x as measured/inferred by the
>>resulting weak emissions! Perhaps a 'third' miracle is needed, oh shit, will
>>it ever all be revealed.
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: mix...@bigpond.com <mailto:mix...@bigpond.com>
>>[mailto:mix...@bigpond.com <mailto:m
, January 18, 2017 8:19 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear
spallation and resonance
Gamma mitigation might lie in how nuclear reactions occur inside a Bose
condinsate.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:11 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com
<
t;it ever all be revealed.
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:36 PM
> >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> >Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren -
>
t;it ever all be revealed.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:36 PM
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear
>spallation and reso
, will
it ever all be revealed.
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:36 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear
spallation and resonance
In reply to Russ Geor
In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:53:41 -0800:
Hi Russ,
[snip]
>Agreed that is the second miracle required! But is there any standing
>reported evidence for strange mishugenonistic neutron resonance, aka
>reflected neutrons, that subsequently behave in a manner effecting
...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 5:27 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear
spallation and resonance
In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:50:11 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>
In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:50:11 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Indeed where is the neutron activation, lots of nuclei in the neighborhood
>yet neither activation nor knock on's is very odd. One miracle to a
>customer, getting neutrons out of nuclei is the 'one miracle'.
The
18, 2017 9:51 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren
– nuclear spallation and resonance
Hello George,
I am sure you are a more experienced guy in regards to LENR than I am. Probably
a better sailor. If it only comes down
I is, I am, I are.
>
>
>
> --- an Old Answer to an Old Question
>
>
>
> From: Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com
> <mailto:lenn...@thornros.com>]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 8:34 AM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex
;
> --- an Old Answer to an Old Question
>
>
>
> *From:* Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2017 8:34 AM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuclear
> spallatio
,
And when I spits, I spits tar.
I'se hard, I is, I am, I are.
--- an Old Answer to an Old Question
From: Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 8:34 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuc
I don't understand the details on the ponderomotive force LENR theory, so
this is pure wishful thinking.
Maybe it can support some other theories which need a new way to make
nucleus interact.
I first think about Edmund Storms Hydroton theory.
The great problem with Hydroton and the Slow Fusion,
Hello Mats,
I think this is interesting. I understand the critic from Jones and Russ
but at least it is a theory and it is based on the result of Lugano. Maybe
it was not such a flawed demo just made so it has too many openings for
critic. This also enhances the profile of Rossi. He has support
Ooops, I thought I was replying to Mats,and didn't see it was a link
from Vortex.
As Jones Beene points out it is lacking proof. Perhaps the new
experiment they talk about will provide it.
I thought it interesting that they forecast the production of light in
view of what we have hear about
Mats,
Most interesting. This sounds like one of the most plausible theories
to me.
I haven't looked at the figures yet but surely this must lean heavily on
what Rossi has already done?
Adrian
On 1/18/2017 7:43 AM, Mats Lewan wrote:
The LENR patent application by Lundin and Lidgren
AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear
spallation and resonance
OK they have a patent application now - after almost two years - but where
is the experimental data?
When this was first announced in 2015, my comment then was the
OK they have a patent application now - after almost two years - but
where is the experimental data?
When this was first announced in 2015, my comment then was the same then
as it is now:
"The theory looks a lot like a mashup of W-L cold neutrons and Hagelstein’s
neutron hopping, neither of
The LENR patent application by Lundin and Lidgren referenced in this blog post:
https://animpossibleinvention.com/2015/10/15/swedish-scientists-claim-lenr-explanation-break-through/
is now public here:
19 matches
Mail list logo
