]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 5:58 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Debunking Steorn Orbo
Pulses cause significant skin effect because their Fourier components
consist of high frequency harmonics.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <mailto:zer
effect because their Fourier components
> consist of high frequency harmonics.
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Sent:* Monday, September 19, 2011 11:08 PM
> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Debunking Steorn Orbo
>
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Sent:* Monday, September 19, 2011 5:21 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Debunking Steorn Orbo
Am 19.09.2011 22:33, schrieb Joe Catania:
Now you are asking me to take it on faith from you. I find you
less convincing than Steorn.
Let
Pulses cause significant skin effect because their Fourier components consist
of high frequency harmonics.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 11:08 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Debunking Steorn Orbo
From
From: Robert Leguillon [mailto:robert.leguil...@hotmail.com]
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Debunking Steorn Orbo
[deleted]
Thus the original question set:
Q1) Does this uneven current flow (skin effect) translate to potentially
uneven heating - even at equilibrium**?
[deleted]
R.L
nents. Where is the paper mentioned?
- Original Message -
From: Peter Heckert
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Debunking Steorn Orbo
Am 19.09.2011 22:33, schrieb Joe Catania:
Now you are asking me to take it on faith from
at a Time,
R.L.
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 23:21:10 +0200
From: peter.heck...@arcor.de
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Debunking Steorn Orbo
Am 19.09.2011 22:33, schrieb Joe Catania:
Now you are asking me to take it on faith from you. I find you less convincing
than Steor
paper? Tell me the price.
Best,
Peter
- Original Message -
*From:* Peter Heckert <mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de>
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Sent:* Monday, September 19, 2011 4:29 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Debunking Steorn Orbo
A
Now you are asking me to take it on faith from you. I find you less convincing
than Steorn.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Heckert
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Debunking Steorn Orbo
Am 19.09.2011 22:22, schrieb Joe
Am 19.09.2011 22:22, schrieb Joe Catania:
I'm not going to take it on faith about the AC power being less than
DC. I've done these types of calculations before and I can tell you
they are not simple.
It is simple. The simplest way to calculate such problems is to use the
law of enery conservati
On Sep 19, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Am 19.09.2011 19:30, schrieb Esa Ruoho:
The next step for Steorn may be when a client licenses one of
their technologies and produces a working product.
;-)
I was going to quote that line, but you saved me the trouble. 8^)
The next step,
sed to evaluate them.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Leguillon
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Debunking Steorn Orbo
My Two Cents--
I must confess that I'm unfamiliar with the effect of electromagnetism on
c
Am 19.09.2011 20:21, schrieb Robert Leguillon:
My Two Cents--
I must confess that I'm unfamiliar with the effect of electromagnetism
on conductive heating. I thought that I'd throw out a few questions
regarding the observations of the 4th paper, hoping to learn:
You must first kow, it is alwa
My Two Cents--
I must confess that I'm unfamiliar with the effect of electromagnetism on
conductive heating. I thought that I'd throw out a few questions regarding the
observations of the 4th paper, hoping to learn:
Background for the questions: Alternating current (dependent on the freque
Am 19.09.2011 19:30, schrieb Esa Ruoho:
The next step for Steorn may be when a client licenses one of their
technologies and produces a working product.
;-)
Am 19.09.2011 17:10, schrieb Ron Wormus:
Peter,
As far as I can see Naudin has never tried an experiment that did not
work for him.
His MAHG power measurements are in error (which has been pointed out
to him).
I did not analyze his power measurements. It is clear to me that an
error with pul
Why are you guys referring to really old JLN stuff in 2011!?
http://pesn.com/2011/09/14/9501914_Steorn_Drops_Four_Bombshell_Documents_Validating_Orbo/
September 14, 2011Steorn Drops Four Bombshell Documents Validating Orbo
*The Dublin based, Irish free energy company Steorn, has allowed PESN to
v
Peter,
As far as I can see Naudin has never tried an experiment that did not work for
him.
His MAHG power measurements are in error (which has been pointed out to him).
His write ups are beautifully presented but in my opinion generally unreliable.
Ron
--On Sunday, September 18, 2011 10:01 AM
Hi Walter!
Am 18.09.2011 14:04, schrieb Walter Eager:
Regarding your "Debunking of Steorn"
You have some great theory my friend. It sure makes a lot of sense,
and I do agree with some of what you are
saying (because it makes sense).
Just one thing. Have you actually tested your theory?
No. I d
http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/indexen.htm
I think, this is easy to debunk.
They say, they have a toroidal magnet. An ideal toroidal magnet has no
external field and so there can be no back electromagnetic force.
Now this is untrue. In this magical moment, where the permanent magnet
passes by
20 matches
Mail list logo
