Dear all,
The Affiliations Committee is glad to announce the recognition [1] of
Shared Knowledge as a Wikimedia User Group [2]. They have been around
for almost a year, and their main interest is to develop free knowledge
and make it more accessible, especially in the Macedonian language.
Hoi,
I alone have contributed millions of edits thanks to Magnus's tools. The
whole GLAM phenomenon relies on our volunteers and on the GLAM-wiki
toolset. When you consider their proven importance it is difficult, if not
impossible, to understand why all such tools have been given the Cinderella
Dear Rodrigo,
The requirements for WUGs are very simple and the Affiliation Committee
has been working recently on making the process of renewing the
recognition of WUGs as straighforward as possible, since it is something
relatively new and we have seen there is plenty of room for
Messaggio inoltrato
Oggetto: [Commons-l] Help fund a macro lens for a Commons contributor
Data: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 12:26:05 +
Mittente: Tomasz W. Kozłowski twkozlow...@gmail.com
Rispondi-a: Wikimedia Commons Discussion List
common...@lists.wikimedia.org
A:
I am a dev and am willing to replace a tool when it dies. I have a fairly
large infrastructure of code that makes it fairly easy
On Sunday, February 22, 2015, WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@gmail.com
wrote:
One of the areas that I would like to see the foundation putting in money
is for
Hey Daniela,
I saw that the prices on the Hotel website are cheaper (78 euro). Would you
advise to book directly trough them?
*Regards,Itzik Edri*
Chairperson, Wikimedia Israel
+972-(0)-54-5878078 | http://www.wikimedia.org.il
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share
Hey Daniela,
I saw that the prices on the Hotel website are cheaper (78 euro). Would you
advise to book directly trough them?
*Regards,Itzik Edri*
Chairperson, Wikimedia Israel
+972-(0)-54-5878078 | http://www.wikimedia.org.il
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely
Hi Luis,
Thank you for agreeing to consider grant funding for software projects.
It sounds like you also plan a broader review of funding for community
needs and growth. I have a list of requests for changes, which boil down to
removing policy barriers and greatly improving communications and
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Luis,
Thank you for agreeing to consider grant funding for software projects.
It sounds like you also plan a broader review of funding for community
needs and growth.
Yes. The timeline is still somewhat up in the air,
WereSpielChequers wrote:
One of the areas that I would like to see the foundation putting in money
is for the running and maintenance of wanted orphan bots.
I think specific examples might help here. If we're talking about category
renaming bots or talk page archiving bots, I wouldn't mind if
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Lila Tretikov l...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Dear Wikimedians,
Among the WMF’s top priorities for 2015 is strengthening our engagement with
Wikimedia editors and volunteers. Today we are taking the first step by
bringing together the people who know our
As some of you know, we are working on the project [1] with Matica
srpska [2]. Basically, that opens numerous possibilities and here is
one of them.
My professor, a Board member of Matica srpska and one of two
co-authors of the Normative Grammar of Serbian Language wants to open
the Grammar.
Dear all,
We are glad to announce that the Affiliations Committee has recognised
[1] Wikimedia Community User Group Georgia [2] as a Wikimedia User
Group. They have been around for some time, working on disseminating
free knowledge in Georgia, but they have decided to join forces. Among
On Sunday, 22 February 2015, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
As some of you know, we are working on the project [1] with Matica
srpska [2]. Basically, that opens numerous possibilities and here is
one of them.
My professor, a Board member of Matica srpska and one of two
co-authors of
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Oliver Keyes ironho...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm finding this a bit difficult to parse; am I interpreting it correctly
if I read it as: because the project is to produce a prescriptive,
normative grammar, there's a desired No Derivatives element of any adopted
15 matches
Mail list logo