Hello group,
Have a look here:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=11#comment-27734
[...] Is it easy to adjust the output power of that unit or is it just “on” or
“off” 10 kW?
#
Andrea Rossi
March 14th, 2011 at 2:16 PM
Dear Mr Mats Heijkenskjold:
Yes, you can adjust it,
Hello group,
Have a look here:
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3126617.ece
Many interesting additional questions from Ny Teknik readers have been
recently answered by Rossi, regarding his E-cat.
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2011-03-19 20:04, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Rossi tells IE, “We are making a thorough series of tests with the
University of Bologna, which will be 12 months long with a reactor in
operation 24 hours per day. During this year we will make a long theory
of measurements and tests, also in collaborat
On 2011-03-29 15:56, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Steve Krivit's Rossi Portal has two new items. A short article and audio
interview from a radio station:
http://radio.rcdc.it/archives/energia-ad-ottobre-parte-la-prima-centrale-a-fusione-fredda-73932/
And a transcript from that broadcast audio track:
h
On 2011-03-30 03:38, Harry Veeder wrote:
The decline in cold fusion google searches has leveled off...
http://tinyurl.com/64dqn7d
I've been keeping track of that too. This query is interesting as well,
it shows that interest about Rossi's E-Cat is not short lived, actually
it's quite steady
Hello group,
A detailed and quite long (even too much to post here completely)
english article on Rossi's Energy Catalyzer has been posted today on Ny
Teknik. Here's its summary:
"In a detailed report, two Swedish physicists exclude chemical reactions
as the energy source in the Italian ‘ene
On 2011-04-06 13:51, Terry Blanton wrote:
Ah! Piccys of naked ECats!
In the technical report itself there are even more pictures of them:
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n+%28pdf%29.
http://tinyurl.com/68wqoyy
Cheers,
S
Hello group,
A *very* interesting (revealing many previously unknown details, to tell
the truth I'm not sure if he was supposed to disclose them all)
three-part audio interview in italian to Sergio Focardi by a local web
radio has been submitted here:
http://radio.rcdc.it/archives/sergio-foc
On 2011-04-06 18:58, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Maybe something got lost in the translation here, but find it
surprising that Focardi apparently doesn't know the composition of the
catalyzer used in Rossi's reactor. Are we to assume Rossi hasn't told
him?
I'm quite sure Focardi told
On 2011-04-06 19:10, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
Really! Does he say why he doesn't want to know?
The only speculation that makes any sense to me might be for personal
safety reasons.
He doesn't, and I don't think he seriously means that either, but maybe
he simply doesn't want to j
On 2011-04-06 22:06, Jed Rothwell wrote:
A few weeks ago I mentioned that I think ganging together many small
Rossi devices will call for some complicated engineering. Perhaps it
will slow down the development of the 1 MW reactor. I'm sure that 100
units can be coordinated but it may take a team
On 2011-04-06 23:01, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vof.se%2Findex.php
Seems new to me.
Proper link to the relevant bit:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vof.se%2Faktuellt.php%23notis472
On 2011-04-05 20:51, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Rossi continues to answer and/or avoid answering questions.
I find this of interest too:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473
"[...] The walls of the reactor are made of stainless steel, copper
free. Yes, I have understood why scaling
On 2011-04-08 14:03, Terry Blanton wrote:
energy. All they suffered was heartbreak. Then comes the final
tragedy: the professor has contracted a terminal disease.
It may sound like a joke, but Focardi did really contract cancer several
years ago. He has recovered from it completely, howeve
On 2011-04-08 23:20, Jed Rothwell wrote:
On April 8, Rossi wrote in his blog: ". . . yesterday we signed a very
important contract in the USA."
[...]
On March 23rd he wrote this:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=12
"[...] Also in the USA we are making tests with an extre
On 2011-04-09 00:40, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I do not think so. I believe I know Rossi well enough to say that the
scattered and poorly organized nature of his web site is not intentional.
He is not the blog webmaster. He did not develop it. So we can't blame
the structure on him. But he does not s
Hello group,
I just found this in the comments section in the Swedish edition of Ny
Teknik's last article on Rossi's Energy Catalyzer (by the way, lots of
information and interesting insights can be found there!):
http://aleklett.wordpress.com/2011/04/08/rossis-energikatalysator-–-en-stor-blu
On 2011-04-09 12:51, Göran Crafte wrote:
[...]
google-translation of the Swedish text that "There are many scientists
who criticise Sven that he even has sexual relations with the
experiment"! The Swedish word which is used in the text is "beblanda"
which should be translated to "mix with" or "in
On 2011-04-08 23:20, Jed Rothwell wrote:
On April 8, Rossi wrote in his blog: ". . . yesterday we signed a very
important contract in the USA."
More info:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473
* * *
Dr Rossi,
Are you able to tell us any more regarding the nature of the contract
On 2011-04-06 18:51, SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Hello group,
A *very* interesting (revealing many previously unknown details, to tell
the truth I'm not sure if he was supposed to disclose them all)
three-part audio interview in italian to Sergio Focardi by a local web
radio has been submitted
On 2011-04-09 17:37, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Ah. Now he says he will not be able to announce the identity of the
customer for "months."
More related info. It looks like we'll have to wait until October, after
all:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=14#comments
* * *
1) You
On 2011-04-10 19:11, Jed Rothwell wrote:
http://www.facebook.com/EnergyCatalyzer
I have never looked at a Facebook page before. It seems chaotic, no
better than Rossi's blog.
What is it with modern programmers that they cannot organize and
categorize information? I think they depend too much on
On 2011-04-11 23:04, Axil Axil wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
[...]
This is an extremely interesting, well thought post; you're definitely
onto something. Iron oxide (=rust) would also be quite cheap to add to
nickel power which is consistent to what we've read so far on char
On 2011-04-11 23:57, Axil Axil wrote:
The following speculation is offered as a springboard for discussion as
regards to the chemical and physical processes that underlie the Rossi
reactor. This is another attempt to connect the dots. "
I haven't seen that part appear here.
Should I sent it a
On 2011-04-12 16:25, Jed Rothwell wrote:
As I said to Jones Beene, Rossi is often secretive. You might say he is
openly secretive, meaning he makes no bones about the fact that he is
hiding information. That is partly what he did in his response to me, below.
By the way, I'm under the impressio
On 2011-04-13 23:00, Jed Rothwell wrote:
This was formerly titled What We Know from Rossi. It is a list of major
assertions made by Rossi and others, mainly Rossi in his blog
You made me remember that a few weeks ago I started writing down (or
more like, copy/pasting) a list of questions answe
On 2011-04-13 23:25, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I do not understand what this means. Someone should please rewrite
"works in a homogeneous phase with nickel powder." Does that mean the
powder is homogeneous? What is a "homogeneous phase"?
Maybe he meant this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homogeneous
On 2011-04-14 01:16, Jed Rothwell wrote:
[...] We could organize this info in a Wiki, with categories: Materials,
Operation method, Performance characteristics . . . [...]
This is a good idea and I was thinking exactly about it yesterday when I
sent that list to the group. The end result shou
On 2011-04-12 17:00, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I do not think he is more unwilling than usual.
Sorry for replying here only now.
The reason behind what I've written is that I'm noticing as time passes
that the amount of "Can't answer" and "Already answered" answers on his
blog has been increasing
Hello group,
In answer to a question from a concerned person regarding water flow
measurements during the last Rossi E-cat test/demonstration, Hanno Essén
added, perhaps unconsciously, that there will be a follow-up experiment
next week. Here's the original email as posted by him on an italian
On 2011-04-14 21:33, noone noone wrote:
What forum was this on?
This one:
http://www.energeticambiente.it/fusione-fredda-e-trasmutazioni-nucleari-bassa-energia/
There are a few regularly updated threads scattered around there about
Rossi's E-Cat.
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2011-04-14 22:02, Peter Gluck wrote:
interesting anti E-cat at Daniele's blog..
Here's a link to his blog (in Italian) for the clueless:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/
By the way, I've read much worse things (mean, irrational, plain
ignorant, etc) around from people discrediting Rossi's wor
On 2011-04-14 22:16, noone noone wrote:
I found it!
Mind if I post the link?
It's a public website after all, go ahead.
Cheers,
S.A.
Hello group,
A human translation in English of the interview to Sergio Focardi linked
here several days ago has been posted on Daniele Passerini's "22passi" blog:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/04/sergio-focardi-father-of-ni-h-cold.html
By request of the original interviewers and because th
On 2011-04-15 03:01, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I assume this part is accurately translated:
"So there were two parallel lines of research: on one side, the
deuterium and palladium people, who never got anything . . ."[...]
Yes, it is. Several people on discussion boards I read on the matter
have cr
On 2011-04-15 16:04, Jed Rothwell wrote:
But Peter Gluck wrote: ". . . one word is missing: 'technological.'"
What do you mean by "missing word"? Did Focardi say this and it is
missing from the translation? Or did he fail to say this and he should
have?
He didn't say that in the interview and
On 2011-04-15 21:07, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I am surprised no one else has picked up on this. This part of the
Focardi interview is likely to put the President of Greece and the Min.
of Energy in the hot seat:
[...]
Does it? Personally when I heard that in the original audio I assumed
what Focard
On 2011-04-15 23:46, Jed Rothwell wrote:
NOTES ON ROSSI DEVICE
[...]
Good job!
I'll try collecting other questions/answers from various posts in
Rossi's blog. I'll post them in this thread unsorted.
By the way, I think the question/answer date is important and should not
be taken out of con
On 2011-04-15 23:46, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The 1 MW (thermal) device will be made of many smaller ones ganged
together. It was originally planned to be made up of ~130 10 kW units,
where 30 were held in standby to replace or augment older ones as the
power decreased. They now plan to use ~300 unit
On 2011-04-15 23:46, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The effect can be quenched with the following methods:
[...]
Inject N to displace the H.
Recently he added:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=64
* * *
2. I’ve read that you once had to stop the machine by insufflating
nitrogen and that t
On 2011-04-16 00:37, Jed Rothwell wrote:
This was either a misunderstanding or he has retracted it. It is not
important. The purpose of the list is to present an up-to-date
description of what Rossi now thinks, not to hold him to previous
statements or find out how often he has changed his mind.
On 2011-04-16 01:36, Jones Beene wrote:
Yes. Do not delete this ! It is important.
Add this one to the growing 'contradictions' list, because I am sure that at
one time he said he can operate the device for a period of time with no
electrical input.
How can it then be possible to shut down auto
On 2011-04-15 23:46, Jed Rothwell wrote:
[...]
You could also add this important piece of information:
* * *
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=16#comment-0
Is it in general possible to regulate the power output of the E-cat in a
continous way and if yes in what limits
On 2011-04-17 07:13, Peter Gluck wrote:
Grazie. a Vi prego- la seconda parte?
It was very well organized and had logical fluency...
Part 1:
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/it/canale-tv.php?id=22918
Part 2:
http://www.rainews24.rai.it/it/canale-tv.php?id=22919
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2011-04-17 15:15, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Is there no mention of Rossi? That's ungracious. He is the reason they
have gained credibility with the public, and they are being interviewed
on TV.
There was absolutely no mention of him, but from what I've read around
it appears this was due to an a
On 2011-04-21 21:37, Jed Rothwell wrote:
[...]
I do not know what to make of it.
Maybe I'm looking too much into it, but I often wonder if the name
"Energy Catalyzer" chosen by Rossi isn't itself a hint regarding the
internal reactor construction. Given that his English language skill
isn't
On 2011-04-21 22:49, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
The exterior copper pipe lining/jacket which encases the external
reactor "torus" wall might assist in the transfer of reactor heat to
the adjacent flowing water. If the reactor "torus" had been built
entirely outside of the copper tubing
Original link:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/01/energy-catalyzer-funziona-e-non-e.html
This is my human translation. Enjoy!
==
Energy catalyzer:
It works and it's not cold fusion
Interview to Eng. Andrea Rossi
22PASSI. Good day Eng. Rossi, I thank you for accepting this intervie
Hello group,
Daniele Passerini from "22passi" blog interviewed again Andrea Rossi on
February 13th. This is the original link:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/02/energy-catalyzer-facciamo-un-po-di.html
And this is an English translation courtesy of PESN, edited by Hank
Mills from a Google tr
49 matches
Mail list logo
