Re: [webkit-dev] DOM methods that affect [[Prototype]]

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Geoffrey Garen wrote: > Anne, can you help me get those comments sent to the w3 list? I sent them > myself, but they seem to be held up or bounced? Hey, I think they did make it, and Boris replied: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2013JanMar/0068.html

Re: [webkit-dev] Changing Github repository to mirror git.webkit.org (was Github vs. git.webkit.org)

Looks like mirroring stopped on 1/23 (last commit: https://github.com/WebKit/webkit/commit/d5c4f2bd4a80b397eade1ee53b39d738e5656598 ). Jesus, can you take a look? Thanks, Florin On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia wrote: > Hi, > > The mirror is finally ready again: https://

[webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

This is a followup to the multiple inheritance discussion. Adam, I checked the IDL files on SVG2 [1]. The interfaces for SVG2 do not have multiple inheritances of interfaces that are exposed to bindings. But SVG2 still uses the "implements" statement for "[NoInterfaceObject]" interfaces [2]. Th

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > This is a followup to the multiple inheritance discussion. > > Adam, I checked the IDL files on SVG2 [1]. The interfaces for SVG2 do not > have multiple inheritances of interfaces that are exposed to bindings. But > SVG2 still uses the "impl

Re: [webkit-dev] build.webkit.org down

Here are the largest results sets on the master in GB. We currently store 6.8TB of total results, going back 14 months, and 1.1TB of archives going back 1 week. 1500Apple MountainLion (Leaks) 1018Chromium Mac Release (Tests) 857 Chromium Linux Release (Tests) 532 Chromium Win Re

Re: [webkit-dev] build.webkit.org down

I'm surprised that chromium mac is 3x the size of Apple Mac... debug even! Chromium build output should be much smaller... at least as of late. On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:30 AM, William Siegrist wrote: > Here are the largest results sets on the master in GB. We currently store > 6.8TB of total r

Re: [webkit-dev] build.webkit.org down

This is the output of the test bots, right? I'm guessing this is due to (a) us running pixel tests and (b) not checking in the expected failing baselines. If I ever get back to working on supporting -failing.png, this could go down *a lot*. Alternatively, we could just decide to check in the exist

Re: [webkit-dev] build.webkit.org down

Yes, I'm referring to the test results that get uploaded to , presumably by the test slaves. The "archives" I refer to are , which I believe are just the binaries built by the build slaves. -Bill On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:42 AM,

[webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

This question came up in: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92393 Do any ports still disable SVG? Should we be removing the ENABLE_SVG defines (and potentially unifying SVG and HTML style resolve more closely)? ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-d

Re: [webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

Many chromium developers disable svg for faster building. Jochen ___ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

Re: [webkit-dev] Changing Github repository to mirror git.webkit.org (was Github vs. git.webkit.org)

Sorry, we have been facing network issues here for the past few days... Anyway, should be fixed now and it is pushing the current git.webkit.org HEAD already. Cheers, jesus 2013/1/25 Florin Malita : > Looks like mirroring stopped on 1/23 (last commit: > https://github.com/WebKit/webkit/commit/d5c

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Adam Barth wrote: > There's no experiment that you can run using web content to detect > whether we implement WebIDL. All you can detect is whether we > implement particular specifications that use WebIDL. We can just > simply not implement the specifications t

Re: [webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

QtWebKit has a --minimal option where SVG is disabled IIRC. On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Jochen Eisinger wrote: > Many chromium developers disable svg for faster building. > > Jochen > > > ___ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org

Re: [webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

Eric, Most of the resource constraint environments(embedded systems) still disables the SVG. If the define is removed code size of WebKit will be increased by atleast 3 to 4M. On 26 January 2013 01:01, wrote: > This question came up in:https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92393 > > Do any por

Re: [webkit-dev] build.webkit.org down

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:30 AM, William Siegrist wrote: > Here are the largest results sets on the master in GB. We currently store > 6.8TB of total results, going back 14 months, and 1.1TB of archives going > back 1 week. > > 1500Apple MountainLion (Leaks) > 1018Chromium Mac Release (Tes

Re: [webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

Perhaps the time to remove ENABLE_SVG is in several years once many pages depend on it and disabling it results in a busted browser... On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Arunprasad Rajkumar wrote: > Eric, Most of the resource constraint environments(embedded systems) still > disables the SVG. If

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Adam Barth wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: >> This is a followup to the multiple inheritance discussion. >> >> Adam, I checked the IDL files on SVG2 [1]. The interfaces for SVG2 do not >> have multiple inheritances of interfaces that

Re: [webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

We could reduce a bit of maintenance cost by removing all the defines. I ran some numbers and I'm not sure we are there yet in terms of lost productivity, even on the Chromium side. SVG adds around 20% to debug compile times: Linux, Z620, no goma, clean build, ninja, Debug DumpRenderTree, without

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Glenn Adams wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Adam Barth wrote: >> There's no experiment that you can run using web content to detect >> whether we implement WebIDL. All you can detect is whether we >> implement particular specifications that use WebIDL

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Adam Barth wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: >>> This is a followup to the multiple inheritance discussion. >>> >>> Adam, I checked the IDL files on SVG2 [1]. The interfaces for SVG2

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: >> On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Adam Barth wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: This is a followup to the multiple inheritance discussion. Adam, I c

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: >>> On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Adam Barth wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > This is a fo

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:09 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > > On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > > > > On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dirk Schulze > wrote: > >>> On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Adam Barth wrote: > O

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

On Jan 25, 2013, at 8:16 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote: >> interface SVGViewSpec >> { >> readonly attribute SVGTransformList transform; >> readonly attribute SVGElement viewTarget; >> readonly attribute DOMString viewBoxString; >> readonly attribute DOMString preserveAspectRatioString; >>

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: > ... > The problem is that SVGFitToViewBox and SVGZoomAndPan of the example above > are implemented by a lot of other interfaces as well. Supplemental is just > supposed to be set once per interface. That is why Supplemental doesn't > work fo

Re: [webkit-dev] Do any ports still disable SVG?

I agree with you guys. Most of the sites now uses SVG. But I'm worrying about the resource constraint platforms where browser is not intended for open Internet browsing, rather it is used for building user interfaces(like navigation systems, tv, set-top-box). Though using SVG in the constraints env

Re: [webkit-dev] WebIDL implementation plans (was: Re: Multiple inheritance in the DOM)

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote: >> ... >> The problem is that SVGFitToViewBox and SVGZoomAndPan of the example above >> are implemented by a lot of other interfaces as well. Supplemental is just >> supposed to be set o