Hubertl, 18/06/2013 07:00:
Hi Johan, Anders Wennersten says:
And as shown earlier we have learned that this actually helps recruting
and keeping editors
???
It is difficult to draw conclusions about user behavior. The more
difficult it is to say something about the behavior of persons, which
I am happy to see that you, as well as Hubertl, is happy to go on as you
always have done. I do not have the ambition to change your view on
life, but to reach out to others open to the new opportunities that
automation gives us in better reahing our aim free knowledge for all
The base fact
On 18/06/13 01:04, Martin Rulsch wrote:
As far as I know, that's even planned by the Wikidata team.
It isn't exactly planned by the Wikidata tema, a volunteer would need to
do it.
2013/6/18 Ziko van Dijk vand...@wmnederland.nl
Hello,
I am also unhappy with the mail from Hubertl, and also
Anders Wennersten, 18/06/2013 09:00:
I am happy to see that you, as well as Hubertl, is happy to go on as you
always have done. I do not have the ambition to change your view on
life, [...]
To clarify, my view on life didn't include any item about bot article
creation last time I checked.
Fantastic - and fascinating.
Would love to see a blog post by someone from the chapter or by one of
them.
Bravo for reaching out to forgotten people.
Bishakha
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles - How beautiful. Thank you for doing and sharing
This is a really wonderful project, I am a big believer in producing
educational opportunities to gaoled prisoners so that they can lead more
productive lives upon their release, and hopefully this project goes a
little way towards making that happen.
Bravo, Wikimedia CH!
Cheers,
Craig Franklin
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Nikola Smolenski smole...@eunet.rs wrote:
On 18/06/13 01:04, Martin Rulsch wrote:
As far as I know, that's even planned by the Wikidata team.
It isn't exactly planned by the Wikidata tema, a volunteer would need to do
it.
What exactly are you talking about
Seriously, are we discussing again about bot stubs yes, bot stubs no?
Those users who want to submit complete 10-page articles, can move to the
defunct Nupedia or the 'vibrant' Citizendium.
This eternal discussion is so boring.
2013/6/18 Lydia Pintscher lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de
On Tue,
Hear, hear
Thanks,
GerardM
Op 18 jun. 2013 12:08 schreef Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada emi...@gmail.com
het volgende:
Seriously, are we discussing again about bot stubs yes, bot stubs no?
Those users who want to submit complete 10-page articles, can move to the
defunct Nupedia or the
2013-06-18, 00:57, skrev Ziko van Dijk:
Hello,
I am also unhappy with the mail from Hubertl, and also some remarks that
good be understood as a criticism of the German Wikipedia editing
community. Actually, both opinions coexist also in de.WP, although the anti
bot faction is obviously
I am a bit suprised about the lack of trying to understand and
develop mindsets here. I joined this mailing list the other day
in the belief that it was directed at discussing current topics
in the Wikimedia community in a constructive manner. So far I
have not found overwhelming proof of
Very good point. (Personally I think building a localised
Wikispecies – with the potential to grow – inside a
Wikipedia version is something good.)
Many thanks,
/Per
Wikipedia user Paracel63
2013-06-18, 14:50, skrev Gerard Meijssen:
Hear, hear
Thanks,
GerardM
Op 18 jun. 2013 12:08 schreef
Hi Per,
The discussions on this list can be heated, and not everyone is always
on their best behavior. All the caveats of debate on the Internet
apply, and any personality problems you might encounter on Wikimedia
projects occur on the lists as well. This is particularly so when, as
in this case,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Anders Wennersten m...@anderswennersten.se
wrote:
The base fact figures for sv:wp is
Increase of views +23% on yearly basis, WM:DE +3, WMF:Fr +8 (all mature
wikipediauser communities), nl with +14 and wm:it with +16 also very good
figures (Spain Russia, and
2013-06-18, 06:34, skrev Hubertl:
Loosing our original idea for which this project is donated by
thousands of donaters! From which you are paid for. As an
unpaid, long term Wikipedian in Residence I do know what I´m
talking about.
Hello!
I'm interested in knowing more of your experience
On 18 June 2013 16:53, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
great to take advantage of the opportunity to monitor changes in the sv-wp
community as a result of this massive automated article creation.
For me it would be interesting to know:
[suggestions for metrics]
Otherwise the same
Many thanks for the resumé. I thought it would be like this, as
I've followed the development of the different wikipedias
(content and key factors) since 2008. BTW, is there a
(searchable) list archive?
Best of wishes,
/Per
2013-06-18, 17:29, skrev Nathan:
Hi Per,
The discussions on this
Great idea! I'm going to try a way of doing this, through svwp and/or WMSE.
Best of wishes,
/Per
Wikipedia user Paracel63
2013-06-18, 17:53, skrev David Cuenca:
Instead of just discussing this topic as always has been done, it would be
great to take advantage of the opportunity to monitor
Per A.J. Andersson, 18/06/2013 18:05:
Many thanks for the resumé. I thought it would be like this, as I've
followed the development of the different wikipedias (content and key
factors) since 2008. BTW, is there a (searchable) list archive?
My project does not aim to be an expansive database like Wikidata. The goal
of my project is create the *periodic table* for economics readable to
laypersons. To my knowledge, no other economist has attempted to make a
'periodic table' for economics.
I demand that my project gets global
Many consider a unsubscription link that requires more than two clicks (one
click on the link, maybe one more on an 'are you sure' or 'confirm' button) to
be bad. Could be a software limitation on the mailing list service we are using.
Regards,
Benjamin Chen / [[User:Bencmq]]
On 17 Jun, 2013,
Many others consider a unsubscription link that requires more than two
clicks (one click on the link, and one more on an 'are you sure' or
'confirm' button) to be good, so that you not accidentily unsubscribe.
*Med vänliga hälsningar,
Jan Ainali*
Verksamhetschef, Wikimedia Sverige
Many consider that there are too many newbies on Internet that gets angry
too easily and don't have patience with trivial things.
Tom
--
Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom)
OKFN Brasil - Rede pelo Conhecimento Livre
http://br.okfn.org
___
Wikimedia-l
Hi all,
a friend of mine is moderating a debate about Wikipedia for diplomat,
professor Marília Maciel, and I think it is of interested of some
wikimedians. Please, see more infomation bellow
http://www.diplomacy.edu/calendar/webinar-wikipedia-diplomats
Diplo Foundation has cood courses on
That would be very interesting and useful information
Cheers,
Peter (User:Pbsouthwood)
- Original Message -
From: David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Mailing List wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Swedish Wikipedia
Everton Zanella Alvarenga wrote:
http://www.diplomacy.edu/calendar/webinar-wikipedia-diplomats
Is it just me who was surprised to see that Bence will be representing
the Affiliations Committee during that webinar? I know for a fact that
AffCom involves a lot of behind–the–scenes talks et
I will be representing myself as a Wikimedia volunteer, who happens to hold
a title related to AffCom and has a somewhat theoretical education of what
diplomacy is supposed to be.
I hope I am not totally unqualified to speak about the Wikipedia topics.
The webinar will be broadcast using Google
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Tomasz W. Kozlowski tom...@twkozlowski.net
wrote:
Bence Damokos wrote:
I hope I am not totally unqualified to speak about the Wikipedia topics.
Quite the contrary, I think you're very knowledgeable about the
subject—but what does AffCom have to do with
Bence Damokos wrote:
I hope I am not totally unqualified to speak about the Wikipedia topics.
Quite the contrary, I think you're very knowledgeable about the
subject—but what does AffCom have to do with it? If you're going to talk
about Wikipedia's role in disseminating information about
Thanks Everton, I will be sure to join the Webinar.
How can diplomats contribute to improve Wikipedia articles to increase
their public diplomacy value?
I am doing a Wikipedia project that is highly related to this issue that
attempts to standardize economic data on Wikipedia for every country
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Everton Zanella Alvarenga
everton.alvare...@okfn.org wrote:
It'd be great to see wikimedians there. Tom
Did anybody get their talk accepted? Not me. Still considering to go
though, espeially if other here are planning to attend as well.
The schedule so far:
Update:
We've added an enhancement to Wikipedia Zero so that if a user who isn't on
a participating carrier network navigates to a Wikipedia Zero page on
language.zero.wikipedia.org, such as
http://en.zero.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muse_%28band%29 , the user will be
presented an option to visit the
SJ:
As we may be very close to having a Board of Trustee approved budget, I
suggest we wait until we can release the full Annual Plan document on July
1, so that there is context for the Wikimedia Foundation spending plan for
FY 13-14.
Regards,
Garfield
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Samuel
Project Home page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_Economic_Map
The goal of my project is create the *periodic table* for economics
readable to laypersons. To my knowledge, no other economist has attempted
to make a 'periodic table' for economics. I am using Wikipedia as a
platform for
Hi Alex, just curious - since you refer to yourself as an economist,
what institution(s) are you affiliated with?
And can you explain how writing Economy of X articles, no matter how
detailed, will solve the problem of uneven resource distribution
around the world?
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:13
Very cool.
I'm curious, did the prison have any concerns about content or want
things filtered out?
I've know that some prisons don't allow reading material that is
sexual, violent, etc. Did restrictions like that have to be
considered? Obviously, most of Wikipedia is pretty mundane, but if
I want to clarify that I am not a professional economist. I am a financial
economics major at Western Washington University.
These 'Economy of X' are designed for laypersons to see the economic
reality of the world. I believe if the public were more informed on
economics, we would better chance
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Alex Peek alexpe...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
These 'Economy of X' are designed for laypersons to see the economic
reality of the world.
So it could be considered a set of articles for http://simple.wikipedia.org?
Cheers,
Micru
Thank you I will set that up
On 18 June 2013 20:40, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Alex Peek alexpe...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
These 'Economy of X' are designed for laypersons to see the economic
reality of the world.
So it could be considered
39 matches
Mail list logo
