Hello again, and please excuse me digging in old mud!
Am Samstag, 22. August 2009 00:58:13 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
Am Samstag, 22. August 2009 00:29:03 schrieb bugs buggy:
It has come up that some of the resolutions we currently use for trac
can seem to be a bit harsh in tone.
Mainly,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Dennis Schriddedevuran...@gmx.net wrote:
I would not generally forbid users to submit feature requests.
The process to submit feature requests is to post them in the forum
for discussion.
Bad/stupid/insane requests can be closed
The discussion of what is
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Christian Ohmchr@gmx.net wrote:
And if View Tickets brought up the list of open tickets, newest first
instead
of the current list of mostly useless reports, it might actually be useful. Is
there a way to modify this report list? It always just distracted
Am Samstag, 22. August 2009 14:50:46 schrieb Christian Ohm:
On Friday, 21 August 2009 at 23:11, Zarel wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Stephen Swaney sswa...@centurytel.net
wrote:
Right now, we overload 'enhancement' to mean both patches and feature
requests. Ideally, we want to
It has come up that some of the resolutions we currently use for trac
can seem to be a bit harsh in tone.
Mainly, the issue is, if a user has some kind of feature request, then
what should be done with it?
If we close it as invalid, that could be conscrewed as us telling them
to bugger off...
If
sounds good with what you said... perhaps answer with
1 will be done eventually...
2 will be done only if you can find someone to do it...
3 can not be done due to game engine restraints...
4 will never be done as it is too code complicated / or / already
exists in some other game ... etc.
Hi!
Am Samstag, 22. August 2009 00:29:03 schrieb bugs buggy:
It has come up that some of the resolutions we currently use for trac
can seem to be a bit harsh in tone.
Mainly, the issue is, if a user has some kind of feature request, then
what should be done with it?
If we close it as
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 06:29:03PM -0400, bugs buggy wrote:
...
Mainly, the issue is, if a user has some kind of feature request, then
what should be done with it?
If we close it as invalid, that could be conscrewed as us telling them
to bugger off...
If we don't close it, then it clogs up
On 8/21/09, Stephen Swaney sswa...@xxx wrote:
One way is simply to have a separate tracker for feature requests.
However, as cybersphinx points out in IRC, having everything in one
database has certain advantages. If we had a separate 'feature
request' type, it would solve that
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Stephen Swaney sswa...@centurytel.net wrote:
Right now, we overload 'enhancement' to mean both patches and feature
requests. Ideally, we want to be able to separate the bugs and
patches from feature requests which are often useless.
The last time I brought
On 8/22/09, bugs buggy buginatorxx...@xxx.com wrote:
I don't think we can do that, without modifying the source code. I
think Giel would know what can / can't be done the best, he seems to
know more about trac than the other devs.
I just found this, this looks like it would be a nice
11 matches
Mail list logo
