In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 22:33:41 -0800: Hi Russ, [snip] >This explanation does not apply to the moving particles that are clearly >involved which though mostly remaining and reacting within the solid state >matrix are also found as strange particle emissions.
The energy of the fusion reaction might be carried away by either a fast electron, a fast proton or a fast Hydrino. All three of these would be penetrating particles. Also, if a whole Hydrino molecule fuses with a target nucleus, then the energy release can be as much as 10-20 MeV, easily enough to produce a free neutron in some cases. Or if the Hydrino is a Deuterino, then the proton may be retained by the target nucleus, and the neutron expelled with the energy of the reaction. Also, a fast Hydrino might have a similar capture cross section to a neutron. In short, there are lots of possibilities. Also, you didn't answer the lower or higher question below. >A hydrino doesnt bear the characteristics of a penetrating particle which >clearly said particles are, I dont see hydrinos being both not captured and >captured when passing through various materials and especially I dont see >hydrinos behaving with such materials in accordance with neutron capture cross >sections! > > > >From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] >Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 8:19 PM >To: vortex-l >Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear >spallation and resonance > > > >Gamma mitigation might lie in how nuclear reactions occur inside a Bose >condinsate. > > > >On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:11 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com ><mailto:mix...@bigpond.com> > wrote: > >In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:50:44 -0800: >Hi Russ, >[snip] >>Mischugenons however unlike 'hydrinos' do produce irrefutable isotopic >>shifts in recipient nuclei, > >During Hydrino fusion, two things can happen:- > >1) A proton fuses with the target nucleus, resulting in a change of element. > >or > >2) A proton & an electron fuse concurrently with the target nucleus resulting >in >an isotope shift in the original element, since essentially they combine to >create a new neutron. This is enhanced electron capture. Enhanced, because the >electron is severely shrunken, making it much easier to capture than a normal >atomic electron. > >>though the quantity of shifted isotopes is much >>lower > >lower or higher? > > >>than the apparent mischugenon flux as measured/inferred by the >>resulting weak emissions! Perhaps a 'third' miracle is needed, oh shit, will >>it ever all be revealed. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: mix...@bigpond.com <mailto:mix...@bigpond.com> >>[mailto:mix...@bigpond.com <mailto:mix...@bigpond.com> ] >>Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:36 PM >>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren - nuclear >>spallation and resonance >> >>In reply to Russ George's message of Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:53:41 -0800: >>Hi Russ, >>[snip] >>>Agreed that is the second miracle required! But is there any standing >>>reported evidence for strange mishugenonistic neutron resonance, aka >>>reflected neutrons, that subsequently behave in a manner effecting the >>>lack of 'energetic gamma'-less absorbing of neutrons save perhaps >>>invoking quasi-dark matter-like behavior, nah... ;) Perhaps said >>>resonant conditioned mischugenon/neutrons would behave somewhat like >>>normal neutrons and be captured preferentially by nuclei according to >>>their neutron capture cross-section resulting in only rather weak >>>emissions. Such beasties would be revealed by the pattern of measurable >>>though weak emissions increasing as they passed through thin foils of >>>metals with increasing neutron capture cross sections, I can live with that >>:) That's a neat experiment and result! >>>http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2013/05/04/edward-teller/ >> >>Are you the "I" in this tale? >> >>As for "mischugenons" they sound a lot like well shrunken Hydrinos. Not as >>small as neutrons, so they penetrate the electron shells of atoms less >>easily, and need to tunnel into the target nucleus, reducing the reaction >>rate. When they merge with a target nucleus, the resultant energy can be >>carried by the accompanying electron, or by the other proton if the initial >>particle was a Hydrino molecule. The latter possibility in particular might >>account for a considerable reduction in emitted gammas (by many orders of >>magnitude). >> >>Regards, >> >>Robin van Spaandonk >> >>http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
