I think we are going to find that LENR, which I think is a form of Dark
Energy is really caused from the inflation of Dark Matter which, like
you say is a DDL form of hydrogen making up the fabric of space. I think
LENR happens all of the time in our atmosphere and is the energy behind our
From: Jones Beene
Oops typo. should be: Therefore, a logical conclusion is that dark matter
is most likely a degenerate from of light matter, meaning that it is mostly
hydrogen in a different and denser form.
BTW - This would be the same species as seen in the many Holmlid/Miley
papers,
From: Lewan Mats
http://phys.org/news/2015-02-presence-dark-milky.html
This story very likely relates to the Rossi/Parkhomov results (which
probably explains why Mats posted it).
Although cosmologists do not know the composition of dark matter... We know
that dark matter is needed in our
Dave, Jack, etal--
I concur with Dave’s comment. You want negative temperature feedback, at least
in the range of temperatures you want to operate. The same idea is used in the
dynamics and control of slow neutron, water cooled fission reactors. The
objective in this reactor is to keep
hi,one way to cool the inner reactortube by convection rapidly would be in case
of a beginning runaway, release compressed air or carbon dioxidby a computer
controlled solenoid valve that would cool the space outside the reactor tube
wherethe heatercoil is located by discharging the cold gas
THat Bang that MFMP got was an instantaneous explosion. There was no delay
in in the speed of the explosive reaction.
You cannot remove heat fast enough to stop that bang. On the other hand,
Jack Cole has a very slow reaction rise rate. What makes the difference
between these to systems.
I put
It is a bit more complicated than what your initial thoughts are Bob. If you
consider that the total power that must be radiated, convected, and conducted
away from the device is equal to the sum of the input plus the internally
generated power, you will realize that if the input is eliminated
From: torulf.gr...@bredband.net
Ø Having titanium hydride as hydrogen carrier may not be so good because the
H2 will come to an equilibrium between Ti and Ni. And the H loading will be
lower.
Yes, but loading does not matter, and a state of dynamic equilibrium between Ti
and Ni is precisely
Jack Cole's calibration could be invalid, but if the Cole experiment is
good, his experiment might show that the key to when LENR is seen and how
strong it is may be a function of when nano particles are produced and
activated by hydrogen and oxigen. At low temperatures, Jack could be seeing
the
Actually the characteristic curves suggest that the input power acts like a
bias that stands behind the incremental behavior. If that bias is quickly
removed then there should exist a point of operation that is located ahead of
the dangerous region. Unless some strong memory exists, I can
From Jones:
Oops typo. should be: Therefore, a logical conclusion is that dark
matter
is most likely a degenerate from of light matter, meaning that it is
mostly
hydrogen in a different and denser form.
BTW - This would be the same species as seen in the many Holmlid/Miley
papers,
I have published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/02/the-lenr-djinn-is-in-bottle-keep-him.html
It is about disputes helping LENR+ by Doug Marker and me, about
how to keep the LENR djinn in his bottle and about daily news.
We need more and better LENR news.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj,
Contrary to popular belief, Mills was not the first to suggest the
fractional hydrogen state, even if many of his supporters want to give him
that status. Dr. Robert Carroll predicted fractional quantum states of
hydrogen in 1976 in a published book: The Eternity Equation, and there were
others.
http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com/blog/limits-gullstrom-theory-neutron-tunneling/
Discussing the draft theory by Swedish PhD student Carl Oscar Gullström, trying
to explain the results in the Lugano report through the idea of bound neutron
tunneling.
Mats
I could add this quote from my book, describing what Giuseppe Levi told me
about experiments with the Hotcat back in 2012, when the device was destroyed
by thermal run-away. That's two and a half years ago.
When they disassembled the reactor they found that the ceramic shield
containing the
David,
It's always interesting to read your analyses of the energetic and thermal
dynamics of LENR systems. They deserve more attention.
I find your model with three types of systems convincing, and I think it is
obvious from what Rossi told me many times about his experiments that the
Terry, I assume that you do not believe that LENR had anything to do with what
happened. There may be another explanation but it appears that the same thing
occurred during several different, yet related experiments.
Take time to consider why you are convinced that a thermal run away
Mats,
Thanks. I can imagine that Rossi performed a large balancing act as he
adjusted the variables in order to achieve a well working design. I hope that
he has been able to construct a type 2 structure that achieves excellent levels
of COP and stable operation at the same time. It likely
That seems like a good quote to add Mats. I have a strong suspicion that you
will have several more to add in the next few months as people experiment with
these latest devices. There is little doubt that many are going to melt down
as the fuel within them is adjusted.
It will also be
http://phys.org/news/2015-02-presence-dark-milky.html
Mats
www.animpossibleinvention.comhttp://www.animpossibleinvention.com
Hi ,
Further back I had some ideas how to use mirrors in order toregulate the
reaktor temperature. Maybe that could be usedas a reversible spoiler:
Shutting down the inputpower to the reaktor would be one way.
I was thinking if one would start the operation of the reaktorwith my
On Mon Feb 9 David said [snip] Since the original product was very close to
becoming unstable, with the increase in gain the latest experiment most likely
resulted in a situation where the positive feedback gain exceeded unity. This
is just another way of saying that a negative resistance
The best spoiler may be variable heat sinking that takes more energy away as
reaction become more robust to throttle it back below the threshold – then
perhaps the drive pwm could push it back above on a duty factor basis. IMHO the
dynamic thermal loading may become more important than the
From: David Roberson
Actually the characteristic curves suggest that the input power acts like a
bias that stands behind the incremental behavior. If that bias is quickly
removed then there should exist a point of operation that is located ahead of
the dangerous region. Unless some strong
Pulse power is the way to go.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
*From:* David Roberson
Actually the characteristic curves suggest that the input power acts like
a bias that stands behind the incremental behavior. If that bias is
quickly removed then
I agree with you Fran that an ideal solution would be to kill the positive
feedback gain in some controlled manner. That could likely be done as you are
discussing by taking more power from the core than it needs to self sustain.
Once this happens the core temperature movement should reverse
I say that LENR is using SUSY to produce a combined fundamental force as
explained in your other thread.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Lewan Mats mats.le...@nyteknik.se wrote:
http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com/blog/limits-gullstrom-theory-neutron-tunneling/
Discussing the draft theory by
Yes! What Jones said :_) and the 95% off time is long enough for a heavy load
of coolant to drag the threshold over a larger window – allowing more time for
a feedback loop to hone in on the sweet spot without self destructing.
Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent:
http://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html
When the geometry of General relativity is changed to reflect quantum
mechanics, the rework predicts a universe without a big bang. But more
importantly, the integration of quantum mechanics into general relativity
predicts that the
Au contraire, mon ami. Just the opposite. When I posted this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg101517.html
I was returned a lot of skepticism.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 3:26 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Terry, I assume that you do not believe that LENR had
Thanks for the history lesson on the provenance of fractional quantum
states, Jones. I was not aware of the fact there had been so many prior BLP
interpretations involving fractional states of the Hydrogen atom. Should
Mills be so lucky as to collect a Nobel prize he may need to share it with
many
An interesting idea that I recently pursued might offer some insight into this
discussion. A few weeks ago I spoke of my thoughts that the mass of an
electron might be distributed throughout the field in the form of field energy.
This would be established by using Einstein's equation that
Jones,
When I first began modeling the ECAT several years ago I used exactly the
concept that you are suggesting. It did in fact appear to yield a COP of 6 or
in that vicinity with careful adjustment of the PWM drive waveform. I used
the duty cycle that Rossi had revealed within his blog
New MFMP Charge Analysis regarding the Explosion Run:
http://bit.ly/1z61hEB (5 hours ago)
This is a shocker to me. Here are the changes to the last values (first
analysis):
Free Volume for Gas: 1.09 ml -- 1.06 ml (not a large change) (Recall that
Parkhomov estimates 2 ml in his
That might be the ticket...no reason to cease searching. At this point it is
necessary for us to understand exactly what caused the explosion event. Does
the fuel have hot spots that go into thermal runaway rapidly at some point?
Are there other types of fuels that are more uniform in
Pity we can't identify a moderator which begins consuming or absorbing H at
1057.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
The way Lithium hydride give off or absorbs Hydrogen is a function of the
pressure of hydrogen that LiH is under . High enough pressure will get LiH
to perform as you want at 1057.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:05 AM, hohlr...@gmail.com hohlr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Pity we can't identify a
Having a switching control of the heater bias is not at all going to fix a
reactor that is unstable once it reaches a critical temperature. Such a
reactor will continue to rise in temperature with NO input at all (pulse
width =0). Such devices as have been shown today have essentially a fixed
The Standard Model has worked beautifully to predict what high energy
experiments have shown so far about the basic building blocks of matter,
but just about all physicists recognize that it is incomplete.
This backbone theory requires new particles to solve a major problem with
the Standard
Having titanium hydride as hydrogen carrier may not be so good
because the H2 will come to an equilibrium between Ti and Ni. And the H
lading will be lesser.
Better is to pre load the Ni.
On Tue, 10 Feb
2015 15:42:01 +, Bob Cook wrote:
Dave, Jack, etal--
I concur
with Dave's
40 matches
Mail list logo
