Chris Zell wrote:
Papp in particular, seemed to have something. The Feynman incident suggests to
me that there was something real about his claims.
It is frustrating to me why intelligent observers continue to think that the
Feynman incident (tragedy) points to something real in alternative
Hi Nigel
Thanks. Physics education has been dumbed down and there now needs to be a
revolution in Science/Physics to get things back on track.
My latest talk at: Boscovich Unified field theory and Atomism given by Roger
Anderton 28 aug 2017
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
||
skimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form
ofLENR?
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Brian Ahern
<ahern_br...@msn.com<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>> wrote:
If you believe in MiB, then it is axiomatic that you
Thank you for introducing me to Boscovich. I had not encountered him
before, but clearly should have.
Nigel
On 29/09/2017 21:23, ROGER ANDERTON wrote:
from my studies of physics history, what "they" (educators of physics)
do is dumb down the history when teach to physics students; so "they"
from my studies of physics history, what "they" (educators of physics) do is
dumb down the history when teach to physics students; so "they" miss out
teaching that unified field theory presented in 1758 by Boscovich, because not
part of the curriculum that are told to teach so miss it out;
missed out unified field theory presented in 1758
>From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoiljkovic
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
||
>From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoilj...
"From Boscovich's theory to modern
For a 100 year history of LENR including Moray and Papp, see
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_0mMpfrsf8
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Chris Zell wrote:
>
>
> Unfortunately this leaves you blind to scams by experts Rossi, Papp, Mills
> and Mayer.
>
> I’m not sure that
Unfortunately this leaves you blind to scams by experts Rossi, Papp, Mills and
Mayer.
I'm not sure that Papp and Meyer were complete scams. Papp in particular,
seemed to have something. The Feynman incident suggests to me that there was
something real about his claims.
Beyond that, I've
017 10:17 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a
novel form ofLENR?
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com
<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>> wrote:
>
ent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 11:15 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form
ofLENR?
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Brian Ahern
<ahern_br...@msn.com<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>>
at a stupid thing to assert. NOT 'axiomatic'. Actually a NON SEQUITUR.
So who's blind here, eh?
>
>
> --
> *From:* Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 10:17 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* Re: [
, September 26, 2017 7:01 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form
ofLENR?
I think the appropriate advice is almost 2000 years old. We need to be as wise
as serpents and as innocent as doves. Not one, or the other, but both.
Nigel
e: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel
form ofLENR?
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com
<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>> wrote:
>
> LeClair hides behind the conspiracy curtain. "He can't do any demos
or the Men in Black will get him."
:17 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form
ofLENR?
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Brian Ahern
<ahern_br...@msn.com<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>> wrote:
>
> LeClair hides behind the conspiracy curtain. "He can
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Brian Ahern wrote:
>
> LeClair hides behind the conspiracy curtain. "He can't do any demos or
the Men in Black will get him."
Whatever the truth of anything else being claimed here on this eList -- the
so-called 'MiB' are very, VERY, *VERY*
In reply to Brian Ahern's message of Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:50:13 +:
Hi,
>This is patently absurd! If he had a system producing radiation from a simple
>cavitation experiment it would be highly desirable and worthy of our interest.
[snip]
Of course it would. To start with, if one is getting
LeClair will never show anything.
From: Nigel Dyer <l...@thedyers.org.uk>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 6:59 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form
ofLENR?
Axil -- To take care is always g
Axil -- To take care is always good advice
I am familiar with Mark's work, indeed I spent a good part of a day with
him discussing what he has done. There are some significant differences
between the two systems, which could well explain why the behaviour of
the two is somewhat different.
Nigel -- My advise (worth what you have paid for it) is to be very careful.
Mark LeClair produced a gainful cavitation system using a pump. He produces
a ton of radiation and radiaoactive isotopes.
DogOne replicated this cavitation reactor and this is what he said:
-
DogOne duplicated
Nigel -- My advise (worth what you have paid for it) is to be very careful,
even cynical - when it comes to investing in this - as there is ample reason to
believe that this system is far from overunity.
My bet is that the person who saw it running did not realize that the water
pressure to
20 matches
Mail list logo