Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-09-02 Thread Adrian Raddatz
Hi all, Just to let you know, User:KTC has been selected as the new interim chair of the elections committee. A permanent chair will be selected once all advisers and members are in place. This change has been reflected at <

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-08-25 Thread Dariusz Jemielniak
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Risker wrote: > I am also curious whether the committee members (and by extension the WMF > staff and Board liaisons) have undertaken to not run in the next election. > Given that the Committee is tasked with reviewing and potentially

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-08-25 Thread Risker
Thank you to those of you who have volunteered in this role. I have a lot of faith in all of you to improve on the groundwork that was done in the recent past, and am particularly glad that you should have sufficient time to consider and test different voting systems - something that the last two

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-07-26 Thread Pete Forsyth
Sorry to post twice -- I spoke too soon with "single greatest opportunity." An acknowledgment of community members' positive role in addressing the Superprotect debacle is another important opportunity that should not be missed. -Pete [[User:Peteforsyth]] On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Pete

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-07-26 Thread Dariusz Jemielniak
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:22 AM, WereSpielChequers < werespielchequ...@gmail.com> wrote: > Pine has a point. We all know that the founder seat will go eventually. > Whether it goes on the death or incapacity of the founder or earlier is a > valid question for the board and the community. I'm not

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-07-26 Thread WereSpielChequers
>2. Re: New Elections Committee (Pine W) >3. Re: New Elections Committee (Gerard Meijssen) > > > > > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 21:53:59 -0700 > From: Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee > Message-ID: >

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-07-26 Thread Peter Southwood
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee Hoi, I really hope that the question is not answered and when answered the answer is no. I am so sick and tired of this nonsense. It never stops and there is supposed to be only one answer. There are two alternatives; no answer and not as you like

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-07-26 Thread Pine W
Hi Gerard, I agree with you that there are many important issues, and as you mentioned one of them is the quality of our products and services. However, I am keenly aware of governance issues at WMF and how they affect the rest of the ecosystem. WMF is a single point of failure (an issue which I

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-07-25 Thread Christophe Henner
That I definitly will :) And at the end of the day we will make a decision and provide reasoning. Just wanted to give you my personal opinion too. And I really did miss the question, sorry about that. Have a great day, Le 26 juil. 2016 7:50 AM, "Pine W" a écrit : > In

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-07-25 Thread Pine W
In the time that it took me to compose my answer to Gerard's question, Christophe answered. (: Christophe, I am glad to hear that this will be a part of the governance review. I would suggest keeping an open mind about this and letting the process take its course. Pine On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-07-25 Thread Pine W
Hi Gerard, I am listening, to you and to others. I believe that others are listening as well. I would ask that you respect that there may be differing perspectives. I hope that we will hear soon from the BGC in the spirit of openness and transparency. They may wish to respond in personal

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-07-25 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, I really hope that the question is not answered and when answered the answer is no. I am so sick and tired of this nonsense. It never stops and there is supposed to be only one answer. There are two alternatives; no answer and not as you like it. Thanks, GerardM On 26 July 2016 at

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-07-25 Thread Pine W
Hi BGC, I asked a question earlier in this thread which seems to have been overlooked. Is the BGC (or the Board as a whole) considering whether the Founder's seat will become an elected seat in the forseeable future? Pine On Jul 20, 2016 21:20, "Pine W" wrote: > Thanks

Re: [Wikimedia-l] New Elections Committee

2016-07-21 Thread Chris Keating
Great news! Congratulations to the incoming Standing Election Committee and many thanks to the outgoing (non-standing; sitting?) one. (I will save the lengthy explanation of my favoured voting system for another occasion ;) ) Chris On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Dariusz Jemielniak