I am using thunderbird as well but must be doing something wrong. I have
a gmail account just set up but it would be easiest for me just to stick
to one mail client only. I am using thunderbird version 1.5 on linux.
How do I monitor a number of interesting threads in Thunderbird? What I
do now is
Is there any way in thunderbird to view only the interesting threads
Never tried (I don't think Watch Thread and Ignore Thread work outside
NNTP?)
I simply recognize my interesting threads by color (i.e. label) and then
use 'N' to locate/read the next unread message.
This works on the thread
Hi,
On 9/16/06, Gustavo Santucho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that I never used any other client, so I'd suggest you follow theteam members advice (they've used both) and try gmail.
I already set up my gmail account and am using it as we speak. As I see
it gmail has exactly (!) the right
I used thunderbird as mail client, and reading the user list was taking a lot of time. It was hard to follow the discussions, and don't get me started about getting back from 3 weeks of beach leisure. When I got to gmail, my mailinglist reading went down to 10% of the time it used to take. You can
It was hard to follow the discussions
Just curious... why?
This (complicated on purpose) picture shows:
a) a visited thread with an unread message
b) a totally unread thread
c) a totally read and closed (for me) thread
d) an important (for me) visited thread with an unread message inside (I
Agree with Gustavo, Thunderbird is without question a great
thread-oriented mail client, and it's for free. Moreover, you can
carry it all in your memory stick, as achieved with this version:
http://portableapps.com/portablethunderbird
;)
Yes, but you have to open each individual message inside the thread.
With gmail I can read all responses in one thread by just scrolling my
mousewheel.
Martijn
On 9/14/06, Manuel Barzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agree with Gustavo, Thunderbird is without question a great
thread-oriented mail
With gmail I can read all responses in one thread by just scrolling my
mousewheel.
That's a good proposal to forward to Mozilla Thunderbird ORG
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
he can always try both seeing how they are both free. even try them in parallel.-IgorOn 9/14/06, Manuel Barzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With gmail I can read all responses in one thread by just scrolling my
mousewheel.That's a good proposal to forward to Mozilla Thunderbird
but you have to open each individual message inside the thread.
With gmail I can read all responses in one thread by just scrolling
my mousewheel.
This is really a good point.
You loose the conversation this way (i.e. who is answering who) but I
think is better for you, being on the
Hi,
I am having more and more difficulty following the mail discussions. I
need a mail client that supports watching mail threads.
Cheers
Erik
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Use gmail. Works perfect. If you don't have an account, let me know so
that I can give you one.
Eelco
On 9/13/06, Erik Brakkee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am having more and more difficulty following the mail discussions. I
need a mail client that supports watching mail threads.
Cheers
g m a i l :) would never use a mailing list without it again.-IgorOn 9/13/06, Erik Brakkee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Hi,I am having more and more difficulty following the mail discussions. I
need a mail client that supports watching mail
I use Thunderbird, threaded view.
I don't know if it's true, but I was told that gmail requires subjects
to stay unchanged in order to group threads.
(seems to be the case in this list, anyway)
-
Gustavo.
Erik Brakkee wrote:
Hi,
I am having more and more difficulty following the mail
yep, its true.seems gmail threading is a list not a tree. i dont know if its good or bad, i think i actually prefer it.-IgorOn 9/13/06,
Gustavo Santucho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use Thunderbird, threaded view.I don't know if it's true, but I was told that gmail requires subjectsto stay
On 9/13/06, Gustavo Santucho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use Thunderbird, threaded view.
I liked Thunderbird too. But I use gmail for everything now.
I don't know if it's true, but I was told that gmail requires subjects
to stay unchanged in order to group threads.
(seems to be the case in
I'm not a fan of gmail because all of your list mail is all bunched up in with all of your other lists. Labels just don't replace folders IMHO.Ayway, I just wanted to try changing the subject to see if a new thread was started. That seems like a bad move because of all the RE and spacing issues
LOL, just tried the same thing.Now what if I change the subject back to the original?On 9/13/06, Igor Vaynberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:this appears as a separate thread.
-IgorOn 9/13/06, Gustavo Santucho
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Does it work?PS: Note that the new subject contains the original
there is a trick to the labels.assign each list a label, then do archive - skip inbox, and your list gets its own folder-IgorOn 9/13/06,
James Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not a fan of gmail because all of your list mail is all bunched up in with all of your other lists. Labels just don't
19 matches
Mail list logo
