I think having a two part RfC with the first part discussing the minimum
conditions the community would like VE to meet before having a discussion about
more widely enabling VE in the second portion of the RfC makes sense. This
raises the possibility that as VE becomes more and more functional
(META: I have to wonder why Wikimedia-l was chosen as the venue for this
conversation. Visual Editor is deployed and working in quite a few of our
projects, including very active ones and difficult ones such as the
right-to-left Hebrew Wikipedia; this discussion, then, is very much about
the
Asaf, I agree in some ways. ENWP's email list is a backwater though, and since
the discussion that got me thinking about this issue started on this list it
made sense to me to keep it on this list. Also, other wikis' experiences with
VE are relevant. My personal experience with VE has most
Hoi,
There should not be separate standards for Commons and any Wikipedia is
surely what you mean...
Thanks,
GerardM
On 4 June 2014 22:17, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
Asaf, I agree in some ways. ENWP's email list is a backwater though, and
since the discussion that got me
GerardM,
Yes, if Asaf or someone else wanted to have a low-frequency discussion about VE
on Hebrew Wikipedia or some other wiki on this list I think that would be ok
too. IMO this is a high-traffic general-purpose list, but Asaf is right that
taking discussions to a more specific place is
On 3 June 2014 03:02, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
Because VE has repeatedly been mentioned in this list as something that is
improving and may help us with acquisition of editors and their knowledge,
I have started to draft an RfC about re-enabling VE on English Wikipedia.
I am
On 3 June 2014 09:05, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2014 03:02, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
Because VE has repeatedly been mentioned in this list as something that
is improving and may help us with acquisition of editors and their
knowledge, I have started to
Sounds like your suggestion would be a perfect contribution to some kind of
community discussion to try and decide a framework to decide if or when we
might want to re-deploy visual editor, much like Pine was suggesting in the
first place :-)
*Edward Saperia*
Chief Coordinator Wikimania London
On 3 June 2014 12:25, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2014 16:37, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, further to what I've said aboveI think that before having an
RFC,
we should seek community assistance to carry out a small-scale study so
that there is some
Thanks Ed. The point I am trying to make is that the community can't make
a good decision on this unless they understand the VisualEditor product as
it exists today. I think pretty much everyone agrees it wasn't ready for
default editing on 1 July 2013, but absent recent data most people would
On 3 June 2014 08:02, ENWP Pine deyntest...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have started to draft an RfC about re-enabling VE on English Wikipedia
URL?
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
Hey Risker, Pine, David, all,
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2014 12:25, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2014 16:37, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, further to what I've said aboveI think that before having an
12 matches
Mail list logo
