On 10/10/2019 22:08, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> People often associate the term "WebKit" with Apple's WebKit port in
> practice. The risk here is really about people not understanding the nuance
> of port specific bugs & set of features. WebKit's ports are unlike Gecko's
> & Blink's because while they
> On Oct 11, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>
>
> 10.10.2019, 23:10, "Ryosuke Niwa" :
>> People often associate the term "WebKit" with Apple's WebKit port in
>> practice. The risk here is really about people not understanding the nuance
>> of port specific bugs & set of
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 9:38 AM Konstantin Tokarev
wrote:
>
> 10.10.2019, 23:10, "Ryosuke Niwa" :
> > People often associate the term "WebKit" with Apple's WebKit port in
> practice. The risk here is really about people not understanding the nuance
> of port specific bugs & set of features.
>
>
10.10.2019, 23:10, "Ryosuke Niwa" :
> People often associate the term "WebKit" with Apple's WebKit port in
> practice. The risk here is really about people not understanding the nuance
> of port specific bugs & set of features.
However, Safari has its own column in the table, and its logo is
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 9:02 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
> wrote:
>
> On 09/10/2019 21:53, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> In terms of legalities:
>>
>> The WebKit logo (as well as the term WebKit) is trademarked by Apple, but
>> there are acceptable use guidelines in the Terms of Use:
>>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:03 AM Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez <
clo...@igalia.com> wrote:
> On 09/10/2019 21:53, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> > In terms of legalities:
> >
> > The WebKit logo (as well as the term WebKit) is trademarked by Apple,
> but there are acceptable use guidelines in the Terms
On 09/10/2019 21:53, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> In terms of legalities:
>
> The WebKit logo (as well as the term WebKit) is trademarked by Apple, but
> there are acceptable use guidelines in the Terms of Use:
> https://webkit.org/terms-of-use/ . I am not a lawyer and cannot give legal
>
> On Oct 9, 2019, at 5:43 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
> wrote:
>
> On 03/10/2019 00:43, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>> I don't know the rules regarding the logo use but it might be a bit
>> misleading to use WebKit logo without any qualification for GTK+ port on
>> wpt.fyi.
>>
>> I'd imagine
On 03/10/2019 00:43, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> I don't know the rules regarding the logo use but it might be a bit
> misleading to use WebKit logo without any qualification for GTK+ port on
> wpt.fyi.
>
> I'd imagine people who visiting wpt.fyi may not realize how different GTK+
> and Apple's WebKit
I don't know the rules regarding the logo use but it might be a bit
misleading to use WebKit logo without any qualification for GTK+ port on
wpt.fyi.
I'd imagine people who visiting wpt.fyi may not realize how different GTK+
and Apple's WebKit ports are in terms of set of features being enabled,
Hi,
I'm working on having daily runs of WebKitGTK (with minibrowser) at
https://wpt.fyi
but then I noticed that the WebKitGTK project doesn't have a logo as such.
So, I wonder...
Would it be OK to use the WebKit logo for the WebKitGTK port?
(to show on wpt.fyi at the top of the column for the
11 matches
Mail list logo
