thought
his model could account for the excess electrical power production. Alas, he
died weeks later before he could explain his position.
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2017 10:38 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Pondering epos and
That's one of the cool characteristics of the epo vacuum lattice that I am
proposing. The smaller the scale, the more nonlinear the propagation
medium will be. Thus, the smaller the wavelength of the photon, the more
nonlinear the medium and the smaller the soliton.
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 10:44
On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
The photon cannot be stretched out too far, or an atom would be unable to
> absorb its energy in an acceptable time.
>
I think this would be the case if the usual four dimensions were involved.
If a further dimension came into play, it is possi
Too bad that Don Hotson is now deceased. It would be wonderful to get his
thinking on these questions.
While I described a vacuum lattice comprised of epos, each having an
elementary magnetic dipole and a freely polarize-able electric dipole at a
right angle, I didn't describe the effect of the m
The photon cannot be stretched out too far, or an atom would be unable to
absorb its energy in an acceptable time. The problem with the other
speculations about soliton being a description of a photon is that the
soliton is only a solution in a NONLINEAR propagation medium - the solution
solution
Hi Eric,
I think Hotson suggests that epos have 0 mass. As I understand it, only
positive energy charges have mass. According to Hotson, protons and
neutrons are comprised of electron and positron lattices - perhaps in a
stabilized positronium-like cluster. Each of the electron and positron has
I wrote:
Assume with Hotson that there is a negative energy sea with negative energy
> charges. I wonder whether, contrary to Hotson's wishes, a positive mass
> would nevertheless fall out of general relativity for such negative energy
> charges. Even weirder would be a negative mass. The weirde
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
Some have postulated that the photon is a soliton solution because such a
> solution can be constrained in size and would not naturally spread out in
> propagation.
>
I wonder about this assumption about photons not spreading out. Perhaps
the
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
Hotson says that only positive energy charges have mass and the epos are
> part of the negative energy sea.
>
Assume with Hotson that there is a negative energy sea with negative energy
charges. I wonder whether, contrary to Hotson's wishes, a
Hi Robin, Thanks for taking the time to read it and comment. I can reply
on a few ...
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 1:27 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:51:30 -0600:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> > - Epos are a spinor solution, and apparently the electron and positron
> >
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Wed, 18 Oct 2017 11:51:30 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
> - Epos are a spinor solution, and apparently the electron and positron
> are found to be different phases of the same elementary particle the
> electron.
>
>
> - During the spinor orbiting of the electro
Greetings Vorts,
For some time I have been trying to understand some of the implications of
Hotson’s hypothesis for the epo as a solution to Dirac’s equation. Here
are some fundamental observations which may prove to be too simplistic (but
they are fun to think about):
- When a free electro
12 matches
Mail list logo
