"I know most on this list use their real names. " < not everyone, most
of us believe MZMcBride is not even a dude!! :O ...
oh and welcome banned user \\//
meh, you are not a wikipedian unless you have been banned or blocked
atleast once..
On 6/5/14, MZMcBride wrote:
> Trillium Corsage wrote:
>>
In many recent discussions in Wikimedia Commons, I noticed that many of our
media contributors are not well aware of the terms of licenses they grant.
Main confusions are in three areas:
1. Attribution: Many people think we can demand attribution near the work
used in off wiki cases. But according
Trillium Corsage wrote:
>Just to say hello and introduce myself to the list. I'm a research
>professional seven years experience hoping to break into the legal field.
>I'm not 25 or anything like that though. I've done other stuff in my
>life, and I am middle-aged. How do I come here to the list? I
Congrats!
On 2 June 2014 15:50, Amy Vossbrinck wrote:
> Very nice work!!
>
> Take good care, Amy
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Cristian Consonni >
> wrote:
>
> > > Today, our organization celebrates anniversary - 5 years from the date
> > > of creation.
> > >
> > > Exactly 5 years
GerardM,
Yes, if Asaf or someone else wanted to have a low-frequency discussion about VE
on Hebrew Wikipedia or some other wiki on this list I think that would be ok
too. IMO this is a high-traffic general-purpose list, but Asaf is right that
taking discussions to a more specific place is appre
Hoi,
There should not be separate standards for Commons and any Wikipedia is
surely what you mean...
Thanks,
GerardM
On 4 June 2014 22:17, ENWP Pine wrote:
> Asaf, I agree in some ways. ENWP's email list is a backwater though, and
> since the discussion that got me thinking about this issu
Asaf, I agree in some ways. ENWP's email list is a backwater though, and since
the discussion that got me thinking about this issue started on this list it
made sense to me to keep it on this list. Also, other wikis' experiences with
VE are relevant. My personal experience with VE has most recen
(META: I have to wonder why Wikimedia-l was chosen as the venue for this
conversation. Visual Editor is deployed and working in quite a few of our
projects, including very active ones and "difficult" ones such as the
right-to-left Hebrew Wikipedia; this discussion, then, is very much about
the Eng
I think having a two part RfC with the first part discussing the minimum
conditions the community would like VE to meet before having a discussion about
more widely enabling VE in the second portion of the RfC makes sense. This
raises the possibility that as VE becomes more and more functional t
Hi Wikimedia-l,
Just to say hello and introduce myself to the list. I'm a research professional
seven years experience hoping to break into the legal field. I'm not 25 or
anything like that though. I've done other stuff in my life, and I am
middle-aged. How do I come here to the list? I was a W
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
> Is there any thought of making metrics updates more machine-readable,
> exposing data/metrics/timelines? Right now the excellent data is
> flattened into slides, and then further flattened into a single pdf.
>
If anyone is seeking more data
(note any comments here are entirely my own personal opinion)
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Mike Godwin wrote:
> The ECJ said the
> right "to be forgotten" applies when the data aggregated "appear to be
> inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive in relation
> to the purpose
Àlex Hinojo, 04/06/2014 16:50:
Oh thanks! Didn't know it was moved to wmflabs and improved so well!
Yes, that's thanks to the renewed efforts by User:Henrik
(stats.grok.se):
https://bitbucket.org/magnusmanske/glamtools/issue/3/treeviews-unchained
Nemo
__
Chris writes:
> I think there's a philosophical issue about "privacy" here. As far as I can
> see the ECJ interprets "privacy" as "the right to enjoy a private life", and
> sees any party holding a significant amount of data about a private
> individual without good reason as a potential infringem
Hi, guys.
I just wanted to remind you that the FDC staff are hosting an office hour
in about 15 minutes. For information on how to attend, please see
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IRC_office_hours
I hope to see you there!
Maggie
--
Maggie Dennis
Senior Community Advocate
Wikimedia Foundation,
+1. These are an amazing resource for understanding what's happening.
Thanks to Tilman and the teams who put these together.
Is there any thought of making metrics updates more machine-readable,
exposing data/metrics/timelines? Right now the excellent data is
flattened into slides, and then furt
>
> Whatever "the right to be forgotten" may turn out to be, it's not
> about publication of previously unpublished information. Ergo, it's
> not about "invasion of privacy," broadly speaking. The opinion makes
> clear that one can publish true, accurate, already-published
> information and neverth
??? writes:
>On 02/06/2014 21:14, Mike Godwin wrote:
>>
>> Google has a clear purpose too, and it was no defense. Plus, there is
>> a public-interest argument in favor of eschewing the erasure of true,
>> accurate public data that happens to be old.
>>
>
>There is nothing in the judgement about er
Hello Alex,
WikiProject Medicine on English discusses this issue in various ways.
Consider posting this message on that project's talk page.
The most prominent international project is with the Translation Task
Force, in which there is a coordinated international effort to get 80
medical articles
Just wondering whether there is going to be a bigger announcement of
Wikimania 2015 going to be in Mexico City, than its appearance in the
WM2014 programme
https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Programme
If the decision is announced on [[m:Wikimania 2015]] by the green text, I
think that is a v
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 00:56:07 +1000, billinghurst
wrote:
> Just wondering whether there is going to be a bigger announcement of
> Wikimania 2015 going to be in Mexico City, than its appearance in the
> WM2014 programme
> https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Programme
>
> If the decision is ann
Oh thanks! Didn't know it was moved to wmflabs and improved so well!
2014-06-04 16:06 GMT+02:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) :
> Àlex Hinojo, 04/06/2014 15:35:
>
> Do you know if there is a tool for that?
>>
>> - tracking which are the most visited articles in a category tree on a
>> wiki
>>
>
> http
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Nathan wrote:
> How would an affiliate have the ability to sign any agreements for the
> delivery of WMF content? The agreements cover access to WMF-owned websites.
> I can see local affiliates being helpful with translation, advice and
> communication support etc.
Àlex Hinojo, 04/06/2014 15:35:
Do you know if there is a tool for that?
- tracking which are the most visited articles in a category tree on a wiki
https://tools.wmflabs.org/glamtools/treeviews/
https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/ (if you're lucky and they share
a title prefix; can work
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:54 AM, David Cuenca wrote:
> A question to Yana et al.:
>
> Is there any reason for the WMF to promote/sign Zero agreements instead of
> the local chapters/user groups?
>
> I mean, if that ability was subsidized to the chapters we could have a
> different strategy dependi
A question to Yana et al.:
Is there any reason for the WMF to promote/sign Zero agreements instead of
the local chapters/user groups?
I mean, if that ability was subsidized to the chapters we could have a
different strategy depending on the country, because:
- in some places the benefits of promo
Hi,
Amical is just drafting its very first collaboration with a Hospital, in
order to improve MED articles on ca.wiki
The doctors comittée asked us, in order to optimize efforts, if we knew
which are the most visited articles medicine related, so they can start
putting their efforts there
Do you
On 06/04/2014 02:36 AM, rupert THURNER wrote:
> @labs
> Could you please provide a reference why labs can be misused?
The problem with Zero-rating (all of) labs is that there is no
constraint on the actual nature of the content that is provided there.
While we /do/ have rules about what is and is
Thanks for sharing, Tilman!
(These are really useful pages, and nice to see them continue to be
maintained).
Best regards,
Bence
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Tilman Bayer wrote:
> Minutes and slides from last week's quarterly review of the
> Foundation's Mobile Contributions team are now a
Hi all,
please spread the word: Tools only on Tool Labs from July 1
About one year ago, we, Wikimedia Deutschland e. V., announced June 30th
as the deadline of the Toolserver migration (Roadmap at [1]). This
deadline is approaching. The Toolserver will stop working on June 30th.
What will happen
30 matches
Mail list logo
