In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Thu, 14 May 2020 01:23:28 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>AFAIK the spin angular momentum of a photon is h-bar.
>
>
>This is highly unlikely as in this case all photons should have the same
>angular momentum.
They do. (At least intrinsic angular momentum. Of course
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Wed, 13 May 2020 20:10:56
+:
Hi,
[snip]
>It is also widely considered that angular momentum (AM) is also quantized
>during physical system total energy transitions. Thus, if a system is
>deconstructed such as Andrew suggests happens when
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 8 May 2020 12:52:08 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci., Vol. 32, May 2020 is here:
>
>http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedze.pdf
>
>There are only three papers in this volume.
I wonder if the authors of "Is the Nuclear Active
In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:31:04 -0400:
Hi Harry,
Are you getting bored because of the low level of activity on Vortex? :)
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:51:24 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
If the electrons are shrunken, then they may well tunnel along with the
protons, making an enhanced electron capture
process possible. A possibility which you may recall I first posted here in the
thread
In reply to H LV's message of Sun, 13 Sep 2020 23:52:03 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>The heat flux from the Earth has been estimated, and she agrees with
>the value, but it is way too small to contribute to global warming
>according to the standard view of heat and radiation which is why it is
>ignored by
In reply to H LV's message of Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:13:59 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>She isn't interested in how the heat is conveyed to the surface. Her
>argument is that it can`t be discounted.
Whether or not it can be discounted depends on how much of it there is. One
would need to estimate the
In reply to H LV's message of Sun, 13 Sep 2020 22:23:13 -0400:
Hi Harry,
[snip]
>As I scan Zoe's various posts and her responses to her critics it seems she
>insists that heat and radiation are related but also maintains that they
>are not equivalent or convertible. She maintains that a body can
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:25:39 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
> Looks like your angle is radiative cooling.
At the melting point of Titanium it will radiate about 80 W/cm^2, compared to
the calculated 500 kW/cm^2 kinetic energy.
>
>Plus, speaking of angles - the full
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 8 Oct 2020 20:53:15 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin wrote:
>
>
>> 5) Interstellar gas is not the only problem. A grain of sand or a pebble
>> would spell disaster.
>>
>
>You're gonna need a VERY high resolution radar and a
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 9 Oct 2020 14:11:08 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>This is exactly why starships travel in subspace.
...se we revert to SciFi to maintain the dream, rather than face reality?
I think it's time we change the dream. We are not going to be leaving the Sol
system
Hi,
At half the speed of light, the kinetic energy of a Hydrogen molecule is in
excess of 200 MeV. At that energy it isn't
going to bounce off. It's going to embed itself in the hull material and
deposit all its energy, thereby ablating the
hull material, irrespective of its composition.
Note
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:06:27 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Indeed, Robin. First we must overcome The Great Filter.
1) I think I have just finished providing at least one reason why Interstellar
travel is limited.
2) I think there is actually lots of evide
Hi,
According to wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstellar_medium) the
density of matter in between stars in the
galaxy is about 1E6 molecules / cm^3. We make the assumption that all of it is
molecular Hydrogen.
A space ship traveling at half the speed of light would encounter these
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:37:02 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
To me it looks like a nickel-iron meteor. Acceleration possibly due to
interaction with the Sun's magnetic field.
>
>Vibrator ! wrote:
> > Probably been mooted before; but could the anomalous
In reply to H LV's message of Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:41:54 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Some magnetic field effects have been modeled but they don't produce the
>observed discrepancy.
I think it would be hard to model correctly without knowing the exact
composition of the thing, or distribution of the
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 22 Aug 2020 18:30:43 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>The problem with the Holmlid way of fusion
>
>9H --> 2 4-He + K^o ,K^+ is, it wastes almost all fusion energy (53MeV)
>in kinetic particles.
It need not be a waste, if you have an absorber that is large
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:49:32 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>The elements is rare, costly and does not appear in the list of Mills
>catalysts (but almost any element can be contorted to be catalytic,, as Mills
>has repeatedly shown).
The 3rd ionization energy of Er is
27.2 and Erbium is
not a match.
>
>
>
>Robin wrote:
>
>>The elements is rare, costly and does not appear in the list of Mills
>>catalysts (but almost any element can be contorted to be catalytic,, as Mills
>>has repeatedly shown).
>
>The 3rd ionization energy
In reply to Sean Logan's message of Mon, 24 Aug 2020 13:35:09 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>>
>> You might consider adding a mirror image of it along the axis. Wide ends
>> together. Maybe then it will generate a
>> "hole in the vacuum"
>>
>
>Oh? What is a "hole in the vaccuum?"
When all matter has
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 25 Aug 2020 02:19:47 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
>Say, having enough microwave energy to power a drone might mean that they
>could also test a hybrid resonant cavity so both things could be going on. I
>suppose that it would be possible to design an EM-type
In reply to Sean Logan's message of Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:29:35 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>I find this fascinating and not ridiculous. Are you speaking from personal
>experience? I mean, have you operated, or observed the operation, of such
>a device?
I once tried to make one by using wire wound into
Hi,
BTW, it only costs about 0.53 kWh/kg to lift something 200 km above the Earth's
surface against gravity. Li-ion cell
phone batteries have about half that. However gasoline is about 12-14 kWh/kg,
less when you need to take along your own
Oxygen. Ideally one would use a small nuclear or
In reply to Sean Logan's message of Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:20:28 -0700:
Hi,
You might consider adding a mirror image of it along the axis. Wide ends
together. Maybe then it will generate a
"hole in the vacuum" in the middle?
[snip]
>Thank you JonesBeene. The thought that the mass of the device
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:32:49 -0400:
Hi Jed,
My apologies. I don't know how that happened. Senior moment maybe? :)
>Robin wrote:
>
>In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:52:04 -0400:
>> Hi Jed,
>> [snip]
>> >>
In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:52:04 -0400:
Hi Jed,
[snip]
>> https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1495
The last entry for 2020 is actually from 2018.
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 29 Sep 2020 17:32:49 -0400:
Hi Jed,
Ok, now I know what happened. The first of the 2020 entries is dated 2020 but
the conference was actually held in 2018.
In reply to Chris Zell's message of Tue, 22 Sep 2020 15:38:15 +:
Hi Chris,
[snip]
>Does anyone have any info on this topic? It seems to me that either Paul
>Brown was a deliberate, calculated fraud or he discovered something of immense
>value.
Have you seen this already?
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:54:01 +0200:
Hi Jürg,
Your theory is already difficult enough for us uncomplicated folk to
understand. It would perhaps help if you didn't use
shorthand. IOW please be very clear and precise, and don't leave any steps out.
I realize
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Thu, 17 Sep 2020 23:22:05 +0200:
Hi Jürg,
If you are talking about a torus, then it would help if you make a distinction
between major and minor radius.
>Things are tricky:
>
>A torus diameter is 4R ! But the torus radius is only R! So its a matter
>of
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:04:39 +0200:
Hi,
>You can look up SO(4) in Wikipedia
>
>The group measure is 2^1/2. This is the length of the unit radius of the
>Clifford torus (formed by the tangent space). To get the standard norm
>(=1) you have to divide by
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:35:46 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>If the electrons are shrunken, then they may well tunnel along with the
>protons,
>
>
>To fully understand physics you must model all particles as EM mass -
>the exact opposite of what standard model does.
>
In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:51:14 -0400:
Hi,
That's how the weather works. We already harness the "cold of outer space" when
we harness wind power.
>In this TED talk a physicist explains how to harness the cold of space on
>the Earth using conventional physics.
>How we
In reply to Jack Cole's message of Wed, 5 Aug 2020 21:28:45 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>They are careful to say it's not CF. Sure seems like it originated in CF
...sounds a bit like Let Us Confuse You. ;)
>methods.
>
>https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/nuclear/nuclear-fusiontokamak-not-included
Hi,
Consider this, to split a deuteron costs 2.2 MeV. Hot fusion of two deuterons
yields about 4 MeV. At best this would
never yield more than about a factor of 2and that's not taking into account
any of the losses. And those losses will
be very significant.
1) Maybe 1% of the electrons
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 6 Aug 2020 02:58:16 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
> Ha! The new and improved new wording is interesting in a semantic sense...
> but get real...
>
>Of course it is the demon cold fusion, but now we can pivot around that stigma
>and instead present it all in
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Fri, 7 Aug 2020 14:30:50
+:
Hi Bob,
[snip]
>On second thought maybe a neutrino beam has been invented with special with
>new materials or fields to harvest neutrino kinetic energy. However such a
>device to collect neutrino energy would be
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:26:41
+:
Hi Bob,
[snip]
>Note how carefully the item avoids any mention of how the energy occurs for
>fear of immediate necessity for classification.
What do you mean by "occurs"? They talk about using renewable energy as
In reply to Michael Foster's message of Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:13:13 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
>I read this article. Don't you find it more than a little annoying that Mr.
>Tesla is nowhere mentioned?
There's a good reason for that. The two technologies have nothing in common.
Tesla used the Earth
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:32:13 -0400:
Hi Terry,
[snip]
>Quick, name 5 compounds that are *not* hydrino catalysts. Are you sure?
> ?
I can't be sure of any of them, but what does that prove?
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Wed, 17 Jun 2020 04:51:53
+:
Hi Bob,
Try this http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/
[snip]
>I think Jurg is working on such knowing for simple systems. The Brookhaven
>Laboratory in New York keeps a data base for many nuclear species of the
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 16 Jun 2020 23:04:48 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Sorry, Donk.
"donk" is Dutch for a low hill or rise in the ground. The Spaan means Spanish.
"van" is "from".
So if an insult was intended, none taken. :)
>Just my sick, cynical humor that no one gets. I've
In reply to Michael Foster's message of Tue, 16 Jun 2020 21:11:40 + (UTC):
Hi,
When Hydrogen and Chlorine burn, they react in a series of reactions like this:-
Cl + H2 -> HCl + H
H + CL2 -> HCl + Cl
Both H & Cl are free radicals.
Both steps produce HCl molecules, and the first step
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 3 Jun 2020 20:30:34 + (UTC):
Hi Jones,
[snip]
> I think these guys are positioned to get to market ahead of anyone else who
> is trying to commercialize dense hydrogen.
>
>http://www.norrontfusion.com/
>
I'm not so sure about that. The copyright on
In reply to Ken Deboer's message of Wed, 3 Jun 2020 11:04:44 -0600:
Hi Ken,
You might also want to check out this site:-
https://brilliantlightpower.com/
If this pans out it would supply humanity with energy for billions of years, as
would CF.
>I have an open-ended question for this group,
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 13 Jun 2020 00:27:41 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>https://www.researchgate.net/post/Did_I_actually_measure_a_superluminous_signal_thus_disproving_the_relativity_theory
Tesla assumed that the signal went around the Earth. If one instead assumes a
light speed
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:51:39 -0400:
Hi,
>Oh, and I have been hoping for hydrogen hype for three decades now. So far
>we are just as likely to have warp drive powered by di-lithium.
Imagine the consequences of running into a pebble, or even a gas cloud, at
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 22 Jul 2020 21:39:22 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
If you mix hydronium cations with hydrino hydride, the excess proton from the
hydronium will combine with the
hydrino-hydride to create a hydrino molecule, releasing a lot of energy in the
process. It won't
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 22 Jul 2020 13:57:20 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
One typical sign of BS is that they can't distinguish between L & kg. Quote:-
"Seconds or 400 liters per hour ( 9,600 kgs in 24 hours) at 20 psi."
also, good luck trying to compress positively charged
Hi,
BTW I found the graphite floating over magnets very interesting. Made me wonder
if it could be used for maglev trains
that only used energy for propulsion, not levitation.
In reply to H LV's message of Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:10:06 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
If I am not mistaken paramagnetism is always attractive.
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 20 Dec 2020 00:28:15 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Not using silver means a self sustain mode is no longer possible...
>
>It's all about understanding physics or just believing to understand
>physics...
>
>J.W.
Gallium is also an odd numbered element.
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 19 Dec 2020 15:37:29 + (UTC):
Hi Jones,
[snip]
>As for the near future, we can ask - is it coincidental that Mills has shifted
>gears and now does not promote silver as a catalyst? Nor does he ever mention
>the bomb. Is that in response to high
In reply to Robin's message of Sun, 20 Dec 2020 06:14:27 +1100:
Hi,
When I pointed out the problem with Silver, I actually suggested Lanthanum
instead, which has a melting point close to
that of Silver, but a much higher boiling point.
In reply to Robin's message of Sun, 20 Dec 2020 06:08:05 +1100:
Hi,
[snip]
Upon checking I see that I was wrong. The boiling point of Gallium is not much
higher, however the melting point is much
lower, which extends the temperature range between melting and boiling.
>In reply to Jones
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 20 Dec 2020 01:43:28 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>I personally do not understand why we (Mills) only wants to
>produce H*-H* when in cold fusion this step is the most complicated one...
Mills wants nothing to do with CF. I suspect because it has a bad
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Sun, 20 Dec 2020 06:29:50 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Silver is very easily activated. That is one of its uses in industry.
What sort of activation are you referring to here?
[snip]
Hi,
Questions:
1) If both the Sun and the planets formed from the same gas/dust cloud, how
come the Sun is mostly Hydrogen and the
Earth is a rocky planet?
2) If some selection process caused primarily Hydrogen to condense at the
middle, why are the rocky planets closer to
the Sun than the
explains planet density and their distances by
>> update of Bode's law to Boscovich theory of repulsive and attractive
>> forces for solar system
>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281489710_ROGER_BOSCOVICH_-_THE_FOUNDER_OF_MODERN_SCIENCE
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>&
the desired nuclear reaction.
>Robin=-=--
>
>I Jurg is correct about magnetic resonances in a phase space, any localized
>volume of space with its localized magnetic moment--free neutral particles
>with "intrinsic spin for example, that enter that phase space may resonance,
>
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Sat, 16 Jan 2021 20:23:48
+:
Hi Bob,
BTW that may also explain the work of Alfred Hubbard and Bob Brown. Since they
used AC current in their coils, which
resulted in a constantly varying magnetic field which could have hit the right
field
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:15:18 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>The term quantization has been introduced by German theorist in good old
>plain vanilla mechanics of coupled rotating masses.
>
>The term then was transported to QM with. With h' somebody invented the
>myth a
from all sides looks the same. This is
>also what we see in optics - given a homogeneous grid.
>
>J.W.
>
>On 25.01.2021 23:31, Robin wrote:
>> In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 25 Jan 2021 22:59:04 +0100:
>> Hi Jürg,
>> [snip]
>>> People always
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 25 Jan 2021 22:59:04 +0100:
Hi Jürg,
[snip]
>People always think that quanta are fix size. This is not the case.
That depends on which quantity you are talking about.
>
>Of course are all electron orbits related by simple quantization rules
>that
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Sun, 24 Jan 2021 16:32:09 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>I uploaded a new version of this paper:
>
>Gordon, F. and H.J. Whitehouse, *Lattice Energy Converter (LEC) (PowerPoint
>slides)*, in LENR Workshop in memory of Dr. M. Srinivasan. 2021: Indian
>Institute of
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:14:50 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
> From the SO(4) model it is clear that the electron is a resonance of
>the proton. In the bound (ground) state there is no electron as we know
>it from the unbound state.
>
>The electron unfolds in three steps
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Tue, 26 Jan 2021 20:54:31
+:
Hi,
[snip]
A changing electric field gives rise to a changing magnetic field, and vice
versa, but what gives rise to a constant
electric field?
>A charge be the same as a changing B field intensity in a
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:22:58 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>With regard to the possibility that the LEC is a battery: A LEC has many
>similarities to a battery and we debated calling it a Hydrogen Ion Battery
>but a LEC is much more. A battery is basically two electrodes of
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 28 Jan 2021 20:22:58 -0500:
Hi,
PS - At the risk of stating the obvious, the internal resistance can be
determined by dividing the open circuit voltage
by the short circuit current.
s maximized.
>Mills uses a pinhole technique for finding UV where he actually drills a
>sub-mm hole into the reactor wall with line of sight to the plasma, and mounts
>and glues a photocell UV detector chip over the hole - but that is for a
>vacuum reactor.
>Robin may ha
is enough to remove some
> sodium from the wall of the glass container.
>
> I didn't see any of the characteristic hydrino spectral lines :-)
>
>
>
>
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
r anti-matter in the Universe.
Perhaps the condensation energy of the Holmlid-hydrogen is sufficient to
overcome the asymmetry, and convert ordinary
Hydrogen into anti-Hydrogen? Maybe with some help from the laser along the way?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 21 Jun 2021 02:55:57 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin
>Anti matter means gamma radiation. Where is the gamma radiation?
Have they stated that it doesn't exist? Have they even looked for it?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
emains behind also counts
as a particle, and can compensate for the
momentum of the single particle by moving in the opposite direction. You see
this when a cannonball is fired from a
cannon.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
ome of which produce energy and others which cost energy, so that there is no
net mass change for the ensemble.
Another possibility is that neutrino/anti-neutrino pairs are produced which
carry energy away undetectably, at least
with ordinary equipment.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
you think they are taking?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
when needed, but are largely non-interventionist. A species (us) mostly
has to discover things for themselves,
otherwise the shock to their development can lead to catastrophe.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
d.
>
>Just look at two spinning masses with opposite rotation. The momentum
>vector sum is "0". Now you can produce a current with one of the
>spinning masses and charge capacitor. After this you have a net momentum.
Where? Relative to what?
Please draw a picture.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
s now searching in those multi million dollar holes in the
>ground might be better served to get their eyes directed toward the skys.
>
>When Ed Witten set down his mathematical description of a
>tachyon condensate, no one would ever imagine that these equations could
>ever actually be realized.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
amma-ray
photons.)
> Also GR is only valid for a closed system but this is a
>contradiction in the model already. So GR is no valid theory at all.
>Except you declare the whole universe as a closed system...what ends up
>in religion...
>
>J.W.
>
>
>On 29.05.2021 02:17, Robin wrote:
&
e effort anyway.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
an inversion layer.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
a solid thing. "Phenomena" also
allows for cloud formations etc. So they are either trying to be objective ;)
or trying to "explain away" as much as
possible.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
f the sky before it hits. See previously
posted photo taken by google street view in outback Western Australia. ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 28 Jun 2021 01:12:35 -0400:
Hi,
>*Fortune favours the bold.*
Unfortunately, so does misfortune. ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
ical reactor also cuts that hardware cost by 75% over what we
>now are stuck with - which is,in effect a "controlled bomb" poised on the edge
>of
>catastrophe.
>
>Thus - if one can provide a cheap source of muons without the beam line - such
>as
>via the Holmlid effect, then this route could be highly preferable to muon
>catalyzed
>fusion - both in cost and and in eliminating waste.
>If this idea has not been patented, then let me now dedicate it to the public
>domain.
>
>
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
ause it doesn't rely on a chain reaction, such reactors could probably
be made quite small, though shielding
would still be needed.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
doubt this engine would ever be built, but it's fun to speculate.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
that less need
be carried. It also gets rid of the nasty weapons grade plutonium we have
created here on Earth.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Michael Foster's message of Tue, 9 Feb 2021 22:02:10 + (UTC):
Hi Michael,
While true, take note of both the power and energy density. They are not as
good as Lithium batteries, though still well
suited to stationary applications IMO, e.g. as a buffer for wind/solar,
especially
In reply to Michael Foster's message of Tue, 9 Feb 2021 22:02:10 + (UTC):
Hi,
BTW there is much research going on in all areas of battery design. Also check
out both Magnesium and Fluoride battery
development.
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Sun, 24 Jan 2021 19:36:51
+:
Hi Bob,
[snip]
I agree about conserving angular momentum, but can you prove that it is
quantized for objects other than photons?
(As near as I can tell this is an assumption made during the early days of QM
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 24 Jan 2021 22:01:48 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Sorry it's not quantized for photons. This is myth!
>
>
>J.W.
Are you saying that photons are the only thing that it's not quantized for, or
are you saying it's not quantized for
anything?
>William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website
>billb at amasci com http://amasci.com
>EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair
>Seattle, WA 206-762-3818unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
Hi,
For an IBM assembler programmer looking at an assembler listing, all statements
start in column 42, hence everything can
be found in column 42 making it the answer to life the universe and everything.
;)
(So it's not 6*9 in base 13). :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:43:23 -0500:
Hi,
It just occurred to me that this sounds like it may the mechanism behind the
John Searle flying saucer, since that also
depends on rotating magnets? (See e.g. https://manmade-ufos.com/john-searl).
>Hamdi's article has
n attribute=axiom. But all factors are connected and not fully
>independent.
>
>But if an electron can be free is questionable as everywhere, there is
>mass and most mass has a magnetic moment, hence there will be interaction.
>
>J.W.
>
>On 26.02.2021 21:41, Robin wrote:
>>
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:49:49 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>All particles we know are resonances of the proton.
Don't you think a free electron is a bit light weight to be a proton resonance?
Maybe structures other than protons are also possible?
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:05:31 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>No the electron has no stable strong force radius.
>
>You can only measure the electron g-factor, where as you can get it from
>a metric transformation from the proton strong force equation.
>
>Physics will
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:06:39 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>The electron is an exact resonance of the proton. We can calculate all
>electron properties from the proton properties.
>
>This is how nature works along magnetism.
>
>
>J.W.
Does that mean you could also
1 - 100 of 1528 matches
Mail list logo
