Jim, sorry about the delay but I have been busy with personal
business.
Protecting original efforts and years of research is a serious
question that WE and wiki's, in general, must come to terms with
before they will truly benefit the communities they serve.
Actually, much as gone on in this
Dear Wayne
While the argument to reduce govt. waste through collaborating to
produce free OERs is appealing, it rests on certain assumptions. The
author does hints at these,but not enough. For example:
1. While hard sciences curriculum can be 'standardised' and 'applied'
globally/nationally.
Sorry, for the delay but I have been busy with personal business.
I think we are on the same wavelength here.
It would be possible to design a single template with parameters specifying
the different reasons for requesting users not to edit the page, for
example:
- Currently being used
Hi all,
Does anyone know of some good resources on governance/ community
governance which might help us enhance the Open Community Governance Policy?
If so, please add:
http://www.wikieducator.org/Workgroup:Amendments_to_Open_Community_Governance_Policy/Resources
Thanks
Kim
PS New
John and Wayne
Thank you for suggestions of using external sources, to hold the
research and original materials, that could be linked into WE pages.
The “building of import == export capability between WikiEducator
and the Connexions platform” is very interesting. This would allow WE
members
Hi all!
Here's the news from the style guide
http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Style_guide front:
Guideline approvals are still on hold whilst we wait for the community
council to briefly reconvene on our behalf. They will be looking to
approve our draft policy
My apologies to all for coming into this so late; my inbox this week
looks like someone set off an email bomb!
On the whole, I agree that some measure must be taken to inform readers
and members of the authors' intent for collaboration. It gets me
frustrated when I see that, despite the
Valerie,
In my experience in wikis, *none* of the categories are ever officially
administered, and all of them are user inspired. Members are free to
create whatever categories that please them, usually guided by a set of
guidelines and watched over by a group of experts and helpers. The
Dear Friends,
I had a few recent discussions regarding the need to inform about
copyrights and I was wondering if it was a good idea to expand the
WikiEducator Learning4Content Tutorials and add a ''Copyright'
Tutorials that addresses the need for more information, options and
enhances open
Hi Phil,
As you say, we do have brilliant Learning4Content tutorials 1-10 which teach
how to use wiki technology, plus a few more on other important subjects such as
the use of Kaltura (video editing) for instance, and how to create a learning
resource and others etc that are not taught in
Hi Steve,
That is a very good question, Steve and there is no easy answer. There
are many books out there that in no way provide all the answers but
attempt to give a general overview of what the license restrictions mean
and refer or provide references to more information elsewhere.
I don't
...or develop them country specific and in the process develop the
largest copyright information resource pool there is
Cheers,
Patricia
-Original Message-
From: wikieducator@googlegroups.com
[mailto:wikieduca...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Patricia Schlicht
Sent: Friday, October
12 matches
Mail list logo
