen or more pseudonyms, including Chen, phen, chan,
Puppy, Lucky, ny@aol.com, d...@inbox.lv, Mint, quickly.. and now
mole4l...@gmail.com. add them to your kill file.. or read it for
entertainment.

A magic penny boiling water for 5 years? And still can't afford a spell
checker. Uh, yeah.. No video needed.

The sad part is we have the same proof for the magic penny as we do for the
e-cat and Hyperion.

- Brad



On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Roarty, Francis X 
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:

 Abd,
 My interest was piqued because I suspect It might be my own theories being
 fed back to the vort.. the bit about milling the powder in inert gas and
 then submerging the finished reactor immediately in a heat sink directly
 from the glove box sounded awful familiar :_) hopefully some troll isn't
 trying to feed me my own tail but that is one suspicion that occurred to
 me.. anyway, nothing came up on google and think whoever labeled this an
 urban legend was probably closest to the mark.. sorry my long winded
 theories appear to annoy you .. as a Christmas present I'll skip my annual
 nod to limestone blocks and ambient gases trapped inside :_)
 Fran

 -Original Message-
 From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.com]
 Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 3:10 PM
 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
 Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

 At 01:47 PM 12/20/2012, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
 I'm trying to ignore the hostility associated
 with this  thread because the subject material
 still has my curiosity piqued.. does anyone have
 some related links where I can learn more about
 lucky saint and his theories... any historical background?

 Look, Fran, you are perfectly welcome to waste
 your time purusing will-o-the-wisps. You are
 actually performing a community service if you
 do. And I've certainly wasted a lot of my own
 time, in a sense, checking out, say Orbo, or the
 Obama fake birth certificate claims, or any of
 many such things. Tell us what you find, this
 particular one is definitely on topic here (as with Orbo, MAHG, etc.)

 I hope, however, you don't regale us with endless
 theories about what you think might actualy be
 happening, when it's highly unlikely that
 anything is happening out of the ordinary at all.

 The default something unknown is generating
 heat is actually quite adequate as a working
 hypothesis. If you find *specific evidence* for
 some serious theory, then call me, maybe. So to speak.




Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 05:06 PM 12/20/2012, James Bowery wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax 
mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:


James Bowery 
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22James+Bowery%22http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22James+Bowery%22 
Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:07:16 -0800 
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20121219http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20121219


Perhaps what is so difficult for the Vortex lame brains is not
deciphering the Mole comment, but figuring out why Lucky Saint has not
provided a video of this LENR disk boiling water.



One could easily fake this in a video, it would be trivial. It could 
be done with, indeed, induction heating of the copper, that could be 
invisible on the video, and *anything* can be faked in a video. But 
this could be extremely difficult to fake with an in-person 
demonstration, where observers could check everything -- except, to 
preserve privacy -- i.e., intellectual rights, if those matter -- 
the contents of the copper cell.



Induction heating would require a visible device nearby.  If Lucky 
Saint is sincerely attempting to help the world by releasing this 
technology, as he has presumably attempted by disclosing the 
fabrication technique, then it would be a small additional effort to 
post a video of a beaker of water containing the boiling device, 
with the beaker elevated on some sort of stand that would not 
plausibly contain an induction heater.


Faking that video would be difficult enough to motivate a Russ 
type of fellow, who has access to the requisite resources, to 
proceed to replicate the recipe.


Aw, c'mon. That level of fake would be trivial. Sure, the video might 
be made so that it would be difficult. But it would still be quite 
possible with video editing software.


Look, it's a lot of work to replicate something like this. I would 
*not* invest that work unless:


1. The researcher is credible, behaves as if sane.
2. The claims are credible. A small disk that boils water for five 
years, not credible.

3. Something that could be confirmed, easily, has been confirmed.

All three tests fail, here.

Absolutely, we can't claim that failing these tests *proves* that 
there is no effect, or that the fellow is actually lying. It merely 
makes that probable enough that investing the resources to verify the 
recipe is likely doomed to find nothing but a failed replication. And 
what would that prove? The guy is claiming five years. Great! If he 
really is out to help the world, *share that*. Show it to someone. 
Let someone credible and independent make that video. I'd trust 
Stewart Allen, assuming he were willing to do some simple tests. It 
is not necessary to open the device. Just to verify that it, sitting 
there with no input, is boiling water in a beaker. Steward should be 
able to pick up the beaker and move it around, so he'll need 
appropriate gloves or the like. Someone should figure out the 
chemical limits from a sealed cell like that, and the video should 
then be on long enough to take the heat out of any reasonable 
chemical explanation.


Look, this is trivial to verify, compared to the trouble of doing a 
replication. Replication of what?


Here is your replication, quite the same as what you already have:

I made one of these, and it's been boiling water continuously now for days.

There. That is an exact replication of the original claim.

Except I'm lying. I just made that up. But suppose someone else makes 
a claim like that? Is the claim therefore *any more credible*?


Not unless the person is a credible researcher, known for honest 
testimony, or the research is independently observed, etc.


The whole field of cold fusion, with hundreds of independent 
researchers verifying the Fleischmann-Pons Heat Effect, were not able 
to produce a simple device like this. The NiH workers, including 
Rossi, have not produced the kind of evidence we would need, and the 
other companies working on it are keeping their results largely 
secret. A device that does what is being claimed would truly be revolutionary.


But Sagan was right: extraordinary claims require extraordinary 
evidence. Okay, maybe not extraordinary evidence, just ordinary 
evidence. What is the evidence here. When someone claims something 
considered as possible, even remotely, we don't out of hand reject 
it. But when it's considered impossible, something *never before 
seen* -- and nobody credible has reported seeing any thing like this, 
sustained for so long -- we *do* note lack of supporting evidence and 
make investment decisions accordingly.


Sure if you have some spare time and have the resources, you can 
check it out. As I mentioned, someone who does that is performing a 
public service, albeit one with relatively low expected utility. 
Reporting the attempt, accurately, adds to the body of things that 

Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread James Bowery
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax 
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:

 At 05:06 PM 12/20/2012, James Bowery wrote:

 On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:
 a...@lomaxdesign.coma**b...@lomaxdesign.com a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:

 James Bowery http://www.mail-archive.com/**
 search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com**q=from:%22James+Bowery%22http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22James+Bowery%22
 http**://www.mail-archive.com/**search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com**
 q=from:%22James+Bowery%22http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=from:%22James+Bowery%22
 Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:07:16 -0800 http://www.mail-archive.com/**
 search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com**q=date:20121219http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20121219
 http://www.**mail-archive.com/search?l=**vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:**
 20121219http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=date:20121219
 


 Perhaps what is so difficult for the Vortex lame brains is not
 deciphering the Mole comment, but figuring out why Lucky Saint has not
 provided a video of this LENR disk boiling water.



 One could easily fake this in a video, it would be trivial. It could be
 done with, indeed, induction heating of the copper, that could be invisible
 on the video, and *anything* can be faked in a video. But this could be
 extremely difficult to fake with an in-person demonstration, where
 observers could check everything -- except, to preserve privacy -- i.e.,
 intellectual rights, if those matter -- the contents of the copper cell.


 Induction heating would require a visible device nearby.  If Lucky
 Saint is sincerely attempting to help the world by releasing this
 technology, as he has presumably attempted by disclosing the fabrication
 technique, then it would be a small additional effort to post a video of a
 beaker of water containing the boiling device, with the beaker elevated on
 some sort of stand that would not plausibly contain an induction heater.

 Faking that video would be difficult enough to motivate a Russ type of
 fellow, who has access to the requisite resources, to proceed to replicate
 the recipe.


 Aw, c'mon. That level of fake would be trivial. Sure, the video might be
 made so that it would be difficult. But it would still be quite possible
 with video editing software.

 Look, it's a lot of work to replicate something like this. I would *not*
 invest that work unless:


You aren't a Russ kind of guy, though, are you?

He's put quite a bit of work into replicating the Papp piston all with even
less direct information about how to build one.

Am I advising people to go out and build this device based on the current
or even the proposed video evidence?


[Vo]:HolocaustPhysics CT,3rdREICH,Columbine,etc.PER Rabbi Dr.YeshuaBenYusef

2012-12-20 Thread Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan

byline: Jack Harbach Jr.//Washingon-DC_USA PER Rabbi Dr. Yeshua Ben Yusef
 
GODSPACE: The Hyper Speed-Dense outer DarkSpace is the Virtually 
'Infinite-Eternal' spacial medium containing myriad 
(virtually infinite in number) whole bubble universes.  There is a centre to 
Hyper DarkSpace.
 
In physics, if the 'medium' is a contiguous 'membrane/M-Brane' (which it is) 
then the 'characteristics' of any given
point-coordinate upon said membrane are then continuous/contiguous upon the 
entire 'M-Brane.'
 
CASE IN POINT OMNIVERSAL SENTIENCE: Sentience, being an aspect of identifiable 
point-coordinates upon the Omniversal HyperDarkSpace Super M-Brane indicates 
that ALL TIMELESS ETERNITY is indeed an INFINITE SENTIENCE; hense then 
'ALL-that-is'
IS FROM, OF,  SUSTAINED by the ENERGEY-SUBSTANCE-STUFF of GODSPACE(indulge me 
some here). . . Hense GODSPACE is expressable
as a Dynamic Super-M-Brane of HYPER COMPRESSED LIVING-DATA unfolding as the 
Atomic-Biologic-'DNA'-Template of the
ongoing continuous development of ALL UNIVERSEs within HyperDarkSpace/GODSPACE.
 
HOW FAST IS THE SPEED of GOD THOUGHT:  Einstein articulated a 'thing' called 
'SPOOKY ACTION at a DISTANCE' that
Hyper DarkSpace/GODSPACE is the SUSTAINING ENERGETIC FABRIC of ALL ENERGETIC 
PHENOMENON.  And Prof. Einstein
articulated that the SPEED-DENSITY of HyperDarkSpace/GODSPACE as moving across 
VIRTUALLY INFINITE DISTANCES at 
the VIRTUALLY INSTANTANEOUS SPEED rate of VIRTUAL-NO-DISTANCE/VIRTUAL NO-TIME 
eg. LIMITLESS SPEED
of TIMELESS-ETERNITY: ergo, God thought is pretty darn quick!
 
EINSTEIN ROSEN BRIDGE:  Einstein Rosen 'virtual worm holes' are MYRIAD  FACT 
and 'singularities/white-or-black holes are their 
'ends.'  By the VOLITIONAL DIRECT DECISION
of the UNIVERSAL OMNI-SENTIENCE, Einstein Rosen Connections to ANY POINT in 
TIME /or timeless SPACE within 
HyperDark Space /or coordinates within any Bubble Universe such as our own at 
the SPEED OF GOD's THOUGHT are
possible  establishable to the very 'physical' OMNIVERSE-HUB-CENTRE of 'GOD's 
MIND-WILL' instantly.  And hense the HYPERVERSAL SENTIENCE can
likewise connect with OMNIVERSAL AWARENESS to ANY  EVERY POINT in either SPACE 
or TIME instantly  constantly.
 
HENSE:  Only SMALL-MINDS would deign to limit the INFINITE-ETERNAL OMNIVERSAL 
SENTIENCE.
 
* * *PER:  THE MOST EMINENT PHYSICIST in HUMAN HISTORY-Rabbi Dr. Yeshua Ben 
Yusef.
 
WITHIN OMNIVERSAL TIMELESS ETERNITY:  There is NO DEATH but only LIFE. . . the 
accurate humanly articulated
'LAW' of the 'Conservation of Mass  Energy' realizes that mass/energy is NOT 
DESTROYED but merely TRANSFORMED.
 
The Omniversal Sentience long since revealed that for His direct parental 
sponsorship of Mankind that he would project
his FOCALIZED Point-Focused perfection into our HISTORIC STREAM as the 
'MESSIAH.'  The Messiah would thus be
an 'humanized' EINSTEIN-ROSEN INSTANEOUS-CONTIGUOUS PORTAL direct to the 
OMNIVERSAL SENTIENT CENTRE
of GODSPACE eg. the 'Pantokrator' ALMIGHTY-GOD//YHWH etc.
 
The MESSIAH-PORTAL would thusly be able to ACT-PERFORM as  a PSYCHO-SPIRITUAL 
SINGULARITY-BlackHole; and as a COLLAPSING
STAR literally ABSORB the ENCAPSULATED-HYPER ALONE  PARANOID  HIDEOUSLY 
ANGUISHED  BLINDERED  CORRUPT HOLOCAUST
NATURE of ALL HISTORIC MANKIND's ENERGY and then in WOMB-LIKE 
METAMORPHOSIS/BIRTH eject us as a TRANSMUTED-RECREATED HUMAN(New Species of 
Collective Humanity) with our
CONSCIENCENESS(both individual  collective) now in VIBRANT CONCERT CO-RESONANT 
FUNCTION within the MIND/HEART/SOUL/SPIRIT/PERFECT LOVE of the OMNIVERSAL PARENT
SENTIENCE aka YHWH.  This in point of fact was done in PERFECT COMPASSIONATE 
EMPATHY @ the CROSS(over Portal) of the
MESSIAH of Bethlehem @ Judea circa CE-One.
 
There are simply ONLY TWO STATES of existence for ALL  EVERY Sentient Being 
within TIMELESS-ETERNAL OMNIVERSAL EXISTENCE.
Those states are simply passed INTO THE MESSIAH UNIVERAL PORTAL; or; WITHOUT 
the MESSIAH UNIVERSAL PORTAL.  We collectively demonstrate daily that OUR BEST 
EFFORTS severally  individually are VIRTUALLY IMPOTENT to improve ourselves and
our collective human species.  Our 'best' plans  solutions are demonstratably 
inadequate and the FATHER allows our free will for us to simply demonstrate 
this to ourselves.   LIBERTY  FREE WILL to CHOOSE OUR DIRECTION is SACRED to 
the FATHER but so is our FREEDOM to LIVE BY OUR CHOICES. . . ouch. . . and HE 
nor we WOULD EXCEPT IT ANY OTHER WAY for our WILLS are made of his VERY 
NATURE/ENERGY. . . we have become ADAM LANZA that REFUSE to COME TO LOVE and 
thus STRIKE OUT SOCIOPATHICALLY in BITTER ANQUISHED ANGRY-AGONY against ALL 
THAT IS PURE  INNOCENT. . . which is the inevitable human collective nature of 
HOLOCAUST-SEPARATED-CONSCIENCE from THE INFINITE LIFE SOURCE.  By the way this 
is the very same HOLOCAUST ESSENSE by which we NONCHALANTLY utilize the 
brutally discompassionate term COLLATERAL DAMAGE.
 
Jesus said:  I AM the TRUTH,  the LIFE,  the WAY, and NO PERSON 

[Vo]:Higgs Boson is back

2012-12-20 Thread Roarty, Francis X
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/07/04/higgs-boson-stephen-hawking/


Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread Jed Rothwell
Brad Lowe ecatbuil...@gmail.com wrote:


 The sad part is we have the same proof for the magic penny as we do for
 the e-cat and Hyperion.


It is not quite as bad as that.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:Is there any flaw in the experimental method in this procedure?

2012-12-20 Thread Jojo Jaro
Axil,

It would seem to me that the heavy metals making up the popper mechanisms would 
not sink the heat evenly.  The popper spark being a point heat source would 
probably sink heat differently than the heater, which I presume would be some 
kind of coil.

And we know that if we get uneven heating, it would be very easy to mistake 
that as OU heat.  It seems to me that this is the lesson we are learning with 
Celani cell replication attempts.

We probably need some fan to distribute the heat.


But I could be wrong.

Also, a spark heat source would take a long time to heat the entire popper 
mechanism.


It seems to me that it would be very easy to prove OU operation with the 
popper.  Simply compute the amount of energy imparted on the piston as it is 
poppped upwards and compare that with the amount of energy inputted into the 
popper cylinder by the electrical spark.  Using the capacitive banks to create 
a spark, it is a straightforward thing to compute the amount of energy in the 
capacitive bank.


Jojo


  - Original Message - 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: vortex-l 
  Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 9:26 AM
  Subject: [Vo]:Is there any flaw in the experimental method in this procedure?


  This is a first pass at a possible way to test the Papp popper for over-unity 
energy production using the KISS method.

  Energy Calibration stage.

  1 - Equalize the temperature of the popper at a fixed arbitrary temperature 
Tc.

  2 - Place the popper in a insolated box in which the internal temperature of 
the box can be measured.

  3 – Use resistive electrical heating to increase the popper to a fixed 
elevated arbitrary temperature Tf. Remove the input electric power to the 
resistive heater when the temperature just reaches Tf.

  4 -  measure the electric energy in watts(Ec) that is required to achieve the 
temperature rise of the popper from Tc to Tf.

Over-unity energy production test

  1 - Equalize the temperature of the popper at a fixed arbitrary temperature 
Tc. 

  2 - Place the popper in a insolated box in which internal temperature can be 
measured.

  3 – Run the popper using spark discharge until the until a fixed elevated 
arbitrary temperature Tf is achieved. Remove the input electric power to the 
popper when the temperature just reaches Tf.

  4 - Measure the electric energy in watts(Es)  that is required to achieve the 
temperature rise of the popper in spark discharge mode from Tc to Tf.

  Over-unity check

  If Es  Ec, then the popper operates at over-unity energy production. 

  Es/Ec is the COP of the popper.

  Is there any flaw in the experimental method in this procedure?






[Vo]:[OT] Digging out in Wisconsin

2012-12-20 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
We knew it was coming. Yesterday hoards descended grocery stores, making
sure we'd make it through the next 24 - 48 hours. I was one of them.

 

I went to bed last night when barely a grounded snowflake could be seen
anywhere in the city. It was above freezing. By 7:30 this morning I woke up
to a fast accumulating six inches. It was coming down something fierce. Big
gobs of white stuff. Wet  very heavy. Perfect for making snow forts and
throwing snowballs with. It was an interesting introduction to my first day
of a much anticipated year-end vacation.

 

After a hearty breakfast consisting of oat hulls and wheat chaff (Raisin
Bran) I headed to the garage and fired up my trusty Toro snow blower. This
was going to be a cinch! I love plowing through thick blankets of white
stuff - shooting jets of snow everywhere!

 

Unfortunately, ten minutes into demolition derby my Toro died on me. What is
this! It's only 20-plus years old! Actually I don't know how old the damned
thing is as I inherited it from my dad. I just filled it with a fresh tank
of gas purchased from the station a couple of months ago, so I knew it
wasn't bad fuel. It's probably a gummed-up spark plug or maybe a clogged
fuel line, neither of which were accessible without doing some serious
disassembly, the kind of disassembly that in my heart I knew my own hands
would not be able to reassemble. It was time to face the music. My Toro was
dead, and was going to stay dead for the remainder of this freaking snow
storm. Time  to break out the back-breaking shovel. Suddenly all this white
stuff doesn't look so much like fun anymore. 

 

* * * * * *

 

It's now mid-evening as I send this post off for the Collective's review.
I'm happy to report that the neighborhood pitched in, helping each other dig
out. Despite my grumpiness it was nice to see community come together in
times like this. Despite all this heroic community effort my aching muscles
and back have endured three labor intensive shoveling sessions. I also raked
18 inches of the #% heavy wet stuff off of the northern slope of the house.
It was a miracle I didn't induce a mini avalanche and end up buried 
suffocated under one of my incessant tugs.

 

The weatherman sez the carnage will cease later tonight. We can then expect
very windy conditions and temperatures falling through the roof into the
single digits by Friday night. All this heavy wet snow... by tomorrow we're
going to be stumbling about like drunken sailors stranded on top of a craggy
glacier.

 

I suspect I have one more major session scheduled late this evening when the
snow has hopefully ceased for good - before things begin to solidify. What's
also on the evening agenda: tackling a ten-foot long berm recently deposited
at the base of my driveway, for the second time today, complements of our
city's quick and efficient snowplow armada. Sigh... I've already gone
through several shirts (from sweating profusely) and two pairs of soggy
gloves. Thank god my snow boots have held up through it all. Needless to
say, I'm sore from all this exertion. No need to run 2 miles for exercise
tonight. 

 

Everything is closed down in Madison. It's deceptively quiet outside, except
for the distant mutter and scraping of snowplows desperately trying to stay
ahead of the game.

 

* * * * *

 

Dear Santa: I've been a very good boy this year. Could you see it in your
heart to send me a set of wiki-waterproof cold-fusion powered electric
gloves and socks for Christmas? My favorite are the ones sold in the Lands
End catalogue... see page 37, the A'OK Lumberjack combo, plaid electric
green, but red or blue works for me too. I'd also ask you for a brand new
TORO cold fusion powered snow blower, but I probably haven't been that good.


 

BTW, I've been meaning to ask you, what do you think about AGW? Has it
affected your supply chains? I'll leave some milk and cookies out for you.

 

Regards,

Steven Vincent Johnson

www.OrionWorks.com

www.zazzle.com/orionworks

 



Re: [Vo]:[OT] Digging out in Wisconsin

2012-12-20 Thread Terry Blanton
Piccys!!!

Are the cats warm?



RE: [Vo]:[OT] Digging out in Wisconsin

2012-12-20 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Terry sez:

 Piccys!!!

 Are the cats warm?

Yes they are, all nice a cozy! But Charm just HAD to go out for a spell. I
just shot this 20 minutes ago on the back porch. We constructed an insulated
Styrofoam box for her hole up in.

Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
attachment: IMG_3105_cropped.jpg

Re: [Vo]:[OT] Digging out in Wisconsin

2012-12-20 Thread Terry Blanton
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:42 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:

 Yes they are, all nice a cozy! But Charm just HAD to go out for a spell. I
 just shot this 20 minutes ago on the back porch. We constructed an insulated
 Styrofoam box for her hole up in.

Aaaaw.  How considerate!

You wouldn't want a 58 yr old son, eh?  :-)

Happy b'ak'tun 14!   I understand that, at 5 am tomorrow, we will all
be able to communicate via ESP and levitate.  I feel lighter already.

http://news.yahoo.com/mexico-agers-end-mayan-calendar-herald-cosmic-dawn-150016975.html



Re: [Vo]:some reviews on my books coming out

2012-12-20 Thread fznidarsic
I got 4 stars.  I would have received if it were not for those typos following 
me around like a swarm of bees.


http://www.amazon.com/Energy-Antigravity-Znidarsic-Science-ebook/dp/B00AD6ARD6/ref=sr_1_1?s=booksie=UTF8qid=1356062169sr=1-1keywords=frank+znidarsic+science+books





-Original Message-
From: fznidarsic fznidar...@aol.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Dec 19, 2012 6:02 pm
Subject: [Vo]:some reviews on my books coming out


http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread904811/pg1


I know not everyone agrees with me.  I do have a peer reviewed paper in the 
pipeline, however  I am now 60 years old and don't have forever for the Journal 
Editors to agree with me.  My book gets the word out quickly   Amazon is doing 
a good job.  It would cost more that $10 to photo copy and bind this material.  
I sorry that I can't please everyone.


Frank Znidarsic
 



Re: [Vo]:[OT] Everyone Needs a Hobby

2012-12-20 Thread Eric Walker
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:

Actually setting up the quadrorotor with a machine gun (carrying a lot of
 rounds!) and designing the control system to anticipate recoil when the gun
 is fired, maintaining attitude and targeting control, that would be
 difficult and very, very expensive to do.


No doubt such a system is under active development.  You would want a very
reliable gyroscope in this instance.

Eric


Re: [Vo]:STMicroelectronics report on their version of the Celani apparatus

2012-12-20 Thread Eric Walker
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:

We have not found LENR effects that produce much prompt radiation, or much
 of any radiation. That's quite an interesting observation, itself. There
 may be something about LENR mechanisms that suppresses unstable products,
 that takes the reaction all the way to stable products (like helium) while
 non-photon/phonon emissions remain at low levels. And the photons cannot be
 high-energy, or they would easily be detected.


Note that there are multiple findings of collimated x-rays, which adds an
interesting twist to the trail of evidence.


 The fly in this ointment is that Be-8 has a normal half-life of a
 femtosecond. It doesn't seem like it would have time to decay as described,
 so the alphas would have *much* higher energy, and that *would* be
 observed. You don't have 20 MeV alphas zipping around with no observable
 effects. Even if there is no prompt gamma, there will be secondary
 radiation, and plenty of it.


This leads one to suspect that some of the momentum of whatever reaction
is occurring is being shared with the heavier lattice atoms.

Eric


Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 06:24 PM 12/20/2012, James Bowery wrote:


On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax 
mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:

At 05:06 PM 12/20/2012, James Bowery wrote:

Induction heating would require a visible device nearby.  If Lucky 
Saint is sincerely attempting to help the world by releasing this 
technology, as he has presumably attempted by disclosing the 
fabrication technique, then it would be a small additional effort to 
post a video of a beaker of water containing the boiling device, 
with the beaker elevated on some sort of stand that would not 
plausibly contain an induction heater.
Faking that video would be difficult enough to motivate a Russ 
type of fellow, who has access to the requisite resources, to 
proceed to replicate the recipe.



Aw, c'mon. That level of fake would be trivial. Sure, the video 
might be made so that it would be difficult. But it would still be 
quite possible with video editing software.
Look, it's a lot of work to replicate something like this. I would 
*not* invest that work unless:



You aren't a Russ kind of guy, though, are you?


Actually, I am. It's a lot of work, though, so I pick my battles.

He's put quite a bit of work into replicating the Papp piston all 
with even less direct information about how to build one.


Yeah. So far, though, he hasn't done the most obvious things to 
measure what is actually going on. And it is not apparently a 
replication. It's a resemblance, which can be very different.


Am I advising people to go out and build this device based on the 
current or even the proposed video evidence?


I didn't think so. Are you? I was pointing out that the evidence you 
suggested would not sensibly make much difference. There are some 
simple things that would. If someone reputable, for example, made the 
video, it could make a big difference.


We've already seen faked videos that got, as an example, Sterling 
Allen going. I think we are starting to get a little wiser.


Allen exposed what he found that showed the videos were faked. That 
increased Allen's credibility, and he's done the same thing with 
other situations.


Naudin's MAHG replication, however, totally trashed his reputation, 
or should have. Really. Awful. What did he do when his gross 
calculation error was exposed?


Nothing. The web site still sits there with the blatant error, and he 
simply stonewalled the criticism. And then the naive look at the 
site, don't notice the error, and believe his results were amazing. 
Obviously, there must be a conspiracy to suppress free energy.


Come to think of it, though, Allen never followed up on his MAHG 
page maybe he'll notice this and do something about it.


http://pesn.com/2005/06/26/9600116_Naudin_MAHG/ 



Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Swedish TV (SVT) show on Rossi Ecat

2012-12-20 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax

At 05:56 PM 12/20/2012, Brad Lowe wrote:
The sad part is we have the same proof for the magic penny as we do 
for the e-cat and Hyperion.


Well, close, but not quite. We don't have any clear independent 
confirmation for those latter devices, but the claims, first of all, 
are not quite so extreme. There is circumstantial evidence that 
*something* is happening and the likely delays are due to 
unreliability, not total deceptions.


Yeah, there is a similarity, but heat from NiH has long been reported.

It's also never been truly clearly and openly confirmed. It's 
somewhat like the status of cold fusion, before heat/helium was 
found, though my impression is that there was more circumstantial 
evidence for cold fusion back then, and there were wider reports.


But with NiH, we have no evidence adequate to establish the ash. It 
might turn out to be difficult. It is the known and heat-correlated 
ash from PdD cold fusion that makes the reality of it a scientific certainty.


It's still difficult to reliably demonstrate.

My opinion is that if Rossi or Defkalion really have *anything*, they 
should sell demonstration devices. Essentially toys. And they 
should patent them as such, with energy generation as an additional claim.


This is along the lines of the popper kit that was promised and that 
apparently has never worked. If it had worked, if it had shown real 
energy release, that would be the kind of demonstration that would 
break the Papp field open. The same would be true for NiH devices. 
Make them cheap and sell them!


Small is beautiful. But Rossi wants to go for megawatt plants. He 
can't make a megawatt plant if he can't make a kilowatt, or, for that 
matter, 100 watts. 10 watts.


In any case, I'm not ready to toss Rossi in the same can as this 
magic penny guy.


But, Brad, you have a point.

Look, Brillouin is at SRI, setting up to run tests with expert 
support. We may see something soon.


PdD is definitely real, but highly unreliable, still. And expensive 
even if it works.


NiH is nowhere near as solidly established, but is very attractive 
because of far cheaper materials, and because of some interesting 
research history, from lots of people. So there is lots of reason to 
encourage efforts to replicate prior work with NiH, or to explore it 
more thoroughly. There is no reason to do that with the magic penny. 



Re: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age

2012-12-20 Thread Jojo Jaro
I am not going to respond to your spin anymore.  The reader only needs to 
research this to confirm I am speaking the truth.


It's funny how after knowing the history of wikipedia and its authorships, 
you still cling to it as an authoritative source.  Something must be wrong 
when you have to depend on wikipedia and claim it as an authoritative 
source.  LOL 


Everyone knows that wikipedia is a politically correct agenda driven 
site.  You should know that by now and yet you appeal to its authority.  My 
goodness, do some real research man.  Go to a real library.  Look at the 
history books written by muslims.  Study real books, not blogs on the 
Internet.  No wonder you can't graduate with a degree.  You don't know how 
to research and do your own thinking.  Wikipeida ... here we come  
LOL


Spins and lies will not help your case. A simple and quick research effort 
will definitely reveal allah to be the moon god of muhammed's tribe.  And 
muhammed did have dozens of wives and concubines including a 9 year old 
little girl.


Spin it all you want.  I just hope people are wise enough to see thru your 
lies.



To my other friends reading this,

One other thing is true; islam only spreads by 2 means:  By force and by 
deception.


By Force:  Anyone who reads the koran will see that it is commanded for a 
muslim man to kill someone who will not convert to islam; and show that his 
conversion is real by paying alms.  Yes, by force, by crashing 2 airliners 
into the heart of the Great Satan.  Yes, by force, by issuing fatwah to 
kill all the enemies of muhammed.


My friends, if you are reading this, let me tell you a true story that you 
can research also.  There was a flight full of muslim men on board getting 
ready to fly to mecca for the ramadan.  You know that annual thing muslims 
do where they walk around that big black meteorite stone.   Before taking 
off, the plane suffered engine trouble and had to be delayed.  The muslim 
men on board were so incensed by the delay, that they would be late for this 
walking around the meteorite thing, that they rose up in a mob and killed 
the pilot and his co-pilot for conspiracy to prevent them from reaching 
mecca.  Needless to say that the delay would not have made them late; and 
furthermore, if I remembered correctly, the pilot and co-pilot were also 
muslims.  This my friends is the violence of islam.   This my friends, is 
one way islam spreads, by force of terror.


No other religion go about their recruiting will so much violent gusto. 
Heck they even go after each other to prove which of their prophets is 
right.  No 2 groups go after each other's throats like sunnis and shiites. 
Yes, this is the trademark of islam.  Conversion and expansion thru 
violence.


(BTW, this walking around the meteorite stone Kaaba, is a tradition dating 
back to their worship of the moon god allah on the kaaba.)


And by deception:  exactly Lomax is doing right now.  He spins the facts and 
say it's more complicated than that.  What's complicated about molesting a 
9 year-old little girl barely out of diapers.  As far as I know, islam is 
the only religion that condones and promotes this.  This is so repulsive to 
the sensibilities of man, that we shriek back in horror of the thought of 
molesting a 9 year-old girl.  Even in prison, child molesters are the second 
class outcasts that have to be separated from the general prison population 
for fear that other inmates would kill them.  Yes, even prison criminals 
shriek back at the crime of child molestation.  But not islam.  They 
celebrate it, justify it or lie about it.


Our children are the most precious things in our lives and we do everything 
to protect them.  But not in islam.  Women, especially little girls, are 
just objects to satisfy the lusts of powerful men.  History is replete with 
these examples.  And people like Lomax have to lie about it because he is so 
embarrassed by this retrograde heritage.  Either that, or he condones and 
practices this himself and has to spin it away and justify it.   I can show 
you proof of many statements by islamic leaders about this, but people need 
to do their own research to prove me wrong.  A simple research effort will 
reveal the truth.


JUST DO IT. Don't relay on Lomax's spin and lies, unless of course you want 
to convert to islam by deception.


And one more thing.  Do not rely on what I say also.  Find out for yourself. 
That is the only way to convince you of these truths.  Not any posts or 
blogs or lies from self-proclaimed experts who did not graduate.






Jojo







- Original Message - 
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com

To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 12:11 PM
Subject: [Vo]:[OT] Moon God, Dozens of wives, and marriageable age



At 05:51 PM 12/20/2012, a certain author wrote:

Which part of what I said do you think is untrue?

Note, I am willing to discuss it as long as you