Jed, if I understand you right the world is full of idiots and scammers and
potential jailbirds.
All technical skepticism you have been provided are done by people without
common sense.
You obviously have more information than anyone else (only from IH?) and
that means your opinion is the one that
Alan Fletcher wrote:
I accept your claim that 1MW in an un-ventilated, insulated room would be
> fatal.
>
> But that is not the case : a 30,000 CPM is sufficient to ventilate it, and
> there is a fan (of similar dimensions to one particular example) on the
> roof. (Plus convective loss, which wou
Patrick Ellul wrote:
> > The temperature was just over 100 deg C according to Rossi.
>
> Where did you get this quote from Rossi?
>
You can compute that from what he told Lewan. See:
[Vo]:Re: CMNS: CONTRIBUTION FROM V. VYSOTSKII, NEW DISPUTE GENERATOR
LAUNCHED
It is also shown directly in the s
On 22 May 2016 1:04 AM, "Jed Rothwell" wrote:
> The temperature was just over 100 deg C according to Rossi.
Where did you get this quote from Rossi?
I accept your claim that 1MW in an un-ventilated, insulated room would be
fatal.
But that is not the case : a 30,000 CPM is sufficient to ventilate it, and
there is a fan (of similar dimensions to one particular example) on the roof.
(Plus convective loss, which would reduce the need for venti
No Jed,
My motto is ,there is always two possibilities. I an sure you have found
the only thing that contradict that statment.
You may have inside information but you have claim for having THE answer.
On May 21, 2016 13:32, "Jed Rothwell" wrote:
H LV wrote:
4. Apply some common sense. Ask yours
Alan Fletcher wrote:
The point is that this thread's title : "1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft.
> facility without industrial ventilation would be fatal" is false.
>
Are you saying this would not be true? Are you saying that putting 25
heaters into an enclosed room with no fan, turning them on wit
a.ashfield wrote:
> Your claim that the heat released from the 1 MW plant would be fatal has
> been shot down.
>
That was not my claim. You are making a straw-man argument.
My claim was that without industrial grade ventilation, when you heat a
space with 26 times more heat than is normally us
Jed,
Your claim that the heat released from the 1 MW plant would be fatal has
been shot down.
Likewise, your certainty of fraud because Rossi was the one who
prevented IH from visiting the customer.
Your other evidence of fraud seem to come mainly from what IH has told
you. Before accepting
The point is that this thread's title : "1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft.
facility without industrial ventilation would be fatal" is false.
On the contract point, re-read the IH/Rossi contract
https://animpossibleinvention.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/rossi_et_al_v_darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__
Alan Fletcher wrote:
The roof has one circular roof fan at the left, and a rectangular box at
> the other.
>
I believe the box on the right is a skylight window.
We are talking about this photo, which I think was taken in 2014. That's
when the street view photos were taken.
https://www.google.
The roof has one circular roof fan at the left, and a rectangular box at the
other.
Presuming that the manufacturing area was was adjacent to JM's offices (on the
left) the left-most circular fan vents the manufacturing area.
Heres the fan : http://lenr.qumbu.com/steampics/160521_fans_01.jpg
H LV wrote:
4. Apply some common sense. Ask yourself: what other reason would Rossi
>> have to refuse admittance, other than the fact that there is no 1 MW
>> machine, and no ventilation system or other means of getting rid of the
>> waste heat? Can you propose ANY reason why an honest person wou
John wrote:
> Your assumption that all the power used by the customer's plant must end
> up in heat in the room is not valid. A quick search of J.M Products Corp
> indicates that they are in the chemicals business - wholesale and
> *manufacturing*. I am not a chemist but I would guess that the
I wrote:
> It seems to me the doctrine of u
> nconscionability
> could be used by IH in their defense although it would be inconsistent
> with their claim of having performed due diligence.
>
>
Actually, it says only a judge can rule on unconscionability and since the
trial (I think) is by j
There isn't evidence for almost everything besides words from IH and
Rossi/Lewan. But the area required for cooling is small, so I don't think
that this point is a big issue.
2016-05-21 16:56 GMT-03:00 David Roberson :
> Is there evidence for the existence of an input opening adequate to
> achiev
a.ashfield wrote:
> There is a difference between saying "in my opinion Rossi is a fraud" and
> a statement of fact, that you have made several times. "Rossi is a fraud."
Okay, let me put it this way: The evidence that he is a fraud is now
overwhelming in my opinion.
> For the latter you
It seems to me the doctrine of u
nconscionability
could be used by IH in their defense although it would be inconsistent
with their claim of having performed due diligence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unconscionability
<<
Unconscionability
(sometimes known as unconscionable dealing
Air must come into the building to replace the heated air that is exhausted.
Is there evidence for the existence of an input opening adequate to achieve
this requirement? Are all the doors and windows closed?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Rocha
To: John Milstone
Sent
> Rossi himself revealed some of the most important details in his interview
> with Lewan. His numbers show that the temperature was close to 100 deg C.
I can't find that statement in Lewan's interview :
https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/05/16/rossi-makes-offer-on-swedish-factory-building-
Why do you assume there were no tubes taking the heat through the ceiling.
Even in the 10/28/2011 1MW there were. And indeed, there was a model of
fan similar to the smallest model displayed on the site you gave the link.
At least that I could see in the video by Mats Lewan.
2016-05-21 16:37 GM
And that's assuming the air is vented directly from the machine to the fan. It
would actually rise by convection, spread over the whole ceiling, and lose a
lot of heat through the roof.
I think this puts it WAY below the "fatal" level.
From: "Daniel Rocha"
To: "vortex-l"
Sent: Saturday,
Previous link was for wall-mounted fans. I think the sub-unit has two roof
fans, so 2 * 16K CFM 36 inch fans would do the job. eg
http://www.industrialfansdirect.com/IND-FA-R-TXB/SP-TXB36RHULWH3S.html
From: "Alan Fletcher"
To: "vortex-l"
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 12:21:04 PM
Subject: R
That's a surprisingly small volume. The machine has one of its smaller
dimensions 3 meters. So, even 1.5m/s per second at one end would cool the
device.
2016-05-21 15:51 GMT-03:00 Alan Fletcher :
> Back-of-the-envelope calculation
>
> I'm going to look at a column of air of volume V -- with area
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Jed Rothwell
wrote:
>
>
> 4. Apply some common sense. Ask yourself: what other reason would Rossi
> have to refuse admittance, other than the fact that there is no 1 MW
> machine, and no ventilation system or other means of getting rid of the
> waste heat? Can yo
Correction ... the photos on that page were lower CFM ... 36 to 42 inch
diameter, not so teeny tiny.
eg http://www.industrialfansdirect.com/IND-FA-EF-PM-A/LFI-ADD36T11000B.html 30K
CFM, 36 inch
From: "Alan Fletcher"
That's a teeny tiny little fan!
http://www.industrialfansdirect.com/wall-v
Back-of-the-envelope calculation
I'm going to look at a column of air of volume V -- with area A ... and a
height H sufficient to hold
1-second's worth of 1MW of heat. This has to be vented in 1 second.
1MW is 1000 kJ /second.
Q = 1000 kJ in one second
Specific heat of air at 100C is 1 kJ
On 21/05/2016 11:13 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Once again people have claimed you can release 1 MW with no ill
effects in a small facility, without industrial scale ventilation.
People should apply some common sense metrics!
Rossi says the facility is 6,500 sq. feet. Conventional heating calls
This chimney sizing link doesn't really apply --- it's for natural draft up a
chimney of a given height and diameter -- WITHOUT a fan.
(The longer the chimney the higher velocity of the draft, so a given diameter
can exhaust more heat. They recommend " The velocity of air and flue gas in a
sma
Jed,
If, as likely, the output of the E-Cats was not much above 100C, one
would need some provision to ensure there wasn't excessive water carry
over. Indeed without that the whole system might fill with liquid.
Until shown otherwise I expect that was done. I also expect the steam
to be wet
Jed,
There is a difference between saying "in my opinion Rossi is a fraud"
and a statement of fact, that you have made several times. "Rossi is a
fraud." For the latter you could be sued for libel in court.
Peter Gluck wrote:
Jed you say you know the data but have to keep them secret.
> Correct?
>
Rossi himself revealed some of the most important details in his interview
with Lewan. His numbers show that the temperature was close to 100 deg C.
With just a little pressure, a slight error in the temp
Jed you say you know the data but have to keep them secret.
Correct?
Can you please tell the most 'innocent' ones- the daily consumes of
electric energy from the grid by the 1MW plant?
peter
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> a.ashfield wrote:
>
>
>> Jed, I gave you one exa
a.ashfield wrote:
> Assuming Rossi (and others) are guilty before the trial is not the
> American way.
>
This only applies to the courts and the legal system. A citizen outside the
legal system is free to decide someone is guilty or innocent. That is no
violation of tradition or law. I am not a
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-21-2016-lenr-was-my-yesterdays.html
I do not consider personal failures as unusual or extraordinary or bad
events
However regarding my editorial about LENR history published yesterday- yes
it was about
a partial failure- but is it a complete falure itse
a.ashfield wrote:
> Jed, I gave you one example from first hand experience, that was a 1.5
> ton/day art glass furnace and someone else provided examples of 4 MW
> boilers. So common sense tells me it is not unreasonable to do so.
>
How much power did your glass furnace consume?
Was the facil
Jed,
Assuming Rossi (and others) are guilty before the trial is not the
American way.
Or do you prefer Napoleonic law?
Jed. "Once again people have claimed you can release 1 MW with no ill
effects in a small facility, without industrial scale ventilation.
People should apply some common sense metrics!"
Jed, I gave you one example from first hand experience, that was a 1.5
ton/day art glass furnace and someone
Once again people have claimed you can release 1 MW with no ill effects in
a small facility, without industrial scale ventilation. People should apply
some common sense metrics!
Rossi says the facility is 6,500 sq. feet. Conventional heating calls for
no more than 20 BTU/sq. ft. in Florida. That's
a.ashfield wrote:
> Whether the output is dry steam depends largely on the temperature, which
> is also easy to measure. So if the temperature was say 120C, it would be
> dry.
The temperature was just over 100 deg C according to Rossi. Do the number
from the interview and that is what you com
Jed. "I have no knowledge of this alleged agreement, but I know that
Rossi constantly lies about all kinds of things, including me. However,
as I pointed out above, even if there were such an agreement, any
sensible person would agree to modify it when the I.H. expert insisted
he needed access
a.ashfield wrote:
> AA. Jed, you have made much of Rossi's refusal to allow IH to visit the
> customer's plant. Now that statement looks very misleading unless you have
> some evidence that Rossi lied about it being IH's written agreement.
>
I have no knowledge of this alleged agreement, but
Jed. "His refusal to allow access to the customer site tells you he is
running a scam."
"Their statement about blocking the door to the customer convinces me. "
AA. Jed, you have made much of Rossi's refusal to allow IH to visit the
customer's plant. Now that statement looks very misleading
43 matches
Mail list logo