Re: [Wikimedia-l] While Election committee counts the votes...
That's great! I'm not complaining about the list of voters being made public (I actually support this!). I'm just pointing out that this wasn't made clear when votes were being cast. Something to improve next time around? Thanks, Mike On 3 Jun 2015, at 23:31, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote: There's been a publicly viewable list of voters for every SecurePoll based election or vote since the time of its creation. Until 2013, BoT voter lists were usually available for several months after the election, until the external host cleared them off (usually just before the next election). The voter lists for English Wikipedia's arbitration committee elections going back to 2009 are still available. The 2013 WMF elections (BoT, FDC, FDC ombud on a single ballot) continue to be publicly viewable on votewiki. There may have been other project-specific uses of which I'm not aware. Risker/Anne On 3 June 2015 at 18:14, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote: At the link, you can find List votes: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections 2015 https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/512 I personally don't mind it being made public that I voted in this election, but this really is something that voters should be clearly informed about when they place their votes! Thanks, Mike ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/guidelineswikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] While Election committee counts the votes...
small in my humble opinion, what's the big deal? we usually vote openly in the projects and everything bad/great about this or that user is revealed really openly (sometimes too openly, but well... nothing to be done here) it is our own decision whether to vote and how to vote, isn't it? /small best, antanana ED of Wikimedia Ukraine 2015-06-04 1:14 GMT+03:00 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net: At the link, you can find List votes: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections 2015 https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/512 I personally don't mind it being made public that I voted in this election, but this really is something that voters should be clearly informed about when they place their votes! Thanks, Mike ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] While Election committee counts the votes...
On 3 Jun 2015, at 23:48, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2015 at 18:42, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
By the way, my understanding is that the practice of generating a public
list of voters who cast ballots, while keeping the nature of their votes
private, is relatively common in election processes in general. In the
United States, political parties use this information for their get out
the vote campaigns so that they know which of their likely supporters
have
yet to vote.
In UK political elections I think that would be illegal...{{citation
needed}}
They certainly exist in Canada, and I'm quite certain they exist in the UK
as well, because that's how the official poll watchers (or scrutineers, as
we call them in Canada) know who to get out when getting out the
vote. They don't get published online, but there is a right to examine
the list of individuals who can vote at the office of the local senior
election official for a few weeks afterward, and then at the national
election office once any challenges have been completed. Of course in
places where voting is mandatory, the failure to vote is going to be public.
Wow. I'm very far from being an expert on the UK voting system, but my
understanding is that although the list of who can vote may be made public
(where voters have agreed to this), who has not yet voted (or, after the fact,
who has not voted) would never be made public. In the UK, election scrutineers
would only be involved in reviewing votes that had been cast, not who had not
voted.
Thanks,
Mike
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] While Election committee counts the votes...
On 3 June 2015 at 19:11, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
On 3 Jun 2015, at 23:48, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2015 at 18:42, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
By the way, my understanding is that the practice of generating a
public
list of voters who cast ballots, while keeping the nature of their
votes
private, is relatively common in election processes in general. In the
United States, political parties use this information for their get
out
the vote campaigns so that they know which of their likely supporters
have
yet to vote.
In UK political elections I think that would be illegal...{{citation
needed}}
They certainly exist in Canada, and I'm quite certain they exist in the
UK
as well, because that's how the official poll watchers (or scrutineers,
as
we call them in Canada) know who to get out when getting out the
vote. They don't get published online, but there is a right to examine
the list of individuals who can vote at the office of the local senior
election official for a few weeks afterward, and then at the national
election office once any challenges have been completed. Of course in
places where voting is mandatory, the failure to vote is going to be
public.
Wow. I'm very far from being an expert on the UK voting system, but my
understanding is that although the list of who can vote may be made public
(where voters have agreed to this), who has not yet voted (or, after the
fact, who has not voted) would never be made public. In the UK, election
scrutineers would only be involved in reviewing votes that had been cast,
not who had not voted.
It occurred to me that there's this really great online reference source
called Wikipedia that's generally pretty accurate when it comes to things
like this, so I looked up Electoral roll. In the UK, [a]fter an
election a 'Marked Register' can be inspected, which is a copy of the
register used for the election with a mark by each elector that has
voted.[1]
As I said...while it's generally accurate, sometimes it's incomplete. I
note the absence of any information about Canada there, although it is
fairly close to the UK system as discussed in the article.
Risker/Anne
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_roll#United_Kingdom
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] While Election committee counts the votes...
By the way, my understanding is that the practice of generating a public
list of voters who cast ballots, while keeping the nature of their votes
private, is relatively common in election processes in general. In the
United States, political parties use this information for their get out
the vote campaigns so that they know which of their likely supporters have
yet to vote.
In UK political elections I think that would be illegal...{{citation needed}}
Thanks,
Mike
___
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikitech-l] [Pywikipedia-l] Fwd: API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for action=query will change at the end of this month
OK, just ones off hand that are already filed phab tickets for: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T57007 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T66835 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T66833 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T59995 https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T57881 And honestly your response to the last ticket is uncalled for. The user filed a report about missing features from compat, your response was basically We dont care, fix it yourself. On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Amir Ladsgroup ladsgr...@gmail.com wrote: Can you name one? On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:02 AM John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote: This is something that the pywiki devs need to fix in compat. Please dont give me shit about moving to core. I have yet to have it not fatally error out in less than 10 minutes of using it. There are still a lot of features that core doesnt have, or that are poorly implemented. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote: Forwarding because of the significance of the change for bots. My understanding is that this affects all wikis, so please get this information out to relevant bot operators on all wikis. Translated messages may be very much appreciated. Pine -- Forwarded message -- From: Brad Jorsch (Anomie) bjor...@wikimedia.org Date: Jun 2, 2015 1:43 PM Subject: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for action=query will change at the end of this month To: Wikimedia developers wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org, mediawiki-api-annou...@lists.wikimedia.org Cc: As has been announced several times (most recently at https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-April/081559.html ), the default continuation mode for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. *The date is now set:* we intend to merge the change to ride the deployment train at the end of June. That should be 1.26wmf12, to be deployed to test wikis on June 30, non-Wikipedias on July 1, and Wikipedias on July 2. If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen here https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=querylist=allpages, for example), it's time to fix your code! - The simple solution is to simply include the rawcontinue parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data ( example https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=querylist=allpagesrawcontinue=1 ). No other code changes should be necessary. - Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=querylist=allpagescontinue= ), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly. Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning. I've compiled a list of bots that have hit the deprecation warning more than 1 times over the course of the week May 23-29. If you are responsible for any of these bots, please fix them. If you know who is, please make sure they've seen this notification. Thanks. AAlertBot AboHeidiBot AbshirBot Acebot Ameenbot ArnauBot Beau.bot Begemot-Bot BeneBot* BeriBot BOT-Superzerocool CalakBot CamelBot CandalBot CategorizationBot CatWatchBot ClueBot_III ClueBot_NG CobainBot CorenSearchBot Cyberbot_I Cyberbot_II DanmicholoBot DeltaQuadBot Dexbot Dibot EdinBot ElphiBot ErfgoedBot Faebot Fatemibot FawikiPatroller HAL HasteurBot HerculeBot Hexabot HRoestBot IluvatarBot Invadibot Irclogbot Irfan-bot Jimmy-abot JYBot Krdbot Legobot Lowercase_sigmabot_III MahdiBot MalarzBOT MastiBot Merge_bot NaggoBot NasirkhanBot NirvanaBot Obaid-bot PatruBOT PBot Phe-bot Rezabot RMCD_bot Shuaib-bot SineBot SteinsplitterBot SvickBOT TaxonBot Theo's_Little_Bot W2Bot WLE-SpainBot Xqbot YaCBot ZedlikBot ZkBot -- Brad Jorsch (Anomie) Software Engineer Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wikitech-l mailing list wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/guidelines%0dwikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ pywikibot mailing list pywiki...@lists.wikimedia.org
Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Spam] Re: While Election committee counts the votes...
On 3 June 2015 at 12:32, Anders Wennersten m...@anderswennersten.se wrote: As a number-crunching nerd myself I would love all my fellows with this interest to also be able to study the detailed numbers. But in order to keep secrecy of who voted, the figures for small project can not be made general available. And to work with the figures from the bigger and medium projects, probably a more qualified analysis of the quality of the numbers used would be needed, just along the reasoning you bring up. I might be misremembering, but I thought that whether or not user X had voted was public information? It certainly was in 2013; digging through old emails turns up a link to https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/290 which seems to be the voter list from that election. Andrew. -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] While Election committee counts the votes...
On 2015-06-01 11:17, Anders Wennersten wrote: Just a clarification on numbers In James (internal) table enwps share of total number of eligible votes is 35,4% Participation rate state from enwp was 8,26% against mean for all 9,5%. If enwp is excluded the participation rate for all of the rest stands at 10,2% Enwp users also include users from non-en countries, and user from en countries will also be found on other wikis like Commons (3,5% of total eligible voters, with a turnout similar to enwp) but this does not change the bottom line, participation rate from enwp has been lower then from the rest of the communities (de, fr, it, ru, es, pl rates being a little above mean of rest, zh and pt a little below and ja much below) Anders Hi Anders, are there significant intersections between the project which can distort statistics? I believe I am eligible on at least 10 projects, and on a couple of them I might be the only eligible voter (making for them 100% participation), but my feeling is that this is rather an exception. Is let us say a high participation rate from it.wp significally affected by users who are also active on en.wp and are eligible there as well? Cheers Yaroslav ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] While Election committee counts the votes...
While the total number of eligible voters is reliable (and also made general available), the breakdown of numbers by project is much less reliable, of the reason you bring up. And for the small, and even more the very small projects, the numbers could even be said to be unreliable. For us in the Election Committee, this breakdown per project, even with non-perfect figures, has been of enormous help. One use is when we verify the result - in order to understand inconsistencies in figures (and here we talk of a factor 2-3 in differences not in decimal points). Also to understand the general picture - The election to Board attracted voters evenly from all project all over the world, while the election of members to FDC got a much lower participation rate from most medium and small project compared with participation rate from some of the biggest (note also the difference in total votes 5200+ vs 1100). As a number-crunching nerd myself I would love all my fellows with this interest to also be able to study the detailed numbers. But in order to keep secrecy of who voted, the figures for small project can not be made general available. And to work with the figures from the bigger and medium projects, probably a more qualified analysis of the quality of the numbers used would be needed, just along the reasoning you bring up. I do hope, though, that some of these numbers will be made available in the election post-mortem work Anders Yaroslav M. Blanter skrev den 2015-06-03 11:49: On 2015-06-01 11:17, Anders Wennersten wrote: Just a clarification on numbers In James (internal) table enwps share of total number of eligible votes is 35,4% Participation rate state from enwp was 8,26% against mean for all 9,5%. If enwp is excluded the participation rate for all of the rest stands at 10,2% Enwp users also include users from non-en countries, and user from en countries will also be found on other wikis like Commons (3,5% of total eligible voters, with a turnout similar to enwp) but this does not change the bottom line, participation rate from enwp has been lower then from the rest of the communities (de, fr, it, ru, es, pl rates being a little above mean of rest, zh and pt a little below and ja much below) Anders Hi Anders, are there significant intersections between the project which can distort statistics? I believe I am eligible on at least 10 projects, and on a couple of them I might be the only eligible voter (making for them 100% participation), but my feeling is that this is rather an exception. Is let us say a high participation rate from it.wp significally affected by users who are also active on en.wp and are eligible there as well? Cheers Yaroslav ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Spam] Re: While Election committee counts the votes...
That's correct. The list of voters remains public, just not how individuals voted. In this way we can work out who is openly male/female, if they have a declared country of residence, if they are associated with chapters or other groups etc. Fae On 3 June 2015 at 12:42, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote: On 3 June 2015 at 12:32, Anders Wennersten m...@anderswennersten.se wrote: As a number-crunching nerd myself I would love all my fellows with this interest to also be able to study the detailed numbers. But in order to keep secrecy of who voted, the figures for small project can not be made general available. And to work with the figures from the bigger and medium projects, probably a more qualified analysis of the quality of the numbers used would be needed, just along the reasoning you bring up. I might be misremembering, but I thought that whether or not user X had voted was public information? It certainly was in 2013; digging through old emails turns up a link to https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/290 which seems to be the voter list from that election. Andrew. -- fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] While Election committee counts the votes...
On 3 June 2015 at 13:26, Anders Wennersten m...@anderswennersten.se wrote: ... This is new information for me. We have had a similar but extended list like this to have as base for vote checking. But I am not aware it will be generally available. At the start this year we discussed what type of voting method to use, like all open as done for stewardelection or with secure Poll with S/N/O. We had an overwhelming majority for non-total open one. But we never discussed general availability of this list. Anders Unless the wider community of Wikimedians has established a consensus to a process change, the list should be published as it has in past years. This has been my full expectation, I even ran some male/female analysis of past lists for research. Fae -- fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] While Election committee counts the votes...
Andrew Gray skrev den 2015-06-03 13:42: I might be misremembering, but I thought that whether or not user X had voted was public information? It certainly was in 2013; digging through old emails turns up a link to https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/290 which seems to be the voter list from that election. Andrew. This is new information for me. We have had a similar but extended list like this to have as base for vote checking. But I am not aware it will be generally available. At the start this year we discussed what type of voting method to use, like all open as done for stewardelection or with secure Poll with S/N/O. We had an overwhelming majority for non-total open one. But we never discussed general availability of this list. Anders ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Pywikipedia-l] Fwd: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for action=query will change at the end of this month
Can you name one? On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:02 AM John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote: This is something that the pywiki devs need to fix in compat. Please dont give me shit about moving to core. I have yet to have it not fatally error out in less than 10 minutes of using it. There are still a lot of features that core doesnt have, or that are poorly implemented. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Pine W wiki.p...@gmail.com wrote: Forwarding because of the significance of the change for bots. My understanding is that this affects all wikis, so please get this information out to relevant bot operators on all wikis. Translated messages may be very much appreciated. Pine -- Forwarded message -- From: Brad Jorsch (Anomie) bjor...@wikimedia.org Date: Jun 2, 2015 1:43 PM Subject: [Wikitech-l] API BREAKING CHANGE: Default continuation mode for action=query will change at the end of this month To: Wikimedia developers wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org, mediawiki-api-annou...@lists.wikimedia.org Cc: As has been announced several times (most recently at https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2015-April/081559.html), the default continuation mode for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. *The date is now set:* we intend to merge the change to ride the deployment train at the end of June. That should be 1.26wmf12, to be deployed to test wikis on June 30, non-Wikipedias on July 1, and Wikipedias on July 2. If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen here https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=querylist=allpages, for example), it's time to fix your code! - The simple solution is to simply include the rawcontinue parameter with your request to continue receiving the raw continuation data ( example https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=querylist=allpagesrawcontinue=1 ). No other code changes should be necessary. - Or you could update your code to use the simplified continuation documented at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/API:Query#Continuing_queries (example https://www.mediawiki.org/w/api.php?action=querylist=allpagescontinue= ), which is much easier for clients to implement correctly. Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning. I've compiled a list of bots that have hit the deprecation warning more than 1 times over the course of the week May 23-29. If you are responsible for any of these bots, please fix them. If you know who is, please make sure they've seen this notification. Thanks. AAlertBot AboHeidiBot AbshirBot Acebot Ameenbot ArnauBot Beau.bot Begemot-Bot BeneBot* BeriBot BOT-Superzerocool CalakBot CamelBot CandalBot CategorizationBot CatWatchBot ClueBot_III ClueBot_NG CobainBot CorenSearchBot Cyberbot_I Cyberbot_II DanmicholoBot DeltaQuadBot Dexbot Dibot EdinBot ElphiBot ErfgoedBot Faebot Fatemibot FawikiPatroller HAL HasteurBot HerculeBot Hexabot HRoestBot IluvatarBot Invadibot Irclogbot Irfan-bot Jimmy-abot JYBot Krdbot Legobot Lowercase_sigmabot_III MahdiBot MalarzBOT MastiBot Merge_bot NaggoBot NasirkhanBot NirvanaBot Obaid-bot PatruBOT PBot Phe-bot Rezabot RMCD_bot Shuaib-bot SineBot SteinsplitterBot SvickBOT TaxonBot Theo's_Little_Bot W2Bot WLE-SpainBot Xqbot YaCBot ZedlikBot ZkBot -- Brad Jorsch (Anomie) Software Engineer Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wikitech-l mailing list wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/guidelines%0dwikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ pywikibot mailing list pywiki...@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikibot ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] While Election committee counts the votes...
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote: On 2015-06-03 17:42, Raymond Leonard wrote: Folks, At the link, you can find List votes: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections 2015 https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/512 Yours, Peaceray -- Thank you. I am indeed listed as voting from Meta, where I barely qualify, and not from for example en.wp or ru.wv where I have tons of edits. Cheers Yaroslav What does it indicate if a vote record is displayed in gray instead of black? ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] While Election committee counts the votes...
Folks, At the link, you can find List votes: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections 2015 https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/512 Yours, Peaceray -- peace...@cascadia.wiki On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote: On 3 June 2015 at 13:26, Anders Wennersten m...@anderswennersten.se wrote: ... This is new information for me. We have had a similar but extended list like this to have as base for vote checking. But I am not aware it will be generally available. At the start this year we discussed what type of voting method to use, like all open as done for stewardelection or with secure Poll with S/N/O. We had an overwhelming majority for non-total open one. But we never discussed general availability of this list. Anders Unless the wider community of Wikimedians has established a consensus to a process change, the list should be published as it has in past years. This has been my full expectation, I even ran some male/female analysis of past lists for research. Fae -- fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] While Election committee counts the votes...
On 2015-06-03 17:42, Raymond Leonard wrote: Folks, At the link, you can find List votes: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections 2015 https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/list/512 Yours, Peaceray -- Thank you. I am indeed listed as voting from Meta, where I barely qualify, and not from for example en.wp or ru.wv where I have tons of edits. Cheers Yaroslav ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [Wikimedia-l] While Election committee counts the votes...
Nathan skrev den 2015-06-03 18:16: What does it indicate if a vote record is displayed in gray instead of black? A vote that was recast later Anders ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
[Wikimedia-l] Next Language Engineering Office Hour is on 10th June 2015 (Wednesday) at 1430 UTC
Hello, The next office hour of the Wikimedia Language Engineering team (now part of Editing) is scheduled for next Wednesday, June 10th at 14:30 UTC. However, this time instead of only IRC we are hosting it as an online discussion over Hangout/Youtube. Given the limitation of Google Hangouts, there will be limited seats for joining into the Hangout. Hence, do let us know (on the event page https://plus.google.com/u/0/events/cuunke6rbmqpetvslv6jlakbhnc) if you would like to participate on the Hangout. The IRC channel #wikimedia-office and the QA channel for the youtube broadcast will also be open for interactions during the session. Our last online round-table session was held a few months back with the editors of the Catalan Wikipedia. You can watch the recording here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHu3vdlE1X8 . Please read below for the event details and do let us know if you have any questions. Thank you Runa == Details == # *Event*: Wikimedia Language Engineering office hour session # *When*: June 10th, 2015 (Wednesday) at 14:30 UTC (check local time http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20150610T1430) # *Where*: https://plus.google.com/u/0/events/cuunke6rbmqpetvslv6jlakbhnc and on IRC #wikimedia-office (Freenode) # *Agenda*: Content Translation https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Content_translation updates and open Q A -- Language Engineering - Outreach and QA Coordinator Wikimedia Foundation ___ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe
