This is patently absurd! If he had a system producing radiation from a simple
cavitation experiment it would be highly desirable and worthy of our interest.
DogOne and Mark LeClair have equal amounts of credibility. Neither will show a
LeClair hides behind the conspiracy curtain. "He can't do any demos or the Men
in Black will get him."
That is a convenient method to have no responsibility to demonstrate any of the
I have tried multiple times to get THE BARD of BUXTON MAINE to show anything,
to no avial.
Let this thread die a natural death.
LeClair will never show anything.
From: Nigel Dyer <l...@thedyers.org.uk>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 6:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Have Cavitation Energy Systems stumbled on a novel form
Axil -- To take care is always good advice
I am familiar with Mark's work, indeed I spent a good part of a day with him
discussing what he has done. There are some significant differences between
the two systems, which could well explain why the behaviour of the two is
On 23/09/2017 00:24, Axil Axil wrote:
Nigel -- My advise (worth what you have paid for it) is to be very careful.
Mark LeClair produced a gainful cavitation system using a pump. He produces a
ton of radiation and radiaoactive isotopes.
DogOne replicated this cavitation reactor and this is what he said:
DogOne duplicated his reaction and got a solution of radioactive waste.
PieEconomics: Cavitation Radiation
Dog-One wrote: ...Creating the cavitation bubbles in the pump using lift
elevation and having control valves to force the bubbles to collapse inside the
media chamber ...