RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

mechanically available angular momentum. This reaction may fit the definition of LENR. Bob Cook Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 9:57 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex From: Chris Zell<mailto:chrisz...@wetmtv.com> * …

RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

. Attraction is narrow, repulsion is broad. And magnets set in repulsion repeatedly may wear out. I’d like to try to reproduce the Linevich device. From: JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 12:57 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

From: Chris Zell ➢ ….and what do we see? Things such as Bedini, Schauberger (liquid and air), Rotoverters,  flywheels with deliberately slipping belts, Linevich, claims by Kanarev and a large proportion of the ‘tin foil hat’ devices reported on Rex Research.  The Wallace inventions

RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

...@pacbell.net] Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 10:35 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex From: Chris Zell<mailto:chrisz...@wetmtv.com> * OK, here’s my current puzzlement: is it possible that physics has ignored a free energy effect within rotational i

Re: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

> > Bob Cook > > > > > > > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > > > *From: *JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> > *Sent: *Thursday, October 19, 2017 6:35 AM > *To: *vortex-l

Re: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

The torque is undoubtedly a thermal / radiative asymmetry between upper (warmer) and lower (cooler) sides of the levitated sphere. However even if it's due to the random, turbulent airflow caused by the temperature gradient and evaporation, it's rectifying to consistent momentum the same way a

Re: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

The motion is powered by the applied current, explained in the synopsis. Ie. input energy is converting to work. The anisotropy is a material, structural or reactive property, not a fundamental field property. Obviously there is chiralty and 'handedness' in nature, but what i was attempting to

RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

sBeene<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 6:35 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex V! sez: * I'm familiar with the producers of the above videos. In every instance of these angular accelerations, they

RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

From: Chris Zell ➢ OK, here’s my current puzzlement: is it possible that physics has ignored a free energy effect within rotational inertia? It is possible that a gainful effect has been overlooked, and that is why it is fun to figure out which of these vids are faked. Rotational anomalies are

RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

V! sez: ➢ I'm familiar with the producers of the above videos.  In every instance of these angular accelerations, they are being produced by the linear accelerations of Mr Hand, either waving a stator ring or poking a magnet at a field etc. Perhaps not. There is both a logical explanation for

Re: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

ing “standard theory”. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > *From: *Chris Zell <chrisz...@wetmtv.com> > *Sent: *Wednesday, October 18, 2017 7:38 AM > *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject: *RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex > > > > > > > > Angular momentum is a vector quantity and in QM has kinetic energy > associated with it. > > > > Is angular momentum in particles conservative? Does it violate laws of > thermodynamics? Is spin left out of conservative formulas because it > unbalances the results? > > > > > > > > > > >

RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

:38 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex Angular momentum is a vector quantity and in QM has kinetic energy associated with it. Is angular momentum in particles conservative? Does it violate laws of thermodynamics? Is spin left out of

RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

Angular momentum is a vector quantity and in QM has kinetic energy associated with it. Is angular momentum in particles conservative? Does it violate laws of thermodynamics? Is spin left out of conservative formulas because it unbalances the results?

Re: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

Axil <janap...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 2:36 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIlijUSJMmg=488s<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DUIlijUSJMmg%26t%3D488

RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

Jones— Yes to all your questions IMHO Bob Cook From: JonesBeene Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 10:05 AM To: Vortex List Subject: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex Quantum spin (nanometer level and below) is always in motion, and the anomaly

RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

Angular momentum is a vector quantity and in QM has kinetic energy associated with it. The middle ground is that thermal energy (orbital energy in QM theory associated with nuclear and atomic/molecular coherent systems) when made available through a change of potential energy to kinetic energy

RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

Quantum spin (nanometer level and below) is always in motion, and the anomaly would be lack of motion - yet at the micro-level self-generated spin as angular momentum would imply “perpetual motion” if it were a reproducible and “harvestable” phenomenon. Is there a middle ground OK, here’s my

Re: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIlijUSJMmg=488s Start video at 8:00 to save time. Rare earth magnets produce spin because these types of magnets produce anisometric (unbalanced) magnetic field lines. An electro magnet does not produce spin because it produces isometric (balanced) field lines.