Try again... "which essentially means everything decays"
That includes the 3 dimensions of space we reside in. On Friday, December 13, 2013, ChemE Stewart wrote: > "which essentially means everything decays. > > On Friday, December 13, 2013, Jones Beene wrote: > > How does your reaction differ from nuclear decay? > > > > There seems to be some confusion in precisely what you are looking for. If > the isotope in question does not decay naturally, the wait can be very long > J > > > > For instance, many common foods contain potassium, which is slightly > radioactive – so you can measure the decay rate in say - bananas - with a > good GM detector. The rate of decay can be increased in some cases. There > are reports of a billion fold increase in some isotopes. (see Bosch, F. et > al., Observation of bound-state b– decay of fully ionized 187Re, Physical > Review Letters 1996 or the Barker patents. > > > > Curiously – potassium is also a catalyst for the Ni-H reaction, but the > radioactive isotope is not to blame… or is it? To add to the confusion, > some “experts” believe that the proton decays, eventually – which > essentially means everything decays. > > > > *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe > > > > I'm not after a theory that is true or not but a fact. > > > > E.g. a receipt like > > > > Arrange atoms A1,A2,... acorfing to .... > > From known principles a good approximation of the system is H(...) > > Then when we calculate the probabilities of nuclear reaction we get > P(system) >> P(single atom) > > > > So, I'm after a mathematical proof or indication from first principles, > that you can induce a > > nuclear reaction this way. A meta theory would then be that LENR might > take advantage of this > >
