On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Won J Jeon wjj...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the update. BTW, is there any switch that I need to turn on in
order to enable WebGL support with QT port?
I built the code by using '--3d-canvas --3d-rendering' switches and
launched QtTestBrowser by using
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
Given there seems to be little focus on these bindings from Nokia it seems
that the best path forward is to have them rewritten in terms of the JSC API
rather than the JSC internals. This will insulate the bindings from
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Simon Fraser simon.fra...@apple.com wrote:
These don't represent the suite of hardware and OSes that WebKit is used on
these days, nor do they represent the various ports. For example, there's no
way to indicate that a bug is in the QT port.
Can we clean this
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Levi Weintraub le...@chromium.org wrote:
As you may know, Emil and I have been diligently working on getting
subpixel layout up and running in WebKit. After much testing, we
settled on a fixed point implementation instead of floats; we're happy
to discuss how
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Features/
notifications/ (8 files)
storage/ (195 files)
fileapi/ (115 files)
webaudio/ (103 files)
mediastream/ (28 files; under active development)
workers/ (43 files)
websockets/ (20 files)
inspector/ (426
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
It seems undesirable to increase the number of dependencies since being able
to port easily is one of the strengths of WebKit. On the other hand,
reducing the number of flags will certainly reduce the build system
complexity
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Andreas Kling kl...@webkit.org wrote:
Are there any objections to removing support for the RVCT compiler (ARM
RealView) in WebKit? As far as I know, the only user has been the Symbian
port which is no longer present on WebKit trunk.
It looks like there are two
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
I'm curious what the practical implications of this are? Are there
500 #ifdefs for RVCT or 5?
I think a dozen of #ifdef, plus a dozen of workarounds for compiler bugs.
Benjamin
___
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Ghita alaoui_gh...@hotmail.com wrote:
I need to know how webkit validates a URL address entered by a user in the
web browser, I tried to follow step by step the compiler, but since I'm new,
I'm completely lost in the webkit source code, so I would like to make
2011/12/19 Alexey Proskuryakov a...@webkit.org:
Generally speaking, I think that it's not worth it making existing tests
pretty for the sake of prettiness or even consistency. It is very easy to
lose some intended non-obvious properties of tests that way, as well as to
lose unintended testing.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
Is this too crazy? Are there other solutions?
I also do not like the selection model but I am unsure about your suggestion.
If we use the visual model for selection, finding the order of the
content would get tricky (because
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Dan Bernstein m...@apple.com wrote:
Please set the svn:mime-type property on binary files that you add to the
tree, such as *-expected.png, before committing. Otherwise the resulting
webkit-changes message will include those files as text, which is
inconvenient.
Hello,
I would like to give another shot at the URL implementation Adam
started some times ago.
There are a few problems with the current KURL:
-there are two implementations: WebKit and Google URL
-some stuff are just plain incorrect :)
-the WebKit implementation has some bugs which makes it
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
Instead of doing all of this work, have you considered just treating
GoogleURL in much the same way as WebKit treats ANGLE? You could perhaps
just commit a copy of GoogleURL into Source/ThirdParty, and then WebKit as a
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
So to clarify, I think we need to keep the current architecture.
Obviously WebKit needs a URL class that uses its String class, so
WTFURL would probably be a wrapper around some core library for WebKit
to use. Chromium
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
If CFNetwork exposed an API to its URL parser, then it would be super wise
for
any port of WebKit using CFNetwork to reuse the same URL parser.
That is an interesting idea.
I always considered it would be beneficial to
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
One of the reasons for using html notifications is to allow direct
interaction with the notifications. Here're some scenarios from our
customers that want to use html notifications purely for this purpose:
Does any platform
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Lynn Neir lynn.n...@skype.net wrote:
Hello… I have a small addition to RenderThemeWin::determineState so it will
handle indeterminate (mixed) state for checkbox. I am not sure who owns
this code.
Nobody owns that code. Submitting patches to WebKit is really
Hello,
I have seen a few patches from Intel to add support of Intel IPP for
some algorithm. A quick search make me think nobody enable this code.
Is anyone really using IPP? My concern is if nobody uses/tests it, we
might be adding dead code to WebKit.
Benjamin
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Milian Wolff milian.wo...@kdab.com wrote:
I wonder, has anyone begun working on this? If not, I am willing to give it a
shot. I realize that this is a big task, and it will probably be hard for a
newcomer like me to do properly. Hence take this email also as a
Hello,
The Gtk EWS bot keep failing with:
Last 500 characters of output:
patch: write error : No space left on device
patch: write error : No space left on device
patch: write error : No space left on device
Can anyone have a look at the poor machine?
Benjamin
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Yongbing Huang huangyongb...@ict.ac.cn wrote:
I met the following problem when running the jsc in QtWebkit. Are
there any suggestions?
You should get the full backtrace create a reduction, and open a bug
report on bugs.webkit.org.
Benjamin
Hello,
The flag PREEMPT_GEOLOCATION_PERMISSION was added in
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/63742 around some code of
Geolocation.
I could not find any case where PREEMPT_GEOLOCATION_PERMISSION is not
used. Unless someone does not use this flag, I plan to remove the flag
and the related useless
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
In July 2010, there was a thread on webkit-dev about removing support
for the -khtml- and -apple- vendor prefixes:
As a first step toward deprecation, it would be nice if browsers could
issue a warning in the console when such
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.org wrote:
I could not find any case where PREEMPT_GEOLOCATION_PERMISSION is not
used. Unless someone does not use this flag, I plan to remove the flag
and the related useless code.
I did not get any answer for a week. Here
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Luke Macpherson
macpher...@chromium.org wrote:
What do we hope to achieve by adding a test when fixing a bug? To
prevent a bug from being reintroduced into the codebase at a later
date. This is a reasonable goal, so let’s remember that the goal is to
prevent
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Rachel Blum gr...@chromium.org wrote:
Unless there's a demonstrable reason that you _need_ a value uninitialized,
why is the burden of proof on the person doing cleanup? Yes, at the point
the code was written, it's well possible that the author was aware that
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
That said, what sort of officialness does this
writeup/guideline/policy have? Do all the ports agree that this is
what our stance should be?
Everyone seemed to agree we just need to discuss each deprecation on
webkit-dev
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
Is the concern that we've been deprecating too many things too quickly?
Quite the contrary. People were concerned about the way to deprecate
more stuff and making fewer mistakes when adding and removing features
:)
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:08 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
e.g. 12345 WIN MAC TEXT IMAGE test.html instead of BUGWK12345 WIN MAC :
test.html = TEXT IMAGE
I wonder how this is gonna help making test_expectation.txt less
obscure. If anything, I would make the file more verbose.
I also
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Any concrete proposals?
I would go for something verbose in a easy to understand format. E.g.
{ test: 'fast/html/keygen.html',
platform: 'mac, linux',
bug: 'webkit.org/b/6',
expectedResults: ['crash', 'text',
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
{ test: 'fast/html/keygen.html',
platform: 'mac, linux',
bug: 'webkit.org/b/6',
expectedResults: ['crash', 'text', 'image'],
action: 'skip' }
As far as I know, a lot of people edit this file on a text editor so
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Myles C. Maxfield
myles.maxfi...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that a good solution is to change the interface of
ICU and try to upstream a patch to ICU - I think a better solution would be
to work around this requirement of ICU inside WebKit.
What is exactly
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
There is still the question of if I can upstream this to ICU, which I'm
checking on.
I was not proposing changing ICU.
I did.
In addition to changing WebKit, not using the pointer when the length
is zero does not
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
So something like
webkit.org/12345 [Win Mac Debug] animations/stop-animation-on-suspend.html
[Crash Text Pass]
? I like that!
This seems quite readable to me as well. As mentioned above, I'd be
inclined to make the
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
It DOES. Even today, I find many comments (even FIXMEs) that are
out-of-date. Say you add a some comment to a function A because of some odd
behavior of another function B, which A calls. Someone awesome later gets
rid of the
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Federico Manuel Echeverri Choux
echeverr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, guys, i develop some application with webkit on gtk client. but i need
to connect with openerp-server.
This is the wrong mailing list. Try webkit-gtk or webkit-help. The
list webkit-dev is about
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Hans Muller hmul...@adobe.com wrote:
Have the merits of C++ unit tests been debated before? I noticed that a bug
representing as much has been around since 2008
(https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21010). The last comment (2009)
concludes with: I'd be
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Navanshu Mahor mahor1...@gmail.com wrote:
Which Folder In Local Hard Disk Stores Html5 Local Storage Data in webkit
This Is The Wrong Mailing List, Try webkit-help.
The mailing list webkit-dev is for discussions about the development
of WebKit. Try the port
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Though the W3C spec allows packing more than one touch point update in
a single touch event, it says nothing about how these updates should
be packed, so I think that the current tests are too restrictive and
should be
It looks like this spec needs an update, not the WebKit tests.
I don't think the spec should be changed so that XInput based platforms cannot
satisfy the spec requirements. But I agree that the tests are good the way
they are because they enforce the requirement to at least possibly support
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Julien Chaffraix
julien.chaffr...@gmail.com wrote:
The most significant performance impact is probably the increase in
the binary size which I won't deny and don't have insights into.
This is only a part of the performance problem but it is actually
fairly bad.
Can I remove this feature?
See http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/DeprecatingFeatures
It would be nice to first have some usage data.
Benjamin
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
Dear webkit-dev,
Some recent changes improved the way we can use string classes with
literals.
There are 3 new constructors for initializing a string from a literal:
-String(ASCIILIteral):
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Source/WTF/wtf/text/WTFString.h#L139
-String(const char[],
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
[[[
The difference between the version is if the length of the string is
included or not. Having the size given in the constructor makes the
constructor faster. Having the size also makes the code bigger, which
is a
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Thanks! The wiki page is very helpful. I wonder if we should
organize a hack-a-thon to deploy this pattern throughout WebKit. Is
there a way the compiler could give us a list of all the code location
we should update?
Hi WebKit-dev,
Some unifying has been done between String and UString, and it will
soon be time to remove UString entirely.
The benefits of removing UStrings are:
-Simpler code.
-No need to implement each feature in String and UString
-Fewer ref-deref
-Smaller binary (about 44kb smaller on Mac
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
Removing operator+= will likely require changes to a number of
port-specific files. I'll do my best to remove these, but I might
need some help from maintainers of individual ports. If you're
interested in helping out,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Anish Bhayani bhay...@adobe.com wrote:
I am an intern on the Adobe Web Platform Authoring team. For the summer, I
was working on implementing CSS Element [1] in WebKit. The specification
itself is still being finalized, but Mozilla [2] has had this feature
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Klemen Slavič krof.drak...@gmail.comwrote:
First time poster. While I admit I haven't worked on WebKit code (yet),
I'm very familiar with its workings across different implementations
(desktop, mobile and otherwise).
In my research regarding WebKit rendering
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:11 PM, James Hawkins jhawk...@chromium.orgwrote:
A few details:
* Google will front the cost of the license (non-zero...very far from
zero) and the infrastructure.
* I'd leave it up to the WebKit leadership to decide who has access (most
likely limited to WebKit
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Gabor Rapcsanyi rga...@inf.u-szeged.huwrote:
On 10/12/2012 11:23 AM, Tom Hudson wrote:
Do you have particular bottleneck functions that you have reason to
believe would benefit from ARM SIMD optimizations? Under what
workloads, and how much benefit?
We've
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:03 AM, ZhangJiPeng oneco...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to porting webkit to a new graphics library, because I need to
rendeting webpage to any platform. The graphic library named Picasso(
http://picasso-graphic.googlecode.com/files/picasso12_source.tar.gz).
Only a
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:34 AM, ryuan Choi ryuan.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to let you know, I am planning to add Screen Orientation API
to WebCore.
This feature will be behind the ENABLE_SCREEN_ORIENTATION. Please see :
http://www.w3.org/TR/screen-orientation/
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Rick Byers rby...@chromium.org wrote:
Outside of the design details, are there any thoughts or concerns
about WebKit getting an implementation of pointer events at some
point?
In my opinion, the pointer events spec is a bad idea (at least, in its
current
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
I'm sympathetic to these concerns, but, unfortunately, I don't see any
other path that leads to interoperability with Internet Explorer.
Currently, there is little to no content that supports pointer events.
There is also
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Adam Barth aba...@webkit.org wrote:
I would prefer WebKit to be wise and wait for either good use cases, or a
better spec.
In my view, the wise course of action is for all user agents to
implement an interoperable set of input events so that authors don't
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
Why does this feature have a flag at all? background-position with up to 4
arguments is specified with CSS3 background and borders. There are three
major implementations with this feature. So we are just catching up. If
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote:
Depends on the future. But for such a small patch, a new flag seems to be
overdone. I looked into the patch, and adding the flag caused more code,
then the actual feature (even if the computed style is missing). I believe
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Rick Byers rby...@chromium.org wrote:
The premise of the specification is that using mouse event and touch
events
interchangeably is needed. In reality, nobody was really asking for that
because it is a terrible idea. You can already easily unify pen, touch
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Николай Матюнин matyuni...@gmail.comwrote:
I need your help (or just some advice).
Currently I use WebKit (actually phantom.JS, which is based on the WebKit)
as an instrument to research and develop the effective methods of ajax
web-applications crawling
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Dean Jackson d...@apple.com wrote:
On Jan 8, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Dean Jackson d...@apple.com wrote:
As well as the other suggestions, you can look at bugs in the Canvas
component. e.g.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82790
Marked as duplicate
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
How will we ensure thread safety? Even at just the tokenizing level
don't we use AtomicString? AtromicString isn't threadsafe wrt StringImpl
IIRC so this
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Chris Fleizach cfleiz...@apple.com wrote:
I'm planning on implementing the speech synthesis aspect of the WebSpeech
API Specification
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/speech-api/raw-file/tip/speechapi.html#tts-section
[...]
Let me know if you have any questions.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Levi Weintraub le...@chromium.org wrote:
I see that this is intended to go in as a module. My understanding is
that concept was created to allow this sort of thing with minimal impact to
core functionality.
I don't think that is the concern at hand, but
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 9:55 PM, TAMURA, Kent tk...@chromium.org wrote:
Please do not enable ENABLE_INPUT_TYPE_DATETIME to ship input
type=datetimeimplementation in your products.
We had some discussion in WHATWG [1] [2] and realized input type=datetime
UIs in iOS Safari and Android Chrome
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Zoltan Herczeg zherc...@webkit.org wrote:
In WebKit both RGBA and BGRA formats are used for different purposes and
different platforms in WebKit. Do we have a policy which one we prefer? It
would be nice to reduce conversions between them in the future as it
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
k...@carewolf.comwrote:
memcpy is heavily optimized for different architectures and even
subarchitectures. Unless you take the time to write several architecture
specific BGRA-RGBA conversions it will never be as fast as memcpy.
This
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Hajime Morrita morr...@chromium.orgwrote:
I'm going to implement Custom Elements standard behind
ENABLE(CUSTOM_ELEMENTS) flag.
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/custom/index.html
Here is the tracking bug for the feature:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote:
background-image: url(a.png), url(b.png);
-webkit-background-blend-mode: screen, screen;
Out of curiosity:
I am probably way too late for the party, but why not blend
surface-to-surface? E.g.
background-image:
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org wrote:
What I've learned from this thread, is that AppleWin and AppleMac are the
only two ports which require lists of exported symbols. If both were to
convert to using EXPORT decorators instead, then we could remove needs for
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Alec Flett alecfl...@chromium.org wrote:
At the moment, SerializedScriptValue uses Vectoruint8_t (aka
Vectorunsigned char) for both it's API (createFromWireBytes, toWireBytes)
as well as its internal representation. (for both v8 and jsc
implementations)
The
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Alec Flett alecfl...@chromium.org wrote:
Well, nobody is explicitly using LChar with SerializedScriptValue (maybe
it should, maybe that's another issue) but I guess this is why I'm asking
- I'm happy to just deal with this in IDB with some ugly
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
There are two other related aspects that make our tests flaky:
1) They're very high level integration tests (mostly), which, as they
cover large swaths of code in each test, are much more susceptible to
flakiness than
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I have to say that the syntax weight of gyp files (quotes, commas, braces,
brackets) makes them feel harder to read and edit than other build file
formats designed for human consumption (obviously Xcode is worse).
As
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
I had similar thoughts but my counter proposal is to let DRT/WTR
generate multiple actual results either in the form of multiple layers in
PNG or multiple PNG images. The advantage of this latter approach is that
we can
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:16 PM, noam.rosent...@nokia.com wrote:
The problem with dynamic features of the web like
animations/interactions is that they're non-deterministic, or at least a
lot less deterministic than static features of the web like layouts.
Ref tests, pixel tests etc. are
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Gregg Tavares g...@google.com wrote:
Can you expose a time or setTime function in DRT and some option that says
let JS control the clock?
Unfortunately, that only works in the simple cases.
We could cheat the WebCore clock, but that would ultimately be wrong
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:24 AM, noam.rosent...@nokia.com wrote:
I did not say they cannot be tested with the two methods suggested :)
It's more about a preference to move some of those decisions from the test
infrastructure to the test itself, but potentially those bugs could be
tested in
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 3:01 PM, James Robinson jam...@google.com wrote:
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/141812 (
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108139) added fine-grain locking
to the AtomicString table in order to support the iOS WebKit threading
model. If parallel execution is
Hi,
Today, adding a support for a new function in TestRunner requires
(painfully) changing:
-WebKitTestRunner.
-Common DRT + 6 implementations (Mac, Win, GTK, EFL, WX, Blackberry).
-Chromium DRT.
-Qt DRT.
I think we can do much better. A first step is to have more common code in
DRT.
One of the
Hi again,
While looking into DRT changes, I notice there is zero activity on the
wxWidgets implementation.
Looking at WebCore/WebKit, excluding general changes, the last commit for
wxWidgets is 6 months old: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/126457
So...is the port still active?
Maybe it should
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:30 PM, 85.mukesh 85.muk...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to put any kind of Box2d effect on html element. These things I
want to do with css extension. [...]
Wrong mailing list.
WebKit-dev is for the development of WebKit. If you want to make some kind
of non-standard
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:56 PM, Jochen Eisinger joc...@chromium.orgwrote:
Today, adding a support for a new function in TestRunner requires
(painfully) changing:
-WebKitTestRunner.
-Common DRT + 6 implementations (Mac, Win, GTK, EFL, WX, Blackberry).
-Chromium DRT.
-Qt DRT.
I think we
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Jochen Eisinger joc...@chromium.orgwrote:
I'm not sure I understand. In what cases do you then add something to DRT
and need to change all of them?
Take this for example: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/130416
It does not make sense to test everything
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.comwrote:
I actually have recently been working on a patch to get trunk building
again, though. The path of least resistance for me would simply be to ask
people to ignore the wx port in their changes, but leave it in the
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Kevin Ollivier kev...@theolliviers.comwrote:
To be honest, I think I know more about the wx port, and would probably be
better able to cleanly remove it from the tree, than you would. As I've
said from the start, I'll remove it if that's what people want, but I
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Dongsung Huang luxte...@company100.netwrote:
I like this idea. I cannot find any harm if we have this functionality.
Those changes are not harmless. There are people monitoring tests results
full time in order to keep WebKit in good shape. No other part of
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
Those changes are not harmless. There are people monitoring tests results
full time in order to keep WebKit in good shape. No other part of WebKit
require continuous attention.
I'm sorry, but either I don't
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:27 PM, noam.rosent...@nokia.com wrote:
Why wasn't a ref-test a better solution in this particular case?
Because gaussian blurs on the GPU are not accurate, and look slightly
different on different GPUs, but usually close enough.
We need a way to measure close
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:45 PM, 徐征 xz91...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
I am handling this issue (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78957)
now.
My question is I test my added test code locally, however, it seems
failed on some other platform(get red on cr-linux).
So can I(and how can I)
Hi Jason,
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Jason Anderssen janders...@exactal.comwrote:
With a background in development (both windows and MAC) I was wanting to
get involved in an open source project that I believe is going to make the
world a greater place. So I have decided to get involved
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
On http://trac.webkit.org/wiki there are a bunch of pages under
Layout Tests and Performance Tests that describe much of the
infrastructure. These days most of it is written in Python.
I don't know what projects
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Julien Chaffraix jchaffr...@webkit.orgwrote:
over several reviews, I have been saying that the following line is a
coding style violation:
firstVariable = secondVariable = 0;
For a concrete example, the computePreferredLogicalWidths uses the
following
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
We've replaced webkit-perf.appspot.com by perf.webkit.org.
webkit-perf.appspot.com will be phased-out in the coming weeks.
I'm going to check in the source code of perf.webkit.org into WebKit
repository in coming months.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Jer Noble jer.no...@apple.com wrote:
On Mar 4, 2013, at 4:46 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Could you add either build or runtime flag?
I most definitely could. But are there any ports who would disable the
flag? (Honestly asking, here.) If not,
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
kenneth.christian...@gmail.com wrote:
I am personally happy that we can make use of C++11 and I don't
suppose it is a problem for the Tizen/EFL port. On the other hand, I
fear that Qt might be targeting some platforms where this could
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Three major problems with existing WebKit performance tests are:
1. There are too many tests to run
2. Some tests have variances that are too high to be of any use
3. Some tests are too specific to be of any
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
Background blur (or background filters in general) are not a web-exposed
feature, so it seems odd that Internals has a switch for some
non-web-exposed feature that is only implemented by one port. It feels like
this was
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
WebKit nightly build for r135421 dated November 21st, 2012 was 46.1MB.
WebKit nightly build for r145786 dated March 13th, 2013 was 49.4MB.
Our binary size increased by 7.2% in just 4 months.
I have been tracking this
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
