Hi all,
I am wondering the following. Is it true that we can arrange, at least
theoretically for atoms structurally in a restful structure and achieve
high probability of a nuclear reaction. With restful
I mean in a way that is not magically forcing the atoms unnaturally close
to each other.
I
I cannot judge whether any of the theory is substantial proof. I can say
there is no theory that is generally accepted by most theoreticians in the
field. No one outside the field knows anything about the theories.
Cold fusion is an experimental finding. There is copious experimental proof
that
I'm not after a theory that is true or not but a fact.
E.g. a receipt like
Arrange atoms A1,A2,... acorfing to
From known principles a good approximation of the system is H(...)
Then when we calculate the probabilities of nuclear reaction we get
P(system) P(single atom)
So, I'm after a
How does your reaction differ from nuclear decay?
There seems to be some confusion in precisely what you are looking for. If
the isotope in question does not decay naturally, the wait can be very long
:-)
For instance, many common foods contain potassium, which is slightly
radioactive -
which essentially means everything decays.
On Friday, December 13, 2013, Jones Beene wrote:
How does your reaction differ from nuclear decay?
There seems to be some confusion in precisely what you are looking for. If
the isotope in question does not decay naturally, the wait can be very
Try again...
which essentially means everything decays
That includes the 3 dimensions of space we reside in.
On Friday, December 13, 2013, ChemE Stewart wrote:
which essentially means everything decays.
On Friday, December 13, 2013, Jones Beene wrote:
How does your reaction differ from
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
To add to the confusion, some “experts” believe that the proton decays,
eventually – which essentially means everything decays.
And at 60 years, I'm feeling it.
hmm, normal decays are of cause not all that interesting, more in line with
what you can find in
https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/36783/TheoreticalAnalysisReactionMechanisms.pdf?sequence=1
the page with
BEGIN QUOTE
• Important !! The Gamow factor suppression occurs with
Dr. Kim has worked (maybe is still working) for DGT. He has calculated the
increased reaction rates that his theory of LENR+(the optical theory)
implies. This theory assumes a charge screening potential that reduces the
coulomb barrier.
for an overview of Kim's theory see
Many thanks Axil!
Wow, it really looks like he is really close to show what I'm asking for.
Really cool. I have heard others
speak about his theory and debunk it on the merit that the BEC have not
been observed in room temperature. Then after reading the very good
overview it really looks like we
The Ni/H reaction in a nutshell…
Heat induced Dipole motion is step 1.
High voltage/frequency EMF production is step 2.
More EMF amplification by nanoparticles is step 3
EMF storage in a soliton via vortex current *whispering*-*gallery mode wave
*formation is step 4. This is how the
11 matches
Mail list logo
