When I start from this page:
http://wikiedu.org/blog/2014/11/07/user-testing-assignment-design-wizard/
and I click the wizard.wikiedu.org
http://wikiedu.org/blog/2014/11/07/user-testing-assignment-design-wizard/wizard.wikiedu.org
link I arrive in a page which says:
This is somewhat embarrassing,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Ilario Valdelli valde...@gmail.com wrote:
When I start from this page:
http://wikiedu.org/blog/2014/11/07/user-testing-assignment-design-wizard/
and I click the wizard.wikiedu.org
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Indeed, highly specialized tools for the cultural and education sector
_are_ being developed and hosted inside Tool Labs or externally.
Looking at the current OAuth consumer requests [5], there are
submissions for a
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Chapters and GLAM tooling
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:45:50 -0700
From: Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org
Reply-To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Just pinging
-2015_round1/Wikimedia_CH/Proposal_form#Offline_Dissemination_Program
*
[2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Kiwix_-_Wikipedia_Offline
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Chapters and GLAM tooling
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:45:50 -0700
From: Erik Moeller e
Erik Moeller wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:16 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Labs is a playground and Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums are
serious enough to warrant a proper investment of resources, in my view.
Magnus and many others develop magnificent tools, but my
Erik Moeller wrote:
I'm not seeing any developer contract time allocated to GLAM tooling
work yet. At the same time I'm seeing reports of breakage and missing
functionality in important tools running in Labs. To the extent that
this breakage is due to Labs infrastructure or access to data, it's
Hoi,
There are several issues and imho the one Erik mentions is crucial. When no
money is intended for GLAM tool related work, nothing will happen. The
situation will remain one where everybody is eying each other... are you
going to make a move ... are you?
If you are all for a comprehensive
MZMcBride, 25/10/2014 16:16:
But again, the focus would be
integrating into the Wikimedia technical platform and fixing issues in
production, rather than trying to make Labs scripts and tools better.
False dichotomy IMHO. Usual example:*
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/42259 Quite clearly
Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
MZMcBride, 25/10/2014 16:16:
But again, the focus would be
integrating into the Wikimedia technical platform and fixing issues in
production, rather than trying to make Labs scripts and tools better.
False dichotomy IMHO. Usual example:*
On 10/25/2014 01:50 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
[...] that probably doesn't mean investing in Labs, exactly.
Not if you want to have a long-term, substantive impact, in my opinion.
I'd like to address that particular recurrent canard here, if I may.
Things that reside in labs are empathically /not/
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:16 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Labs is a playground and Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums are
serious enough to warrant a proper investment of resources, in my view.
Magnus and many others develop magnificent tools, but my sense is that
they're
Just pinging this thread -- looking through all the proposals for
annual plan grants:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Proposals/2014-2015_round1/Wikimedia_%C3%96sterreich/Proposal_form
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:APG/Proposals/2014-2015_round1/Wikimedia_UK/Proposal_form
Similarly to what you are describing, Micru, BeWelcome has a process to
identify issues and resolve them in a community discussion. It’s a sort of
communal product specification/design.
The process looks like: [1]
1/ firstly, community members can submit issues or product ideas,
2/ secondly,
I will add this to my ever-growing list of possible projects for Cascadia.
There are a few other projects under consideration that have received
little WMF support but I feel are movement-aligned and would interest the
public or the contributor base.
In order for Cascadia to work on these
Thanks Erik,
This is certainly something we are keen to work on. I was talking to Magnus
just last night and of course our experience with Europeana has taught us a
lot )I hope we have fully learnt the messages!).
We are undertaking a scoping review of our Development plans at the moment
and this
Just as a quick update from WMCH - we are currently discussing our
strategy/priorities for the 2015-20 cycle and yes, we plan to decide over
the Summer whether we want to ramp up our development activities or not.
We will, of course, keep you guys posted.
2014-06-26 10:29 GMT+02:00 Jon Davies
Hi Erik,
I would remember that in IEG or PEG there are several proposals of software
development but every time these proposals don't offer a well defined
approach to the maintenance.
We know that maintenance is an important phase of the software development
and it would be good to know if the
Dear Erik,
(Also copying in the Cultural Partners and GLAMwiki Toolset mailing lists
as Erik's email below is directly is related to them).
Thank you for this email with the explicit invitation for groups in the
Wikimedia movement to directly take responsibility for supporting the
technology
Erik (and others), is there any coordination page where groups could place,
take, or discuss requests for development or requests for maintenance?
I saw often that sometimes the hard-to-achieve consensus is found, but
there is no way to evaluate the idea further. What now happens is:
- several
Hi folks,
At the Zurich Hackathon, I met with a couple of folks from WM-CH who
were interested in talking about ways that chapters can get involved
in engineering/product development, similar to WM-DE's work on
Wikidata.
My recommendation to them was to consider working on GLAM-related
tooling.
21 matches
Mail list logo
