Personally I am highly skeptical that they could predict with enough
accuracy where one would fall in the event it is actually small enough to
evacuate an area rather than a whole country.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:54 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 9
Well, it's great to see that one inventor who bucked the establishment seems to
have come out on
top...
Let's pray that LENR/CF is right behind him...
HYPERLINK
http://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/spinoff2000/ip3.htmhttp://www.sti.nasa.gov/tto/spinoff2000/ip3.htm
HYPERLINK
Hmmm, mention of Griggs is nowhere to be seen on their website. Have I got him
mixed up w/some
other water-related technology, Hydro-Catalysis perhaps??? Did he not live to
see it succeed?
-Mark
_
From: Mark Iverson [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 11:36
thomas malloy wrote:
grok wrote:
Your posts show that you think that everything has an economic
basis, Grok. This is a result of the aforementioned cool aide
which was served to you, during your education, by the
Oligarchy, which you willingly drank. Most likely paid for
(willingly) by
A Meteorological Agency video camera captured dramatic images of a
volcano erupting a few hours ago in Japan, at 6 am local time. The
video is here at the Asahi newspaper website (text in Japanese):
http://www.asahi.com/video/news/TKY200903100244.html
The location is at Sakurajima, Kagoshima
Mark Iverson wrote:
Hmmm, mention of Griggs is nowhere to be seen on their
website. Have I got him mixed up w/some other water-related
technology, Hydro-Catalysis perhaps??? Did he not live to see it succeed?
Griggs left the company many years ago.
There is no mention in the NASA
On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:59 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
A Meteorological Agency video camera captured dramatic images of a
volcano erupting a few hours ago in Japan, at 6 am local time. The
video is here at the Asahi newspaper website (text in Japanese):
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.netwrote:
On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:59 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
A Meteorological Agency video camera captured dramatic images of a volcano
erupting a few hours ago in Japan, at 6 am local time. The video is here at
the Asahi
Not brand new- but an excellent Three Dimensional Time Theory -
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0510/0510010v1.pdf
This could be the one (pun intended). Although Chen's command of English (or
his translator) is a bit lacking, and his other paper's should be read to get a
full picture
I suspect PAM Dirac would have enjoyed this topic of discussion.
Terry
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Not brand new- but an excellent Three Dimensional Time Theory -
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/quant-ph/pdf/0510/0510010v1.pdf
This could be the one
Not Jeeves:
http://www.twine.com/item/122mz8lz9-4c/wolfram-alpha-is-coming-and-it-could-be-as-important-as-google
http://snipurl.com/djb4u [www_twine_com]
Stephan's Computational Knowledge Engine should give Google pause.
It sounds exciting:
Where Google is a system for FINDING things that we
If this works it is an astounding accomplishment. It appears to be a
giant leap forward in artificial intelligence (AI). The article
describes why Wolfram does not consider it to be AI in the
traditional sense, but it seems like a distinction without a difference.
This is important, but I
Kyle Mcallister wrote:
Hi,
Okay, as per Horace's suggestion, made a crude
spherical (er...kind of spherical) terminal out of two
mixing bowls. Didn't go to WalMart, as that place
frightens me, so I got them from Kmart. Duct taped
them together at the seams, so as to make a crude
corona
From: Terry Blanton
I suspect PAM Dirac would have enjoyed this topic of discussion.
Probably - but do you have anything specific on Dirac and 3D time?
BTW - here is a good paper which did not turn up til I added Dirac to the
search query:
http://www.physorg.com/news96027669.html
But
In reply to Mark Iverson's message of Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:35:43 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
HYPERLINK
http://www.sciencenews.org/index/feature/activity/view/id/41220/title/Cold_Panaceahttp://www.scien
cenews.org/index/feature/activity/view/id/41220/title/Cold_Panacea
[snip]
Quote:
We are investing in things
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:27:45 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
This is important, but I think the most important potential AI
breakthrough would be in robotics. It would the ability to deal with
3-dimensional space with the same speed and agility as, say, a
housefly brain.
--- mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Kyle Mcallister's message of Mon, 9 Mar
2009 19:58:55 -0700 (PDT):
[snip]
I thought that in Podkletnov's experiment the device
was a superconductor, and
that the electron pairs in the superconductor were
mandatory to getting an
effect?
The SC
--- Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
I'm curious -- why is common grounded? Seems like a
hand placed too
near it would reward you with holes blown through
the soles of your
shoes as a result, no?
Wouldn't it be safer to let the hot parts of the rig
float?
A few reasons why
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:27:45 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
This is important, but I think the most important potential AI
breakthrough would be in robotics. It would the ability to deal with
3-dimensional space with the same speed and
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Terry Blanton
I suspect PAM Dirac would have enjoyed this topic of discussion.
Probably - but do you have anything specific on Dirac and 3D time?
Just that mass contracts (actually rotates in 3 space) with
All,
Another update. Didn't get as much done today as I'd
like, as I did end up getting pretty sick.
Nevertheless, here's what I did and what I found.
I took the original 'target' plate, connected to
ground, and shielded it with a 7.75 square sheet of
.125 plexiglass. A 1/2 hole was drilled in
In reply to Kyle Mcallister's message of Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:41:44 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
The SC isn't required, supposedly. This is sort of a
different experiment using normal conductors. The
effect may be related, as John Berry speculates.
Assuming of course that the effect even exists, and
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:11:12 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
As far as I can tell, flies don't believe in glass.
[snip]
..I doubt they have enough brain to believe in anything. :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
23 matches
Mail list logo
