release.
Therefore, the net energy released into the system is the same independent of
path.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tue, Sep 4, 2012 12:16 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:01 PM, David Roberson wrote:
It would
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:01 PM, David Roberson wrote:
It would be ideal if the pseudo neutron can be formed which would then
penetrate the nucleus but I am afraid that the energy equations would not
balance. If there are two different paths to the same
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:01 PM, David Roberson wrote:
It would be ideal if the pseudo neutron can be formed which would then
> penetrate the nucleus but I am afraid that the energy equations would not
> balance. If there are two different paths to the same ultimate result,
> they should releas
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:01 PM, David Roberson wrote:
It would be ideal if the pseudo neutron can be formed which would then
> penetrate the nucleus but I am afraid that the energy equations would not
> balance. If there are two different paths to the same ultimate result,
> they should releas
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:49 PM, David Roberson wrote:
It is apparent that the oblong shape would result in a strong dipole
> behavior provided that that nucleus is not in the center. The references
> that have been suggested all show the nucleus of the atom as located at one
> foci. I must adm
Just a couple noteworthy items from my research for those few of you that
cannot get enough of my black hole/collapsed matter theory of CF.
A 2008 study considered the internal mass of a black hole to be very
similar to a dense Bose Einstein Condensate, not necessarily a singularity.
http://arxiv.
Le Sep 3, 2012 à 2:43 PM, Jed Rothwell a écrit :
> Mike McKubre says that he first met Martin Fleischmann, there were several
> students in the hallway firing a bow and arrow for some sort of experiment.
> It looked foolhardy. Mike decided it was just the place for him.
I recall a bow-and-arro
Mike confirmed that story. It wasn't my imagination that he said that. He
said "they were making micro-electrodes by stretching a (molten) hollow
glass fiber as fast as they could before it cooled."
- Jed
Or "Hey, what's this button do?..."
On Monday, September 3, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Jed Rothwell
> >
> wrote:
>
> > My daughter spent time in New Zealand. She says the national slogan there
> > should be: "Hey, let's try it! Why not?"
>
> Kind of like the inf
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> My daughter spent time in New Zealand. She says the national slogan there
> should be: "Hey, let's try it! Why not?"
Kind of like the infamous redneck last words, "Hey, Bubba, watch this!"
T
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>>
>> > My "don't try this at home" variation would be making some very
>> > highly loaded PdD and then whacking it with a sledge hammer.
>>
>> Someone, I think more than one researcher, has admitted to trying this.
>
>
Terry Blanton wrote:
>
> > My "don't try this at home" variation would be making some very
> > highly loaded PdD and then whacking it with a sledge hammer.
>
> Someone, I think more than one researcher, has admitted to trying this.
>
Yup. I recall hearing that some Russians tried it with a gun.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
wrote:
> My "don't try this at home" variation would be making some very
> highly loaded PdD and then whacking it with a sledge hammer.
Someone, I think more than one researcher, has admitted to trying this.
T
At 12:03 PM 9/3/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
I don't know how Kim at Purdue is regarded in this group, but aside
from his theoretical work, his ICCF-17 paper proposes three
experiments along these lines. They are: (a) Determine the velocity
distribution of deuterons in metals, which he states "i
At 12:03 PM 9/3/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
I don't know how Kim at Purdue is regarded in
this group, but aside from his theoretical work,
his ICCF-17 paper proposes three experiments
along these lines. They are: (a) Determine the
velocity distribution of deuterons in metals,
which he states
I don't know how Kim at Purdue is regarded in this group, but aside from
his theoretical work, his ICCF-17 paper proposes three experiments along
these lines. They are: (a) Determine the velocity distribution of deuterons
in metals, which he states "is expected to be different" from an ideal gas.
(
I understand and agree. I also understand that fusion also has thermal
issues since it typically occurs at millions of degrees Kelvin.
Maybe DGT's trojan horse theory is correct, who knows at this point.
On Monday, September 3, 2012, Jones Beene wrote:
> This is a good find with possible relev
This is a good find with possible relevance for Ni-H, Stewart, but many
observers will have a different take on how far one can take the BEC due to
thermal issues.
The classic "dipolar boson" and probably the only one which has a chance to
form a BEC at high temperature, since it has greatly re
reactions so that we can look at these?
>
> Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Walker
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Mon, Sep 3, 2012 12:04 am
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields
>
> Le Sep 2, 2012 à 7:07 PM, Terry Blanton a écrit :
>
> > Okay, bu
reactions so that we can look at these?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l
Sent: Mon, Sep 3, 2012 12:04 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields
Le Sep 2, 2012 à 7:07 PM, Terry Blanton a écrit :
> Okay, but what I'm sayin' is that in the crevasse of a pa
contact with a
free proton in space? Does the electron begin to orbit both protons at that
time? Does the combination result in a symmetrical spatial arrangement?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Sep 2, 2012 11:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric
Le Sep 2, 2012 à 7:07 PM, Terry Blanton a écrit :
> Okay, but what I'm sayin' is that in the crevasse of a partial crystal
> lattice, those partial bound electrons restrict where the RSH fermion
> might reside by exclusion.
>
> "Well, I can't go there."
>
> "And I can't go there."
>
> Fritz!
Le Sep 2, 2012 à 4:59 PM, David Roberson a écrit :
> I assume you refer to inverse Rydberg (f/h) matter here. Normal Rydberg
> matter is less dense from what I have seen.
It seems the oblong shape of Rydberg atoms causes them to become electrostatic
dipoles, which allows them to be oriented a
x27;);>>
> To: vortex-l 'vortex-l@eskimo.com');>>
> Sent: Sun, Sep 2, 2012 9:54 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields
>
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:48 PM, David Roberson > wrote:
> > Not a problem. If a classical orbit is true for any length of ti
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Water-Babies,_A_Fairy_Tale_for_a_Land_Baby
"Landshark"
http://www.telly.com/GVSNS?fromtwitvid=1
Message-
From: Terry Blanton
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Sep 2, 2012 10:18 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:16 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> Actually, it is a little premature to throw out a theory that has worked so
> well for so long
Or maybe the t
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:16 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> Actually, it is a little premature to throw out a theory that has worked so
> well for so long
Or maybe the time is now.
Or not.
Happy Laborless day!
T
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Sep 2, 2012 9:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:48 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> Not a problem. If a classical orbit is true for any length of time, quantum
> mechanics has some expl
: Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields
In chemistry, Schrödinger, Pauling, Mulliken and others noted that the
consequence of Heisenberg's relation was that the electron, as a wave packet,
could not be considered to have an exact location in its orbital. Max Born
suggested that the elect
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:58 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> I was thinking of the other guy whose name is Heisenberg. The wave
> functions do not have a time domain feature from what I recall. And then,
> any attempt to locate the electron will shove it out of position. This
> discussion reminds me
expert in QM, perhaps
someone who has that knowledge will help out here.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Sep 2, 2012 9:46 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:43 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> The lady in red certai
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:53 PM, ChemE Stewart wrote:
> Terry is just saying the probability that the electron will be closer to the
> neucleus is higher.
And in the presence of partially bound electrons in a broken lattice,
the word becomes "restricted".
T
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:48 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> Not a problem. If a classical orbit is true for any length of time, quantum
> mechanics has some explaining to do. Again, is this evidence for a hole in
> that theory?
LOL! Yeah, we call it LENR. :-)
I do not know; but, you put a bunch
ssical orbit is true for any length of time,
> quantum mechanics has some explaining to do. Again, is this evidence for a
> hole in that theory?
>
> Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Terry Blanton 'hohlr...@gmail.com');>>
> To: vortex-l 'vortex-l@eskimo
Not a problem. If a classical orbit is true for any length of time, quantum
mechanics has some explaining to do. Again, is this evidence for a hole in
that theory?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Sep 2, 2012 9:44 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RSH in
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:43 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> The lady in red certainly has the appearance of a neutron if the electron
> orbits in this time domain(classical) fashion. Can we assume that the
> ability of Rydberg hydrogen to fuse relatively easily is evidence that
> quantum mechanics i
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Granted that the Bohr model is simplistic; but, for a few hundreths of
> a nanosecond, the Rydberg atom of hydrogen is essentially a neutron.
I think my time scale is off. We might be looking at hundreds of femtoseconds.
In the words of my
9:24 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:16 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> I guess I was not aware of this situation Terry.
Well, look at the Lady in Red:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sommerfeld_ellipses.svg
from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_mo
Sounds reasonable. I would think the ions may be more vulnerable/unstable
in this state, especially if they are densely packed in a compressed void
with the repulsion of the walls and with possible concentrated
charge/fields within.
On Sunday, September 2, 2012, ChemE Stewart wrote:
> Dave,
>
>
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:16 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> I guess I was not aware of this situation Terry.
Well, look at the Lady in Red:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sommerfeld_ellipses.svg
from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_model
Granted that the Bohr model is simplistic; but, for a
12 8:52 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:59 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> I assume you refer to inverse Rydberg (f/h) matter here. Normal Rydberg
> matter is less dense from what I have seen.
No, I refer to hydrogen with extra energy which forces the electr
Dave,
I was looking at Rydberg matter densities and Inverted Rydberg densities
from this paper from Miley and others.
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/STAFF/VISITING_FELLOWS&PROFESSORS/pdf/MileyClusterRydbLPBsing.pdf
On Sunday, September 2, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:59
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:59 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> I assume you refer to inverse Rydberg (f/h) matter here. Normal Rydberg
> matter is less dense from what I have seen.
No, I refer to hydrogen with extra energy which forces the electron
into a higher energy state near ionization. The elect
I assume you refer to inverse Rydberg (f/h) matter here. Normal Rydberg matter
is less dense from what I have seen.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ChemE Stewart
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Sep 2, 2012 2:07 pm
Subject: [Vo]:RSH in Electric Fields
I'll defer to Axil, but i would sa
I'll defer to Axil, but i would say yes. Rydberg matter is also nice and
dense allowing you to pack more matter into voids to get more "fuel" into
the chambers.
Stewart
On Sunday, September 2, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Would a static electric field result in a polarization of Rydberg
> hydr
Would a static electric field result in a polarization of Rydberg
hydrogen atoms? Also, since DGT implies that the Pm3m space group
enhances the NAE would that static field enhance the reaction?
T
46 matches
Mail list logo
