https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #63 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scr.html is quite mysterious for me, I'm
unable to extract any meaningful information from it.
* pending graph has no legend, the ? icon does nothing. Worth
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #64 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Nemo, we will try to clarify all these points.
But our current effort is in closing KPIs.
We will clarify and fix all of this once KPIs are closed. Thank you very much
for your valuable
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|a...@bitergia.com|q...@wikimedia.org
---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #60 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
As agreed with Alvaro, his only remaining task in this report is to edit the
graph The evolution of the total amount of merged commits at
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #61 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Quim, you will have this change tomorrow for the review meeting! :)
And I hope some advances also in KPI gerrit review queue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #59 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
(In reply to comment #55)
In a second look I have realized that the graphs at
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scr-countries.html count reviews. I think it
would make more sense that they
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #58 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #57)
Can we get some KPIs on the smaller stuff ?
Just a bit of background: we agreed to focus our work on five KPIs described at
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #55 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
In a second look I have realized that the graphs at
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scr-countries.html count reviews. I think it
would make more sense that they would count authors.
I mean,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #56 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #55)
Sorry, that comment belongs to bug 55626
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
Derk-Jan Hartman hartman.w...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #54 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
(In reply to comment #53)
We are in the final sprint:
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/who_contributes_code.html
Points for Alvaro:
Blockers
* The search boxes don't seem to work.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|55626 |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||suma...@wikimedia.org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #52 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #32)
This graph is obviously not excluding self-merges (there's even L10n-bot),
it's not particularly useful.
Let's see. When it comes to code MERGED we have two
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #47 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
(In reply to comment #45)
(In reply to comment #40)
Guys, the evolution in time and global of merged reviews by company:
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scr-companies-summary.html
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #48 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
(In reply to comment #45)
(In reply to comment #40)
Guys, the evolution in time and global of merged reviews by company:
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scr-companies-summary.html
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #49 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) bawolff...@gmail.com ---
[mildly off topic suggestions] It might also be cool to further split up WMF
(since its such a big contributor) into departments (Features, Platform, Ops,
Other). It would also
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #50 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
(In reply to comment #49)
It would also be interesting to see which groups are being reviewed
by
which other groups (e.g. Do WMF mostly review other WMFers code or does
everyone's code
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
Bug 53485 depends on bug 53489, which changed state.
Bug 53489 Summary: Relating tech contributors with organizations
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53489
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #51 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #49)
[mildly off topic suggestions] It might also be cool to further split up WMF
(since its such a big contributor) into departments (Features, Platform, Ops,
Other).
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #40 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Guys, the evolution in time and global of merged reviews by company:
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scr-companies-summary.html
It answers How is the weight of the WMF evolving?.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #41 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
(In reply to comment #36)
Ref L10n-bot: ok, let's not counted. Requested at Bug 53489 comment 24. If
you
find more users that should be removed please report them in that bug report.
Thank
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #42 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
How is the weight of the WMF evolving?
Pending. This will be answered by a graph like
http://activity.openstack.org/dash/newbrowser/browser/scm-companies-summary.
html
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #43 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
(In reply to comment #38)
I confess not knowing anything about self-merges. Are they still code
contributions? Then they should be counted in our metrics about code
contributions.
About
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #44 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) bawolff...@gmail.com ---
Nothing is reviewed by jenkins. Things get verified by jenkins, and things get
submitted by jenkins (sometimes the word merged is used for this act of
submitting, which is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #45 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #40)
Guys, the evolution in time and global of merged reviews by company:
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scr-companies-summary.html
It answers How is the weight
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #46 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
(In reply to comment #43)
About the time to respond metrics ok, if they are instant merges they are
deforming the picture and we need to address this. Questions:
Which are instant
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #38 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
I confess not knowing anything about self-merges. Are they still code
contributions? Then they should be counted in our metrics about code
contributions.
About the time to respond metrics
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #39 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
(In reply to comment #38)
I confess not knowing anything about self-merges.
+2 is for code review, not merging your own stuff ([[mw:Gerrit/+2]]).
Self-merges i.e. +2 on own commits are not
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #31 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
Status of this report:
(In reply to comment #0)
Who is contributing merged code each quarter?
Answered at http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/contributors.html
How is the weight of the WMF
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #32 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
(In reply to comment #31)
Status of this report:
(In reply to comment #0)
Who is contributing merged code each quarter?
Answered at
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #33 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
L10n-bot channels the contributions from the translatewiki.net community. Are
these contributions we want to count? If not, why not?
Are there other self-merges? Should be excluded?
--
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
Bawolff (Brian Wolff) bawolff...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #35 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
(In reply to comment #33)
Are there other self-merges?
Several of those I see there look like self-merges, I've not run my own stats
on it.
Should be excluded?
Self-merges are not code
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #36 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
Ref L10n-bot: ok, let's not counted. Requested at Bug 53489 comment 24. If you
find more users that should be removed please report them in that bug report.
Thank you!
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #37 from Nemo federicol...@tiscali.it ---
(In reply to comment #36)
Ref L10n-bot: ok, let's not counted. Requested at Bug 53489 comment 24. If
you
find more users that should be removed please report them in that bug report.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #28 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
Álvaro, we will demo http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/contributors.html in
exactly 24 hours.
That page still needs some work on low-hanging fruits. Did you see my pull
requests in GitHub?
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #29 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
This is my next task, taking a look to pull requests and pushing them. I hope I
can do it next two hours!!!
Ups, contributors.html is in early beta state but ok, let's try to put it a
better
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #30 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Quim, you have all your changes now in:
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/contributors.html
I have tried to give you credit for the changes but I have changed also
contributors.html so no
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #27 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #26)
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/contributors.html
Good!
Please follow the format proposed at Comment #18, or propose a better format.
:)
An All-time header
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #20 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Ok, we can try it. Include here the contributors (people and orgs) using the
above criteria. First step is to include the Top100 lists with the search
field. And then, we can think in a GUI for
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #21 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Ok, this is a start. Thank you!
Why the data starts in 2011 only? Is it because we are only looking at code
merged via Gerrit?
Yes, as you can see in
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #22 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
But since the question is Who contributes code, and in the SVN/Git history we
have also the email addresses of the contributors, could we answer the question
properly since the development
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #23 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Yes, at some point we should mix SCR and SCM information. But right now we
decided to focus SCR as the data source for contributions analysis. Right now
we have also the global view for SCM that
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #24 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #23)
SCR (Source Code Review): gerrit
Is that ok? Maybe we can open a new issue for it so we can move on closing
tickets.
Ok, let's nail down first this KPI in the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #25 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
SVN history ... git history now :) SVN analysis is more ... ellaborated. It is
pretty good to have git instead. Good weekend Quim!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #26 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Quim, after some development, first results:
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/contributors.html
You can see total contributors and companies lists and companies quarters
reports.
In order to
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #18 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
Ok, this is a start. Thank you!
Why the data starts in 2011 only? Is it because we are only looking at code
merged via Gerrit?
If we start with tables then the format we probably want is:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #19 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #13)
we can see later how to present it. Maybe new HTML pages for Top
Contributors and Top Orgs including this data.
Why not having everything at
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #14 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Quim, I have already the queries to get this information. Now we need to format
it a report. You have always the last SQL database in:
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/data/db/
In this case,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #15 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Quim, I have already the queries to get this information. Now we need to
format
it a report. You have always the last SQL database in:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #17 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Created attachment 13555
-- https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=13555action=edit
Report for Wikimedia orgs contributors per quarter
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #16 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Created attachment 13554
-- https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=13554action=edit
Report for Wikimedia contributors per quarter
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #11 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Taking a look to the original questions:
* Who is contributing merged code each quarter?
We know who is contributing code and we can create SQL queries for this
specific case. Right now we
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #12 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
Ok, then
Who is contributing merged code each quarter?
What about this:
* List of all-time top 100 individual mergers (as they are called now).
Currently only 10 are shown.
* List of
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #13 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Ok, we can do that way. I am working now in SQL queries for getting all these
data and we can see later how to present it. Maybe new HTML pages for Top
Contributors and Top Orgs including this
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #10 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
Author, committer and reviewer are clear terms. Merger is confusing.
As far as I know it's not a term used to describe a person, even less
contributors whose patch has been merged. If
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #9 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Mergers right now are not committers. We are using committers in the git
analysis but not in gerrit one. In gerrit we call mergers to contributors whose
patch has being merged.
We are using
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||55626
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||innocentkil...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #5 from Alvaro a...@bitergia.com ---
Is it ok to use Gerrit (vs Git) data to answer this question?
commits = merged submissions
In
http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scr.html
we are close to cover this who contributes code KPI.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #6 from Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Is it ok to use Gerrit (vs Git) data to answer this question?
Yes, Bug 53489 is a blocker of this one. We are talking about the same thing.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Highest |High
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
MZMcBride b...@mzmcbride.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|KPI: who contributes code? |Key performance
66 matches
Mail list logo
