On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Geoffrey Garen gga...@apple.com wrote:
Anne, can you help me get those comments sent to the w3 list? I sent them
myself, but they seem to be held up or bounced?
Hey, I think they did make it, and Boris replied:
Looks like mirroring stopped on 1/23 (last commit:
https://github.com/WebKit/webkit/commit/d5c4f2bd4a80b397eade1ee53b39d738e5656598
).
Jesus, can you take a look?
Thanks,
Florin
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia je...@webkit.orgwrote:
Hi,
The mirror is finally ready
This is a followup to the multiple inheritance discussion.
Adam, I checked the IDL files on SVG2 [1]. The interfaces for SVG2 do not have
multiple inheritances of interfaces that are exposed to bindings. But SVG2
still uses the implements statement for [NoInterfaceObject] interfaces [2].
This
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
This is a followup to the multiple inheritance discussion.
Adam, I checked the IDL files on SVG2 [1]. The interfaces for SVG2 do not
have multiple inheritances of interfaces that are exposed to bindings. But
SVG2 still
Here are the largest results sets on the master in GB. We currently store 6.8TB
of total results, going back 14 months, and 1.1TB of archives going back 1
week.
1500Apple MountainLion (Leaks)
1018Chromium Mac Release (Tests)
857 Chromium Linux Release (Tests)
532 Chromium Win
I'm surprised that chromium mac is 3x the size of Apple Mac... debug
even! Chromium build output should be much smaller... at least as of
late.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:30 AM, William Siegrist wsiegr...@apple.com wrote:
Here are the largest results sets on the master in GB. We currently store
This is the output of the test bots, right? I'm guessing this is due
to (a) us running pixel tests and (b) not checking in the expected
failing baselines. If I ever get back to working on supporting
-failing.png, this could go down *a lot*.
Alternatively, we could just decide to check in the
Yes, I'm referring to the test results that get uploaded to
http://build.webkit.org/results/, presumably by the test slaves. The
archives I refer to are http://build.webkit.org/archives/, which I believe
are just the binaries built by the build slaves.
-Bill
On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Dirk
This question came up in:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92393
Do any ports still disable SVG? Should we be removing the ENABLE_SVG
defines (and potentially unifying SVG and HTML style resolve more
closely)?
___
webkit-dev mailing list
Many chromium developers disable svg for faster building.
Jochen
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
There's no experiment that you can run using web content to detect
whether we implement WebIDL. All you can detect is whether we
implement particular specifications that use WebIDL. We can just
simply not implement the
QtWebKit has a --minimal option where SVG is disabled IIRC.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Jochen Eisinger joc...@chromium.org wrote:
Many chromium developers disable svg for faster building.
Jochen
___
webkit-dev mailing list
Eric, Most of the resource constraint environments(embedded systems) still
disables the SVG. If the define is removed code size of WebKit will be
increased by atleast 3 to 4M.
On 26 January 2013 01:01, webkit-dev-requ...@lists.webkit.org wrote:
This question came up
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:30 AM, William Siegrist wsiegr...@apple.comwrote:
Here are the largest results sets on the master in GB. We currently store
6.8TB of total results, going back 14 months, and 1.1TB of archives going
back 1 week.
1500Apple MountainLion (Leaks)
1018Chromium
Perhaps the time to remove ENABLE_SVG is in several years once many pages
depend on it and disabling it results in a busted browser...
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Arunprasad Rajkumar ararunpra...@gmail.com
wrote:
Eric, Most of the resource constraint environments(embedded systems) still
On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
This is a followup to the multiple inheritance discussion.
Adam, I checked the IDL files on SVG2 [1]. The interfaces for SVG2 do not
have multiple
We could reduce a bit of maintenance cost by removing all the defines. I
ran some numbers and I'm not sure we are there yet in terms of lost
productivity, even on the Chromium side. SVG adds around 20% to debug
compile times:
Linux, Z620, no goma, clean build, ninja, Debug DumpRenderTree, without
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
There's no experiment that you can run using web content to detect
whether we implement WebIDL. All you can detect is whether we
implement particular
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
This is a followup to the multiple inheritance discussion.
Adam, I checked the IDL
On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
This is a followup
On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com
wrote:
On
On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:16 PM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@chromium.org wrote:
interface SVGViewSpec
{
readonly attribute SVGTransformList transform;
readonly attribute SVGElement viewTarget;
readonly attribute DOMString viewBoxString;
readonly attribute DOMString
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
...
The problem is that SVGFitToViewBox and SVGZoomAndPan of the example above
are implemented by a lot of other interfaces as well. Supplemental is just
supposed to be set once per interface. That is why Supplemental
I agree with you guys. Most of the sites now uses SVG. But I'm worrying
about the resource constraint platforms where browser is not intended for
open Internet browsing, rather it is used for building user interfaces(like
navigation systems, tv, set-top-box). Though using SVG in the constraints
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Elliott Sprehn espr...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
...
The problem is that SVGFitToViewBox and SVGZoomAndPan of the example above
are implemented by a lot of other interfaces as well. Supplemental
26 matches
Mail list logo
