Hi,
I have an electric heater that can be controlled to within 1/10 of a degree
centigrade, and also temperature monitoring
software that reports the temperature.
I have noticed that early in the morning I am comfortable with a temperature of
22ºC, but as we approach noon I need the
temperature
Harry
I was quoting wikipedia and I disagree with the quote.
-- Original Message --
From: "H L V"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 21:10
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
I have heard different accounts of what mot
t;H L V"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday,
12 Nov, 23 At 16:39 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special
Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
I should not have said "seems".
It does more accurately predict the amount of stellar aberration.
t something added later.
>
>
> But now relativistic mass gets discarded so all that extra stuff might
> also be discarded anon.
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "H L V"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 16:39
> Subj
But now relativistic mass gets discarded so all that extra stuff might
also be discarded anon.
-- Original Message --
From: "H L V"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 16:39
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
I should not hav
gt;
> When contrasting a Newtonian calculation with an Einsteinian calculation -
> its usually not given.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "H L V"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 15:18
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: R
>>>seems <<<
???
When contrasting a Newtonian calculation with an Einsteinian calculation
- its usually not given.
-- Original Message --
From: "H L V"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 15:18
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Specia
Even if it is impossible to measure the one way speed of light according to
Einstein's theory, astronomers use a specific finite one way speed of light
to explain the phenomenon known as stellar aberration. Astronomer's have
been studying this phenomenon for nearly 300 years. The amount of
was
rejected.https://beyondmainstream.org/dr-louis-essen-inventor-of-atomic-clock-rejects-einsteins-relativity-theory/
-- Original Message --
From: "Jürg Wyttenbach"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 12:20
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR)
On 12.11.2023 12:59, ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
>>I think there are aspects of QM that are rather well established,
but much less so with SR.
It seems to me that Quantum Physics is open to many different
interpretations and really isn't dogmatic about which is true.<<
QM I (SChrödigner) is
ations, but
unlike Quantum physics rarely admits to the different interpretations.
For instance -- Lorentz transformations can be interpreted the
Einsteinian or Lorentzian way.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, 12 Nov, 23 At 00:50
On 12.11.2023 01:50, Jonathan Berry wrote:
Another idea I came across is that gravity is a result of time dilation!
Gravity, as shown exactly in SOP, is a very weak "nuclear" force. Time
dilation as origin of a force is a nice fantasy - just good for a Disney
movie.
J.W.
--
Jürg
Discussing about physics needs years long reflection about what physical
> constants mean and how these interrelate and are measured.
>
A constant is an obsession and assumption that it will continue under all
conditions.
In the case of Light speed it is an illogical assumption if we apply what
t.
But will check out what the translation issue is, thanks.
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 23:13, ROGER ANDERTON
wrote:
but it is
-- Original Message --
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 06:34
Subjec
Well, yes in theory it could be infinite as I explained but I didn't say
that.
And I don't think it is likely to be that we are moving in effect
infinitely fast through the Aether.
What astronomers teach is an assumption.
On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 at 10:22, H L V wrote:
> In the video by Veritasium
In the video by Veritasium he says the one way speed of light could in
principle be infinite and that
there is nothing to stop us from saying we are seeing the distant stars as
they are now rather than as they were hundreds of years ago.
He states this without mentioning the fact that this
I didn't say it can be infinite, I just said the 2 way speed only has to
average to C.
Now, I guess it could be infinite if you were moving infinitely fast, then
the speed of light the other way would be half C to make the round trip C.
But moving infinitely fast seems problematic.
On Sun, 12
Also if the speed of light depended on direction would it even be possible
to establish a reliable communication link between a transmitter and a
receiver which are moving at different inclinations and at different
speeds?
Harry
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 1:19 PM H L V wrote:
>
> If the one way
If the one way speed of light can be infinite then there would be no
rational basis for claiming
that when we look deeper and deeper into the universe we are looking
further and further back in time.
Harry
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 3:28 AM Jonathan Berry
wrote:
> If you ask most people, most
--
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; evg...@groups.io; aethericscien...@groups.io
Sent: Friday, 10 Nov, 23 At 02:20
Subject: [Vo]:Re: Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
A few updates...
First because the Michelson Morley claim seemed plausible but
It's always interesting to question what is considered our standard point
of view even when it works so well. Special Relativity is common sense in
my opinion and is why I would never give it up. However, what always
bugged me was time and using it as a 4th dimension. One of the concepts of
A few updates...
First because the Michelson Morley claim seemed plausible but not totally
conclusive, I wasn't doing the math myself and math isn't my thing so I
farmed that out to AI's that kept on having different ideas so to be sure I
had to really drill down and figure out the best most pure
Which means
"they" don't believe in a definitively defined theory, but instead
believe in a theory that is in constant flux/change.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 22:40
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polish
that Einstein’s relativity has been misunderstood
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TiJZA-trjU
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 13:28
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Po
been
misunderstood
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TiJZA-trjU
-- Original Message --
From: "ROGER ANDERTON"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 13:28
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
One-way and two-way speed of light would b
Message --
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 10:52
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
What I mean is that there might be translation issues, but I doubt it
was a translation issue relating to Einstein not
t;one way" part.
But will check out what the translation issue is, thanks.
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 23:13, ROGER ANDERTON
wrote:
> but it is
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Jonathan Berry"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov,
23 At 09:16
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
but it is
-- Original Message --
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 06:34
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
I doubt it's a tra
but it is
-- Original Message --
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, 9 Nov, 23 At 06:34
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
I doubt it's a translation issue.
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 at 22:24, ROGER ANDERTON <mai
se on him what he should
> have meant using those terms.
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Jonathan Berry"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; evg...@groups.io; aethericscien...@groups.io
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 Nov, 23 At 08:28
> Subject: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Spe
: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; evg...@groups.io; aethericscien...@groups.io
Sent: Wednesday, 8 Nov, 23 At 08:28
Subject: [Vo]:Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
If you ask most people, most physicists, and most LLM's (Large Language
Models) if the one way spee
If you ask most people, most physicists, and most LLM's (Large Language
Models) if the one way speed of light is constant they all will say it is
and that it is part of Special Relativity (SR).
If you ask most, "how can that be", they will answer the contraction of
space and dilation of time, but
If you ask most people, most physicists and most LLM's (Large Language
Models) if the one way speed of light is constant they all will say it is
and that it is part of Special Relativity (SR).
If you ask most, "how can that be", they will answer the contraction of
space and dilation of time, but
Michael Faraday noticed something peculiar about the behaviour of a needle
near a wire that others did not because he was not constrained by the
dominant conception of forces in his time.
This presentation recreates some of the key experiments of Faraday and his
based on entries from Faraday's
Yes I remember, but I was not familiar enough with magnetic levitation to
appreciate that his configuration defied conventional expectations.
Sometimes it can be a struggle to find an audience that is knowledgeable
enough to see the significance of a novel observation performed with
rudimentary
Hi,
President Biden's new executive order demonstrates a true lack of comprehension
of the potential problem.
1) It only pertains to the US, while threats are more likely to come from
overseas.
2) Those interested in harming the US are not going to tell the US government
about it anyway.
3)
U.S. DoE
Advanced Materials Characterization and Nuclear Product Detection for LENR
Robert V. Duncan, Ph.D. President’s Distinguished Chair in Physics and
Professor of Physics Texas Tech University Washington, DC
September 8, 2023
Congratulations!
Here is the rest of the article behind the paywall:
There is a simple way to levitate magnets – and physicists are beginning to
understand how it works. The technique could have applications in robotics
in the future.
In 2021, Hamdi Ucar
Hi
I found an advantage of Schauberger Doppeldrall - double whirl in English.
The idea is that Taylor-Dean vortex creation is prevented by letting the
Coriolis stress, that causes the buildup of Taylor-Dean vortices, act in
different directions instead of consistently the same direction as is
Most everyone on this forum has seen the movie by now...
There was no mention in the film of the "Oppenheimer-Phillips effect" nor of
Melba Phillips.
We did mention in a Vortex thread here years ago the possibility that one
version of LANR (lattice assisted) was in fact a hybrid of the
The Story of Our Universe May Be Starting to Unravel
Sept 2, 2023
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/02/opinion/cosmology-crisis-webb-telescope.html
quote
<>
Harry
Good observation, but I don't think the angle of the light source is great
enough to account for the number of helical turns within the
given length of the tube.
harry
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 6:20 PM MSF wrote:
> One other thing. If you aim a laser into the inside of a transparent tube,
> you
One other thing. If you aim a laser into the inside of a transparent tube, you
get that barber pole effect spiraling around at a greater or lesser frequency
depending on the angle of the beam into the interior of the tube. So that may
explain the barber pole in the video.
--- Original
I can't even begin to express how conceptually and experimentally wrong this
demonstration is. The first thing is the perpetuation of the mistaken idea that
photons are wiggling in a sinusiodal fashion. When you see that sine wave, it's
a graph of the varying field as the wave propagates. It's
The first law is specifically framed in terms of 'closed systems', yet what
constitutes full thermodynamic enclosure is always open to question.
Fundamentally, the system has to be open to a fundamental force constant,
and time. That could be the EM force constant, alpha, or the gravitational
The ARV story is chaff; misdirection to fill the void with something
semi-plausible, at least to some degree of consistency, yet whilst only
providing bumsteer. The UFO equivalent of red mercury. Visitors' craft
are obviously surrounded by some kind of glowing orb phenomenon, commonly
assumed to
As I was eating some soup (on day 5 of the fasting mimicking diet) I
wondered why I didn't try putting a pyramid in a box?!
I took a Pyramid I made from A4 Paper where I printed a Template for a
Pyramid of my own design, this design uses an effect I discovered and then
found another researcher
BTW, just curious about things with a high dielectric constant as these
have been correlated with both Free Energy (a researcher with a coil around
a Barium Titanate coil inputting a special frequency got a blue glow and
free energy out, yes, Barium again pops up).
But also I recall reading about
I have presented this to some degree here years ago but time for another
crack at it.
When I was in bed this morning I thought of this list, actually in that
state I was able to think, I believe of a few extra cases that currently I
can't put my finger on, they would belong in the middle of the
Sorry, there was a missing character in the final link. Here is the correct
link.
_Goethe’s Theory of Colors from the Perspective of Modern Physics_
What is yellow? by PehrSall
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_1WiWGndZw
PehrSall is a physicist who is interested in the history and science of
color theory. He has many video's in which he investigates Newton's and
Geothe's color theories experimentally.
He also has a video on Land's two color
Book of Abstracts and program:
https://iccf25.com/conf-data/iccf-25/files/ICCF25-book-of-abstracts_final.pdf
Infinite Energy reports on conference:
https://infinite-energy.com/resources/iccf25.html
This will be a short and easy one, essentially there are two ways to look
at the law of conservation of energy that seem identical but have important
differences.
Let's assume for the moment that energy cannot be (in a net sense) created
or destroyed.
So then energy can either be said to be
i'd have to look at that very carefully in light of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbr0fQfJC-8
He cites some compelling reasons it might be busted, but, you never know.
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 03:12, Terry Blanton wrote:
> It's Back...LK-99 second chance? Silicon?
>
>
>
It's Back...LK-99 second chance? Silicon?
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/lk-99-patent-update-suggest-it-could-work
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 11:25 AM Terry Blanton wrote:
> And a new candidate with "dancing" Cooper pairs.
>
>
>
The delay? I don't think we're in a hurry. And clearly no one else on the list
has an interest in our discussion.
Spectral colors and their perception are my business. I've made literally
billions of square meters of diffraction gratings, mostly decorative patterns.
Yellow and magenta have
Sorry about the delay.
I am not sure. If you think about it, overlapping colours don't go along
with the topology of stress lines.
However, cellophane tape is a different situation. It could be that
the perception of the colour magenta is situational like
the perception of yellow.
Did you know
And a new candidate with "dancing" Cooper pairs.
https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-identify-a-strange-new-form-of-superconductivity
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 8:31 PM Jonathan Berry
wrote:
> Maybe, look at how both cases of levitation had one end up and one end
> down.
>
> This suggests one
https://apnews.com/us-news/georgia-power-co-georgia-southern-co-utilities-general-news-5f0ad26f63b3db12707263b7730b30be
Maybe, look at how both cases of levitation had one end up and one end down.
This suggests one of 2 things, they either made a ferromagnetic material
not a superconductor.
OR, they made a superconductor that is only superconductive at one end.
So a tiny bit of contamination only occurred at
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:13:33 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Two down
>
>https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/18/lk-99-room-temperature-superconductor/
...maybe the impurities are what it's all about. Clearly the substance they
produced behaved remarkably like a
superconductor.
Two down
https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/18/lk-99-room-temperature-superconductor/
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023, 7:37 PM Terry Blanton wrote:
> One down, one to go.
>
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/15/science/retraction-ranga-dias-rochester.html
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 6:33 PM Terry Blanton
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> > Otherwise there is no point. If it cannot be replicated, it is not
> > science. If the researcher wants to cash in on the discovery, that is
> > fine. He or she needs to file for a patent before publishing the paper.
>
> May be you see the point. With 3 months reports
On 18.08.2023 17:27, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Otherwise there is no point. If it cannot be replicated, it is not
science. If the researcher wants to cash in on the discovery, that is
fine. He or she needs to file for a patent before publishing the paper.
May be you see the point. With 3 months
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Jed, I do not object reporting, but these blood suckers like to have
> detailed reports...This would be OK for 10x more money...
>
Everything must be published in enough detail to replicate the experiment.
Otherwise there is no point. If it cannot be replicated, it is
Jed, I do not object reporting, but these blood suckers like to have
detailed reports...This would be OK for 10x more money...
Further:: A little bit more advanced experiments need high level
equipment. Like a multi target PVD coater, a good galvanostat and access
to a decent XRF just to
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Not a single experienced researcher will spend more than a few seconds to
> read such outraging nonsense as writing progress reports every 3 months for
> e.g. 25k $ funding is just a bad joke...
>
I have given several researchers funding, with no strings attached. I
One down, one to go.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/15/science/retraction-ranga-dias-rochester.html
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 6:33 PM Terry Blanton wrote:
> Sound is sound. Energy changes with frequency.
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023, 12:47 PM Andrew Meulenberg
> wrote:
>
>> Phonons are important to
This is the same method IH (international heat did use)
==> Get maximal information for a minimum of money.
Not a single experienced researcher will spend more than a few seconds
to read such outraging nonsense as writing progress reports every 3
months for e.g. 25k $ funding is just a bad
See:
Anthropocene Institute Advances Solid-State Fusion Energy at ICCF-25
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230817380396/en/
Anthropocene-Institute-Advances-Solid-State-Fusion-Energy-at-ICCF-25
Exploration Grants
The Anthropocene Institute is connecting funding sources with researchers
Would it change your mind if you saw the real thing instead of a digital
representation? All of color photography, both on film and now with digital
cameras and LCD or OLED screens depend upon acceptable approximations of the
real colors. This varies among different cultures.
And now, I delve
The demonstrations given by this lecturer are more refined so it is easier
to observe how magenta arises in proximity to other colours.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqZ1THDGD34
The idea that real or objective colour is reducible to a single parameter
known as wavelength seems to me simplistic
Cool. Your story got me to watch videos of stress visualization in plastic
using polarized light.
Noticing how readily the colour magenta (a.k.a. pink ) is produced in this
video as the plastic is rotated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6U4uembaNQ
Watching how the magenta patches come and go
More polarized fun...
A much more easily viewed demonstration of the effect we are discussing here is
looking at clear glass table tops outside. If you happen to have some lawn
furniture that includes a clear tempered glass table top, all you have to do is
stand to the east or west of of the
Here a practical link for optical calculations like Brewster angle
https://refractiveindex.info/?shelf=main=Ni=Johnson
J.W.
Thanks for the feedback.
I had not heard of Brewster's angle.
I will need time to consider these suggestions.
Harry
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 3:11 PM MSF wrote:
Thanks for the feedback.
I had not heard of Brewster's angle.
I will need time to consider these suggestions.
Harry
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 3:11 PM MSF wrote:
> We call them "colors" down here south of the border, Harry. But to your
> question, yes I have experienced the same phenomenon. Keep
We call them "colors" down here south of the border, Harry. But to your
question, yes I have experienced the same phenomenon. Keep in mind that
peripheral vision is more light sensitive than foveal vision.
I can think of two possibilities to explain the phenomenon. Light from the
clear sky is
This summer I have been walking to work in the morning during twilight just
before the sun rises.
As I walk across asphalt paved streets which are old and cracking,
sometimes I see very faint bands of colour
in my peripheral vision when I am looking at the pavement. When it happens
I am walking
Sound is sound. Energy changes with frequency.
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023, 12:47 PM Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
> Phonons are important to the CF process; but, the ultrasound might provide
> organized pressure waves to align defects into CF productive structures.
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 10:34 AM
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Mon, 7 Aug 2023 11:06:38 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>I think there have been studies on phonons in CF. You might search Jed's
>web site.
Look at the work done by a.o. Russ George.
Buy electric cars and recharge them from solar panels on your roof.
Phonons are important to the CF process; but, the ultrasound might provide
organized pressure waves to align defects into CF productive structures.
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 10:34 AM Terry Blanton wrote:
> I think there have been studies on phonons in CF. You might search Jed's
> web site.
>
> On
I think there have been studies on phonons in CF. You might search Jed's
web site.
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023, 10:57 AM Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
> Robin, Good suggestion in your BTW.
>
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 2:57 PM Robin
> wrote:
>
>> In reply to Andrew Meulenberg's message of Sat, 5 Aug 2023
Robin, Good suggestion in your BTW.
On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 2:57 PM Robin
wrote:
> In reply to Andrew Meulenberg's message of Sat, 5 Aug 2023 14:41:18 -0500:
> Hi Andrew,
> [snip]
> >Robin, Your strained lattices might also be the answer to useful CF.
>
> Please feel free to pursue it. It's way
In reply to Andrew Meulenberg's message of Sat, 5 Aug 2023 14:41:18 -0500:
Hi Andrew,
[snip]
>Robin, Your strained lattices might also be the answer to useful CF.
Please feel free to pursue it. It's way beyond my means to do so.
BTW, it can be enhanced by introducing a forced ultrasound
Robin, Your strained lattices might also be the answer to useful CF.
_ _ _
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 3:38 PM Robin
wrote:
> In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 26 Jul 2023 19:32:07 +
> (UTC):
> Hi,
>
> You may recall that years ago, I suggested on this list that strained
> lattices
Super conduction (SC) is a complex field. First the old cooper pair
model is invalid for most cases as shown by Hirsch.
The physical reality more looks like evolving spin currents (=EM flux
only) that seemlessly explains why field lines cannot penetrate an SC:
From this it is clear that a
Two bit da Vinci...yeah worth about 25¢
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023, 8:19 PM Jones Beene wrote:
>
> the arm-chair physicists out there seem to be positing "a new kind of
> superconductivity" rather than, you know
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLr95AFBRXI
>
>
>
> Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>
the arm-chair physicists out there seem to be positing "a new kind of
superconductivity" rather than, you know
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLr95AFBRXI
Terry Blanton wrote:
Rendered Invalid
Rendered Invalid
https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2023/08/03/business/tech/Korea-Quantum-Energy-Research-Centre-superconductor/20230803184638075.html
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 9:49 AM Terry Blanton wrote:
>
> https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008?s=09
>
>
>
>
>
Leave it to a Brit to take the fun out of everything.
Burned any 5G towers lately?
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 5:45 PM Frogfall wrote:
> > And then there's bug chitin:
> >
> > http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm
>
> In the UK they have developed a way to synthesise this.
> It is now
> And then there's bug chitin:
>
> http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm
In the UK they have developed a way to synthesise this.
It is now widely used as a moulding compound.
https://img.milli.az/2020/04/09/840379_01.jpg
One design of Grebenikov's echo's a discovery I have made.
The "Paper comb" which is paper folded into a zig-zag pattern, well I have
found that the general type of phenomena which Grebenikov, Kozyrev, and in
truth most everything with extraordinary claims is based on which is
something in the
Anybody try any of the experiments? I played with cardboard pyramids in the
late 60s and my controlled experiments did not sweeten sugar solution,
sharpen razor blades, retard decomposition or more speedily germinate
seed...
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023, 02:37 Terry Blanton, wrote:
> And then there's bug
And then there's bug chitin:
http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 6:37 PM Frogfall wrote:
> Have a look at this report:
>
> NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program
> https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980201240
> Published 1998
>
> This stuff was all quite
Have a look at this report:
NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980201240
Published 1998
This stuff was all quite open at the time.
In the UK, British Aerospace was also funding antigravity studies, in the shape
of "Project Greenglow" - which was
Robin wrote:
> >I exclude robot readers after identifying them by various methods.
>
> Why would you exclude them? Surely allowing access would ensure that
> people doing searches would be more likely to find
> the site?
>
Perhaps I should make it clear I am not actually excluding anyone. That
Okay, I found 4,697 records associated with an AI project. I filtered those
out, bringing the July total down to 23,151. It is still substantially more
than the previous month.
https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1213
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, 2 Aug, 23 At 14:33
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li
If there's any truth to the testimony before Congress, we already have
the tech.
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023, 5:56 AM ROGER ANDERTON <mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote:
&l
17 Issue 4
>
>
> https://studio.youtube.com/video/oPw3xK-9tVQ/edit
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Jed Rothwell"
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 Aug, 23 At 02:01
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr.
e
Frontier Research Vol 17 Issue 4
https://studio.youtube.com/video/oPw3xK-9tVQ/edit
-- Original Message --
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, 2 Aug, 23 At 02:01
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Fate of Dr. Ning Li
That is very interesting! And sad. I
101 - 200 of 104653 matches
Mail list logo
