On 31/10/2011 07:29, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Dictionaries download is broken, please urgently see
Bug 42408 - the address referred by tools - languages - more
dictionaries online doesn't work
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41376
The right issue link is:
webmaster for Kracked Press Productions wrote:
On 10/31/2011 04:24 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Andrea Pescetti schrieb:
The right issue link is:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42408
Argh, of course!
I mentioned this many months ago. It seems to point to the OOo site
On 20/10/2011 Andreas Mantke wrote:
I propose for a wiki page, where we can collect all the requirements for our
new CMS.
I think it would help, if the teams from the last OOo/LibreOffice conferences
would
jump in and share there thoughts / experience / needs.
My only experience (when
On 05/08/2011 Christian Lohmaier wrote:
I changed the page to read:
LibreOffice is licensed under the terms of the LGPLv3 (new
contributions are dual-licensed under both LGPLv3+ and MPL).
OK, since this seems stable I've just updated
http://it.libreoffice.org/download/licenza accordingly.
On 05/08/2011 Italo Vignoli wrote:
New contributions are LGPLv3+/MPL, so I do not think that the or later
has any specific meaning. The + after the license means that once a new
version of the license is available the contribution does not need to be
re-licensed as the license is automatically
Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
My suggestion: report a bug (Details you find on
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#WWW.
If someone else will have the same problem, he will be cheered up a
little seeing that he is not alone ;-)
Since it seems that only a handful of people registered
Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
On 8/10/11 1:04 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
a few days ago. I was able to:
- Register to the website
- Set my password
- Propose a new project and request that it was published
- [ It was indeed published by some unknown administrator ]
- Create and publish a release
Andreas Mantke wrote:
The reviewer should look about the license and that the project intent
to be usefull for LibO (not spam, joke etc.). If we look later at the
files, we had to test, if they work with specific versions of LibO. But
that is not the task for the reviewer, when he decides if he
., remove the wrong (or later) from the text.
I fixed it in the Italian translation, but if there are reasons to keep
(or later) in the Italian version too we will comply.
Regards,
Andrea.
On 18/06/2011 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
While working on the Italian translation of the license page, I saw
Florian Effenberger wrote:
Andrea Pescetti wrote on 2011-08-05 10:30:
minimal and straightforward: use the same license
indication in http://www.libreoffice.org/download/license/ and in the
page footer, i.e., remove the wrong (or later) from the text.
hm, I'm not sure, but didn't we have
Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
2011/7/3 Andreas Mantke ma...@gmx.de
GPL|GPL - GNU General Public License|
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/GPL/2.0/
LGPL|LGPL - GNU Lesser General Public License|
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/LGPL/2.1/
BSD|BSD License
Andreas Mantke:
Am Montag, 27. Juni 2011, 19:02:42 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
For usability, I'd prefer not to have a default here. Otherwise, people
may overlook the field and it might well happen that someone uploads an
extension that gets tagged as GPL but actually has (within the OXT
Marc Paré wrote:
Regarding one of those items on the wiki page: Extension transfer from
OOo repository , we should make sure that if we do this that we try to
find the author of the extensions to give proper attribution. When I
looked at the templates and hoped to transfer some from the OOo
Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 6/19/11 11:25 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Could you suggest another description that we could use that would be
more appropriate for us?
I think that we should use free software license, preferably copyleft
Just free software license linked to
On 17/06/2011 Andreas Mantke wrote:
We need a proposal for the text on this home page that explains what
extensions and
templates are used for, why they are so helpfull. Then the user of the site
should be
encouraged to provide extensions and templates to the new site.
The text should
While working on the Italian translation of the license page, I saw that
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/license/ states that LibreOffice is
licensed under the terms of the LGPLv3 (or later).
The (or later), unless something really unexpected happened right now,
is just wrong and it should be
On 23/05/2011 Gianluca Turconi wrote:
since few days I'm discussing a proposal about the creation of a
employment-office-like collaboration tool for LibO volunteers. Here is my
original proposal:
On 12/05/2011 Sophie Gautier wrote:
On 12/05/2011 01:32, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I kind of expected that a new site development would have been announced
here.
it seems that it's just what Andreas did ;) Consider it like Litmus, we
test the tool, try some dev on it to make sure it's
Andreas Mantke wrote:
I'm working on such an environment for LibreOffice for some weeks in
my spare time. I hope to solve some bugs in the product, that I
created for this purpose.
Ah, surprise! I admit I find it weird that there is a test website in
the .libreoffice.org hierarchy active since
Alexander Thurgood wrote:
USERS BEWARE : the extensions site
appears to be currently suffering from availability issues, etc, this
does not actually solve the underlying problem. A quick whois tells me
that the servers are registered to Sun (no surprise there), so we remain
dependent on the
Andreas Mantke wrote:
He gave me also a link to a site which compared the available open source
conference
managing systems:
http://feeding.cloud.geek.nz/2010/05/list-of-open-source-conference.html
That post does not list COD (it's mentioned in the comments), a free,
open-source and no-cost
On 23/02/2011 Nino Novak wrote:
As LibO is a downstream derivate of OOo, apparently any feature from
OOo makes or can make it into LibO (unless removed by the LibO devs
for some reason - is there any???)
Existing OpenOffice.org features that have been removed, deprecated or
are rumored to be
On 31/01/2011 drew wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 07:56 +0100, Stefan Weigel wrote:
For me, there is absolutely nothing against presenting support for
LibreOffice at sites that use OpenOffice.org branding.
I'd say I agree with Stefan's opinion here; but in general my point
would be that the
Narayan Aras wrote:
And yet LibO requires full download for each version.
Immediately after taking over, Oracle made OOo upgradable.
Oracle cares about this. We don't.
We pander to the contributors instead.
How much time was devoted to making LibO upgradable with patches?
For what is
Italo Vignoli wrote:
I have seen mentions of these 23 roles many times, but I have not seen
a list where they are described in detail. It looks like they have been
developed without even asking the SC members - or the group of the
founders - if this was the right approach.
Since nobody
On 14/01/2011 Sophie Gautier wrote:
a small amount of Go-oo
features have been incorporated for now. More will come later, once
our users base is consolidated.
Really? I expected most of the Go-OO features had made their way into
LibreOffice, or at least http://planet.go-oo.org/ made me think
Sophie Gautier wrote:
We are a very very large
community and hence have very different needs, QA, l10, docs come at the
topf of my mind. Our community is not new, it comes with a past of work
and usage.
I agree with this. The OpenOffice.org volunteers now employ dozens of
tools, see slide
On 13/11/2010 Christian Lohmaier wrote:
the css and related files as well as the silverstripe code and related
files have been uploaded to git and can be accessed/downloaded from
github
Thanks! Is it (at least theoretically) possible to do something similar
with the actual site content? We had
On 07/11/2010 Stefan Weigel wrote:
Am 07.11.2010 17:21, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
A usability issue I see in http://test.libreoffice.org/
You are invited to improve it. Have you already got your access as a
publisher to the CMS?
Of course I had registered and completed my profile before
not be very keen to donate time for yet another D6
project).
Regards,
Andrea Pescetti.
--
E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly
On 04/11/2010 Florian Effenberger wrote:
believe me - we *NEED* a WYSIWYG editor, if we want large contributions
to the wiki (which we do). ;)
Large in what sense? A large number of contributors or a few
contributors making a large amount of work each?
I would say that in the first case the
infrastructure. Anyone
available to discuss this at the next DrupalCon in Chicago
http://chicago2011.drupal.org/ maybe?
...and then if the Steering Committee decides not to migrate we will
just fork again! (I'm joking, of course).
Regards,
Andrea Pescetti.
--
E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org
development... Unless there is the attitude to rediscuss this in a few
months, like the Codebase migration from CVS discussion, that was
resolved by temporarily migrating to SVN as a quick decision with the
promise (then fulfilled) to migrate to a distributed SCM after one year.
Best regards,
Andrea
Sophie Gautier wrote:
Just to point that we need to handle i18n and l10n easily also, this
is important to think this multilanguage way till the beginning.
Then I'll have to ask again what you mean by this!
1) Having translatable pages (meaning: an English about page at
Marc Paré wrote:
So, there are 2 things to consider:
1. Does the SC wish #1 [AP: translatable pages] or the #2 [AP: subsites]
option?
2. Can either Silverstripe and Drupal support either of these scenarios.
Opinions on #2 is the one that is really important for this thread.
Could the
Florian Effenberger wrote:
Andrea Pescetti wrote on 2010-10-15 21.28:
Is there the possibility to add the message date too in the message
lists like http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website ? ...
should work now ;)
Thanks, it is much more convenient this way!
Regards,
Andrea.
--
E
/website ? I had to look for
messages in the archives a few times and I would have found very helpful
to have dates somewhere on the list.
Regards,
Andrea Pescetti.
--
E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http
37 matches
Mail list logo
