l@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
>
> Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
> > This has been the problem all along -- everything is sloppy, Rossi's
> > statements are often inaccurate or confusing, there's a little bit of
> > what might be ou
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
This has been the problem all along -- everything is sloppy, Rossi's
statements are often inaccurate or confusing, there's a little bit of
what might be outright lying going on (e.g., the dry steam in the
early tests, the undetectable isotope shifts, the factory heat
You don't understand skin effect well. Injecting high frequencies obviously
may fool the meter. I think it would be safer to heat with DC.
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Heckert"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E
pulsed power will blow a fuse which can't be blown by the same DC level.
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Heckert"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
Another possibility is to make a small modification to each com
No you don't understand skin effect.
- Original Message -
From: "Roarty, Francis X"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 3:15 PM
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
Joe, Peter is correct -XL =6.28fl and real current thru the coil is
"cho
ge -
From: "Peter Heckert"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
> Am 12.10.2011 20:00, schrieb Joe Catania:
>> Nonsense, high frequencies are subject to skin effect.
> So you have studied electrical engineering?
&g
On 11-10-12 03:38 PM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Another possibility is to make a small modification to each component:
Measure the flow rate a little bit wrong, measure temperatures a
little bit wrong, calculate a little bit wrong, introduce so much
errors and inaccuracies that a single one -if d
stor but it does not get hot because it
is only storing it not dissipating it.
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Joe Catania [mailto:zrosumg...@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 2:01 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
Nonsense, high fre
Another possibility is to make a small modification to each component:
Measure the flow rate a little bit wrong, measure temperatures a
little bit wrong, calculate a little bit wrong, introduce so much
errors and inaccuracies that a single one -if discovered- would prove
nothing, but all toge
elds can induce electric
polarization and eddie currents which can dissiapte heat.
- Original Message - From: "Peter Heckert"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
Am 12.10.2011 20:00, schrieb Joe Catania:
Nonsense, high freque
;Peter Heckert"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
Am 12.10.2011 20:00, schrieb Joe Catania:
Nonsense, high frequencies are subject to skin effect.
So you have studied electrical engineering?
I have. Unfortunately I dont know the prop
question here and with those thick
cables you can almost forget the skin effect.
- Original Message - From: "Peter Heckert"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
Am 12.10.2011 18:39, schrieb Joe Catania:
http://www.omega.com/h
Another problem is magnetic and electric field coupling to dipolar matter.
This can dissipate energy as well.
- Original Message -
From: "Man on Bridges"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
Hi,
On 12-10-2011 20:08, J
Hi,
On 12-10-2011 20:08, Joe Catania wrote:
But an analyzer would eliminate doubt. You'd actually be measuring
power instead of relying of neglecting something you know nothing about.
A cheap secondhand CRT oscilloscope up to 10 MHz would show a lot of
information as well ;-)
Kind regards,
But an analyzer would eliminate doubt. You'd actually be measuring power
instead of relying of neglecting something you know nothing about.
- Original Message -
From: "Alan J Fletcher"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for
Nonsense, high frequencies are subject to skin effect.
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Heckert"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
Am 12.10.2011 18:39, schrieb Joe Catania:
http://www.omega.com/h
Wednesday, October 12, 2011 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
2011/10/12 Joe Catania :
It occurs to me that the means they are using to measure power is prone to
error. An energy analyzer would be the best way to do it. If there's any
reactance in the circuit they power ca
At 10:58 AM 10/12/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
2011/10/12 Joe Catania :
It can measure also DC current, but with separate DC settings of
course. So could it be plausible to feed DC-current along with AC and
clamp ammeter would not notice a thing? Then only conducting wire's
capacity could limit ho
2011/10/12 Joe Catania :
> It occurs to me that the means they are using to measure power is prone to
> error. An energy analyzer would be the best way to do it. If there's any
> reactance in the circuit they power calculations they use would be
> inaccurate.
Indeed, they used very cheap (€40) cla
- Original Message - From: "Terry Blanton"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
Yep, it's called power factor. You're really on top of things, Joe!
T
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Joe Catania
wrote:
It o
Wednesday, October 12, 2011 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Energy Analyzer for E-Cat
Yep, it's called power factor. You're really on top of things, Joe!
T
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Joe Catania wrote:
It occurs to me that the means they are using to measure power is prone
to
error
Yep, it's called power factor. You're really on top of things, Joe!
T
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Joe Catania wrote:
> It occurs to me that the means they are using to measure power is prone to
> error. An energy analyzer would be the best way to do it. If there's any
> reactance in the c
It occurs to me that the means they are using to measure power is prone to
error. An energy analyzer would be the best way to do it. If there's any
reactance in the circuit they power calculations they use would be inaccurate.
23 matches
Mail list logo
